Jump to content
TEST environment ×
TEST environment

Recommended Posts

Posted

Oddly enough, most of my suspects did not end up voting for Byron.

Is that odd? Don't scum play a little WIFOM game with themselves about how it will look when they're noted to have voted for a townie, versus no lynch which may or may not benefit them, versus just lynching off a townie, versus just hoping the town will lynch off a townie anyway. We could play the same WIFOM game, but we don't know what they ended up doing.

I'm not saying you're scummy for saying this, don't get me wrong, but I think it's unwise to assume scum would (or would not, indeed) have just voted for Byr-Byr.

Posted

Adelaide has not really been on my suspicions list ever, but she has hardly spoken about anything except the "policy lynch" issue. She argued it with Jamie and the captain throughout night and day one, and then did little more than show up on night two to cast a vote. She hasn't yet given me that scumy vibe yet, and today her speech seems at least a bit more worthwhile. Also, all of the people on her list would be on my list although some further down from the top three.

Cap'n Rolfe is a bit of an odd character. He struck me as suspicious from the beginning. He accused Shane of being passive, but then backed down quickly when Shane didn't say anything. Now that Shane flipped town, though, I'm not sure what to think. I would have thought that if he were scum, he would try to use Shane's passiveness to his advantage. All throughout Night 1 and Day 2 he stuck to his guns about policy lynching until it almost seemed a bit forced. You know it's supposedly a town-tell to be stubborn and not back down or whatever, but it almost seemed like he was sticking to a lost cause on purpose to look town. I still think it's very odd the way he seemed to twisty Jamie's words when he voted for her on Night 1. He also insisted on the Byron vote and started it off. Now admittedly I believe I forgot about Byron's Night 1 post explaining his vote for me, but for someone who was actively pushing for a vote on Byron, one would think that the captain would have been studying his words a bit better. Cap'n Rolfe was also quick to agree to Dexter's statement about the cop investigating Dogukan. All three of those people I have my suspicions on, but I think Dexter would be to a lesser extent than the other two. Still, I'm not sure if two scum would try to jump on a move for the cop to investigate a specific person when one would probably be enough. It doesn't seem likely.

Actually, looking over this list reignites my suspicions of Cap'n Rolfe, but, perhaps Jamie's thoughts on him being town decrease my suspicion. :sceptic:

Posted

Here's the three I am suspicious with:

Colin - As I've outlined earlier in previous days.

Dogukan - I am not going to repeat what others have said before, but I am going to add this:

I am not sure why as to he would post in the day thread if he was told to go to sleep. The lynch only occurs in the night so he always have the opportunity to come by night time to say whatever he wanted to say. He said he would be back later but I guess we are still waiting.

Rolfe -

Are we even still sure Hound Doğ is scum? :wacko:

Interesting to note that change in position.

I'll give my list of suspicions now.

1) Doğ the Bounty Hunter - the reasons should be obvious, seein' as everyone and their grandma's repeated them. Between Doğ-and-pony-show over there and Kristina's mysterious contacts, something definitely ain't right.

Now you list him as one of your suspects. What changed? Twice?

Posted

Candy has also been rather odd. I don't really know what to think of him. He had a very lazy attitude on the first day and night and in general made wishy-washy statements (not to be hypocritical :blush: ). He was called out by Patricia and gave a weak response, finally voted Redblade, and then we saw this:

Well to reply to your earlier comment about Penelope, the reason I find her off from the begining is both her strange posts early on, as well as her trying to come off as the "good" cop among theives--which is strange since she's a corrupt cop. Really, it's just a gut thing for me with her, and I cannot prove anything, but that's just how I feel.

You however are making me feel like your either scummy or good friends with Bryon. You insist we need a vote today, but only if it's not Bryon. I too don't find him too scummy, and that's why I didn't vote for him, but you above all are trying to save him and send in Captain Rolfe's head instead. Do you know something about Bryon that makes you fight for him so much--he doesn't even fight for himself that much?!

The first part comes after Jamie commented on a number of people saying that I "never sat well with them", etc after Dexter and Shane offered their suspicions of my thinking there wasn't much to be learned about speculating on the kills. It seems like Candy did not think at all before posting his thoughts about how suspicious I was and had to quickly come up with something, hence he settled on some obscure statements about my being a corrupt cop, etc. That already sounds like he's not really interested or actively looking for suspicious people, but then he makes the oddest statement about Jamie protecting Byron. He then gets Jamie's vote target mixed up with his own and imagines Jamie was going after Rolfe. It's possible that this was just a slip of the tongue, but was there a cause? It seems odd to accidentally insert the name of the person he was voting for himself. Perhaps he had forgotten whom he was accusing because he never really was interested in accusing them at all.

