Jump to content
THIS IS THE TEST SITE OF EUROBRICKS! ×
THIS IS THE TEST SITE OF EUROBRICKS!

John McCracken

Gamer
  • Posts

    19
  • Joined

About John McCracken

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male

Recent Profile Visitors

261 profile views

John McCracken's Achievements

Rookie

Rookie (2/14)

  • First Post
  • Collaborator
  • Week One Done
  • One Month Later
  • One Year In

Recent Badges

  1. Well of course, as every true minimalist artist should, every thursday evening I round up the local peasants and have them throw unbaked sugary pastries at me while I do the macarena naked. Friday is poker night. I do this of course to better understand Pollock's later work.
  2. Because assuming someone having two roles and knows exactly what to do to survive is a smarter option than covering all our bases. As I said, I can't change anything, but it's not the best option. You wanna know who I am? My secret identity? Who I am hiding behind this mask... Sometimes... I wonder if the mask has become me... I am... player40. CUE DRAMATIC MUSIC In all honestly, this whole Eva thing reminds me of The Scream: Terrifying, nonsensical, and no one has any idea where it's at.
  3. Hey, hey, I am here. I've been doing... something... Maybe... I still think it's a better idea actualize the artistic values that Mondrian tried to instill in people with his Composition II and vote for Brice and vig kill Carly, but there you go. Won't make a difference. Vote: Brice Marden It looks like it could be a show to me.
  4. Uh huh, Carl... For the ones who are left, everything's pretty much clear how things are, may as well do it public instead of hiding behind the hidden curtains of the mysterious backstage. I think Brice's vote for Robert has a very good chance of being something a scum would do to another scum, to use later. The no reasoning whatsoever make it very Picassoy, very sketchy. Like Guernica. Also, with Brice claiming PGO, that would mean it'd be much safer to lynch him, and have the vigilante kill Carl. Efficiency!
  5. I'm going to Vote: Dan Flavin I gave my reasons earlier. His post earlier did literally nothing to alleviate that... Even though I am confirmed, it doesn't mean I know everything. I'd urge you to come to a reasoned judgement of who to vote for yourself, and as it is seeing that Dan is being lynched, perhaps it's a constructive thing to attempt to sniff out his allies. (assuming he is scum)
  6. I was told today, I assume I have been investigated last night, otherwise the investigator really did us a disservice with me being in the running to be lynched and all. I say what I was told, that's all. I don't know what Eva's deal is with what she's saying earlier. It's possible the investigator did not contact her, perhaps in fear of her being the godfather, but I do not know. I asked both Eva and the investigator about it, but have not received answers yet. Of course it came up to me that this could be a ploy from Eva and the investigator... Them being both scum, but... Why me? It doesn't make much sense, although I could see the merits of such a plan, I don't think people would do it. Carl, I appreciate what you're doing, but that still leaves like most people able to be teamed up with each other. Until we find a scum, and I am confident that we will, it will not be of a lot of use, although I guess if you can find people that cannot be teamed up or seemed to be teamed up that helps... A lot... As for my suspicions, I suspect Dan, after him being suspicious having been suggested to me. Leaving the fact he thinks lynching an investigated townie is an option for today aside. (it's technically an option, but I don't think it's a very good one) Dan, day 1, voted for Eva. On day 2, he ended up voting for me.... Look at his posts, he rarely says anything substantial, and when suspicion is thrown his way, he doesn't adress it. He also really likes to summarize.
  7. Right. So I got investigated, as Town, of course. I was advised to state this to the public. Also Eva Hesse was investigated as Town.
  8. I brought him up because good points were made, should I just stay in defensive mode all day for doing nothing wrong? Sure, I am dumb and made a silly mistake. Not that that silly mistake has resulted in anything, there were people after me that could have turned the tide for a vote. Saying the fact that there was no lynch was my fault is incredibly silly. You shouldn't vote for me because I haven't done anything scummy. Only something dumb, for which I am sorry...? I am just a sculptor whose intentions are good. Please don't let me be misunderstood. That's interesting because just a few posts above this you said Eva was your one true suspect. I am going to vote for Tony. (No, not because I'd be saving myself, not that lynching a good townie would be the way to go). But rather because of the fact that I feel Ellsworth has made some good points against him, and Tony continues failing to adress them in a sufficient way. Vote: Tony Smith
  9. Unleash the McCracken! Yeah I noticed the voting thing after the day was over. It seems the ´according to my math´ I mentioned is of very low quality. It was a mistake on my end. No one ended up lynched though... I´m not sure why I thought I had to vote Ellsworth to save myself. Obviously an unknown being lynched is better than a confirmed town (from my point of view)... Ellsworth today I think makes a good point about Tony, and I don´t think what little Tony has said today answers it all that well. I think there is a decent enough chance that Sol was killed solely (get it?) because she was a middle of the road kind of player, unlikely to be protected and possibly be a power role. There´s a good chance content of her posts or other communication has little to do with it. And Tony. ´Can´t see her being anything else?´ Really?
  10. Right, so I'm going to sleepy sleepy, and I don't want to be lynched. By my math, if I Unvote: Eva Hesse and Vote: Ellsworth Kelly I should be alive for now.
  11. Just want to point out, I'm getting lynched as it stands. I am innocent. To give myself a chance I will Unvote: Anne Truitt, and Vote: Eva Hesse. I still have heard no reason at all for why I would be scum. Anne's reasons are no reasons, as they lay words in my mouth I have not said.
  12. Wow.... Okay... How is it fishing to state: If there are no apparant gambits or people using roles, we will have no real information to go on. Period. That is not fishing, that is stating a fact. The second portion was also just a logical and apparant fact. Your argument is based on nothing. It just seems to me like you got scared of me voting (incorrectly, it would seem ) for you, and this is your reaction. Elsworth's reaction is perhaps the most interesting, as he thinks this argument is reasonable. Still, Anne's reactionalism and skittishness seem more suspicious to me. Vote: Anne Truitt
  13. What do germans know about humour.... You do realize with lynch methods I was talking about ways of finding out the best lynch target, not the practical way of how we are going to kill someone... You seem to be the only one that misunderstood that.
  14. I guess I'll start us off then. I'm going to Vote: Anne Truitt. Am I sure? No. A little bit? Not really. The reason I chose Anne though is because I kinda feel her response to my question was something a scum would say to appear helpful, as well as her talk about real life bonds and the art our digs are based of. Got to start with someone. You've got a red thing on your right side where such a clip would be.
×
×
  • Create New...