Srbandrews Posted January 11, 2015 Posted January 11, 2015 (edited) Hi all, Apologies if something like this has been done already, but I couldn't find anything quite like it. I thought it might be a good idea to start a thread to share ideas about the best ways of squeezing Power Functions into small spaces. I occasionaly come across images where I think 'oh, that's a good way of fitting that in' but usually I've stumbled across it by chance and the reference is never there when I need it. So if you have any images of your own MOCs, or somebody elses (try to give credit of course), share them here. As a start, I found this video by a youtube user names Zanthera quite useful in the past, but tenders can make things a lot easier for steam loco builders: Anyone know of any really clever tank engines or small shunters? Edited January 11, 2015 by Srbandrews Quote
dr_spock Posted January 11, 2015 Posted January 11, 2015 Have you done a look through the Train forum master index topic -> http://www.eurobricks.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=28418 There are indexes of MOCs with pics, PF functions, etc. in there. Quote
Defaultsound Posted January 11, 2015 Posted January 11, 2015 The narrow gauge engine by Lok24 impressed me http://www.eurobricks.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=79312 pretty good example of fitting PF in a small space. I've been working out the exact construction based on the images. Probably going to release my version some time in the future when I get time. Quote
v6TransAM Posted January 11, 2015 Posted January 11, 2015 Have you done a look through the Train forum master index topic -> http://www.eurobrick...showtopic=28418 There are indexes of MOCs with pics, PF functions, etc. in there. With the colors used, you want to puke by the time you get done going thru the help indexes here. A search function by forum would help out a ton, not to mention be a much more modern board. Quote
1974 Posted January 11, 2015 Posted January 11, 2015 Yes, I don't understand why a search function and indexing don't have higher priority? Rather more important than fancy banners matching the season Quote
snowvictim Posted January 11, 2015 Posted January 11, 2015 I power my Emerald Nights via the tender. One is a modified 9V tender that accomodates 2x 9V motors, the other is a PF train motor on the tender. I'd say it's the only way to go, the original powering of the Emerald Night was dreadful... all that torque loss from the gears... Quote
dr_spock Posted January 11, 2015 Posted January 11, 2015 I crammed PF into Monster Fighter Ghost Train a couple of years ago -> http://www.eurobricks.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=88006 Not sure which is easier, retrofitting an existing engine for PF or designing your MOC for PF. Quote
Commander Wolf Posted January 11, 2015 Posted January 11, 2015 I like the idea of hiding the PF receiver in coal. I'm pretty sure I've seen it before, but it seems more clever now that I think about it. For me I think the trick to getting good PF equipment density is to find a model that fits the shape of the PF stuff well - for example such that you can line up a vertical M motor and a battery box and another vertical M motor without having a bunch of used volume in between or around. Quote
Chromeknight Posted January 12, 2015 Posted January 12, 2015 Some examples you might like to look at are 6-wide steam shunter 7-wide British railways type 01 6-wide BR Class 08 Tiny PF shunter Another, simpler Class 08 Quote
Brickthus Posted January 12, 2015 Posted January 12, 2015 8mm scale Class 08 shunter with 2 gears 0.5-3.5 and 3-20mph and a 3rd gear for decoupling. Crams in LiPo battery, IR Receiver, M-motor for gear selection and L-Motor for power. Mark Quote
Srbandrews Posted January 13, 2015 Author Posted January 13, 2015 Some really great uses of space here. Chromeknight, some of those shunters are fantastic. That 'Tiny PF Shunter' is very cleverly done. I really like this one I found on youtube too: I suppose it's to be expected that diesels are less complicated than steam. I love Class 08s and would like to add one to my collection at some stage, but I think I'd like to do a self-contained steam shunter first. Here is one concept I've been working on, based on a Manning-Wardle style saddle tank: It's really not easy squeezing everything in and preserving some kind of shape. Just focusing on shape and size and not detail at the moment. Quote
ScotNick Posted January 13, 2015 Posted January 13, 2015 You might also want to have a look at Carl's great 08 shunter: Quote
Srbandrews Posted January 13, 2015 Author Posted January 13, 2015 You might also want to have a look at Carl's great 08 shunter: https://www.flickr.c...57633434965560/ While I do think that's a really nice engine, it uses too many custom and modified parts for me. I mean using custom wheels is one thing, but cutting up baseplates... T__T Quote
