Jump to content
THIS IS THE TEST SITE OF EUROBRICKS! ×
THIS IS THE TEST SITE OF EUROBRICKS!

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 59
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted (edited)

actually im more worried about the canvas of the light....it's kinda tricky

Angle them with axle connecters?

You could use lego fence for the front mesh.

Edited by Alasdair Ryan
Posted

How will you create the air intake scoop above the windshield?

Might i suggest this in red? http://www.bricklink...&colorID=5&in=A

30647.jpg?0

that piece is cool! never seen it before... if it fits the proportion it will definitely do its job :)

Angle them with axle connecters?

You could use lego fence for the front mesh.

yeah connectors could do a good job but the shape won't be exactly the same....i might go into standar pieces maybe

Posted

finally i started building :)

i reinforced the autoclutch as it was causing some problems in the pinin, and it was also using modified parts such as a cut half axle to fill the rubber parts...

i'll probably put a beam to keep the grey gears together

proportions seem fine....now the hardest part: steering system... i hate it more than gearboxes ahah

hope you'll like it!

ad11qw.jpg

Posted

finally i started building :)

i reinforced the autoclutch as it was causing some problems in the pinin, and it was also using modified parts such as a cut half axle to fill the rubber parts...

i'll probably put a beam to keep the grey gears together

proportions seem fine....now the hardest part: steering system... i hate it more than gearboxes ahah

hope you'll like it!

Here is excerpt from the rules:

No cutting, sculpting or modifying parts.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but those shock absorbers don't seem to be original.

Posted

nothing has been modified....if i dismount a shock absorber it's not modifying :P

yeah those aren't original but if i have to stick to the rules i'll dismount a regular shock absorber.... actually i'll probably need to dismount the yellow ones as i'll need something stiffer than the ones im using now

Posted (edited)

Those absorbers of yours look good. There are four elements: spring, axle connector, regular connector on top and 4L axle with stop, right?

How are they performing?

Edited by Milan
Posted

exactly.... you can buy them separately from bricklink... modifying is cutting, bending, re-shaping parts.... dismounting doesn't mean the same thing :) (at least i hope lol)

Those absorbers of yours look good. There are four elements: spring, axle connector, regular connector on top and 4L axle with stop, right?

How are they performing?

Those absorbers of yours look good. There are four elements: spring, axle connector, regular connector on top and 4L axle with stop, right?

How are they performing?

they're performing great....i've used tham in a lot of mocs and i feel so comfortable with them, you can set the lenght and the way they're mounted, i think that's the best thing i've built so far :P

Posted

I written something like: I would not say these are modified absorbers. These are lego pieces, used from absorber that is made from 3 parts. As someone told earlier, similar would be to use minifig hands to hold rigid hoses. But, that is just my opinion...But deleted few minutes ago, as it was not stated in the rules is it allowed to use just shock, I think DocBrown asked that.

Nevertheless, for moc outside the contest, it can be great addition.

One more question: If 4L axle with stop is placed into yellow axle connector, does it have problem with friction during traveling through yellow axle connector? Hop you understand :)

Posted

lol so is it allowed or not?

because in case it's not i have to think to different solutions :)

btw, no there's no friction problem as it travels through the black connector on top, the only downside of it is that you need some room for the top part to move :)

Posted (edited)

I believe Jim already gave a green light for dismantled schock absorbers. TC6 info topic, post #141. You mister can proceed with your interesting project ;-)

Not only it's a green light (with all the rights to be) but I wouldn't stop Piterx from building this wonderful moc just because a shock absorber has been dismantled! Sometime it feels like people are trying every way to stop good builders when it comes to contest...jelousy maybe??

Go ahead as you are the best PiterX!!!

Edited by TheItalianBrick
Posted (edited)

It's not about jealousy or the shock absorbers, because they are clearly more beautiful and in some ways better that TLG's. It's the concept of "modifying" that is questionable. I really want to see as many MOCs in this competition as possible and besides I love PANDAS. They are great, fluffy and stuff, they chew bamboo and know kung-fu.

I'm a bit confused because I can't understand one thing. LEGO provides this part as single unit in all it's sets and it has official part number, so in order to get a part of this unit one must modify it by dismantling. Which is obvious. However if the unit was never assembled in the first place, one can get part/parts of which it consists and use them freely. But TLG doesn't officially sell spare parts, only complete units. So here comes the confusion. The unit must be dismantled by the 3rd party or it's spare parts must be supplied by the 3rd party. So what's the difference if unit was modified by me or by random guy from bricklink? Both violate rules. One may say "Me and the 3rd party never dismantled anything because the unit wasn't assembled in the first place" and I will agree but the rule is "All entries are to include only real LEGO. No clone brands, 3rd party parts, or digital entries allowed." And real LEGO part only comes as a single unit.

In conclusion.

There is a simple solution to avoid such debates in the future by adding one tiny modification in the rule.

"All entries are to include only real LEGO. Bricklink parts of complete units are allowed. No clone brands, 3rd party parts, or digital entries allowed."

I hope that this made my point of view a little bit clearer since it wasn't obvious enough for me what is allowed and what is not. Maybe because English language is not so strict on definitions of words?

However, I WANT PANDA! :excited:

Edited by Omikron
Posted (edited)

It's already been said, but Jim already said a dismantled Lego spring is allowed., but I just want to state (much like the post quoted in Jim's post) that there is a clear difference between modifying a part and dismantling it. A modified part can't be turned back to its original state. A simple example: some of the reinforced Lego diffs people use in their MOCs. A dismantled spring can always be returned to its original state by simply putting it back together. Therefore: a dismantled part is not the same as a modified part. So good luck Piterx with your dismantled springs! :classic:

Edited by Appie
Posted

AEF5F789-824C-4023-A6B2-C10F0F167ED2.jpg

Hope hope this photo isn't too big, I'm Sorry for the image, but this piece Could be useful for your lights? Also you can use an eye-shaped edge made with flexible axles. I don't know in witch set there Was that piece i'm sorry :(

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

Early edition of 8860 had springs on axels. Track down a set of those and nobody could complain.

You are indeed right! I was never aware... Definitively a "legal" solution then.

d4e4o5g414f4w5w5n4z5m44426a4k4l4y5v2c423b4v2u23413u2z3j4l4f4s2u204q2.jpg

-ED-

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Announcements

  • THIS IS THE TEST SITE OF EUROBRICKS!

×
×
  • Create New...