Fugazi Posted February 14, 2015 Posted February 14, 2015 Me too, but I'm more compelled by what you point out here: There's 3.5 hours left in the day. I think we could lynch Maggie and I'd feel good about that choice. Well, it was reported by Berty after the night kills were in, so... WIFOM.
Hinckley Posted February 14, 2015 Posted February 14, 2015 So, Hazel or Maggie? Who am I currently voting for? Ah, yes. unvote: Nash Ash (Zepher)
Dragonfire Posted February 14, 2015 Posted February 14, 2015 I don't know if this has alerted anyone but it sure has to me. Firstly, who claimed to be the vigilante? I have seen anyone claim that responsibility and I think that the vigilante would have been an easy target had he/she done so. Jack has also clearly said that the vigilante should attack people who claim to be a vanilla and if worst comes to worst, a vanilla is dead. That is terrible for the town. It thins out the numbers of Oaks! Also, if I claimed right now that I were the vigilante, would you believe? I honestly wouldn't. Making a role claim doesn't necessarily mean it's true. Stop fishing for the Vig !!! Vig targets Night One: Buck Night Two: Agnes Night Three: Bobby If you are Scum picking the first Town name that you like and then justifying it, I'm much less confident in my suspicion about Jack. Thanks for the confirmation; I'm pretty sure that Barry wasn't the SK now, but scum. No, I've just been sleeping for eight hours. (Tru fact tho) Anyhow, I'm not sure how I feel about Jack. He doesn't seem to be playing the same way he was the last game. (Town) His claiming someone claimed vigilante, which obviously never happened in thread, is what has pinged me the most. Bandwagoning. You're taking Hinck's suspicions and Hazel's crazy ideas about the vig thing and twisting it into a suspicion. He was being hypothetical. In fact, I think I'm going to Unvote: Peter Cedar (badboytje88) and Vote: Chester Chestnut (Lego Spy). So, regarding the complications with the investigator: There are two of them. Bruce and I were investigated on Night One by two different players and claimed to each other almost simultaneously. We tricked the investigators into targeting each other, telling them they were checking the bomb claim. Neither is lying, we know. One is dead, Clem, and the other was investigated by Clem. They independently confirmed their roles were worded the same way and the remaining investigator has done something no other Townie could do. We kept this secret for obvious reasons. Or if not obvious, because we didn't want the Scum to know if we did have two investigators and Bruce and I wanted to see what results they would give us. If one was Scum we wanted to string them along. Only when we were sure did we bring them together. Everyone make sure to thank Lauren for getting the other one killed. As far as having two, we know it's not standard and have been trying to think what it might be balancing. One thought was that it's balancing the stumps that are removed from the forest. It would give us a better chance to know an affiliation before it's lynched to verify theories of all non-Oak trees are removed from the forest. It could be a balance to some other type of role, a framer or tailor. We're also aware that two investigators sometimes means one is insane or naive. The remaining one got the correct result on Clem so he's not insane. We were planning on having them target the same player tonight, but now that plan has been thwarted. So, I asked the Town Block not to claim or to claim vanilla to the stumps. You've met the stumps, I was afraid that a couple of them would freak out. There was a lot of discussion about this and we never reached a conclusion, so I'm not sure what Clem has told the stumps. But I'm sure if this sounds off from anything he has told you, he will verify that it is true. Two investigators? If there are actually two Town Investigators, then the scum must have so much power to balance it out. If what you are saying is true, then I am inclined to believe it, as weird as it may seem. Could they be some form of Investigator Faith Healers or something like that? I remember reading a game in which there were faith healers....
Fugazi Posted February 14, 2015 Posted February 14, 2015 Voting Update: Peter Cedar (badboytje88) - 2 (Dragonfire, Bob) Hazel Hazelnut (Goliath) - 1 (Jamesn) Jack Pine (mostlytechnic) - 1 (Hinckley) Simon Persimmon (Hinckley) - 1 (Scubacarrot) There are 34 Hours remaining in DAy 4. It takes 8 votes to lynch. There's 3.5 hours left in the day. I think there are 24 hours left or so...
