Posted January 8, 201213 yr A caterpillar bulldozer with 4 motors and 6 funtions like the 8043 system but more small. It has 2 small linear actuators back and two big ones front with 4 big linear pneumatics, 2 front and 2 back with 2 pneumatic valvules. It has full independent suspension with rubber band and a pendular tracked suspension... and it works all . Edited January 8, 201213 yr by jorgeopesi
January 8, 201213 yr Looks good so far! I like your use of BOTH pneumatic cylinders and Linear Actuators.
January 8, 201213 yr Author in withs scale is it in the 8275 I think mine is 5 studs smaller between axles that 8275 and it will have two functions more and all of them are much more realistics that lego set but it will not have fake engine, I have room for it but not for the trasmision .
January 8, 201213 yr I think mine is 5 studs smaller between axles that 8275 and it will have two functions more and all of them are much more realistics that lego set but it will not have fake engine, I have room for it but not for the trasmision . i only that who that looks so small how wide it most be but yes lego had made a few mistakes made in the 8275 but i whant to make one to ,but don't have now enough parts Edited January 8, 201213 yr by olaf9198
January 9, 201213 yr Very interesting build you have going on there. I will follow closely your progresses...
January 10, 201213 yr Author We have video, only WIP but I will finish it soon. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NfqQU9wZnUA&list=HL1326204601&feature=mh_lolz Edited January 10, 201213 yr by jorgeopesi
January 10, 201213 yr It looking great,i might be a idea to see if you could give the front blade a bit more height,it looks like it could be too low,what valve design did you use,i am guessing it is not mine. Oh i would of also made it 2 studs wider,as it seems it looks a bit out of scale in terms of the width. Edited January 10, 201213 yr by Alasdair Ryan
January 10, 201213 yr Author It looking great,i might be a idea to see if you could give the front blade a bit more height,it looks like it could be too low,what valve design did you use,i am guessing it is not mine. Oh i would of also made it 2 studs wider,as it seems it looks a bit out of scale in terms of the width. It looks a bit out of scale in terms of width for the tracks, the lego tracks are too big but the real D11 is narrow bulldozer and the technic experience will be better building with no room . The front blade will be up thank you and I don´t know who is the valve designer but is probably the best technic idea I ever seen.
January 11, 201213 yr It looks a bit out of scale in terms of width for the tracks, the lego tracks are too big but the real D11 is narrow bulldozer and the technic experience will be better building with no room . The front blade will be up thank you and I don´t know who is the valve designer but is probably the best technic idea I ever seen. You cant just leave us hanging! Please post the link to the idea. tim
January 11, 201213 yr Author I don´t know who was the inventor, maybe Sariel in stud version or Nico71 in studless, anyway I am using the version that Nico71 uses in his bulldozers, but smaller. Good question, who was the first whom used that system?.
January 11, 201213 yr Author Another video, close to be finish... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UTteeGrMj-4&feature=mfu_in_order&list=UL
January 11, 201213 yr Author I think your bulldozer is a bit to fast,how much pushing power does it have? Two L motors with 12 to 20 gear... I don´t have room for more reduction .
January 11, 201213 yr Maybe a pf speed controler may come in handy. Edited January 11, 201213 yr by Alasdair Ryan
January 11, 201213 yr Maybe a pf speed controler may come in handy. Ya what he said. I really like your bulldozer. The functions work really well. If you were to get some hamster bedding sawdust you could bulldoze some fake hills . tim
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.