Nice set and review but disagree with the rather naive comments about industrial wind energy.
Which is more environmentally friendly? :
A) A gas well about the size of a tennis court feeding a 300MW gas power station the size of a medium industrial unit.
or
B) an industrial windfarm capable of intermittently generating the same power - requiring about 300 x 3MW industrial wind turbines, each 100m tall, spaced 700m apart, occupying an area of 140km2, plus the associated pylons necessary to transmit the electricity from the remote windy hills to the city where it's needed.
Consider the impact on birds and bats of 300 blades spinning at 180mph over an area of 140km2. Consider the impact on the natural landscape. And don't forget you still need the gas power station for backup when the wind's not blowing - although it now requires extra subsidy payments to sit in standby mode.
> I also think it is a very educational set and could inspire young builders about sustainability and renewable energy.
Yes - I hope they read widely and don't just unquestioning accept the demonisation of fossil fuels which are used to make wonderful plastic products like Lego and which provide billions of people with abundant low-cost heat, light, transport, fertiliser, clothes, medical & household products and electronics.
People questioned the Lego Shell sets. I hope they apply the same critical thinking to Vestas sets.