Oh, and then today there's this:

Agree. This is what I got out of the situation, as well as Kritina's own words on the matter yesterday. We need to know who this Person A is; since it's likely that they are the one's who talked, to a possible scum Dogukan, and therefore Person A is themselves a scum. Once we know person A, and we can tie some loose strings there, we can better choose or choose with more confidence, who to lynch tonight.

Now I have my doubts about this Person A and Kristina's tale, but Candy seems a little too desperate to find out who Person A, who could be our protector...possibly, is.

Sorry if this all came out a bit jumbled and mixed up. I'm in field work for a reason. Wasn't organized enough to sit behind a desk at the police station.

By the way, can't say I've noticed anything incredibly odd about Cebastian. No real suspicions there.

Colin jumped on Shane from the very beginning. Now Shane was acting a bit lackadaisically, but I kind of agree that there wasn't much going on and Day 1 lynches often don't turn out particularly well or helpfully. When Colin first jumped on him, I thought it seemed like it would be an ideal opportunity for scum to try to out a strong character early on, especially since Shane was doing little to protect himself, but just stating his feelings bluntly. However, when Shane continued on that path, I thought more and more that he must be scum. Colin disappeared for a while then, and after that he's not really done much at all. His post today was rather odd, but he did manage to give us three suspicions at least. :sceptic:

Something odd about him though, is that for someone who has a record of getting killed early on, he's still alive and kicking and doesn't seem very helpful. I would imagine that somebody of his reputation would be much more influential in helping town out, but he's certainly not been that way.

Apologies if sometimes I'm just recalling former events. I didn't want to start quoting all those posts, as some of them are quite long. Hopefully this will give you all at least a little something to work with. :sweet:

Posted

What more would you like from me, everyone? Maybe I shouldn't have showed up to that family dinner, but sometimes things happen that you can't plan for. Sometimes they're even as bad as your best friend falling into a nuclear reactor.

I honestly believed Shane to be scummy. A fair number of you admitted that you found him to be so as well.

Sorry, wasn't finished...

I gave you my suspicions. I plan to vote for Dogface today. I believe Kristina's story. If you guys would rather meta-game me than follow up a decent lead, go for it.

Posted

Sorry I haven't been very active lately, Tony and I have been getting daily nail work done...

It seems my name has been raised a lot.... Mostly for posting fluff.. I don't see how I'm posting fluff. Rambling, yes, I'll admit to, but I'm trying to contribute things, and as I say them I tend to ramble on, so I guess you could call that fluff by your criteria. As for inactivity, I can't help that I'm inactive, but I'm working on speaking more. For the mostpart I haven't been talking because I didn't really feel like I had anything to say.

I'll address specific accusations as soon as I can, hopefully very shortly.

Posted

That sentence made absolutely no sense to me, why would Person A not know about being in contact with Kristina before she told everyone else about it :wacko:. Have you been drinking? :look:

That's my own fault. :blush: My mind was thinking ahead of me, I meant to say Shane, not Person A at the end. Of course Person A knew they were in contact with Kristina, they were in contact with each other, of course.

In the past, a really smart person PMed everybody to get an idea of their top three suspects for Scum. Since we can't try that in this situation, let's just all rank our suspicions and see how we match up. And let's all do it. Whoever doesn't want to is clearly Scum.

1. Pudgy Peter

2. Terrence

3. Dogfoodcan

Terrence is just fluffily repeating what others have already concluded while Dogfoodcan was doing the same but now claims to have been blocked from talking (will he have a penalty when voting starts?) and is never fun to accuse since he stops in once every 36 hours and pretty much wastes the day for the Town since we can't discover much waiting for him to answer accusations.

I haven't been trying to repeat others, and I really wouldn't say I'm doing it terribly often, and if I am, I'll be better about it. It's not something I notice.

2. Terrence (no, I'm not just flipping Bernard's list upside down, I swear :look:) - it's the way he just doesn't seem to be his usual active townie self. I guess I'm metagame-suspecting him :sceptic:

As I've said, I've suddenly been more busy, and it's not something I can help. :sceptic: I'm going to be a bit more flexible tomorrow and I'll be able to post, hopefully.