Hinckley Posted February 14, 2015 Posted February 14, 2015 Could they be some form of Investigator Faith Healers or something like that? I remember reading a game in which there were faith healers.... Isn't that a protector? I think there are 24 hours left or so... Oh, really?? Sorry. I was getting annoyed that people weren't around. Now, I see we have some time. Hilarious. Sorry.
Dragonfire Posted February 14, 2015 Posted February 14, 2015 After our discussions and knowing the vig targeted Bobby, I'm assuming Barry was Scum. So, if that's true, these posts are interesting: He loves to defend Berty. He even makes an excuse for him not claiming in his first post in the guise of a wise Mafia lesson. Why is everyone so educated on Millers? I had no idea there was a specific protocol until Jack told me and Barry and Lassie seem to advocate the idea as well. Yes, it's a post on Mafiawiki, but wow, one year off and everyone gets all educated on weird roles. Have millers been common in recent games? They weren't very common in my day. Where's my cane? This pinged me at the time and all the subsequent times I read it. Bruce was suggesting claiming to the stumps in public. What had been discussed as unfair was everyone PMing claims to the stumps. This seems like remnants of a Scum "stump-gripe-fest". I had said I thought PMing claims to Lauren would break the game. Discussion around communicating with the stumps in public was gaining positive traction. Barry didn't notice. But Berty brought the information about Barry's weird claim to Bruce. So, that doesn't mean he's Scummy, does it? I found it odd that Berty didn't come to me first to tell me there was a second claim for bomb. Why go to Bruce when we had already discussed the bomb claim in private? I think it's possible the Scum needed a valid way to get this information to the Town block without seeming obvious. Perhaps, Berty's "concern" was a veiled attempt to warn the Town block that Barry blows up if targeted for a kill and that he has a sudden and new kill action in case he is tracked or caught by a watcher. I'm suddenly very interested in hearing Berty's version of all of this. When did Barry bring this info to you? Good thing you're here reading this right now. Weird, Berty left. Speaking further of Berty, Bruce told me that Berty came to him because Bruce is part of the Town block and Berty thought that Barry might be the Serial Killer. Something smells faintly like megablocks to me. According to William, Barry told him about his "role" because William had PMed him about our deal to lynch him with me as hammer. That's an organic reason to have a conversation. Berty, what brought up Barry's role in your conversation? 1) So am I. 2) I had a strong townread on Barry. He probably saw this as a good opportunity to both buddy someone and gain their trust. 3) I know right? Everyone seems to think that reading mafiawiki is a default option for a newbie miller. 4) I went to Bruce because you were involved in the whole William/Barry deal thingy and the mutual kill thingy. He was less likely to be biased and also, I trusted him more. He was also more likely to believe me. You would just think that I was fishing for the bomb again. 5) Perhaps it was. But how likely is a scum bomb? Very unlikely. 6) Very recently; at 07:10pm forum time before the night action deadline. 7) How? I thought he was the SK. The SK is a threat to town, right? I thought the block should know. 8) Barry told me that William had claimed Vengeful to him and asked me if I had also received the claim. In the same post, he strongly hinted that he was the bomb but had not claimed to Simon. I asked him if he was the bomb and then he replied with his role. Well, it was reported by Berty after the night kills were in, so... WIFOM. Wait what? Isn't that a protector? Yes, but there are two of them and there are some rules about what they can and can't do. I thought that there could be a version of Faith Healers, only with investigators rather than protectors.
Bob Posted February 14, 2015 Posted February 14, 2015 There's 3.5 hours left in the day. I think we could lynch Maggie and I'd feel good about that choice. We still have another day. Honestly I'm not sure about Hazel or Maggie. Maggie hasn't said enough for me to comment and Hazel has said plenty but it's basically all just crazy nonsense, her trying to start a bandwagon, or her trying to fish for the vigilante. I'm still uncertain about Peter, because I don't think he's even been back to say anything since I voted for him. I'm not sure which I find scummier at the moment. I think there are 24 hours left or so... Oh, it would appear that Sammy has ninja'd me.
