Jump to content
THIS IS THE TEST SITE OF EUROBRICKS! ×
THIS IS THE TEST SITE OF EUROBRICKS!

Recommended Posts

Posted

There are few 'what if' threads recently and my intention is not to reverse the clock. It is more hopefully to voice a 'need' and possibly have TLG grant our wishes.

Yes, everyone wants to see the 19L black flex axle come back. But, that aside, what other parts you think are long overdue? Here's one to start: The spindle of 8466/8070/Ferraris

x873c01.gif?0

Posted

Other common popular parts that we want back

-red soft axles(except 19L 11L and 12L)

-#3 red connectors

-power puller wheels

-wheel covers such as on 8145

-pneumatic brackets(Although the demand might go down with the longer cylinders)

etc.

Personally I want 3713 bushes in black again, red toggle joints, and the steering parts from 8081 which are starting to become uncommon

Posted

Here's another one ... I like the 'function' but have not used them in anything specific (besides slowing down doors as in 8466)

32181c02.gif?0

Posted (edited)

Easy for me.

'pictures removed'

This has 8880/8448 written all over it.

Agreed, it's such a pity that those parts were of very limited distribution, mostly exclusive to those two sets only.

Edited by DrJB
Posted (edited)

Guys. please try to post pictures whenever you can (Should be easy, go to bricklink, find item, and right click copy/paste). Grazie!

Edited by DrJB
Posted

I completely agree about the 9v transformer and the Technic figures. The new PF controllers are ok for certain situations, but the old transformers are a lot more useful.

Posted

+1 for flex system.

Non colour vomited axles, connector pegs and gears.

Easy for me.

cJugkKx.jpgrdvL0IV.jpgfm9vpuk.jpg

5JIoYeD.gif6LblpID.jpgRy2RRYY.gif

I can see the appeal but I think they could design better alternatives to these, like a 8880 style cv joint without the 8880 friction and larger, deeper, 8448 like wheels but with a firmer mounting and better look.

Posted

I think there is a big difference between part types that are out of production as opposed to rare colors of parts that are in production. For parts out of production, if they were replaced by something or there was a problem with the original part, you won't see them come back.

Yes, everyone wants to see the 19L black flex axle come back. But, that aside, what other parts you think are long overdue? Here's one to start: The spindle of 8466/8070/Ferraris

Since this part has been replaced by the new hubs from 42000, I don't think we'll ever see them again.

Other common popular parts that we want back

-red soft axles(except 19L 11L and 12L)

-#3 red connectors

-power puller wheels

-wheel covers such as on 8145

-pneumatic brackets(Although the demand might go down with the longer cylinders)

etc.

Personally I want 3713 bushes in black again, red toggle joints, and the steering parts from 8081 which are starting to become uncommon

Many of these are just color wishes which will hopefully be seen again. I would guess the PP wheels and tires are too expensive and have limited application so they won't be back. The pneumatic brackets are probably no longer needed because longer actuators will be available.

Here's another one ... I like the 'function' but have not used them in anything specific (besides slowing down doors as in 8466)

Those parts had a lot of breakage problems so they probably won't come back. I really liked them, but their application is limited and probably not worth the production cost.

The flex system.

Again, these parts had a lot of breakage problems so they won't be back. They were rarely utilized to their full potential in sets. Maybe a new flex system which solves the durability problems?

Posted (edited)

Seems odd that they would cost so much to produce. It was a single revolving red light in a fancy lego brick. Was it that the set itself wasn't very good so they didn't make enough of them for the effects of mass production to bring the cost down? But then they was also in the space shuttle, which was a great set for it's day.

Edited by allanp
Posted

Seems odd that they would cost so much to produce. It was a single revolving red light in a fancy lego brick. Was it that the set itself wasn't very good so they didn't make enough of them for the effects of mass production to bring the cost down? But then they was also in the space shuttle, which was a great set for it's day.

There was a big argument about this in another thread, in which I participated. It comes to this. In my opinion, this statement is not accurate:

....The most shocking finding was about sets that included the LEGO micro-motor and fiber-optic kits — in both cases it cost LEGO more to source these parts then the whole set was being sold for....

My guess is that Mark was intentionally simplifying the matter for a simple magazine reading audience. The words "source" and "sold for" are a problem. "Source" is just the per item cost to buy something and "sold for" indicates the total retail price. There is just no way that it cost $100+ to buy (source) a light bulb in a plastic box. I would speculate that a properly specific sentence should have said:

..in both cases the Total Cost of Acquisition of these parts, when amortizing all development costs over such a small number of units, exceeded the procurement cost of the remaining parts in those sets...

When interpreted this way, you might be comparing $250,000 in development costs over 4 sets, each with 1 unit, each of which sold 10,000 copies. This would come to ~$6 per unit in development alone and given that only a small portion of the final cost of a retail set is part cost, could exceed the cost of all the other parts in the set. This also fits better with the fact that apparently "no one actually knew". Certainly the per item cost of the element was known. The statement only makes sense if you consider that no one had bothered to amortize the development cost to figure out the total cost.

Posted

Those are some interesting points you made, Blakbird. I think Lego did learn from these mistakes, though.

Back on topic, I'd like to see these parts return:

x334c01.gif?0

Znap flex axle. Although, I heard that they can actually be unwound by being twisted the wrong way, so maybe an improved version.

73090b.gif

Weight brick

2986.gif?0

Micro motor

67c01.jpg?0

Air Tank

32003.jpg?032004a.jpg?1

5571 Black Cat wheels and tires.

32078.jpg?032077.jpg?0

3 spoke wheels.

32305.gif?0

70644.gif?0

Metal hook.

x784.jpg?0

Hailfire wheels

41681c01.gif?0

These click joints

53178.gif?0

Cylinder brackets. Yes, I know, we will be getting longer cylinders, but still, there is no other good method of joining pneumatic cylinders back to back.

It's not parts, but I've got some other things that would fall under stuff that Lego should bring back.

Colors:

Dark pearl gray

Teal. Teal. TEAL!!!!

Other:

Parts packs, with a variety of beams in a variety of colors, or panels, or a variety of parts like pneumatic parts

Universal sets.

Posted (edited)

2986.gif?0

Micro motor

Yes I would also like to see the return of the micro motor. But I think we should get the gear blocks and chain set back.

Edited by Blakbird
: Please, please trim your quotes!
Posted

Yes I would also like to see the return of the micro motor. But I think we should get the gear blocks and chain set back.

While I'm certain the little red beast won't make a return, I'm equally certain there will be something to take its place, in the form of an S or XS PF motor.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...