Jump to content
THIS IS THE TEST SITE OF EUROBRICKS! ×
THIS IS THE TEST SITE OF EUROBRICKS!

LiLmeFromDaFuture

Eurobricks Knights
  • Posts

    811
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About LiLmeFromDaFuture

Spam Prevention

  • What is favorite LEGO theme? (we need this info to prevent spam)
    LEGO

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male

Extra

  • Country
    United States

Recent Profile Visitors

4,956 profile views

LiLmeFromDaFuture's Achievements

Proficient

Proficient (10/14)

  • Week One Done
  • One Month Later
  • One Year In
  • Conversation Starter
  • First Post

Recent Badges

  1. @q_biq: Aha, I figured I could be wrong (comparing your dimensions to mine)! The photos really undersell the large awesomeness of this behemoth creation!
  2. Indeed, for its 8x8 diameter, but there could be more to the design underneath that would make reducing the height difficult, perhaps @q_biq? Does look great still!
  3. @q_biq Research is certainly has its benefits! I still scour the internet for new AT-AT creations and look forward to doing more research with the official UCS set, before I get back to redesigning my walker. The leg design on your walker looks fantastic; Technic and all!
  4. Never a bad time to see "Yet another AT-AT!" It's a big reason why I still hang around this forum; hoping to see a new AT-AT creation, and yours does not disappoint! This is a hefty build and I am shocked it's packed with 6,000+ pieces not even including the base! The pictures does not do your creation justice; it's bigger than I imagined! My current WIP was around 6,126 pieces and dimensions 52cm x 18cm x 60cm. Very clean build, nicely designed, and well presented!
  5. Yeah, the doors are unforgivable. I could care less that the Minifigures didn't reflect the wishlist(s). I mean they asked for suggestions instead of offering concrete options to vote on and be obligated to fulfill. The cannons I could possibly turn a blind eye to but not to the doors, its flaws are hard to overlook. The problem is furthermore exaggerated by the sudden widening in the middle of the ship. When the Gunship was announced the winner, I looked forward to a day-one purchase and my first UCS set. However, after the reveal and the set images, the doors jutting out when closed is glaringly obvious and a big turn-off. It certainly could be modified but that's beyond the reason why I would purchase a set in the first place because I am pleased with its original design.
  6. Fun build, but now, I can't get out of my mind that he's riding a unicycle with his hands behind him!
  7. Over half who voted chose the LAAT—I love democracy, I love the Republic Gunship! I would have been content if the Gunship did not win (I thought it wouldn't due to the supposed "Imperial interference"), but hearing this puts a smile on my face I'm actually surprised so many like the Gunship, but I guess it's mostly due to the TCW. However, I am confident, and expecting they will make a set based on the appearance from AOTC, not the cartoon. Anyway, I would have like to see the numbers for how many individuals voted and how many votes each option received?
  8. Nicely done!
  9. Have you tried using the connect feature?
  10. It could be the possibility of illegitimate votes cast by fake accounts?
  11. My vote is the Gunship. I thought about making my own, but I may reconsider at the chance of an official one, or wait, so I could borrow some techniques From the looks of the comment section, the Gunship seems to be claiming the most votes, besides those clamoring for a "501st Battle Pack"<
  12. Great looking scene! The simplicity of its construction is nice, and I especially like the doors!
  13. I prefer the new lever design for the S-foil mechanism; it takes less effort as well as time to engage it, and it could be done in one hand.
  14. Wow, this is nice!
  15. The rebuilt turret looks fantastic! What's it connected to?
×
×
  • Create New...