Piratedave84 Posted February 3, 2015 Posted February 3, 2015 In other news, through some behind-the-scenes claims, I can confidently say that Bruce is verified to be an Oak. That's good, huh? I'm sure this will get mixed reviews... William? WHY DO PEOPLE CLAIM TO AN UNCONFIRMED PERSON ... People never learn ...
Tamamono Posted February 3, 2015 Posted February 3, 2015 WHY DO PEOPLE CLAIM TO AN UNCONFIRMED PERSON ... People never learn ... Yeah, claim to me instead - I'm a confirmed person!
Piratedave84 Posted February 3, 2015 Posted February 3, 2015 Yeah, claim to me instead - I'm a confirmed person! Confirmed through the unconfirmed via the over-eager investigator ... Yes, do claim! I want to: irrelevant-stumpvote: Maggie Magnolia-Calanon for having said exactly jack-shit today. Oops! Forgot to put my icon besides my post about claiming!
Hinckley Posted February 3, 2015 Posted February 3, 2015 I think it's great. I do think the whole argument that seems to be going on today between you and Sycamore is very silly. Maybe I'm missing something, but Sycamore does not seem like scum to me, not more than you do at least. I'll get my thoughts together and vote in a few hours, sleep and stuff. Like I said, it's my suspicion. It may be magnified since it's my words being misconstrued. I did notice him pop in and out of here since I voted and he was "searching..." for a while. Sorry if I used the wrong markings, but I was trying to emphasize the mothering part which is what Berty was doing for Hazel. Why asterisks?
Tamamono Posted February 4, 2015 Posted February 4, 2015 Confirmed through the unconfirmed via the over-eager investigator ... Yes, do claim! I've got the dead guy's stamp of approval at least! Seriously though, if you're looking for guidance with your night action, who better to help you than a tried and true townie??
TheLazyChicken Posted February 4, 2015 Posted February 4, 2015 Bobby and Larry are both n00bs, remember, and fillering / random defending / fluff posting are what n00bs do. Not saying that this is excusable behaviour, but just pointing something out. Like I said before, the reason I said that, was because editing a post wasn't a thing to identify you as scum. I didn't really see why Chester saw that as a scummy thing to do.
Lady K Posted February 4, 2015 Posted February 4, 2015 Like I said, it's my suspicion. It may be magnified since it's my words being misconstrued. I did notice him pop in and out of here since I voted and he was "searching..." for a while. Why asterisks? I really don't know. I'm typing in very low light so I guess it looked good to me.
Hinckley Posted February 4, 2015 Posted February 4, 2015 Like I said before, the reason I said that, was because editing a post wasn't a thing to identify you as scum. I didn't really see why Chester saw that as a scummy thing to do. And your other contributions? I really don't know. I'm typing in very low light so I guess it looked good to me. :rofl: :rofl: Oh, this is the best response ever! I laughed out loud for so long. Are you on a Smith Corona typewriter, typing by candlelight???? You're typing in low light! Bwahahahahahahahaha! Because screens aren't backlit. AAAAAAAAaahahahahahahahah!!! Brilliant I'm so for voting Catarina if Sammy doesn't get any more votes. This is priceless!
TheLazyChicken Posted February 4, 2015 Posted February 4, 2015 Ditto. Well aside from that poignant remark I nothing even vaguely useful to add at the moment. Sorry. I have to agree with others on this, this isn't helpful at all. Do you have any suspicions at the moment? I interested to see who you find suspicious.
Hinckley Posted February 4, 2015 Posted February 4, 2015 Sorry! Very low light! :laugh: AHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!
Hinckley Posted February 4, 2015 Posted February 4, 2015 I have to agree with others on this, this isn't helpful at all. Do you have any suspicions at the moment? I interested to see who you find suspicious. Oh, a contribution!
jimmynick Posted February 4, 2015 Posted February 4, 2015 Yeah, I'm going with that too. Vote: Catarina Dogwood (adventurer1)
Lady K Posted February 4, 2015 Posted February 4, 2015 And your other contributions? :rofl: :rofl: Oh, this is the best response ever! I laughed out loud for so long. Are you on a Smith Corona typewriter, typing by candlelight???? You're typing in low light! Bwahahahahahahahaha! Because screens aren't backlit. AAAAAAAAaahahahahahahahah!!! Brilliant I'm so for voting Catarina if Sammy doesn't get any more votes. This is priceless! Sorry! Very low light! :laugh: AHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! Forgive me for disturbing your laughter, but I do have my screen turned down to its second lowest setting because bright light hurts my eyes at night. But hey, laugh if you want, I guess.
