Munchkin255

You could also use an actual Pi instead of a LEGO hub. The Raspberry Pi Build HAT allows you to connect four PowerdUp / Technic / Spike motors to a Raspberry Pi. https://www.raspberrypi.com/products/build-hat/

I recommend that you check out Antons Mindstorms. He is doing a lot with Spike and 3rd party parts. https://www.antonsmindstorms.com/

Here is a suggestion from MicroSoft CoPilot: It sounds like you’re ready for a challenging and rewarding project! Here’s an idea that could spark your creativity: Project: Transforming Robot with Multiple Modes Imagine building a robot that can transform between different modes, such as a vehicle mode, a humanoid robot mode, and a third unique mode of your choice (like an animal or aircraft). This project would incorporate complex mechanisms, motors for movement, and pneumatics for actions like lifting or grabbing. Key Features to Include: Articulated Joints: Use Technic gears and levers to create smooth and controllable movements. Motorized Functions: Integrate motors to drive the robot’s transformation and mobility. Pneumatic Systems: Add pneumatics for realistic mechanical actions. Remote Control: Implement a control system to operate the robot remotely. Design Considerations: Stability: Ensure the structure is stable in all forms. Weight Distribution: Balance the weight to prevent tipping during transformation. Aesthetics: Design the exterior to be visually appealing in all modes. Building Tips: Start by sketching out your ideas and planning the transformation sequence. Create a sturdy core frame that can support the various moving parts. Experiment with different gear ratios for optimal speed and torque. Use color-coding to enhance the visual appeal and differentiate between modes. This project will not only put your Lego Technic collection to good use but also challenge your engineering and design skills. Have fun building, and I’d love to hear about your progress on this exciting endeavor! 🚀 I might add. How about building a pneumatic octopus 🐙

I really like, that the winner is using a good old RCX

LEGO i overpriced for what it is. :-) I think you should be very aware about his age and what you are asking of him. Spike Prime is recommended for age ten and up. So is this something that he will get the full benefit from? Maybe Boost is a better way to introduce him to programmable Lego?

the Spike app comes with many different built and coding projects. I recommend that you download the Spike app and check out what it offers. Then you can decide if that is the way to go. Personally I think it is brilliant and understand why it might not be for everyone. About the price of the set maybe check Bricklink for a cheaper price than getting it directly from Lego Shop at home.

Maybe check out 4993 LEGO Creator Cool Convertible. It has a nice and simple mechanism.

Hi I am not really an expert on the Mindstorms App. To me it looks like that one issue is that every time you move a new slider you will start a new sub-part of the program and subsequently a new infinite loop (widerhole fortlaufend). This means that if you move all four slides then the program will execute four loops all giving different commands to motor E. A possible solution might me to exchange the loop widerhole fortlaufend (run forever) with a run until block. And setup each of these loops to run until slider is 0. How does that work? Cheers Carsten

That is a great concept, that brings much needed computing power to Spike robots. I wonder if it is possible to attach multiple HATs to allow connection of more than 4 sensor / motors.

Technic makes poor floating boats and even worse flying aircraft. Thank you Jim for a constructive review that brings some positive wibes to this set.

I love it. Next step must be to build a bot that plays the game for you.

Hi Gimmick I am using Spike Prime with the LEGO Education Spike software. I guess my code will not really help you. The program I have is for the driving wheels of a robot. For this I am actually not using the absolute angle measurement from the servos. Instead I use the degrees turned measurements. Furthermore my motors aren't really synchronized instead I use the gyro input to keep the robot moving in a straight line. An option - if you want the arms to move with the skies could be to do something like: motorpair.start() While not a desired angle: Do nothing or maybe use the yield command to do other stuff When at desired angle: motorpair.stop()

I met the same limitation with a First Lego League Spike Prime robot I am working on. My solution was to program my own program to control the robot. Instead of synchronising the motors based on angles I choose to use the built in gyro instead. I also made code to ramp up the speed of the motors in the beginning and slow them down again near the target angle. The code is currently embedded into a large library, that is very much a work-in-process. I will try to isolate the motor control method for you and will upload it here on EB - this however might take some days. A small hint of caution beforehand is, that my program probability still needs some tweaking if it is to be matched against the awesome solutions of pybricks.

It was actually intentionally that I wrote 0 as the first parameter when calling the function hub.display.pixel(). This does off course only result in a single column of LED showing the battery level. (In this case to the left on the LED Matrix.) Which is different from your program, that uses all 25 LEDs. I have been using the same code to show the distance measured by three distance sensors. There it makes sense to only use one column for each distance measured. Did the code run without fault on the Robotic Inventor Hub? Cheers Carsten

Thank you for the reply. What I really like about your machine is how you have both worked out great solutions for hardware construction and for the use of sensors, servos and programming. The drum feeder is a perfect example of where the psychical construction have solved the problem. This is coupled with color sensors and servos for the sorting. I thought that reason for two color sensors was just to measure length of the pins, but I can see how using two different backgrounds colors can aid in telling the difference between two very similar colors. Once again congratulations on a fine build. Cheers Carsten