Piratedave84 Posted May 20, 2015 Posted May 20, 2015 What happened to the whole "If Brian is scum then Russell is also scum" theory from yesterday? I'm courious to see why the main supporters of that theory are now focusing elsewhere. Regarding Ace, it seems to me that scum would have made an effort,would have been pressured by their peers, to vote so as not to accrue unnecessary penalty vote adnd subsequently become an easy lynch. This is not to say he HAS to be town, he has been very quiet; lurking even. I'm acually going to Vote: Gregory McHenry (Lady K) based mostly on a gut feeling. I'm also curious of last night's results; surely by now the cop has confirmed someone.
Piratedave84 Posted May 20, 2015 Posted May 20, 2015 Does this bother anyone else? It's weird that two people (one a confirmed scumbag) arrived at the same conclusion about Sarah's inactivity (even when other people were just as inactive) within minutes of each other. And why is Eric rolling his eyes when someone else has the same opinion as him? It almost feels like he was trying to point out that both of their votes were a coincidence in an attempt to distance themselves from each other. I still don't have much confidence in Russell's behaviour either. I'm comfortable voting for either of the remaining Sarah bandwagoners today. I also noiced that whil re-reading yesterdays' logs. Yesterday's vote also came in later, once majority was reachd and it was clear that there was no way to save himself. You know what, this is more tangible than my initial gut feeling so Unvote: Gregory McHenry (Lady K) and Vote: Sarah Harris (Jackjonespaw)
Sandy Posted May 20, 2015 Posted May 20, 2015 What happened to the whole "If Brian is scum then Russell is also scum" theory from yesterday? I hope it is dropped because its a crappy theory. I had nothing to do with Brian, and I had nothing to do with Irene, and I wouldn't have to constantly repeat myself if I wasn't vocally trying to solve this mess instead of lurking around like half of the players. The cop should have had every opportunity to prove me innocent last night.
MagPiesRUs Posted May 20, 2015 Posted May 20, 2015 I also noiced that whil re-reading yesterdays' logs. Yesterday's vote also came in later, once majority was reachd and it was clear that there was no way to save himself. You know what, this is more tangible than my initial gut feeling so Unvote: Gregory McHenry (Lady K) and Vote: Sarah Harris (Jackjonespaw) Why are you voting for Sarah? Are you sure you didn't mean Eric? I hope it is dropped because its a crappy theory. I had nothing to do with Brian, and I had nothing to do with Irene, and I wouldn't have to constantly repeat myself if I wasn't vocally trying to solve this mess instead of lurking around like half of the players. The cop should have had every opportunity to prove me innocent last night. You're right that you had nothing to do with Brian or Irene, because you avoided voting for either one of them. You and Irene had an argument yesterday, which is what I'd expect two scum to do if everyone was suggesting there was scum on the Sarah bandwagon. Make it look like you weren't affiliated if either of you were lynched. And despite your suspicions of each other, neither of you actually voted for each other. Perhaps you were hoping the Gregory bandwagon would emerge as an alternative? Unfortunately we can't investigate everyone. It is interesting how insistent you are on being investigated or tracked though.
StickFig Posted May 20, 2015 Posted May 20, 2015 My theory is that since there are so many different role claims, there might be a second Mafia family besides the dreadful Milano. Really? This is what you think? Pamela and I agreed though that today's Lynch should go to either Ace, or Greg, both of whom have behaved scummily in similar yet different ways. Ace, from her actions and thoughts on the Shadows lynch on day one, and Greg for whatever reason tipped everybody off to him in the first place, and for oscillating on the Shadows lynch. Regarding Ace, it seems to me that scum would have made an effort,would have been pressured by their peers, to vote so as not to accrue unnecessary penalty vote and subsequently become an easy lynch. I was leaning towards Ace, based on other people's suspicions, until you pointed this out. And I never did figure out the suspicion against Greg. Plenty of people (including Pamela, as I pointed out yesterday) were ambivalent on the Brian lynch. However, I don't feel as if I'm ready to vote for you yet, and since I want to hear from him more, I'm going to Vote: Eric (Palathdric) until he speaks about his seeming involvement and defence of known scum Irene. This is the most interesting story of today. I will Vote: Eric Foster (Palathadric) for now because I want to hear something from him on this matter as well, and hey, voting is open! I'm also curious of last night's results[/font][/color]; surely by now the cop has confirmed someone. Yes, were we lucky enough to find (another) scum? Who has been cleared? Is anyone investigating anyone? You know what, this is more tangible than my initial gut feeling so Unvote: Gregory McHenry (Lady K) and Vote: Sarah Harris (Jackjonespaw) Why are you voting for Sarah? Are you sure you didn't mean Eric? I concur with Al: what are you talking about, Wanda?
