THIS IS THE TEST SITE OF EUROBRICKS!
- LEGO Star Wars 2018 Set Discussion - READ FIRST POST!
- Marvel Superheroes 2018 - Set Discussion
-
LEGO Star Wars 2018 Set Discussion - READ FIRST POST!
Dirt on the Mimban minifigures in 75211 is represented using dark tan and dark gray. However, the torso mistakenly used on the Sandcrawler droid features white or light gray marks, probably representing snow. Also, that torso undeniably resembles the concept art for a Conveyex gunner. If Lego had a Mimban set planned, they most likely would have released the Mimban Stormtrooper and the Mimban versions of Han and Beckett in that set, instead of shoehorning them into the TIE Fighter set. As for a reason why we haven't heard of an imperial driver/gunner being included in 75217, the person who 'leaked' the minifigure lineup may have been looking at the box art, which may not have shown the figure (since it's most likely in the Conveyex itself).
- LEGO Star Wars 2018 Set Discussion - READ FIRST POST!
-
LEGO Star Wars 2018 Set Discussion - READ FIRST POST!
Do we have any updates on the TIE Interceptor rumor (rumored to be 75221)? It was rumored to release in June, so you'd think we would have seen something by now. It seems we have more rumors than available set numbers. IIRC, the current rumors for unknown Star Wars sets are the TIE Interceptor, a V-19 Starfighter, a Resistance Transport, a Solo playset (including a Mudtrooper), and a Hoth playset (rumored to be 75203), while the only other rumored set numbers for this year are 75221, 75203, and 75222 (which is the D2C) Also, is it possible that we could get a set or sets based on Star Wars Resistance in a December or January wave or will Lego be hesitant after the poor sales of Star Wars Rebels sets? I know it's probably too soon to ask, but I figured I would anyway
-
LEGO Star Wars 2018 Set Discussion - READ FIRST POST!
Is it possible that 75203 is the Resistance Transport and 75221 is the V-19? 75203 is rumored to be 40€, which is about what the original rumored price was for the Resistance Transport. We don’t know any other set numbers that these sets could use (although, Lego’s set numbering rarely makes sense), and it seems rather convenient that we have 2 unknown sets with confirmed set numbers and 2 rumored sets with unknown set numbers.
- Marvel Superheroes 2018 - Set Discussion
-
Marvel Superheroes 2018 - Set Discussion
The fact that it’s April and we still don’t have any solid rumors about an Ant-Man set (that would most likely release in June like the Homecoming sets) is concerning, to say the least. I just checked with some other orange plates I have and they all have the same issue (some of those pieces are over 5 years old). This clearly isn’t a recent issue and definitely isn’t specific to that set.
- LEGO Star Wars 2018 Set Discussion - READ FIRST POST!
- Marvel Superheroes 2018 - Set Discussion
- Marvel Superheroes 2018 - Set Discussion
-
LEGO Star Wars 2018 Set Discussion - READ FIRST POST!
I don't know why people still think we're getting a V-19. It's pretty safe to say that the rumor was fake. The description of the real throne room set is very different from the "leaked" description, and if Sir Von Lego didn't see a V-19 at Toy Fair, it's safe to say we aren't getting it.
- LEGO Star Wars 2018 Set Discussion - READ FIRST POST!
-
Marvel Superheroes 2018 - Set Discussion
The more I think about it, the more I'm starting to believe that the D2C is a UCS-style Hulkbuster (I know I'm not the first to mention this). But looking back at the original Hulkbuster head leak (from a few months ago), it's clearly much larger than minifig scale. It doesn't have the two 'notches' at the front like the others do, so I think it's the same dome piece used on the front of Yondu's drill ship from 76080. Also, if the D2C really does release in March, it would make sense that the only unaccounted for figure is Iron Man, the same one that piloted the Hulkbuster in Avengers 2. Lastly, if you compare the leaked head to the AoU Hulkbuster and the IW Hulkbuster, this one is clearly based on the AoU design, not IW, meaning that if we are getting a UCS Hulkbuster, it might not be solely based on IW, which would explain why the mk 43 is included (since it hasn't been confirmed to even be in IW). So, unless the Hulkbuster head leak is fake, it seems like we might have a UCS Hulkbuster coming soon. At least, I think it's the theory that makes the most sense as of right now. Sorry for the super long post by the way!
- Marvel Superheroes 2018 - Set Discussion
Sponsored Links