Hinckley Posted February 14, 2015 Posted February 14, 2015 4) I went to Bruce because you were involved in the whole William/Barry deal thingy and the mutual kill thingy. Remind me again how you knew about the deal with William? 6) Very recently; at 07:10pm forum time before the night action deadline. 3 hours after Day 3 ended?
jimmynick Posted February 14, 2015 Posted February 14, 2015 3 hours after Day 3 ended? Time zones? For example, your post says "2:13" to me, but probably says "8:13" to one our English trees.
Hinckley Posted February 14, 2015 Posted February 14, 2015 Time zones? For example, your post says "2:13" to me, but probably says "8:13" to one our English trees. That's why I'm asking for reference to the end of the day.
jimmynick Posted February 14, 2015 Posted February 14, 2015 We're also aware that two investigators sometimes means one is insane or naive. The remaining one got the correct result on Clem so he's not insane. We were planning on having them target the same player tonight, but now that plan has been thwarted. If you aren't sure the second investigator isn't naive, then we can't be sure you or Bruce is verified. Why should we accept that you are an Oak at face value, then?
Hinckley Posted February 14, 2015 Posted February 14, 2015 If you aren't sure the second investigator isn't naive, then we can't be sure you or Bruce is verified. Why should we accept that you are an Oak at face value, then? As I mentioned, there are other things that make us trust each other. We are working to ensure we have a valid investigator. The potential naivete of the investigator is why we're not all sitting in one big happy PM together. None of the targets or identities are being shared. We are being careful about Night Action discussion so we're not risking any Power Role or their result being tampered with. I'm transferring info back and forth amongst the claimants and the others we've been able to verify. Even if they are both legit, there's still a potential of a Godfather or a framer/tailor. We've discussed the possibilities endlessly, as you could imagine. Considering the Scum or the mechanics in general have some way to hinder our knowledge of alignment of those who die or are lynched, two legit investigators might be a balance to that. But, we are keeping all options in mind. None of us feel 100% comfortable.
mostlytechnic Posted February 14, 2015 Posted February 14, 2015 (whole bunch of twisted misquotes removed for sanity) Lemme address these, so that fighting over me is not a distraction today. And anyone who wants the context, click the little arrow next to Hazel's name there to see her post. Most of what you argued against me was my stating hypotheticals or explaining a theory, not stating facts. First, the "don't bandwagon me" was an OBVIOUS joke after I used carets in my post and after we lost a townie due to asterisks. Second, saying codes can be used to mislead. Even right there in what you quoted was me saying the misleading was to prevent the maples from learning anything when you use the codes. For example, if I said "hey stumps, I think Joe is a 123" then the maples would know I was thinking Joe was a power role. On the other hand, I could say "hey stumps, I think Joe is a 123 and Jeremy is a 456 and John is a 789" and then the stumps could check and see that 123 was the only code I actually used, but the maples wouldn't know which person I was talking about. And as for sending codes to people I didn't trust? Again, beating a dead horse for you, but I sent to everyone because I DON'T KNOW FOR SURE WHO ARE OAK AND WHO ARE MAPLE. Once they're a stump, then I know. And since I used DIFFERENT CODES for every person, I can communicate with whoever died, as opposed to the situations we're seeing where people want to claim to the stumps but can't because they didn't send codes to any of them. Third, I never said someone claimed vig. I was addressing HOW THE STUMPS COULD USE THE CODES. If they only got 1 vig claim via code, that person would probably be telling the truth. But that isn't true now since so many people haven't claimed. And yes, I still hold that the stumps should guide the vig using the claims. Someone who claimed a PR and seems legit, don't vig kill them. But someone who seems scummy out of the list of vanilla (or those who didn't claim at all), yes, vig kill one of them. The risk of loss of a vanilla is worth the chance of getting a scum, since I assume the scum all claimed vanilla via the codes. Or didn't claim at all, since so many didn't do codes that the scum had plenty of room to hide there. But enough of that, enough time wasted on this nonsense. Why is everyone so educated on Millers? I had no idea there was a specific protocol until Jack told me and Barry and Lassie seem to advocate the idea as well. Yes, it's a post on Mafiawiki, but wow, one year off and everyone gets all educated on weird roles. Have millers been common in recent games? They weren't very common in my day. Where's my cane? Well, I took a quick check because I know I've seen millers around the forest several times lately. Cosplay school (which about 10 of us were participants in) had one. Red Menace had one. Silver City had one. And besides, if I got a role I wasn't familiar with, step 1 would be google "role name mafia" and the mafiascum wiki page is the first thing to come up. Now, all that said, I do think the claim is legit and I trust that Berty is town.
