Sylyphics

Thanks! At 8x8, the dome is really the perfect size for minifigs to have a shield cover them and still touch the ground in a realistic way, very glad that part exists and in light blue!

Links to my three entries:

[M4-24 - Duel of the Fates] Force Fighter by Sylyphics, on Flickr Coming soon to an arcade near you, it's the freshly released Force Fighter! Battle with an original cast of characters as you duel your opponent in a 4v4 tag team showdown! Early reviewers have praised the fluid swapping mechanic and the depth of combos it opens up, as well as unique per character animations, but have criticized the lack of balance especially in regards to a certain joke character. [M4-24 - Duel of the Fates] Force Fighter by Sylyphics, on Flickr [M4-24 - Duel of the Fates] Force Fighter by Sylyphics, on Flickr I wanted to play around with both how it's a duel, typically 1v1, and yet a cast of characters are involved in an endless struggle. Happy I managed to squeeze in a Harrower to help set this stage's time period (not the characters' as it's a fighting game, so the two are unrelated), though it did take up 28 of my 100 budget. Came in at a total of 98/100.

[M4-24 - The Phantom Menace] Droideka Introduction by Sylyphics, on Flickr [M4-24 - The Phantom Menace] Droideka Introduction by Sylyphics, on Flickr [M4-24 - The Phantom Menace] Droideka Introduction by Sylyphics, on Flickr [M4-24 - The Phantom Menace] Droideka Introduction by Sylyphics, on Flickr One of the most memorable to me scenes from the Phantom Menace was the introduction of the droidekas. The droideka with its rolling, non-anthropomorphic looks (unusual for Star Wars droids), and shields really captured my imagination as a kid. The scene depicts the moment right after Obi-Wan and Qui-Gon used Force Dash (its only appearance in the films).

[M4-24 - Sabines Paint] Under New Management by Sylyphics, on Flickr CIS took the colorful (for Star Wars) fighters of the Trade Federation and decided that it was high time they got back to the grayscale conformity Star Wars ships must have! At least they added some nice deep blues in some places. Since this was a theme of coloring ships, I wanted to do a scene where recoloring is central to the story, even though it's actually about how the rare-colored ship defying the traditional greyscale palette was made grey. Both ships' parts are identical, but different colors, so the new blue variant is just there for the story. [M4-24 - Sabines Paint] Under New Management by Sylyphics, on Flickr [M4-24 - Sabines Paint] Under New Management by Sylyphics, on Flickr The vulture ended up with some really interesting "connections" where it's actually a 63586 rangefinder accessory and a 15392 launcher trigger keeping the 1x1 trans-red tiles in place, and which was needed since, to my surprise, there were no 1x3 trans-red tiles and a traditional connection wouldn't fit. The missile attachments also work very well despite not being a traditional connection, and there's some more part trapping in the wings. Overall, there's nothing that is illegal to my knowledge. The vulture is very swooshable and can transform into walk or flight modes. I'll make a free set of instructions for it when I get some spare time.

Fantastic moc of my favorite era of Star Wars. Really wish we had more good looking ships from then, but you took one of the best looking ones and did it justice.

Updated my minifig-scale droideka for the premiere of Episode I 25 years ago, May 16th, in Los Angeles and for Eurobrick's May the 4th contest. Updated Droideka Minifig I redesigned the head, which was the weakest element of the previous design; its eye-sensors are more accurate now. I also found the new version can be rebuilt into a ball, which while not a perfect sphere, will roll on a carpet just fine. It's a tad taller, but same height as the B2 so still perfectly minifig-scale and it also fits in the shield I designed for them. I'll be including them in a scene for the contest entry, but felt like just the updated version itself may be of interest to some. Free instructions on my Rebrickable

Better detailed now than smooth IMO, though it changes the look. Part of the effect that it looks more detailed is that it now has a lot more of a negative-space type look, as if what we are seeing is the inner part of the mandible with the top section removed, the epidermal layer of hull if you will. Looking at some photos of the film prop it seems the mandibles are almost the same thickness as the edge of the hull "dish", so you can likely get away with bulking them up a bit more visually.