Dad, I'd be very happy to put together a list of suspects. I wouldn't say this is in any particular order of most scummy to least scummy, but they're my top three at the moment.

2. Terrance (TrumpetKing): I would agree with the others who have raised suspicions about him tonight - his posts have been waffly and full of hot air. Leave it to a lawyer to talk and talk without saying anything. Goddamn lawyers... I also admit that there's a bit of metagaming involved in my suspicions. His ancestor acted much the same in an old western town.

How have my posts been full of hot air? It's a general concensus that they've been waffly, but full of hot air? Elaborate.

I'm happy to play along:

1. Dogukan - for the obvious reasons

2. Terrence - for not being helpful with his fluffy posts and the fact he's not his usual talkative self.

3. Adelaide - not the biggest lurker, but what she has said hasn't been helpful

I'm getting a little irritated that people are just repeating what Bernard has said. Funny how I'm being called out for "copying" others, yet those who are accusing me are doing the same.

Sounds like "do you still want to lynch Dogfood or can we lynch someone else instead?" and additionally as others have said, I really find it hard to believe that they could both be town communications experts. This sounds scummy to me.

What I'm trying to ask is whether Dogfood is still the best lynch, since it seems like most of the suspicion surrounding him was based off of Kristina's case.

My suspicions are (in no order)

Priscilla or whatever (PPJB): She's being awfully quiet, or at least not standing out, similarly to Prudence Jellison.

Adelaide (Adam): I want to think there's one scum accusing me, and the one that sticks out to me is Adelaide. I'm in a rush so I'll elaborate later.

Dogfood (Draggy): For reasons already stated.

Posted

Candy has also been rather odd. I don't really know what to think of him. He had a very lazy attitude on the first day and night and in general made wishy-washy statements (not to be hypocritical :blush: ). He was called out by Patricia and gave a weak response, finally voted Redblade, and then we saw this:

The first part comes after Jamie commented on a number of people saying that I "never sat well with them", etc after Dexter and Shane offered their suspicions of my thinking there wasn't much to be learned about speculating on the kills. It seems like Candy did not think at all before posting his thoughts about how suspicious I was and had to quickly come up with something, hence he settled on some obscure statements about my being a corrupt cop, etc. That already sounds like he's not really interested or actively looking for suspicious people, but then he makes the oddest statement about Jamie protecting Byron. He then gets Jamie's vote target mixed up with his own and imagines Jamie was going after Rolfe. It's possible that this was just a slip of the tongue, but was there a cause? It seems odd to accidentally insert the name of the person he was voting for himself. Perhaps he had forgotten whom he was accusing because he never really was interested in accusing them at all.

Oh, and then today there's this:

Now I have my doubts about this Person A and Kristina's tale, but Candy seems a little too desperate to find out who Person A, who could be our protector...possibly, is.

Sorry if this all came out a bit jumbled and mixed up. I'm in field work for a reason. Wasn't organized enough to sit behind a desk at the police station.

Accept that, I'm different, as in that I'm spectacular, but anyways...I don't think my attitude/activity in the early days nights was terrible, not perfect but not terrible. Frainkly thus far it seems like there's no activity from anyone, so yes a bit hypocritical. Though I will admit, that waffely-ness does seem to run in my family (As does townieness--though really your meta-gaming me off of three games, one of which I lived one day, the other four, and the third I just scrapped by; so this pattern is not very good), and I do change opinions quick, based off of new information that I find out about--I don't see why that makes people think I'm scummy, if anything it just shows that I'm a townie whose trying to choose right. On the Jamie thing, it seems I was mixed up on who he placed his emphisis towards. There's lots of stuff going on, and I mess up some times. Ergo, spectacular Candy is not so spectacular (But still a little).

On the Kristina note, I am interested in who Person A is, and I don't know why others are not. The entire situation, with the exception of one off hand comment from Dogfoodbowl (Like all of his comments), was brought about and told to us by Kristina. We know only what she is telling us from the events, and we know that some person, whoever A is, also knows something. That Person A is the only person who can add in new information and perspective to what Kristina is telling us. We only have one side of this puzzle rather than two. And frainkly I wasn't even thinking about the protector thing, since it was only mentioned in passing by Kristina that she was told by Person A that said person was a protector (I cannot be sure about that, and you don't seem sure about it either); though obviously outing the protector would be a bad thing, we are still getting little information.