Hinckley Posted February 14, 2015 Posted February 14, 2015 But enough of that, enough time wasted on this nonsense. I found it interesting how quickly Chester backed off after I pointed out that they were taking your quotes out of context. Has Hazel retracted or is he too afraid to show he was taking advantage of my vote on you?
Dragonfire Posted February 14, 2015 Posted February 14, 2015 Remind me again how you knew about the deal with William? 3 hours after Day 3 ended? It was at 06:10 PM on the 11th of February (English/UK time). The forum time is one hour ahead of my time it seems due to the clocks changing. So it says 07:10 but is actually 06:10 English time. You'll have to work out what that equates to in your time. Which deal with William? William himself told me about the mutual kill thing, but Barry told me about the "deal" he made with William.
Yzalirk Posted February 14, 2015 Posted February 14, 2015 Yes. Yes I do. @Nash Good point. Basically their play styles seem terrible regardless of their side, is my point. Do you believe that Hazel is a maple? Can you elaborate on what my play style is and how so terrible it is? Even I'm curious. And do YOU believe I'm a Maple? Don't ask what others think because you are clearly going with what others think, not yourself. And yes, I'm an Hazel, the most dangerous Maple you will ever encounter in your life! I'm actually wondering what will happen if I get lynched, what everyone will think of Nash and Waldorf. I also don't feel confident in my vote and I feel like I made a terrible judgment on Jack. Unvote: Jack Pine (mostlytechnic) I found it interesting how quickly Chester backed off after I pointed out that they were taking your quotes out of context. Has Hazel retracted or is he too afraid to show he was taking advantage of my vote on you? If I took advantage, don't you think I wouldn't have taken the time to find some reasons? If I did take advantage of your vote, I would have just agreed to what you said and not found anything of my own. And Jack, thanks for the disrespect.
Dragonfire Posted February 14, 2015 Posted February 14, 2015 I found it interesting how quickly Chester backed off after I pointed out that they were taking your quotes out of context. Has Hazel retracted or is he too afraid to show he was taking advantage of my vote on you? Which is one of the reasons I'm voting for him. On to today's lynch. I don't think we should lynch William, because if he is scum, he is probably not a vengeful scum and therefore would have no reason to try to get lynched. If he is town, then he will probably kill Simon, and if he's town too (which I believe to be the case) then it is all a waste. Simon and Bruce are also not viable options for the lynch; nor is Jack in my opinion. Everyone else is fair game. Maggie hasn't spoken at all today (correct me if I'm wrong); plus, Barry was reluctant to kill her. If he even had a kill action. I'm just not sure that warrants a vote. I'd be happy to vote for Peter, Chester, Nash or Hazel today. Has Hazel retracted or is he too afraid to show he was taking advantage of my vote on you? I also don't feel confident in my vote and I feel like I made a terrible judgment on Jack. :laugh:
Hinckley Posted February 14, 2015 Posted February 14, 2015 It was at 06:10 PM on the 11th of February (English/UK time). The forum time is one hour ahead of my time it seems due to the clocks changing. So it says 07:10 but is actually 06:10 English time. You'll have to work out what that equates to in your time. Forgive me for being a Root Admin and not knowing what forum time is. Each member sets their own time and something is off with the software that sets it back by an hour. That's why I'm asking, when–in relation to the end of the day–did he bring you this info? One hour after the day ended? 18 hours after the day ended? I don't feel like doing the math for DST. Sorry. Which deal with William? William himself told me about the mutual kill thing, but Barry told me about the "deal" he made with William. My "deal" with William. I am curious why William chose you two specifically and who else he told. If I took advantage, don't you think I wouldn't have taken the time to find some reasons? If I did take advantage of your vote, I would have just agreed to what you said and not found anything of my own. It's conspicuous that you had just been called out for picking names and making up justifications. On to today's lynch. I don't think we should lynch William, because if he is scum, he is probably not a vengeful scum and therefore would have no reason to try to get lynched. If he is town, then he will probably kill Simon, and if he's town too (which I believe to be the case) then it is all a waste. The more my mind relaxes about the whole thing and the more we learn about what Barry was doing, the more I think William is practically verified as Town.
