Jump to content
THIS IS THE TEST SITE OF EUROBRICKS!
THIS IS THE TEST SITE OF EUROBRICKS!

NV Lego technic

Eurobricks Citizen
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by NV Lego technic

  1. What do you mean but beating at 90° physically? Also, my steering mechanisms don't always turn 90° untill end stop. And what other control solutions are there? I don't own a gaming controller.
  2. Since I started using the 'servo' function in my buwizz 3.0 pro with PU L motors, there were some issues that became more and more problematic as time progressed. These are the issues: When calibrating, after getting readings for both sides, I lands off center. When I enter the 'drive' mode, it sometimes steers on it's own and doesn't return to center. This can also happen In the middle of a drive, as if the center was shifted as far to one side as possible. Doesn't fully return to center. When I release the steering, on one side it works normally and on the other it only does half the way to the center. In this topic I'm looking for similar occurrences of other people, and ideas. On how to fix these issues.
  3. Very cool, I'd like to tru something similar to you jeep, but at a smaller scale because I only have 2 buwizz motors.
  4. That's a bit illogical, it would ve better called #2,5
  5. Buwizz motors are pretty cheap IMO but a buwizz unit certainly isn't. You can use geekservos along with lipo battery and a receiver, but I don't know if you consider that cheating or not...
  6. I expected this, as there was no visible linkage that's connected to the sliding selector
  7. Well of course, I imagine how challenging it would be to move a complex drivetrain by a fan or something. I'm just used to building rc models, so my logic flows engine/motor>wheels
  8. That's because front axle has more friction than the rear one, so when the central diff is unlocked, the drivetrain chooses to only propell the rear axle. But when the diff is locked, it's forced to drive all wheels so it looks like an rwd/awd selector.
  9. If we do actually get an underwater technic subtheme, I'd love to see some kind of depth control, possibly bringing the concept of am air tank back. An underwater motor would be amazing, along with some kind of radio control that can penetrate a few meters of water, and maybe a pressure sensor of some kind. That's why this is called a discussion thread
  10. That's the solution I've been thinking of all the time, as it allows for much more space around the axle for a steering and diff lock motor, also requiring less special parts
  11. I can't imagine Lego designers finding a MOC on rebrickable and thinking "oh we can't make one of the most popular MOC themes because someone already did it
  12. Or if you really want to push yourself, maybe a 7+N would do, but I can't see how could it be implemented with RC without sacrificing the interior. Or, a DNR selector would make sense if you used an LPE to power the model, but then, fitting a 3x diff lock, valve motors, and an air tank would be challenging
  13. Why would you have a DNR selector in an RC model?
  14. That's a manual model, and I don't see the point of testing it like that
  15. I said that it was a disappointment, why would I pay $700 for less then 3000 parts? Also I'm not really into crawler cranes I said it would have been delayed and not that it is delayed
  16. That is quite possible, and if so Lego would face a decision to either delay the set like with the 42146, and un my opinion it's the most disappointing set we had in a while, or leave the front screwed up as is.
  17. I'm talking by gwp standards and not by general build standards. I won't buy this set anyway and even if I do, it will be for the parts, so getting a few more from the gwp is better than getting a bunch of system parts that you already have.
  18. Looks pretty cool, I'll definitely be using a similar solution in my MOCs.
Sponsored Links