Posted

Vote: Doğukan Akbulut (Dragonator)

Well, everyone's going to be doing that, so I'll go against the grain and Vote: Corelin Moordog (CorneliusMurdock). While I do think Dogfoodcan needs to go, especially since he can't bother to come by but once every other day and vaguely answer some suspicions then disappear again and not contribute...lame, I think he will be lynched so I'd like to poke some other people. If I can be convinced that the Scummy Corelin isn't Scum I'll switch my vote to Pudgy Peter. I hate lawyers anyway.

If I were to guess who the Scum are right now, I'd guess there were five and that they were the following:

Corelin

Dogfoodcan

Terrence

Peter

Candy

Priscilla stinks a bit too, though.

Posted

Vote Count

Doğukan Akbulut (Dragonator) - 1 (CorneliusMurdock)

Colin Malone (CorneliusMurdock - 1 (Chillax Darth Frodo)

46.5 hours until Dawn.

Posted

OK, so why I'm not liking Adelaide.

First, she is one of the people here who I never really notice. Priscilla and Cebastien also fall into this category for me as well, but lately I've been noticing more from Cebastien, so I will leave him befor now. Second, she seems to join in on the case against me, repeating what Bernard has said, and also adding that I've been posting with a head full of hot air. I'm not sure what's making her think that, since I believe I have a pretty decent idea of what's going on, and I'm not mindlessly posting things. If she's referring to the post where I accidentally called Shane Person A, then that's warranted, but other than that, I see nothing of mine that really screams "Wow, he doesn't know what the hell he's talking about". Is it possible she's trying to put more blame on me to make me appear scummier? I think it is very possible, and I'll be sureto watch out for Adelaide.

We started off with 18 players. Since typically scum take up 1/4 of the players, that would leave us with an estimate of either 4 or 5 scum, and seeing how there is estimated to be a Serial Killer, I'm leaning towards 4 scum, so why don't we provide 4 or 5 suspicions, and see if we can nail the scum on the head, as well as our supposed Serial Killer? Adding to my original suspicions, I'd also add

Dammit, hit post too early. Stupid mobile.

I'd also add Candy and Penelope, for cases already brought up against them. I can't really add anything else, as I haven't seen anything else from them that sticks out, but my suspicions stand.

I'd say Dogfoodan is our biggest lead, so it will be best to lynch him.

Vote: Doğukan Akbulut (Dragonater)

Posted

Vote Count

Doğukan Akbulut (Dragonator) - 1 (CorneliusMurdock, Trumpetking)

Colin Malone (CorneliusMurdock - 1 (Chillax Darth Frodo)

46 hours until Dawn.

Posted

Evening all, nice to be back. My apologies for to Bernard for being so incredibly busy working on these stylish custard suit pants for him, I'm a busy tailor! Let's see if I can clear up a few things, since nobody seemed to actually read what I posted during the day.

I don't know why Dokogan broke the rules during the day when his neck wasn't on the line. He has another 70 hours to defend whatever the charges are.

Simple actually, I had a genius idea to try and indicate that I had, indeed, been prevented from talking and was not simply avoiding you all. Sadly it seems we do indeed receive private warnings, so that backfired somewhat, however I can still say that I have indeed been warned and I was indeed told not to post during the day; someone was clearly trying to silence me so they could continue with this ridiculous attempt to frame me for... not much right?

So let's recap why I posted. Primarily, I wanted to clear up the whole bone-picking thing, which Kristina has managed to completely side-rail you all on. I had no clue Kristina was in contact with Shane privately, not even the slightest idea of it. You think I'd be dumb enough to mention something she said to him in private when I have no way of knowing that? Don't be ridiculous. My bone picking comment was in reference to her very early stab at Shane, which he countered and then she never seemed to respond to until suddenly, oh Shane's dead look at that. I found that suspicious and wanted to point it out.

Clearly though, if Kristina is truly what she claims she is (which we cannot currently verify) then perhaps what I observered was not the scummy play I thought it was. Much like my (fairly typical for me) infrequent posts are not some attempt to hide; I am still following along and trying to give input when I can, hence my comments about Kristina at the end of last night. It's busy being a tailor you know.