Yzalirk Posted February 14, 2015 Posted February 14, 2015 I've given some thought and I feel like I should just do this; Vote: Hazel Hazelnut (Goliath) I vote for myself for many reasons but I'll keep it short and sweet, for the most part. If you guys believe that I'm a perfect person to be lynched, I'm 100% perfectly fine with this. I'd rather be lynched and shown that I'm an Oak rather than being attacked by a Maple and janitored that way no one knows who I am. I'm a vanilla Oak and I'm not very helpful to the town. So why should I even be here? I'm surprised I even made it this far and even that is a goal for me. I'm somewhat sad about my decision here but, like I said, I'd rather go out knowing I was an Oak and hopefully that will open up the eyes of everyone here. I don't expect anyone to believe it, yet. Clearly I'm not as experienced as most people here but I don't want people to feel bad because of that. So please, don't. Sadly, you guys will be down a townie but I believe I'll just cause more harm than help. I have no reason to back up why I behaved like a bit of a dick other than I tried to help. I also probably won't be on for a bit but if I'm the lynchee for the day, Oaks, don't screw up. I'd say I'm probably the least helpful townie there is and I've only contributed to getting other Oaks lynched that I believed were Maples. Now it seems the tides have turned. This is probably going to be a decision I'll regret but it must be done, in my opinion. Now, I feel like I'm getting to the part where I just repeat myself. I don't want anyone to feel bad because it's inevitable that I will be gone and I'd rather have it sooner than later. And I will say it again, I don't want to be janitored by Maples, if I even can, that won't prove my innocence, that will just make me sad. And if I'm gone, take a look into those whom I hinted at suspecting or that I would suspect, like Nash or Chester.
Dragonfire Posted February 14, 2015 Posted February 14, 2015 Forgive me for being a Root Admin and not knowing what forum time is. Each member sets their own time and something is off with the software that sets it back by an hour. That's why I'm asking, when–in relation to the end of the day–did he bring you this info? One hour after the day ended? 18 hours after the day ended? I don't feel like doing the math for DST. Sorry. Barry claimed that he was a neutral survivor/killer/bomb exactly 20 hours and 2 minutes after the end of Day Three. Root Admin My "deal" with William. I am curious why William chose you two specifically and who else he told. He told me that he had told everyone who he was already in contact with.
Hinckley Posted February 14, 2015 Posted February 14, 2015 I'd say I'm probably the least helpful I'd rank you higher than that. But, you're the second player to go all self-deprecation and give up. I think this tactic should be discouraged no matter what side you're on. Stick around and fight, no matter what side you're on. I boo giving up. Boo! Root Admin Yay! Inadvertent pun!
