Jump to content
TEST environment ×
TEST environment

Recommended Posts

Posted

It could well be that the sets are already in the USA and so have no tariff.

Although if not, there are other options if they don't want a high price in the USA ruining the reveal. They could release details for Europe, Canada, Australia,  China, essentially the rest of the world - just no USA price. They could go further and release the set for the rest of the world and let Americans wait for a delayed release until or if tariffs settle down. Or just let Americans see the real price with their extra tariffs added on to the base price. Other countries have extra charges such as VAT that get handled that way. 

Posted
6 minutes ago, Khargeust said:

Pokemon 2026 officially announced before Bag End and its GWP.

Not sure if that was an accidental reveal by the Mexican LEGO team which forced the official teaser page to be published :shrug_oh_well:
 

3 minutes ago, Cyprinus said:

Apparently they are aiming for a reveal on the 25th.

Where did you hear this?
Still pretty unprecedented for the LotR reveals, which were typically teased over 3 weeks in advance.

Posted
12 minutes ago, TheDoctor said:

Where did you hear this?
Still pretty unprecedented for the LotR reveals, which were typically teased over 3 weeks in advance.

Tandnbricks teased it.

Alongside these

vpy9btq.jpegzHxHctU.jpeg

Posted
On 3/15/2025 at 4:55 PM, RichardGoring said:

I understand that leaked photos can't be published here, but this photo was published on the LEGO UK website. It's since been removed. So I understand, is it considered a 'leaked image' because it hasn't been officially announced, or because LEGO have since removed the page? Or something else? Thanks!

In this case "leaked" is nebulous. As the original photo was dropped by an official site it would technically be allowed. But since Lego has removed it and there has been no official announcement it's better to play it safe and not re-post it here. How you handled it, buy removing the photo part that could potentially make Lego angry with us, was great.

Posted
42 minutes ago, TheDoctor said:

Where did you hear this?
Still pretty unprecedented for the LotR reveals, which were typically teased over 3 weeks in advance.

If it turns out to be true, then it shows that what happened in the past isn't the way it must always happen in future or, alternatively, sometimes things change.

Posted
45 minutes ago, Cyprinus said:

Tandnbricks teased it.

He said “3.25 LotR will be eating good”

so looks like that’s the announcement date, but by “eating good” do you think we’ll get more revealed then just the Shire? Maybe that’s why the later announcement, we’re also getting the Balrog set revealed for later this Summer?

Posted
7 hours ago, sqidlord05 said:

It just occurred to me that this set is releasing on a rather suspicious day…

LEGO fans are used to sets being released on 1st of month, even April.

Posted
4 minutes ago, MAB said:

LEGO fans are used to sets being released on 1st of month, even April.

Which is why the April 2nd release date sounds wrong...

Posted
4 minutes ago, Balrogofmorgoth said:

March 25th is Tolkien Reading Day, so I can understand why they would want to aim for a reveal that day, but less than a week before the release is absolutely crazy

Great catch, I'd like to book the day off work to travel to my nearest city and LEGO shop for the day, so I hope they announce it sooner!

Posted
On 3/18/2025 at 5:30 PM, nicknack116 said:

He said “3.25 LotR will be eating good”

so looks like that’s the announcement date, but by “eating good” do you think we’ll get more revealed then just the Shire? Maybe that’s why the later announcement, we’re also getting the Balrog set revealed for later this Summer?

Can @TandNbricks tells us more ? What is really behind this statement ? Could we have more than Bag End and the booknook ??

Posted

Back of the box leaked!

Looks like Gandalf’s cape is hanging up inside, but is included
Interior isn’t superb, but it has everything necessary for a Fellowship of the Ring version

Merry and Pippin have regular hairpieces included as well, which I assumed but it’s nice to see it confirmed
There’s a play feature on the Party Tree to make Bilbo disappear

There’s also a play feature at the fireplace to throw the envelope in and have only the Ring come out
Bilbo’s hair still looks awful

Posted

The interior doesn't look great to be honest, and feels small in comparison with the exterior.

I like the fireplace mechanism, but the disappearing trick is disappointing. It's very simple, which is fine, but it doesn't explain why the tree is so poor. It's just a bad tree, which seems odd.

Looking forward to seeing better quality photos and videos of it.

 

Posted

It's an acceptable interior for a $200 set.

For a $270 set, it's laughable. What a major letdown - I've been excited for this set for awhile, and aside from the background Hobbits, nothing about this is really exciting me.

Posted

There is a feature to make Bilbo disappear.  The interior looks good.  Still will wait till the 25th for further judgement.  

Posted

Does look a smaller and shallower interior than anticipated, hopefully the price will reflect that ( given we only know the US price and prices aren't always consistent across regions).

 

Posted

Can't find the image of the rear of the box. The feedback so far doesn't surprise me, though. Judging from the leaked image of the front, I wasn't expecting a spacious interior. The official reveal needs to get here!

Posted
1 hour ago, mirkwoodspiders said:

Can't find the image of the rear of the box. The feedback so far doesn't surprise me, though. Judging from the leaked image of the front, I wasn't expecting a spacious interior. The official reveal needs to get here!

Go to legolotrfans subreddit.

Posted

not seeing $270 in this set, love the exterior, interior is small but fine, just not seeing $270 in it.  Still will buy for the gwp but the cost lowers my excitement for what is a great looking set otherwise.

Posted

The interior is so underwhelming from what I can see in that blurry pic… definitelly not a $270 set. There are obvious budget cuts which hurt the set a lot.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...