Honestly though, I don't see why I'm considered a big lead. I supposedly didn't contribute much despite making several observations which seem to have mostly been ignored, and then I tried pointing out something I thought was suspicious about Kristina and suddenly she's got her claws right out and is trying her best to tear me down swiftly. Can't blame a tailor for finding that a bit off! Personalyl I'd actually be a bit more suspicious of the people who have wordlessly followed Kristina's misguided lead, perhaps seeing it as an easy bandwagon and a way to waste another day. Take Colin for example. I pointed him out previously as someone who has trying to say a little but not much (take a look at his one post in Day 2 for example), and now here he is throwing a vote out without even an "I agree for these reasons". Come tomorrow, he'll naturally be right up there supporting the people wanting to question whoever led them to lynch another Malone I am sure.

I still feel too little attention has been paid to Person A. It seems very coincidental that Kristina finds a protector in the first person she contacts, then tells him/her something about Shane and Shane ends up dead soon after. That seems pretty off to me and is the biggest question I would want to persue right now, if so many of you weren't mindlessly persuing me. It seems possible to me that Person A may be manipulating Kristina; I'm sure the Ferraris would jump at the chance to be in contact with a Malone privately and would want to make the most of that opportunity. Protector is easy enough for scum to claim as they can simply not kill the person they're manipulating; I've done that very thing in a past life.

So my conclusion then, is that I urge you, Kristina, to perhaps have another think about the circumstances so far and think about the possibility that maybe Person A isn't as trustworthy as you think! I certainly see a lot more substance in questioning whoever it is as there is a clear possibility that they were involved in Shane's death somehow, if you passed on some information to them about him.

Posted

Vote Count

Doğukan Akbulut (Dragonator) - 1 (CorneliusMurdock, Trumpetking)

Colin Malone (CorneliusMurdock - 1 (Chillax Darth Frodo)

46 hours until Dawn.

Look at me. I'm God. I quote myself and don't even get the numbers right. :hmpf:

:tongue:

Evening all, nice to be back. My apologies for to Bernard for being so incredibly busy working on these stylish custard suit pants for him, I'm a busy tailor! Let's see if I can clear up a few things, since nobody seemed to actually read what I posted during the day.

Simple actually, I had a genius idea to try and indicate that I had, indeed, been prevented from talking and was not simply avoiding you all. Sadly it seems we do indeed receive private warnings, so that backfired somewhat, however I can still say that I have indeed been warned and I was indeed told not to post during the day; someone was clearly trying to silence me so they could continue with this ridiculous attempt to frame me for... not much right?

So let's recap why I posted. Primarily, I wanted to clear up the whole bone-picking thing, which Kristina has managed to completely side-rail you all on. I had no clue Kristina was in contact with Shane privately, not even the slightest idea of it. You think I'd be dumb enough to mention something she said to him in private when I have no way of knowing that? Don't be ridiculous. My bone picking comment was in reference to her very early stab at Shane, which he countered and then she never seemed to respond to until suddenly, oh Shane's dead look at that. I found that suspicious and wanted to point it out.

Clearly though, if Kristina is truly what she claims she is (which we cannot currently verify) then perhaps what I observered was not the scummy play I thought it was. Much like my (fairly typical for me) infrequent posts are not some attempt to hide; I am still following along and trying to give input when I can, hence my comments about Kristina at the end of last night. It's busy being a tailor you know.

Honestly though, I don't see why I'm considered a big lead. I supposedly didn't contribute much despite making several observations which seem to have mostly been ignored, and then I tried pointing out something I thought was suspicious about Kristina and suddenly she's got her claws right out and is trying her best to tear me down swiftly. Can't blame a tailor for finding that a bit off! Personalyl I'd actually be a bit more suspicious of the people who have wordlessly followed Kristina's misguided lead, perhaps seeing it as an easy bandwagon and a way to waste another day. Take Colin for example. I pointed him out previously as someone who has trying to say a little but not much (take a look at his one post in Day 2 for example), and now here he is throwing a vote out without even an "I agree for these reasons". Come tomorrow, he'll naturally be right up there supporting the people wanting to question whoever led them to lynch another Malone I am sure.

I still feel too little attention has been paid to Person A. It seems very coincidental that Kristina finds a protector in the first person she contacts, then tells him/her something about Shane and Shane ends up dead soon after. That seems pretty off to me and is the biggest question I would want to persue right now, if so many of you weren't mindlessly persuing me. It seems possible to me that Person A may be manipulating Kristina; I'm sure the Ferraris would jump at the chance to be in contact with a Malone privately and would want to make the most of that opportunity. Protector is easy enough for scum to claim as they can simply not kill the person they're manipulating; I've done that very thing in a past life.

