Jump to content
THIS IS THE TEST SITE OF EUROBRICKS! ×
THIS IS THE TEST SITE OF EUROBRICKS!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Ninja Treasure Transport #6033 contains a strange piece. In the image of the set below (from the box), the grey ninja grabs a blue "antenna piece" with his left hand. The piece is held on the grey rock formation by a black vertical 1x1 clip.

6033-1.jpg

Is this a staff? A scepter/wand? Or just a stick? Or even something else? I find the choice of blue an odd color and it's the only blue piece in the 51 piece set. What is this piece suppose to be?

Share your thoughts of this mystery piece.

Posted

i think it is so that you can pose the ninja in an "attack" stance. like he jumping out from behind the rock. its more so you can "sets up" a scene (like in a diaroma) rather than play with the set.

though, blue is a weird choice for the color. however, i seem to recall some other odd choice pieces in sets, where there purpose is "fuction" (like in this set) not "to look good".

*y* great topic, by the way. i love discussion like this *y*

- BrickMiner

Posted

ok, here is an example of what i think it is... LEGO seemed to use a "different" color piece on purpose, when the piece fills the purpose of function.

in sheriff's lock-up 6755, the spring unit/mechanism that blows off the jail door uses a red plate. well like blue with the ninja set, red appears no where else in the structure. odd choice there too *wacko*

6755_red_plate.jpg

- BrickMiner

Posted

I honestly think the correct theory mentioned was that it's there to give the Ninja an action-y pose. Yes, grey or black would have worked better, but this is clearly meant to be hidden behind the rock. They probably had spare blue, so decided to use that. Same with the red 1x1 plate you showed.

Posted

or the blue was supposed to be sky. skys are blue, and if the piece is really not there as a visual enhancer, then its better off blending with the background... which i guess is presumably sky.

- BrickMiner

Posted

I don't think the "action pose theory" is correct in this case. The picture does not have the ninja in an action pose but rather just grabbing the piece, as if to use it as a weapon.

Oh, I take that back. His legs are off the ground. Action pose all the way! Maybe it is just something to hold him up.

Posted

I think it was explained once, don't ask me when or where, that Lego liked to put off/odd colored pieces in where they couldn't be seen, so that kids could have a large variety of colors to play with. It seems kids like many multi-colored pieces, even when it doesn't make any aesthetic sence, at all.

Steve

Posted

thats a very good expination for the color... different colors/shapes inspire a kids imagination too (gets them thinking creatively when they try to come up with arlternate models), which is the ultimate goal for LEGO, right ???

i never bought into the whole, "they is the piece/color that had overstocked, so that is what they used" theory. i have way more confidence in LEGO than to say that. thanks athos !!! now, i can use the above expination in my arsenal for arguments (if i ever need to, hopefully not ;-) ).

- BrickMiner

Posted

I think I read it in a discussion over at fbtb about either the original millenium falcon or AT-AT. As I recall, it was an official Lego rep, probably Jake.

Steve

Posted
that hints at NOT supporting the theory that LEGO uses what ever pieces are in stock X-D they chose a less common color !!!

- BrickMiner

To me it makes sense. I mean they used a color that they barely used in other sets. Why? If it was one of the more common colors, they'd have plenty of use for it. For an uncommon color like that they'd have no use but to hide it away somewhere.

Posted

The spring clean sets proved (and Jake admitted) that lego make pieces first, ie everything blue for a month, than design sets from whats in the warehouse. This is why they occassionaly have a very successful sell out and simply announce they have no way of restocking, because they are working on a yellow output at the time. I think this bizzare production practice/unnecessary warehousing are a large cause of Lego's economic problems. (Note how he boldly expands the topic... ;-) )

God Bless all,

Nathan

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...