petersv

@efferman what do you think about this [ldd] ? I changed the 24316 3M cross axle at the horizontal aligned 32270 conical wheel. to be honest, i've never tried 3749 Axle Pin without Friction Ridges in operation.

@efferman suggestion 1 - 'cause my mind sometimes stuck in a loop during the creative process and i'm not able to interrupt it without external influence. This is a perfect example :) Your idea make this approach much more better, thank you. I think this is the same improvement that @aefferen suggested above. @efferman suggestion 2 - i've tried exactly the same layout with the 99773 triangle and the 32065 liftarm 1x7 but i stuck with the vertical 32270 conical wheel. The horizontal alignment in your approach is really wise. From the functionality point of view this is 100/100 for me, however it's hiding the "eye candy". Thanks for the feedback & comments.

Dear aefferen, Here is the first revision with axles for a more convenient assembly [ldd]. Probably this setup is not that rigid. Just a guess. fig 04.

Thank you for all the mods & improvements. Inspired by the huge amount of work of this community (eg 42056 Community-driven Errata) i'd like to share another idea on the step 5 issue. The initial intention was to redesign the little bevel gearbox assembly. The main standpoints were to keep the compatibility with the original concept (prevent further rebuild of the environment) while improve the functionality and maintain the visibility / presence. So here is my very first post with my first improvement idea [ldd files]. fig 01. fig 02. Those steps where the Axle Pins 3L (11214) /# 3 & 4 on fig 03./ are inserted on the opposite sides of the beam frame (64179) may be found a little inconvenient: the pins should be bend. fig 03. I'm a virtual builder, so if someone has the possibility to test it, a picture or a youtube confirmation on the working assembly would be deeply appreciated. Waiting for your kind comments and suggestions.