Jump to content
THIS IS THE TEST SITE OF EUROBRICKS!
THIS IS THE TEST SITE OF EUROBRICKS!

Ullum Zurt

Eurobricks Vassals
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Ullum Zurt

  1. I create decals using the following method: 1. Print using a colour-laser printer on standard 70/80gsm paper. 2. Cover decal with clear packing tape, ensure no bubbles 3. Cut out decals 4. Soak cut-out decals in a basin of cool water until paper dissolves, or is soft enough to be rubbed out with your fingers 5. The decal should have transferred to the clear tape, and can be applied to the tile/panel.
  2. Great choice of scale, good amount of functionality and detail without being un-necessarily big or heavy. And despite requiring a lot of effort to design, build and make instructions for, kudos for releasing them for free. There are some on Rebrickble who think their highly repetitive MOCs are good enough to be considered "Premium" just because their artificially-boosted view counts consistently puts them on the 1st page of "Hottest MOCs". I will definitely be building this once I accumulate sufficient matching panels. Thank you!
  3. That's very good crawling performance even in high gear! I really need to learn how to build a 2-speed gearbox for my crawler.
  4. This is really cool. I love crawlers, and your thought processes in designing this were good to read through. What is the final gear ratio at the wheels?
  5. Since TLG's been on a Batman's vehicle run recently, a Technic one would have meant functional steering (and possibly suspension)!!
  6. Good to see something different (superhero vehicle), but can not see why this has to beTechnic (light brick not-withstanding).
  7. Very well said. It is no different to a certain ex-president's insensitive references to the source of a particular virus.
  8. I'm wishing the telehandler comes equipped like the Ideas set: https://ideas.lego.com/projects/a1fd723d-9a32-4500-b720-d5270ccf89d1 I would buy this in a heartbeat.
  9. While really OT for this thread, what about Cada Pro servos? Do the Cada Pro L.motors trip on ludicrous mode with minimum/no load or only under moderate/heavy load?
  10. I look forward to your review of this C-model. In-fact, there should be more reviews of alt models.
  11. Apologies for digging up an old thread. I'm looking to build a small buggy, powered by Buwizz 2.0, with 2 L motors, and hoping to run in ludicrous mode. I will need to procure the motors though. Would it have to be PF motors so that the power cut-off is not hit, or can I go with cheaper MouldKing or Cada high-speed versions? Thanks!
  12. Wow! Now this is worth getting 42129.
  13. Understand the rigid hose is to protect the motor, gears, chain when it topples. Would a 1L shorter hose on each side make any perceptible difference?
  14. I've got a stash of PF servos sealed, so I'm good for now. Will look into getting the XL motor and other missing parts. Thank you!
  15. While I am too heavily invested in PF (I still have L and servo motors new and sealed), if I were to venture into PU, I think the best point of entry would be 42124 for the 2 PU L motors and the new tires. All the other newer parts can be easily BrickLinked or through BnP.
  16. With current lack of availability of 8882, my only option is 3rd party XL motors. If the have sufficient speed/torque, there may be hope that I can build this.
  17. Thank you for the explanation. Looks like I will have to source for the XL motor and confirm that before bricklinking the wheels/tires. Cheers!
  18. Is this achievable using an L motor instead of an XL motor?
  19. Wow! This is very interesting. Especially as a less bulky alternative to the PF AA battery box.
  20. While B models are definitely a big plus, given the increased popularity of Rebrickable, and alternate model MOCs available there, the absence of an official B model doesn't bother me as much. In fact, nearly half the Technic kits I bought in the past year have been because of the availability of alternate MOCs which I found more appealing than the original A model by TLG. With that said, 42131 is a clear pass for me. Neither the nature of the model, nor the lack of interesting functions, nor the presence of C+ help justify the high cost for me.
  21. If it is indeed 2.4 Ghz, couldn't you in theory use a pistol grip remote instead of current IR remote?
  22. But at least if you use stickers, people have the option to use them or not. Printed pieces don't, and then when doing a MOC, you'll need to come up with clever ways of hiding the out-of-place printed part, or doing without it.
  23. The "realistic" movement of the truck is very impressive. How I wish that there were trigger style trigger style controllers to use with lego motors.
  24. Every time the suspension bottomed out and the front hit the sand/rocks, I cringed. Does the bottom liftarm not get badly scratched up?
Sponsored Links