Dragonfire Posted February 14, 2015 Posted February 14, 2015 I've given some thought and I feel like I should just do this; Vote: Hazel Hazelnut (Goliath) I vote for myself for many reasons but I'll keep it short and sweet, for the most part. If you guys believe that I'm a perfect person to be lynched, I'm 100% perfectly fine with this. I'd rather be lynched and shown that I'm an Oak rather than being attacked by a Maple and janitored that way no one knows who I am. I'm a vanilla Oak and I'm not very helpful to the town. So why should I even be here? I'm surprised I even made it this far and even that is a goal for me. I'm somewhat sad about my decision here but, like I said, I'd rather go out knowing I was an Oak and hopefully that will open up the eyes of everyone here. I don't expect anyone to believe it, yet. Clearly I'm not as experienced as most people here but I don't want people to feel bad because of that. So please, don't. Sadly, you guys will be down a townie but I believe I'll just cause more harm than help. I have no reason to back up why I behaved like a bit of a dick other than I tried to help. I also probably won't be on for a bit but if I'm the lynchee for the day, Oaks, don't screw up. I'd say I'm probably the least helpful townie there is and I've only contributed to getting other Oaks lynched that I believed were Maples. Now it seems the tides have turned. This is probably going to be a decision I'll regret but it must be done, in my opinion. Now, I feel like I'm getting to the part where I just repeat myself. I don't want anyone to feel bad because it's inevitable that I will be gone and I'd rather have it sooner than later. And I will say it again, I don't want to be janitored by Maples, if I even can, that won't prove my innocence, that will just make me sad. And if I'm gone, take a look into those whom I hinted at suspecting or that I would suspect, like Nash or Chester. Hazel. If you're an Oak, this is the worst possible thing to do. This behaviour is stupid and detrimental to town. I hope you are scum. I think Hazel is Town. This is literally the longest post she has ever made and I think it's genuine. No scum would do this, and yes, I know it could be AtE, but given Hazel's previous contributions, that's unlikely. Hazel, you think you're the least helpful? Some trees haven't spoken the whole day! (*wink* Maggie *wink*)
Hinckley Posted February 14, 2015 Posted February 14, 2015 I find the sob story itself suspicious, so I looked into the voting record. Twice, Hazel has followed me on the vote. Today with Jack and on the first day with Larry. As much as I want to, it's hard to determine a good candidate when it's day one and everyone has been posting nonsense? Besides, me being me, I seem to get the boot no matter who I vote for... But I will say the one person who has stood out to me was Larry. Simon pointed out that Larry defended two people, Bobby and Berty, for no reason. With my mindset, I find that rather odd, like Larry might be trying to defend those he may be in cahoots with? I think he's experienced enough to know to not do that but on day one, why? There are quite a few questions to be answered on that but I don't see the point in him defending people, if he's an Oak, that he doesn't know an Oak from a Maple or he is simple a Maple defending his Maple syrup producing buddies. Vote: Larry Larch (TheLazyChicken) Mmmmm, I feel quite satisfied with my vote. Alright, I've decided who I should vote for, Vote: Larry Larch (TheLazyChicken) To start off with, I was pretty suspicious of you on Day One for defending two people when there was no need for it at all and it was just unnecessary. You've also defended Bobby again and, apparently you didn't get it from Day One and Two, to not stick your neck out for people with no reason other than "he edited a post". He can defend himself, so let go of his hand. This leads me to believe that you are indeed a Maple. I'm sure Bobby has enough experience to know what he did and I think he may have said some things that he wanted to get rid of so you quickly jumped to his side and defended him. You, Larry, also are trying too hard to look like an Oak which doesn't convince me, sorry. You've also dodged some questions against you and, I'm not sure why. Even if you don't have a good answer, at least make an attempt and not just avoid the question, especially when under fire. You've also posted some fluff here and there to help avoid questions and to just keep up your activity here. I find