Jump to content
TEST environment ×
TEST environment

Recommended Posts

Posted
20 minutes ago, Scarilian said:

 

Nobody be risking getting fired for Venomized Groot, buildable figures, etc...

You're purposefully missing the point, when we ask for leaks, we mean: NWH, CMF, marvels, unknown 100$ etc.

Posted (edited)
11 minutes ago, Goofster said:

You're purposefully missing the point, when we ask for leaks, we mean: NWH, CMF, marvels, unknown 100$ etc.

Not remotely, you are simply asking for leaks from later in the year that we don't normally get until June/July anyway other than the rarest of exceptions. Lego just fired someone who went on a leak rampage, they are probably cracking down and implimenting new security measures.

Look at the release dates of what you are asking for and then remember we are only in April:

  • NWH: August
  • Unknown $100 set: August
  • CMF: September
  • Marvels: Probably October/November

The change to the NWH set means also that details may not be finalized.

The only confusing thing is the lack of us seeing the mid year July sets, but that can be explained by nobody wanting to risk their position over something like Venomized Groot, Buildable Figures,etc... as a I mentioned.

Edited by Scarilian
Posted
10 minutes ago, Scarilian said:

 

Bro the full star wars slate leaked, summer, September, (fall?), why cant we get the same? I understand, most of those leaks came from fluffly sky, but what about promo bricks?

Posted

According to "The Unibricks" via YouTube, he's saying 76232: The Marvels set is a July? release at 420 pcs & $89.99 USD, which we all already knew, but with the minifigures being Captain Marvel, Ms. Marvel, Monica Rambeau, and Yan D'Alana, and that it's not known yet which suit Ms. Marvel will be done in; film or D+ versions. He has it printed on the screen "Release date: July 1 ?" But actually says, kinda in a skeptical/surprised tone, "This is supposed to be a July release..." So... yeah... there's that...

Also, the new magazines, that we are unfortunately "un-privy to" here in the states, will include the most recent Dr. Strange that was in the polybag and Sanctum and such. Then the next one will feature Mighty Thor, which was of course included in both TLAT sets. I know it doesn't mean much for those of us this side of the pond, but I thought it may be useful information for others :shrug_oh_well:

One other thing... I REALLY want a set that is comparable in style with the leaked Little Mermaid $170 set. Obviously not a shell! Marvel adapted, but I hope y'all know what I mean! That set looks AMAZING! I've said before, I'm a total Marvel completionist and besides CMFs, space, and modulars, that's my primary focus. But I may just have to get that one! Even if I just build it then pass it on, it's just too cool looking! We need a Marvel set like that!!

Posted
2 hours ago, Scarilian said:

Not remotely, you are simply asking for leaks from later in the year that we don't normally get until June/July anyway other than the rarest of exceptions. Lego just fired someone who went on a leak rampage, they are probably cracking down and implimenting new security measures.

Ah man, they got Fluffy? RIP. 

1 hour ago, Goofster said:

Bro the full star wars slate leaked, summer, September, (fall?), why cant we get the same? I understand, most of those leaks came from fluffly sky, but what about promo bricks?

Because Promobricks doesn't want to risk getting their contacts fired, so they have to be careful. They leak what information they can without implicating their sources, and while that means sometimes we get info on stuff pretty far away, it also means sometimes we just have to be patient. Promobricks might well know what the marvel sets are for later this year, or have more details on some of the ones we know are coming. But they're likely worried that not enough people know that info, and that publishing the info could lead to them losing their contact.

Posted
11 hours ago, Goofster said:

Bro the full star wars slate leaked, summer, September, (fall?), why cant we get the same? I understand, most of those leaks came from fluffly sky, but what about promo bricks?

It's possible that certain aspects of the Marvel theme have different levels of security? The Shield, Spider-man Art set and Avengers Tower are likely being worked on by different groups within Lego. In terms of the information on the slate

Updated List:

  Hide contents

May 2023 (Total 1):

  • 76256: Ant-Man Construction Figure

JUNE 2023 (Total 4):

AUGUST 2023 (Total 6):

SEPTEMBER 2023 (Total 1 + CMF Series + Visual Dictionary)

NOVEMBER (Total 1)

UNKNOWN 2023 (Total 3):

Rumored/Other sets:

  • X-Men Mansion, prototype leaked during a survey by Lego. Maybe a 2024 release
  • 76266 rumored to be based on the female team-up scene from Avengers Endgame

Notes:

  • Unidentified sets may wind up being from DC, please be aware
  • Currency listings are taken from a variety of sources and may vary
  • Release dates are estimated given conflicting reports
  • Sets seem to be getting created with overlapping set numbers, please be aware fan made set titles may be reported by some sites as being official titles for these new set

Promobricks generally prioritize quality and relay information via text, only relaying information once they are certain. They don't tend to provide images much. I am also hopeful that we get visuals soon, but in terms of info we know virtually everything about the numbers we are aware of except for two or three sets.