Hinckley Posted February 4, 2015 Posted February 4, 2015 Fine. Let's lynch the obvious asterisk-maple. Unvote: Sammy (the Scummiest Scum) Sycamore (Fugazi) and vote: Catarina Dogwood (adventurer1). May you burn in hell, you Scum-Oak-Syrup-Sucking-Maple-Tyrant! Or burn in a campfire or wood stove, incinerator, wherever! Very low light! I love you. It's the best Mafia moment since "gut instincts".
Lady K Posted February 4, 2015 Posted February 4, 2015 Vote: Catarina Dogwood (adventurer1) Yeah, I'm going with that too. Vote: Catarina Dogwood (adventurer1) Glad I could be of amusement to all of you.
Hinckley Posted February 4, 2015 Posted February 4, 2015 Forgive me for disturbing your laughter, but I do have my screen turned down to its second lowest setting because bright light hurts my eyes at night. But hey, laugh if you want, I guess. You are my favorite! Thank you for all the laughs. That's brilliant. Brilliant! Screen is at it's second lowest setting, therefore I used asterisks. Fruitcake.
Lady K Posted February 4, 2015 Posted February 4, 2015 Fine. Let's lynch the obvious asterisk-maple. Unvote: Sammy (the Scummiest Scum) Sycamore (Fugazi) and vote: Catarina Dogwood (adventurer1). May you burn in hell, you Scum-Oak-Syrup-Sucking-Maple-Tyrant! Or burn in a campfire or wood stove, incinerator, wherever! Very low light! I love you. It's the best Mafia moment since "gut instincts". You seriously find it that funny? You are my favorite! Thank you for all the laughs. That's brilliant. Brilliant! Screen is at it's second lowest setting, therefore I used asterisks. Fruitcake. If I'm a fruitcake then what are you? A moth attracted to bright light?
Tamamono Posted February 4, 2015 Posted February 4, 2015 If I'm a fruitcake then what are you? A moth attracted to bright light? This is so awesome it deserves an unvote. Unvote: Catarina Dogwood (adventurer1)
MagPiesRUs Posted February 4, 2015 Posted February 4, 2015 Wouldn't every Oak need to know the code before they died? I can't imagine this working unless every Oak knew the code and we kept it from the Maples. If we could do that, we would've already won. This looks like you are trying to be helpful but can't really think like an Oak. But stumps are allowed to PM among themselves, aren't they? So only one stump would have to have a code in place. In other news, through some behind-the-scenes claims, I can confidently say that Bruce is verified to be an Oak. That's good, huh? I'm sure this will get mixed reviews... William? So the person who verified Bruce chose to give this information to an unverified tree rather than the tree they'd just verified? Makes no sense. Unfortunately, this story is all too plausible though.
JackJonespaw Posted February 4, 2015 Posted February 4, 2015 Catarina, you've put a up pretty weak fight, not to mention your continued blame on topics that we've long passed. Vote: Catarina Dogwood (adventurer1) Glad I could be of amusement to all of you. Quick word of advice, you might want to defend yourself, see if you can't get some of us to unvote you, instead of just complaining. But, if not, please continue on this hilarious low-light thing. It's absolutely fantastic.
jluck Posted February 4, 2015 Posted February 4, 2015 You seriously find it that funny? If I'm a fruitcake then what are you? A moth attracted to bright light? Ok, so maybe laughing at you might be a little far. Still, this has been my lynch since day 1 and I'll be darned if I don't see it through. vote: Catarina dogwood (adventurer1) Not because she types in low light, but because she's only been suspicious of those who suspect her and because she just seems really scummy...like sticky with maple scummy.
Lady K Posted February 4, 2015 Posted February 4, 2015 Catarina, you've put a up pretty weak fight, not to mention your continued blame on topics that we've long passed. Vote: Catarina Dogwood (adventurer1) Quick word of advice, you might want to defend yourself, see if you can't get some of us to unvote you, instead of just complaining. But, if not, please continue on this hilarious low-light thing. It's absolutely fantastic. Please, show me where I am complaining? Defend myself against what?
Hinckley Posted February 4, 2015 Posted February 4, 2015 But stumps are allowed to PM among themselves, aren't they? So only one stump would have to have a code in place. So the person who verified Bruce chose to give this information to an unverified tree rather than the tree they'd just verified? Makes no sense. Unfortunately, this story is all too plausible though. I'm feeling really dense about the Stump revealing plan. Is this just among the Stumps? So they can pass the info along if they don't get to stay until the end. Is that right? As far as the verification, unfortunately, you just have to trust me for now. I can't say anything about how Bruce was verified. Sorry. I know that's not what anyone wants to hear, but it's best to keep the info safe for now.
Recommended Posts