that to be the least scummy thing about you though, if that makes you happy. That is why I'll have my vote set on you, Larry. This was the other person I thought was parroting me besides Sue. I had multi-quoted and then lost it to a backspace fiasco. Sorry everyone, I missed out on a lot apparently that I need to reread to get caught up. I am aware though that there is voting as well. Hopefully this shouldn't be of surprise. Vote: Catarina Dogwood (adventurer1) I think it's pretty self-explanatory why I vote her but I'll quickly sum up why I vote for her - She has given weak accusations with merely no evidence besides making assumptions and has overall given weak explanations to try try and defend herself. For example: Anyone can say that but how do we know if she really is? I think if she is, she'd have defended herself way better than she has. She is simply lazy and has overall been of no use to the "town". I should also mention she has said this; She says she's fine with being lynched, on Day One, but isn't prepared today... it seems like? Even if she does turn up to be an Oak, then we'll have a bit less fluff posts and aimless accusations from here. She has been flailing about quite a bit it seems like and if she is really an Oak, I think she'd be trying a bit harder to prove her innocence. Like I said, it just seems like she's lazy and what help is a lazy player? Whoops, meant "her", not "here". There is a lot of "if she's an Oak" in this vote. And on Day One after removing his vote from the person I voted for: I suppose your right. Now that I think about it, it makes no sense that a Maple would defend another Maple for editing his post since that isn't very scummy but could have simply been a mistake. Unvote: Larry Larch (TheLazyChicken) Vote: Catarina Dogwood (adventurer1) I think it's self explanatory considering what I have said but I'll essentially repeat myself. I find her to very annoying and she gets very defensive when a few people vote for her which is just unnecessary. She is also very hypocritical when it comes down that if you accuse her for being a Maple, it's not fine but when she does it, it's perfectly normal. If she wants to be sacrificed as a martyr, so be it, you can have my vote. Besides, most of her posts have been fluff. Also, I really don't believe Alastair is a Maple but if he does turn up to be one tomorrow, I would be amazed. I should also mention that Catarina is pretty good at The Flail despite the fact she can hardly move, only her branches. She's annoying and she wants to be a martyr. She'd have to be an Oak to be a martyr. There's also the "amazement" if Alastair flips Maple. Warning: this next theory might be a little far-fetched, but I think it's worth covering all bases. Barry hammered Alastair on Day One. Was he protecting a hammerer? Alastair Pear - 15 (Stickfig, Tamamono, Scaevola, Lord Duvors, jamesn, Lego Spy, PirateDave84, Zepher, Calanon, Bob, Hinckley, adventurer1, jluck, TinyPiesRUs, Mencot) Catarina Dogwood - 2 ( Brickelodeon, Goliath) There is 1 Hour left in Day 1. It takes 13 votes to lynch. Voting Update: Catarina Dogwood (adventurer1) - 16 (jamesn, Hinckley, JackJonespaw, jluck, Scaevola, Lego Spy, Bob, Lord Duvors, Fugazi, Goliath, Dragonfire, TheLazyChicken, badboytje88, fhomess, mostlytechnic, Tamamono) Larry Larch (TheLazyChicken) - 12 (Zepher, Hinckley, Tamamono, Bob, Goliath, Lego Spy, Calanon, fhomess, badboytje88, TinyPiesRUs, jamesn, Dragonfire) Maybe I'm reading too far into it, but Hazel's behavior of picking a name and justifying it could be the tactics of a hammerer, though it's a role I've never seen used here. Barry placing the hammer might also be ensuring that Hazel's vote wasn't moved to the bandwagon passively. Barry was also in a good spot on Catarina's bandwagon to unvote if he needed in order to not reveal Hazel as the hammerer. Am I overthinking? Am I even interpreting the role correctly? Ooops! Good thing I'm a root admin. Sorry! (I accidentally posted on Day Three and moved it back over here.) Hazel. ...I hope you are scum. I think Hazel is Town.
Walter Kovacs Posted February 14, 2015 Author Posted February 14, 2015 Voting update: Hazel Hazelnut (Goliath) - 2 (jamesn, Goliath) Chester Chestnut (Lego Spy) - 1 (Dragonfire) Peter Cedar (badboytje88) - 1 (Bob) Simon Persimmon (Hinckley) - 1 (scubacarrot) There are 24 Hours left in Day 4. It takes 8 votes to lynch.
Dragonfire Posted February 14, 2015 Posted February 14, 2015 I hope she's scum, but I think she's Town.
Recommended Posts