THIS IS THE TEST SITE OF EUROBRICKS!
-
Posts
753 -
Joined
-
Last visited
About Kdapt-Preacher
Spam Prevention
-
What is favorite LEGO theme? (we need this info to prevent spam)
Star Wars
Profile Information
-
Gender
Male
Recent Profile Visitors
5,431 profile views
Kdapt-Preacher's Achievements
Rising Star (9/14)
- Rare
Recent Badges
-
Hmmm. 3386 is a good idea. I'd been thinking about a vertical clip so the B-wing could fly 'upright' with the knife blade downwards, but holding it horizontally like that is about as good. I definitely like the bucket and clip better for the X-wing, but they're all just difficult to make readable at this size. It's pure happy coincidence that the TIE fighters happen to work out as nicely as they do; basically no other starfighter is that cooperative.
-
LEGO Star Wars 2024 Set Discussion - READ FIRST POST!!!
Kdapt-Preacher replied to MKJoshA's topic in LEGO Star Wars
There's good precedent for new helmets in battle packs specifically, too. The ARF trooper in 2011, ARC trooper in 2012, First Order officer cap in 2016, patrol trooper in 2018, Praetorian Guard in 2019, Imperial commando from just earlier this year, etc., plus 4-LOM's head in 2017, and the macrobinoculars from the 501st BP last year, which is another one that the clone crowd has wanted for a long time. Being in a battle pack definitely does not mean they won't do Bacara justice. -
Aaaaaand..... I'm moving to Guam. Immediately. Still in the US, technically, but no better than Australia was from a LEGO standpoint (actually worse, since there are LEGO stores in Australia and there aren't any in Guam. And the cost of shipping anything will be ridiculous). I'm not going to have time to finish the Venator or probably anything else. Sigh. IDK. I'll try to come up with some better solution so I can continue building MOCs in the future; I've hated not really being able to work on this project for the last two years, but it doesn't look like it's going to immediately improve.
-
LEGO Star Wars 2024 Set Discussion - READ FIRST POST!!!
Kdapt-Preacher replied to MKJoshA's topic in LEGO Star Wars
The skirt piece might be better, but it still doesn't address the biggest issue with the Royal Guards, which is that their robes are supposed to conceal their arms. Even though the skirt piece is probably closer to a literal representation of the uniform, I'm not sure it conveys the overall impression as well. It would make them look like the Praetorians. I can't see LEGO doing it, but the better solution IMO would be to give them either a new headpiece that extends down over the torso and legs (like the old ghost minifigures) or a bespoke cape piece that wraps around the body more than the current ones do. -
LEGO Star Wars 2024 Set Discussion - READ FIRST POST!!!
Kdapt-Preacher replied to MKJoshA's topic in LEGO Star Wars
Not in the original Thrawn Trilogy, but more so in Outbound Flight and the other media around that. By the time of Heir to the Empire he's been an Imperial for decades and has largely worked out his ethical issues, but the younger versions of him have more of that angle. Depending on how they played it, it could have been less about the survivors not being believed and more about them just not having any useful information. The Vong aren't particularly communicative; you could easily have a storyline where the TCW crew encounters and fights a YV scout ship but never really learns much about them other than that they're a previously-unencountered aggressive faction. In more LEGO-related discussion, this is still the 2024 thread. Is a 2025 thread going to open at some point? -
At some point in the last year or so, BrickLink (or possibly LDraw, or possibly both) have updated their ID numbers for some common parts. Most prominently, #3023 Plate 1x2 has split into 3023a and 3023b to reflect mold variants, but something similar has been done to #3069 Tile 1x2 and several other pieces as well. That's all well and good, but the result is that now my older Stud.io files that have all the 1x2 plates as just #3023 rather than #3023b can no longer be imported into BrickLink because it doesn't recognize the pieces. This is an issue because I've published several hundred MOCs on Rebrickable with Stud.io files for instructions and now I have people messaging me about the files being broken. I can fix this by going through every file manually and replacing all the existing parts with the new variants, but that would take days of work. Is there any way to convert them en masse, or to make BrickLink translate #3023 to #3023b automatically (which seems like how this ought to work, anyway)? Thanks!
-
Celebrating the release of Skeleton Crew (only a week late), we have #208, the Onyx Cinder! Pretty straightforward little model, but I think it's ended up being a pretty good representation of the ship. In more substantial news, after more than 18 months away I am finally back in the US and have access to my parts collection again, so at long last I should be able to start making progress on MOCs again! I have a lot of IRL work to do at the moment, so it's not going to be an immediate giant burst of stuff, but I'm optimistic that I'll be able to get things rolling again in the near future. It's past time to get the Venator finished.
-
There's a lot of stuff that could maybe be done to make it sturdier, but the spacing is very awkward. To achieve the 12-degree angle between segments the clips are offset relative to each other by half a plate (not half a stud, half a plate) both horizontally and vertically, which isn't trivial to achieve with anything other than clips. I think this will hold up, but of course there's no way to know for sure if it'll hold without testing it IRL. Have to see.
-
Long time no update, and this still isn't much of an update since I'm still in Australia, still have no physical bricks, etc., etc. But I've been brainstorming on the Eye of Sion a bit and I've got a version that's reasonably round, reasonably thin, and I think will be sturdy enough to support the weight of the back end of the UCS ISD. I haven't been able to test that theory yet, due to the repeatedly mentioned Australia thing, but this is what I'm looking at at the moment. Just the ring is already almost 3000 pieces before I've even started on the engines, stand, and connection to the ISD (which I think I have a reasonably solid plan for), and it'll need more greebling than it currently has, too. The Eye might end up being more pieces than the ISD itself. Although the Peridea Chimaera version of the ISD would have a lot more pieces than the regular one due to all the damage detailing, so that might still be more.
-
Australia is lovely. In my non-LEGO time I'm a marine ecologist, so I came to Australia to see the Great Barrier Reef and look at all your crabs, which you have a lot more of than we do in the US. The Indo-Pacific is the global center for crab biodiversity (just about all marine biodiversity, really), so there's a ton of stuff to do here, and it has not disappointed. I've seen upwards of a hundred new species of decapods in the last year, which is pretty hard to argue with as far as I'm concerned.
-
Not really, unfortunately. The update is that I'm still in Australia and won't have access to physical bricks again for at least another six months (and maybe longer, depending on various factors). I've taken the Venator about as far as I can digitally; I don't think I can do much more with it until I've physically held it and can tell how well the internals actually hold up, and in particular how well the dorsal hull panels mesh with the bridge towers and superstructure around the back of the ship. I think I may have too much open space around the engines, but Stud.io can't really tell me that. So, rest assured that I am eventually going to finish it, but it's going to be a while yet, until I'm either back in the US or in a longer-term situation here.
-
Alright, finally, here we are: #207, the MC30c frigate! Substantially the same as the previously posted version, but incorporating the feedback from The-yukio and TeddytheSpoon (thanks guys!), and with some slight color changes because it turns out that 1x1 stadium tile doesn't actually exist in dark tan.
-
It's taken me seven months, but I have found an example, and it's even in a Star Wars set: they used one for 4-LOM's faceplate in the 2010 Celebration exclusive set. So like I said in October, that's immediate full approval for the turntables as far as I'm concerned; that's clearly the right way to do it. I should go back and look at my Immobilizer 418 model too, probably, since that has a couple of places where those boat stud 2x2s are currently used where they don't hold particularly well. Sorry for the very delayed response. It'll be approximately 98 studs long (~79cm, 31 inches).