So my conclusion then, is that I urge you, Kristina, to perhaps have another think about the circumstances so far and think about the possibility that maybe Person A isn't as trustworthy as you think! I certainly see a lot more substance in questioning whoever it is as there is a clear possibility that they were involved in Shane's death somehow, if you passed on some information to them about him.

Ugh. :hmpf: Finally someone made a Scummier post than Colin. Why would the Scum try to frame you specifically? I mean, really. Why? Are you really such a threat? Posting once every other day? Not contributing anything. If I were Scum, I'd certainly want a strong Townie like you out of the way. :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: That's five sarcasms. You're a huge Scum target but don't make any sense as a lynch, yes I see it now, it's us who is in the wrong here. We've analyzed your stellar and strong gameplay thus far. Clearly you're the hardest working Townie and the Scum is desperate to frame you. It's all clear now. This is still all sarcasm for those who can't tell. Hey, I know! Next let's try to cast suspicion on this person A! So, instead of lynching you, we should ask Kristina to reveal Person A and risk losing that person to lynch or Scum or SK kill, right? Oh that's a much better plan. :sarcasm: :sarcasm: Still sarcasm. Next, we'll just lynch ourselves and let the Scum win. You are Scum, Dogfoodcan.

Can someone fill in a blank for me? I'm ridiculously busy. I wish I had the time to read every post from the first couple days. You young lazy whipper-snappers haven't been posting much anyway, so it shouldn't really be too hard but I am swamped. I keep hearing mention of a protector coming into play. What happened with a protector?

Posted

Ugh. :hmpf: Finally someone made a Scummier post than Colin. Why would the Scum try to frame you specifically? I mean, really. Why? Are you really such a threat? Posting once every other day? Not contributing anything. If I were Scum, I'd certainly want a strong Townie like you out of the way. :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm: That's five sarcasms. You're a huge Scum target but don't make any sense as a lynch, yes I see it now, it's us who is in the wrong here. We've analyzed your stellar and strong gameplay thus far. Clearly you're the hardest working Townie and the Scum is desperate to frame you. It's all clear now. This is still all sarcasm for those who can't tell. Hey, I know! Next let's try to cast suspicion on this person A! So, instead of lynching you, we should ask Kristina to reveal Person A and risk losing that person to lynch or Scum or SK kill, right? Oh that's a much better plan. :sarcasm: :sarcasm: Still sarcasm. Next, we'll just lynch ourselves and let the Scum win. You are Scum, Dogfoodcan.

Can someone fill in a blank for me? I'm ridiculously busy. I wish I had the time to read every post from the first couple days. You young lazy whipper-snappers haven't been posting much anyway, so it shouldn't really be too hard but I am swamped. I keep hearing mention of a protector coming into play. What happened with a protector?

Still the ungrateful moron no matter how many nice coats I make you it seems. :hmpf:

Posted

Still the ungrateful moron no matter how many nice coats I make you it seems. :hmpf:

Still spouting substance-free nonsense and/or fluff. Thanks for the contribution. :hmpf: :hmpf:

That was dickish. Sorry. I'm not trying to insult you. My intention was to poke you because you're Scummy. Sorry if I crossed a line.

Posted

Firstly, I have not already decided on Dogukan, but you seem to wilfully ignore that point. Secondly, just because Shane may or may not have been killed by a vig or SK doesn't mean we wouldn't learn anything from his alignment even without the information Kristina has just brought to light. You really think it would tell us nothing (even without Kristina's information) if Shane flips scum tonight? Or flips SK? Or even flips town?

So Patricia, care to drop a knowledge bomb on us? Shane was town. What does that tell you? And since you haven't decided on Dogukan (or hadn't, to be fair), who are you going to push for a lynch? Now is the time to live up to your talk. I imagine Shane's towniness will be a deciding factor since you made such an issue out of it :hmpf:

In the meantime, I'm going to:

Vote: Dogukan (Dragonator)

He's suspicious, and we just need to know. Patricia and Penelope are against investigating him, half the town already finds him suspicious, and we can't go forward with this hanging over us.

I'm really curious about Bernard and Colin. I don't think they are putting on a show here. Between Colin's reactions to Bernard, and his happy echoing of my interest in getting Dogukan investigated (which is scummy to me in a way that suggesting it in the first place isn't, Patricia, since scum often like to be second or third in all things), he's looking suss. I would suggest investigating Colin tonight, but I don't want to listen to Patricia harp on me any more :enough:

Posted

I'm really curious about Bernard and Colin. I don't think they are putting on a show here.

