What is this? Why do you have to get away with anything if you have a good case? Slip of the tongue?
As said before, the way the votes stacked on me made me think it has to be scum among those voting for me. Since I am not sure which one of those 4 is scum. Could be one, could be 2. Therefore I pay respect to the opinion of those I think are more likely to be town on the other lynch candidate. If Newt is indeed an insane/paranoid cop, we are barking at 2 wrong trees. But at the moment Newt have some logical faults which Kyle and Egon are pointing out. (That would of course be a dream scenario for scum - lynching 1 town and having another ready for autolynch....).
Let's see:
Scenario 1:
Newts defense is correct. Why did you not talk about or to Egon about your thoughts? @Bob Your thoughts? What did Newt mean with his above post? Is he telling the truth?
Scenario 2: If he turns up scum, @Bob Did he try to implicate you, for a future lynch? Or if I get lynched, will you be considered town alongside your scum buddy?
"unless Bob is a godfather" <- What is this: in case Bob is revealed as scum, you can claim he must have been a godfather, so you don't come of as a lying bag of scum?
Defendese of Newt, by Tyrion, before Newt even answered those valid concerns here:
He also investigated Egon/Bob, for a scum result, but saying he thinks he has a town game, or so he claims. Why no mention of this before? Why don't you let Newt answer?
You are very persistent on lynching me since your post (that was posted after the day had ended), and judging by page 3 of today you are intensifying this notion. I wonder if you have committed to heavily on your opinion on me, since you are not addressing more concrete issues than attacking my behavior. You are building very actively upon the tension between 2 candidates. You're active defense for Kotz, which put yourself in a very bad situation if Kotz turns up scum, or I turn up town.