rsb0204 Posted January 14, 2015 Posted January 14, 2015 I run a 7597 with PF, only I use the batterybox from the monorails (you know, the ones that actually take a 9v battery). they are much smaller than the PF batteryboxes, I think 7597 looks more natural this way than the other PF mods ive seen (with their huge tenders ). Quote
peterab Posted January 15, 2015 Posted January 15, 2015 For me this is still one of the high water marks for PF use despite being quite early. http://www.mocpages.com/moc.php/151611 No obvious compromises on the design of the engine, but fits is all the PF gear in a small 0-6-0. Quote
baard Posted March 7, 2015 Posted March 7, 2015 Hi, This is why I build Lego The challenge to create something that looks real, but also is functioning well. The limitations of the bricks and space foster creativity. As you can see on my Flickr, my MOC of this Norwegian diesel shunter is containing 2 M motors, one 9V battery and the PF receiver ++, and all this is placed within 4 studs. It is possible, albeit difficult. MOC: Based on real life train: "exploded" view of the trains components: and finally showing the decoupler mechanism and PF receiver placement: Happy building! Quote
Srbandrews Posted March 7, 2015 Author Posted March 7, 2015 Very impressive. Great loco and I especially like the IR receiver placement. While I did make a separate thread for it, I did eventually make my steam shunter and never updated this topic, but since it's been resurrected: Not very ingenious, but it did surpass my fairly modest expectations. Quote
TF Twitch Posted March 8, 2015 Posted March 8, 2015 I made a 4-4-0 American steam locomotive that is completely Power Functions powered. It features a PF Train Motor powering the driving wheels. I understand that this setup will not haul lots of train cars at any great speed, but it is not intended to. This locomotive would look great pulling three smaller passenger and/or freight cars. Quote
codefox421 Posted March 10, 2015 Posted March 10, 2015 I made a 4-4-0 American steam locomotive that is completely Power Functions powered. It features a PF Train Motor powering the driving wheels. I understand that this setup will not haul lots of train cars at any great speed, but it is not intended to. This locomotive would look great pulling three smaller passenger and/or freight cars. Not sure if parts are available in those colors, but that is one fantastic looking locomotive! Quote
cgarison Posted March 10, 2015 Posted March 10, 2015 This list would not be complete without Josh Sanders 0-6-0 Saddle Tanker that has the Power Functions completely self contained. Quote
Duq Posted March 10, 2015 Posted March 10, 2015 For me this is still one of the high water marks for PF use despite being quite early. http://www.mocpages.com/moc.php/151611 No obvious compromises on the design of the engine, but fits is all the PF gear in a small 0-6-0. Yup, Holgers BR080 is brilliant! On my todo-list... He's got pictures on Flickr too and is working on instructions: BR 80 PowerFunctions cable loom by holgermatthes, on Flickr This is my mini shunter: KoF front by Duq, on Flickr Full PF but using the old 9V battery box in red. It works but doesn't have a lot of power and doesn't last very long on a single battery. It's using this trick to save space: PF with old 9V by Duq, on Flickr I just didn't have anywhere to stack 2 PF connectors on top of eachother... Quote
TF Twitch Posted March 10, 2015 Posted March 10, 2015 Not sure if parts are available in those colors, but that is one fantastic looking locomotive! I think the windows and pistons are not available in those colors, but a more dressed down and not as flashy version would be completely possible. The base colors of the dressed down version are grays and black with red and gold accents. Thank you for the compliment, though. It was my entry into the 2014 Railbricks contest, but it did not win anything even though it got lots of positive reviews. Quote
Chromeknight Posted March 11, 2015 Posted March 11, 2015 Not sure if parts are available in those colors, but that is one fantastic looking locomotive! It does look very nice. Not sure if the pistons wouldn't seize, since they're only attached by a single technic pin and can rotate out of alignment. Quote
zephyr1934 Posted March 14, 2015 Posted March 14, 2015 You will never guess how I disguised the motor on this locomotive... ... or this one... Grin... Quote
TF Twitch Posted March 15, 2015 Posted March 15, 2015 It does look very nice. Not sure if the pistons wouldn't seize, since they're only attached by a single technic pin and can rotate out of alignment. The pins that come out of the pistons are fixed whereas the small connectors "float" over them. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.