Am I Bernard? I'm old and I forget things. Anyway, this is a very real possibility that should be considered, if I am, in fact, the Bernard you refer to. Are we just putting on a show, the two of us, Bernard and Colin?

No wait, we can't be because only one of us is participating. I don't feel Colin has responded very much to my accusations or vote, which is actually solidifying my suspicions of him. He's not normally one to take accusations lightly and comes back pretty quick and strong if he's wrongly accused. I know he claims to be busy throwing friends into nuclear reactors but there's just a difference in his reactions, I don't want to say it specifically because he'll fix it next time, but if I'm right, I've picked up on a Scum tell of his...

Posted

Can someone fill in a blank for me? I'm ridiculously busy. I wish I had the time to read every post from the first couple days. You young lazy whipper-snappers haven't been posting much anyway, so it shouldn't really be too hard but I am swamped. I keep hearing mention of a protector coming into play. What happened with a protector?

Are you still being sarcastic, or was this an actual question? :look::tongue:

Kristina claims to have contacted two people with her communications skills, Shane and Person A. Furthermore, she claims that Person A has claimed protector to her. Does that clear it up for you? And yes you are Bernard, you senile old man :tongue:

My opinion on Dogukan hasn't changed, so I will

Vote: Doğukan Akbulut (Dragonator)

We can worry about Person A later. If Person A has claimed protector, we have to trust Kristina's judgement for now, as we don't want to make it easy for scum to kill our PRs. And if Person A is scum, he's going to want to try to maintain his cover as long as possible by not letting the scum team kill her, which means either Kristina is protected by a real protector in Person A, or protected by the fact that scum are trying to have a foot inside the communication ring or whatever Kristina is able to set up. But I hope and trust that Kristina will use her powers wisely, and not blab too much to Person A unless she can get him verified somehow.

Posted

We can worry about Person A later. If Person A has claimed protector, we have to trust Kristina's judgement for now, as we don't want to make it easy for scum to kill our PRs. And if Person A is scum, he's going to want to try to maintain his cover as long as possible by not letting the scum team kill her, which means either Kristina is protected by a real protector in Person A, or protected by the fact that scum are trying to have a foot inside the communication ring or whatever Kristina is able to set up. But I hope and trust that Kristina will use her powers wisely, and not blab too much to Person A unless she can get him verified somehow.

Or alternatively, they kill Kristina relatively soon and she takes the identity of Person A to her grave! Lots of options for how this could all turn out.

It's a pity some of you are so set on taking me out, but I guess it can't be helped. A couple of small words and a crazy whispering woman and boom, my fashion career is toast once more. I just hope you all at least pay my words some heed come tomorrow, as I do feel I'm on to something there with Colin. Take for example, his vote against Shane yesterday. You might think that voting for the person that is later killed wouldn't be a good move for scum, but perhaps he did it for exactly that reason; to be able to pretend that he was just an innocent townie that was clearly not voting as the scum would, since Shane was then killed. He didn't have any other reason for his vote, in fact he based it entirely on Shane "acting too much like a townie":

Anyway, yes, I'm still suspicious of Shane. I still have nothing to back that up, though. Just a general uneasiness about the way he talks. Everything he says seems to feel rehearsed. Like he's trying act exactly like he would if. He were a townie. If this feeling remains, I may pllace my vote that way later.

I know that it's hard to defend against, Shane. You haven't slipped up as a scum, I just see things the way I see them.

Vote: Shane Donalds (Shadows)

Seems like a pretty thin reason to place a vote against Shane when there were so many other options yesterday. To this humble tailor it looks like he was just finding any excuse to make the vote so he could point to it later as an obvious sign of not being in on the scum action plan while hoping nobody picked up on his crap reasoning for placing such a vote.

If you do decide to lynch me, do at least consider these thoughts tomorrow. I shall Vote: Colin Malone (Cornelius Murdock).

I suppose I should at least go prepare something fittingly fabulous just in case this is my last hurrah, maybe the turquoise blazer...

Posted

Or alternatively, they kill Kristina relatively soon and she takes the identity of Person A to her grave! Lots of options for how this could all turn out.

Well that is worst case scenario. But if Person A is scum, then we can hope that there is a real town protector out there who's looking out for Kristina, seeing as she's our only claimed powerful town role at the moment.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...