Official reveals are normally the first week of May though, so not long to wait :3

9 hours ago, Mandalorianknight said:

Ah man, they got Fluffy? RIP.

As far as I've heard, that was the reason why the leak occured and was so large because it was retaliation for them being fired for potentially unrelated reasons.

9 hours ago, CowInADenBuilds said:

One other thing... I REALLY want a set that is comparable in style with the leaked Little Mermaid $170 set. Obviously not a shell! Marvel adapted, but I hope y'all know what I mean!

Not the biggest fan of that set, but I do think a concept of say a New York Battlefield with the core Avengers or perhaps a collection of vignette style builds latched together would work well. At some stage they need to revisit Iron Man and do the Mansion or his armour room.

Posted

Well, that yes.

I did hope to get all the 5, or atleast the 3 younger, in a set or 2. Ant-Man, Wasp, Ant-Girl/Stinger.

Posted (edited)
11 minutes ago, Goofster said:

Chi ha detto che è di quantumania 🤣 avete dimenticato loki s2..

exactly, if the cmfs are disney plus it is very likely that kang is from loki…

Edited by Legocentrico
Posted
18 minutes ago, Legocentrico said:

exactly, if the cmfs are disney plus it is very likely that kang is from loki…

Didnt the leaker specify he would be the one from Quantumania with the blue face?

Posted
8 minutes ago, PGBQW said:

Didnt the leaker specify he would be the one from Quantumania with the blue face?

Promobricks simply said "the blue version." It could be from Loki Season 2, but until we see more, Quantumania is the only reference I can think of.

Posted

Blue Kang's inclusion is the fig that makes me doubt its legitimacy. It's very odd that a movie villain would show up, unless Loki S2 marries one of the three versions of Kang with Quantumania's "Conqueror." This would be the only 'movie' character in two waves of D+ figs otherwise.

Posted (edited)
7 hours ago, PGBQW said:

Il leaker non ha specificato che sarebbe stato quello di Quantumania con la faccia blu?

at the end of season 1 we see the statue of a kang in the tva headquarters (I guess whoever took over the tva is the final villain of the season). He has a comic book-like design.  The statue is not wearing a helmet, but may have.

if you don't have the disney plus app at hand, you can find it on google images

Edited by Legocentrico
Posted

Could he be wearing blue robes and blue armor? Or is it the face only, if so, are y'all gonna forget that just how a normal kang looks like? 

Posted
On 4/13/2023 at 7:03 AM, Scarilian said:

Not the biggest fan of that set, but I do think a concept of say a New York Battlefield with the core Avengers or perhaps a collection of vignette style builds latched together would work well. At some stage they need to revisit Iron Man and do the Mansion or his armour room.

Really?! Wow! I just love it! Most of all I think I like the fact that it's just unique from anything else I can remember. At least recently. To each his own, tho, right!? That's what so great about LEGO! I COMPLETELY agree with revisiting some of the previous iconic places/things!

I've heard in a lot of places that the D2C is the tower. I'm wondering tho is those are just still rumors, or has any serious, well-known, reliable leakers, like Promobricks for example, confirmed that that is in fact what it is? I feel like it's too good to be true after the last couple years! 😂 🤷‍♀️ 

Promobricks is saying August for the Marvels set... did they say anything about the build or figs or anything just yet?

Posted
6 minutes ago, BrickBob Studpants said:

The exclusive book minifig is… *drumroll* … an Iron Man suit :tongue: Don‘t recognise which one it is tho

It looks like the Mark 50 with the torso section incomplete and other small differences.

Posted
30 minutes ago, BrickBob Studpants said:

The exclusive book minifig is… *drumroll* … an Iron Man suit :tongue: Don‘t recognise which one it is tho

How INCREDIBLY disappointing!! Not by ANY MEANS a surprise, but definitely a let down none the less... it's sad to say, but in all honesty, I was SOOOO VERY EXCITED for our 1st Marvel book like this, but being that the exclusive fig is ANOTHER Iron Man, assuming the $50 price point is correct, I may just skip it! Is that being childish?? Yall are free to say so if it is! 😂 

Posted
28 minutes ago, BrickBob Studpants said:

The exclusive book minifig is… *drumroll* … an Iron Man suit :tongue: Don‘t recognise which one it is tho

Inevitable Fig. Nice Fig. If it was an Iron Man I was hoping for a suit thats the quality of Silver Centurion or the Mark IV (they even have a page showing Mark I - V clearly lacking a Mark IV in the list). A new character would have been preferred choice but that was never likely to happen.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...