I actually preferred the first mandible iteration, as the second version lost the texture of the plate built, and now integrates less well with the busier texture-wise main hull. Perhaps consider using bricks with studs on sides and brackets to add detailing back in? That said, brick-built would likely still miss the sidewall greebling that the wedge plates gave the outer edges of the mandibles, which was a nice continuation of the sidewalls from the main hull.

Thanks, quite happy with it's look, too! Thank you! Yeah, I wondered about calling it UCS as it's quite nebulous, and Lego uses it for a variety of scales and detail levels, and in my mind serves a similar role of display for the collector who wants the best they can get at the scale. Can be used as an indicator of the part count and price-tag (part count wise it's pretty close to the recent UCS A-wing, 1573 vs 1672), though my Defender is cheaper than any UCS set they'd put out these days (about $150 estimated new on Bricklink for where I am right now before shipping, and regular Lego Starwars sets are more expensive than that). I guess packed-with-as-many-relevant-details-as-the-scale-allows style, accuracy/fidelity focused, and minifig-scale, is more accurate, but figured UCS could be used to denote that more succinctly. I tested experimentally during design and it's stable enough without alternation between the 65578 parts, but the alteration adds a little bit of extra stability, yes. The model is delicate and for display only, though mine has stood without issue since I built it and survived being moved around for it's photoshoots. It doesn't use anything I know of to be "illegal", like connections that stress pieces due to not fitting, bending pieces, things half studded in/not fully connected, etc, essentially things that to me feel like they are "cheating" the system, as the fun of designing it for me is to get it to work within the confines of the "rules". I'm actually fair pedantic about trying to avoid these "illegal" connections and that's one of the reasons I greatly prefer to design with physical bricks, as stud.io is very tolerant of some connections that don't work in real bricks. An example of me avoiding said connections in this design from the Ad x7 thread linked in the first post: This kind of work around requires physical bricks as stud.io doesn't complain so doesn't even show as a problem digitally. I will say my personal definition of "illegal" connections doesn't extend to things that are difficult for children or open to interpretation in the instructions (i.e. how deep to insert a bar into a hole), though I think that's usually only a concern for Lego themselves and not MOCs.

Thanks everyone, this was the first Lego contest I participated in and it was great watching it unfold and all the directions people took the prompts. Lots of wonderful MOCs!

Thanks, and neat it is the same technique for the triangle! I toyed with using instead part 1941 the ninjago weapon holder, as it has the same triangle shape needed to fill part of the gap between the 6x6 dishes and related shapes, but it was too noisy a look and departed from the smoothness. The biggest challenge were the wedge slopes need to continue the shaping past the triangles, and due to limited space they are actually attached using 3 completely different techniques in different parts of the build. The brick built wings also were tricky, as I wanted them to be accurate and robust but also like the rest of the build not use any illegal techniques which would stress pieces. The rear of the wing actually needed a slight trick with that, as the tiny irregularity of the 1x1 inverted bracket piece makes it push up pieces almost unnoticeably but it does. Not sure why Lego made that (I think 0.5 LDU) offset. In any case, by making the rear grey trim out of 1x2 tiles, which have no underside stud supports, allows the parts to push together the 0.25 LDU part tolerances in between them and solve the 0.5 LDU extra issue cleanly. Thank you, and not being a ship guy makes the compliment better!

Nicely out of the box and yet still on theme; the AT-AT is the highlight and I personally really dig like how the lamp came out, as it conveys the time period and workshop aura wonderfully.

Thanks everyone, I really appreciate all the comments! In terms of sturdiness, it's not a play model but when on rest on display it's fine. I moved it around and shook it plenty during filming and it held up fine. It sits and doesn't tip as the center of gravity is back far enough, but the large brick built wings and the thin pylons mean that if you tip it forward too much, the pylons can come apart. The most delicate part is the joint/pylon area with the wings, so as long as you have a solid grip on the bottom two wings/joints/pylons and don't tip it you can move it without much issue. If you drag in around by one wing it will loosen but it's a few second fix to press the joints/pylons back together. I swooshed it around with two hands for a bit for fun and nothing broke, but I don't consider it to be a play/swooshable model.

Thanks! Thanks and yep, novel cockpit; the desire to design a new cockpit technique was one of my main motivations for tackling a TIE variant. Chose the AD x7 for having the most ball cockpit as I realty wanted to capture the spherical nature of the TIE series.