DLuders Posted November 8, 2011 Posted November 8, 2011 (edited) [From the link on Holodoc's Eurobricks signature] Midori posted this Lego Cuusoo nominee -- a Lego Power Functions XS Motor (extra small): "Like a red Micro-motor, this saves lots of spaces. Unlike the red Micro-motor, this can easily attach to other bricks. The product ( http://lego.cuusoo.com/ideas/view/575 ) got me started on suggesting." Log into Lego Cuusoo to read about how it works, and add your support to the PF XS Motor! A Power Functions XS Motor could be very useful for these Lego themes: * Technic * Trains * Star Wars ... and probably others! So far, there is a Power Functions "Medium" and "XL" motor. It makes you wonder about TLG's original vision for the Power Functions motor lineup. What happened to the "Small" and "Large" motor sizes? It's been 4 years since Lego Power Functions was released.... Edited November 11, 2011 by DLuders Quote
le60head Posted November 8, 2011 Posted November 8, 2011 I hope this idea gets enough support on Cusoo. No doubt such a motor would be of great use! Quote
Alasdair Ryan Posted November 8, 2011 Posted November 8, 2011 I hope too this gets enough votes, it would be great to have a xs pf motor. Quote
olaf9198 Posted November 8, 2011 Posted November 8, 2011 :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: (i support this) Quote
Sokratesz Posted November 8, 2011 Posted November 8, 2011 I'd want it to be smaller yet, 3x3x3 is more than twice as big as the red micro motor was. 2x2x2 is more like it, it doesn't need much speed. - Sok. Quote
allanp Posted November 8, 2011 Posted November 8, 2011 I'm not sure I can say I support it until we can agree on the exact size and output speed. For me it would need to be a maximum of 3x3x3 but smaller would be better with an output speed of no greater than 30 rpm. Quote
KEvron Posted November 8, 2011 Posted November 8, 2011 why not give us both? a small and a new micro. you'd think a micro would sell like hotcakes.... Quote
olaf9198 Posted November 8, 2011 Posted November 8, 2011 why not give us both? a small and a new micro. you'd think a micro would sell like hotcakes.... then here it will sell like hot brownies I'd want it to be smaller yet, 3x3x3 is more than twice as big as the red micro motor was. 2x2x2 is more like it, it doesn't need much speed. - Sok. hi sok but the Technic scale is alwas uneven so like 3 9 17 so the motor is easy to use in a technic creation Quote
Milan Posted November 8, 2011 Posted November 8, 2011 but the Technic scale is alwas uneven so like 3 9 17 so the motor is easy to use in a technic creation Technic is not always uneven. Only the studless are uneven, there are still plenty of old Technic bricks and plates to use. I would not say that new parts has to be uneven. I like the new 8878 Battery Box for its even number of studs. Quote
nielsvdv Posted November 8, 2011 Posted November 8, 2011 i would suggest the same torque as an m, but a lot lower rpm's, like 30 to 40 Quote
fred67 Posted November 8, 2011 Posted November 8, 2011 I supported... like this design much better than the one that inspired it; smaller would be nice, too. Quote
Sokratesz Posted November 8, 2011 Posted November 8, 2011 (edited) hi sok but the Technic scale is alwas uneven so like 3 9 17 so the motor is easy to use in a technic creation Yes, it would be consistent, but it wouldn't be very small. The axle doesn't need to be in the middle, it could be on the side or on a corner, with mounting holes next to it. There's many different ways to go about it. Ideally, it should be even smaller than the old 9v micromotor, because the cable is attached directly and it thus foregoes the large 2x2x2/3 connector. - Sok. Edited November 8, 2011 by Sokratesz Quote
timslegos Posted November 8, 2011 Posted November 8, 2011 Everyone wants a tiny motor but you have to realize that there might not be a motor commercially available that would be small enough to fit in some of the requirements some have suggested. Lego probably wouldn't develop their own motor, so they would have to be able to buy a cheap motor from another company and put it inside a Lego case. tim Quote
Sokratesz Posted November 8, 2011 Posted November 8, 2011 (edited) Everyone wants a tiny motor but you have to realize that there might not be a motor commercially available that would be small enough to fit in some of the requirements some have suggested. Lego probably wouldn't develop their own motor, so they would have to be able to buy a cheap motor from another company and put it inside a Lego case. tim The old micro motor was smaller than 2x2x2 studs (1.6cm boxed), and it's almost 20 years old now. It shouldn't be hard to find a suitable, similarly small new motor for the PF line. One thing that could help in keeping it small is changing the way they are mounted - by not putting giant pinholes in it, for example, but instead making them half-depth or even putting a .5 or 1 length fixed axle on the outside to allow for fixed mounting. - Sok. Edited November 8, 2011 by Sokratesz Quote
timslegos Posted November 8, 2011 Posted November 8, 2011 The old micro motor was smaller than 2x2x2 studs (1.6cm boxed), and it's almost 20 years old now. It shouldn't be hard to find a suitable, similarly small new motor for the PF line. - Sok. Good point, i just meant people should be a little more realistic in size. tim Quote
dhc6twinotter Posted November 9, 2011 Posted November 9, 2011 Heck yeah! I'd be all over some XS motors. I think a motor with return to center and built in clutch would be even better. Quote
olaf9198 Posted November 9, 2011 Posted November 9, 2011 (edited) Technic is not always uneven. Only the studless are uneven, there are still plenty of old Technic bricks and plates to use. I would not say that new parts has to be uneven. I like the new 8878 Battery Box for its even number of studs. but the 8878 isn't made for lego technic (the aren't use them in technic sets) Edited November 9, 2011 by olaf9198 Quote
allanp Posted November 9, 2011 Posted November 9, 2011 Heck yeah! I'd be all over some XS motors. I think a motor with return to center and built in clutch would be even better. Is that a servo motor you are refering to? Personally I would prefere a proper servo motor that can be controlled remotely to a small motor. Quote
Alasdair Ryan Posted November 9, 2011 Posted November 9, 2011 Perhaps one of us could make a cad drawing of a small servo motor and upload it to the site ................ You you use a small servo motor as a small pf motor as well couldn't you? Quote
allanp Posted November 9, 2011 Posted November 9, 2011 I think before I inadvertantly hijack another thread (which I think I may be in danger of doing, again! ) I must suggest that this thread be kept to the small motor. Quote
timslegos Posted November 9, 2011 Posted November 9, 2011 I think before I inadvertantly hijack another thread (which I think I may be in danger of doing, again! ) I must suggest that this thread be kept to the small motor. Haha good save . tim Quote
parda Posted November 10, 2011 Posted November 10, 2011 (edited) Beauty and useful motor, priceless! Edited November 10, 2011 by parda Quote
Countdown Posted November 10, 2011 Posted November 10, 2011 A XS motor would be perfect! Maybe the design of the XS motor housing could have an attachment for the regular and articulated LA bracket so that the motor could be closer to the LA and/or possibility to have an universal joint. Linear actuator holder Articulated Linear actuator holder Quote
BondemandClausen Posted November 10, 2011 Posted November 10, 2011 An outstanding idea, that LEGO should take up, and start processing immidiately. In one of my present projects i could easily use two or three of those. The size is perfect, and eventhough it propaply isnt possible to get the same torque out of a engine that size, it would be great to have it, considering the lower weight it also would have. LEGO just get it on! Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.