Dannylonglegs Posted May 20, 2015 Posted May 20, 2015 Guys, we can't simply rely on night actions to get our job done. That's lazy. Al claimed watcher, and voting off a potential power role day one is idiotic. Thus, since Brian had not claimed a role, the vote went back to Brian. I agreed with Brian that Al's quietness at the time was suspicious, and took my vote off him and put it on Al, but when Al claimed watcher, I had to vote for Brian again, due to his lack of conviction on his vote for Greg, and seemingly trying to vote off a quiet and content lacking townie. I am however still suspicious of Greg. Brian's lack of a vote on him is curious in the long run, unless he was attempting to create a scenario where we'd kill Greg through potential affiliation. That first part is an ok explanation of what might have been going through your head if you are town... but the theory in the second half makes no sense. Not sure how Pamela felt about your sausage (which might be a matter you'd want to take up with Al), but I'm happily married. So keep that sausage where it belongs, sir! Day 3: The Day of Fluff Posts! I'll have you know that she loved my sausage! She came time and time again for my sausage! Everyone loves my sausage! I am a master chef! My sausage belongs in everyone's mouths! Maybe he was trying to hide his scum pal, Greg, by just avoiding contact whatsoever. That sounds a lot more likely. Honestly, it was for both of your suggested reasons. You claimed a power role, and we needed a day one lynch. It would've been foolish of me to vote off a power role, and to keep my vote on a power role player after claim so would be even stupider and scummier looking. That and we needed an anchor point, and Brian's lynch was one I originally backed and the most likely to occur. I know it makes me look scummy, but that's the reason why. I'm not a scumbum, though. *to the tune of Rise of the Valkyries* *ping ping ping ping! Ping ping ping ping! Ping ping ping ping! Ping ping ping ping!* Does this bother anyone else? It's weird that two people (one a confirmed scumbag) arrived at the same conclusion about Sarah's inactivity (even when other people were just as inactive) within minutes of each other. And why is Eric rolling his eyes when someone else has the same opinion as him? It almost feels like he was trying to point out that both of their votes were a coincidence in an attempt to distance themselves from each other. I still don't have much confidence in Russell's behaviour either. I'm comfortable voting for either of the remaining Sarah bandwagoners today. Ugh. I wish my logic was infallible and that there was only the possibility of there being one scum on the bandwagon... but you make a convincing point, and you're right. There could have been more than one scum on the bandwagon. Ugh. Figuring out the scum on the bandwagon will be harder now that there's no actual proof that there was ever more than one on it (I see it's existence as proof enough that there was one scum on it, which was proven already) perhaps I can figure out another test by going through the previous days? I don't have time to do so now, but I'll be sure to see if I can find some more hints later. I just don't understand how you can still be saying I was in cahoots with Irene, after the way she attacked me yesterday. It really brought the attention to me, didn't it? It would totally suck to be a scum if one's mates were like that... I still think Ace is trying to fly under the radar, and with the penalty votes he should have from not voting yesterday, he would be an easy lynch. My theory is that since there are so many different role claims, there might be a second Mafia family besides the dreadful Milano. On Day One, he listed the options for the killers, but did not mention that possibility, which struck me as odd. Of course, Ace is not the only inactive person in this game of life, which makes it sad that the active and contributing people are only pointing at each other and getting killed. well, scum have been known to fake arguments with eachother... interesting that you're so quick to jump to your defense with that faulty logic... not the first time you've made a defence based on faulty logic this game, but I digress. A second scum team? I mean, it's not completely unheard of... but it doesn't exactly change how we need to act to figure this all out... And also I might add that I find it highly unlikely. Much more reasonable with this number of participants to assume a Vig, an SK, and a Scum kill. (Oh my!) What happened to the whole "If Brian is scum then Russell is also scum" theory from yesterday? I'm courious to see why the main supporters of that theory are now focusing elsewhere. Regarding Ace, it seems to me that scum would have made an effort,would have been pressured by their peers, to vote so as not to accrue unnecessary penalty vote adnd subsequently become an easy lynch. This is not to say he HAS to be town, he has been very quiet; lurking even. That was never the theory. The theory was that since Shady's scum, then someone on the SARAH bandwagon was also scum. Theory was proven, but unfortunately not conclusive as to whether there were more scum aboard. also, need I remind everyone that a scum can have a life too? I also noiced that whil re-reading yesterdays' logs. Yesterday's vote also came in later, once majority was reachd and it was clear that there was no way to save himself. You know what, this is more tangible than my initial gut feeling so Unvote: Gregory McHenry (Lady K) and Vote: Sarah Harris (Jackjonespaw) You don't actually mean that do you? Oof. :sigh:
