Hinckley Posted February 13, 2015 Posted February 13, 2015 They, the genderless form of he or she. It seemed to fit when writing, but did look a little odd when I posted it. It was Barry.
Scubacarrot Posted February 13, 2015 Posted February 13, 2015 It was Barry. Yes? I thought that was obvious.
Hinckley Posted February 13, 2015 Posted February 13, 2015 I figured the PMs I send would force your hand. Quite daring to still resist going for it. It's also funny that a scum vengeful never seems to have crossed your mind before Adelaide mentioned it. I just figured if you were Scum it was a complete lie, but Adelaide's right, you might actually be vengeful but Scum. That would explain your confidence in being able to kill someone when lynched. As far as being your hammer, I prefer not to do things on the terms of someone so Scummy. Also "we", we being the town, don't want William dead. "Me" wants "you" dead, that is why we are even talking about this. Oh, good catch. Of course you meant the Town, the side you're on, right?
Scubacarrot Posted February 13, 2015 Posted February 13, 2015 Oh, good catch. Of course you meant the Town, the side you're on, right? You said we. I mean, I assumed you meant the town with that "we".
Piratedave84 Posted February 13, 2015 Posted February 13, 2015 So maybe not all fishing is done by Scum. Think about it, Lauren. They are afraid of being Daved. Wasn't a list of vanillas sent by Lauren to the Scum yesterday, giving them a smaller pool to choose Night kills from? It'd help if we could trust the Stumps. Are you going to be here every day? I did send codes. We have no code that we can confirm; how unfortunate right? I'm a certified 100% Oak whereas you are not; that is a certitude. You are scum I am sure of it! Now is town ready to lynch scum for once or are you going to be mislead again? You need to lynch Simon, end of story.
Scubacarrot Posted February 13, 2015 Posted February 13, 2015 I just figured if you were Scum it was a complete lie, but Adelaide's right, you might actually be vengeful but Scum. That would explain your confidence in being able to kill someone when lynched. As far as being your hammer, I prefer not to do things on the terms of someone so Scummy. Scum confirmed. Since I reckon some people need to open their eyes, and the deal is off the table, I guess I'm going to have to prepare my case against you. Exciting!
MagPiesRUs Posted February 13, 2015 Posted February 13, 2015 Which accusations that he made do you think made sense? Fishing? Undermining him and Bruce and being scum for it? I never fished, that was clearly a lie. How he tried to justify that in private was by avoiding my questions to it. Do you think the "contradiction" makes sense? I don't see the logic you speak of at all. Since a towny doesn't need to lie, nor need to come up with shoddy accusations and display the clever "only reply to some posts" scum-tactic, I am pretty much 100% sure Simon is scum. The "contradiction" accusation does make sense. You said the asterisks were BS, but that Catarina's behaviour was scummy. I don't think anyone voted for her because of the asterisks, they voted for her primarily because they found her posts scummy. You can't act as if the vote against Catarina hinged on asterisks, and take the high ground because of it. As for the fishing: everyone knows that Simon is paranoid. They are afraid of being Daved. Wasn't a list of vanillas sent by Lauren to the Scum yesterday, giving them a smaller pool to choose Night kills from? It'd help if we could trust the Stumps. I highly doubt that's going to happen again. I'm sure the stumps have learned their lesson. It is a little odd how much you and Bruce have been trying to discredit the codes and the stumps, expecting the stumps to do the exact thing we've complained about endlessly again.
Hinckley Posted February 13, 2015 Posted February 13, 2015 We have no code that we can confirm; how unfortunate right? Talk to Clem when he gets here. He'll explain my code.
Piratedave84 Posted February 13, 2015 Posted February 13, 2015 We're down at least 8 Oaks and we have reason to believe that Barry was janitored. I am going to ask this; I think we should open up the situation and reveal everything we know. This code business has done it's job of hiding the scum and misdirecting town and it's time for some scum hunting. Full disclosure, yay or nay; majority wins.
Hinckley Posted February 13, 2015 Posted February 13, 2015 I highly doubt that's going to happen again. I'm sure the stumps have learned their lesson. It is a little odd how much you and Bruce have been trying to discredit the codes and the stumps, expecting the stumps to do the exact thing we've complained about endlessly again. At this point I'm back on board. I sent my codes. The rest of the block didn't trust Lauren. Let's let Clem handle everything from now on, please. I think the others in the block will be able to agree to that.
Hinckley Posted February 13, 2015 Posted February 13, 2015 We're down at least 8 Oaks and we have reason to believe that Barry was janitored. I am going to ask this; I think we should open up the situation and reveal everything we know. This code business has done it's job of hiding the scum and misdirecting town and it's time for some scum hunting. Full disclosure, yay or nay; majority wins. Nay!!!!! Let Clem deal with the codes and sit down for a while, please. No offense, but just give your brain a rest.
Piratedave84 Posted February 13, 2015 Posted February 13, 2015 Talk to Clem when he gets here. He'll explain my code. I can't wait!!!! Nay!!!!! Let Clem deal with the codes and sit down for a while, please. No offense, but just give your brain a rest. Why so you can continue to mislead them? Yeah, no. At this point I'm back on board. I sent my codes. The rest of the block didn't trust Lauren. Let's let Clem handle everything from now on, please. I think the others in the block will be able to agree to that. This is the first time you reference a block; you were promoted several times yesterday and today but never acknowledged it before now; why? Is it bad that we have a block? *prompted
Hinckley Posted February 13, 2015 Posted February 13, 2015 I can't talk to you, Lauren. You give me a headache.
Piratedave84 Posted February 13, 2015 Posted February 13, 2015 I can't talk to you, Lauren. You give me a headache. Fine, go away! Clem stopped by our group PM, gave some nice info but somehow forgot to talk about you ... Weird right?
Hinckley Posted February 13, 2015 Posted February 13, 2015 So Berty fished his way to the claimed bomb? No, this is separate from the person who claimed bomb to me. It seems like Berty was alerting Bruce what Bobby was saying but Bruce will have to verify that. There's still a bomb claim alive among us. Berty asked me about the bomb the first time, but went to Bruce when Bobby claimed Bomb.
Bob Posted February 13, 2015 Posted February 13, 2015 We're down at least 8 Oaks and we have reason to believe that Barry was janitored. I am going to ask this; I think we should open up the situation and reveal everything we know. This code business has done it's job of hiding the scum and misdirecting town and it's time for some scum hunting. Full disclosure, yay or nay; majority wins. How do the rest of the stumps feel about this? Are they on board with dumping all of the accumulated knowledge as well? I don't think it's a good idea to reveal every role that's out there. As of right now I'm going to have to go with nay, because whilst this whole code situation has been a bit of a debacle, I don't think it's really logical to reveal everything full boat.
Tamamono Posted February 13, 2015 Posted February 13, 2015 William and Simon - cut it out. I really think you are both Oaks, and this is doing nothing but fueling the Maple fire. We can't let that happen anymore. This is completely ridiculous. I'm sorry, but is this weird to anyone else? Since when has a neutral party had to last until an arbitrary day like Day Four? Most neutrals have to last until the end of the game or have to be purposefully lynched, not killed mid-game. It just sounds way too suspicious for me. I know, this is why this weirded me out... Barry Cherry's claim code matches one he sent me, and it was not bomb or vigilante. Well, to be fair, if you were a neutral survivor who blew people up or... whatever would you really claim that role??? If Barry was janitored, why? Is it possible that the Maples knew Barry was the "bomb" so they janitored him? Unless the the "Alignment Unknown" is supposed to be for a Neutral tree, than I think we might be viewing this the wrong way. It's too risky to janitor someone you don't know will die... There's no way "Alignment Unknown" means Neutral. That's completely unfair. I am going to ask this; I think we should open up the situation and reveal everything we know. This code business has done it's job of hiding the scum and misdirecting town and it's time for some scum hunting. Full disclosure, yay or nay; majority wins. Nay. I think you guys should deal with the rest of the claims. Clem was pretty townie in the thread, so I had codes with him (as opposed to with the rest of you scummy stumps ), and it seems like a lot of people share my sentiments. Get everything straightened out and then we can do it. Be patient.
Hinckley Posted February 13, 2015 Posted February 13, 2015 Prophetic: Drama. I love it. This code thing is bound to fail in an epic way!
JackJonespaw Posted February 13, 2015 Posted February 13, 2015 We're down at least 8 Oaks and we have reason to believe that Barry was janitored. I am going to ask this; I think we should open up the situation and reveal everything we know. This code business has done it's job of hiding the scum and misdirecting town and it's time for some scum hunting. Full disclosure, yay or nay; majority wins. I say yay (as in yes, not because I'm excited. In fact, I'm quite tired.). Some of these claims may be lies, but at the very least some thoughts will be forced into those alive trees' heads. And I agree with Bruce - the Willy and Simon thing is getting out of hand. You're pointing fingers at each other and no one else is pointing at either of you.
Hinckley Posted February 13, 2015 Posted February 13, 2015 If Barry was janitored, why? Is it possible that the Maples knew Barry was the "bomb" so they janitored him? Unless the the "Alignment Unknown" is supposed to be for a Neutral tree, than I think we might be viewing this the wrong way. Did this ping anybody? What do you think the right way to view this is? Who else is down for a Maggie lynch? Why Maggie? Peter's voting was really odd yesterday. Nash is still weird.
Hinckley Posted February 13, 2015 Posted February 13, 2015 I can't help myself. One more point: I was not working with Barry in any way. They did claim (don't ask me why) to be some kind of killer, that was last night, I figured Vig, but said it was not exactly vigilante, so that could be the bomb thing. They targetted Bobby, is what he told me last.. How is Mr-so-sure-of-himself not all over Barry claiming "some kind of killer, not exactly vigilante" but is 100% sure about me because I'm suspicious of him. I can't imagine William softly accepting such a waffly claim. I suppose I'll digress unless anyone else sees what I see.
jimmynick Posted February 13, 2015 Posted February 13, 2015 And I agree with Bruce - the Willy and Simon thing is getting out of hand. You're pointing fingers at each other and no one else is pointing at either of you. Did this ping anybody? What do you think the right way to view this is? It's just dumb.
Hinckley Posted February 13, 2015 Posted February 13, 2015 It's just dumb. What I meant is: Hazel, what way do you think we should be viewing the disappearance of Barry?
Recommended Posts