Palathadric Posted May 20, 2015 Posted May 20, 2015 So, my thoughts on the matter are as follows: Yes. There is a possibility that there were other scum on that Lynch... but, that said, I'm much less suspicious of them than I was before. The scum look for ways to manipulate, but they also need to focus on making themselves all look dissimilar. Now, maybe I haven't been scum in a while, and maybe I forget how it all works, but to me, it seems like joining the same bandwagon would be like putting your eggs all in one basket. I have to say that my suspicions on Russel have cooled somewhat. Since discovering Irene was scum, I have needed to rethink a lot of things and am still in the process of doing so. I really thought I was onto something as far as Sarah is concerned, but it seems like that will need to be re-"thunk" as well. I'm still not convinced that she's a townie though. At the very least she doesn't seem to be paying much attention at all.
TrumpetKing Posted May 20, 2015 Posted May 20, 2015 Nice to see the cop was right on Irene. As far as suspects go, I do still feel suspicious of Wanda and Russell. Russell's scummy behavior, as well as eagerness to defend Wanda, makes me feel as if they're both working together, and unless there's a town block that early in the game, or they're a third party partnership like that of Harriet Slutter, my inclination is to believe they're both guilty.
Palathadric Posted May 20, 2015 Posted May 20, 2015 (I'm assuming either five or four original scum) I could be wrong, but to me, five scum in a game of eighteen people sounds a bit much. Of course, this could be based on my assumption on Day 1 that there was a Serial Killer, which may or may not be the case. Nice to see the cop was right on Irene. Please! Can you people pay attention. Brian's lack of a vote on him is curious in the long run, unless he was attempting to create a scenario where we'd kill Greg through potential affiliation. Uh...I'm pretty sure Brian did not know he was going to be lynched when he originally did not vote for Greg.
Sandy Posted May 20, 2015 Posted May 20, 2015 Unfortunately we can't investigate everyone. It is interesting how insistent you are on being investigated or tracked though. But I did vote for Irene! You are again demanding that I should've been clairvoyant and know to vote for Irene before any concrete evidence showed up, just like the case was with Brian. I don't have a ring of night action users around me, so why am I supposed to be the one holding all the knowledge? If i'm considered to be the Big Bad here, surely my investigation would be number one priority? Unless the scum have a framer at their disposal... Damn, too many night actions to consider... I just feel like I'm being used as a major scapegoat, here... Russell's scummy behavior, as well as eagerness to defend Wanda, makes me feel as if they're both working together Who's Wanda, and how have I ever defended her? Now you're just making things up! Why do I even bother with you guys... I need a coffee break!
Palathadric Posted May 20, 2015 Posted May 20, 2015 Does this bother anyone else? It's weird that two people (one a confirmed scumbag) arrived at the same conclusion about Sarah's inactivity (even when other people were just as inactive) within minutes of each other. And why is Eric rolling his eyes when someone else has the same opinion as him? It almost feels like he was trying to point out that both of their votes were a coincidence in an attempt to distance themselves from each other. I rolled my eyes, because I knew that everyone would look at the closeness of the votes and say that we were probably scum working together to switch the bandwagon from Brian to Sarah. If I were scum and trying to distance myself from Irene, I would probably not have jumped onto her wagon so soon. Who's Wanda, and how have I ever defended her? Now you're just making things up! Why do I even bother with you guys... I need a coffee break! You explained away Wanda's "suspicious" behaviour by claiming she was probably just a noob, when really she's not that inexperienced at all. The only other time he makes a direct reply to Irene is a " " face after she says this to Sarah. There's not enough interaction between Irene and Eric on day 2, but it could be a move between the two to seem less connected. I want Eric to speak, ASAP. I had nothing to say about Irene. As I said in the post you quoted, I didn't think she was scum. The only reason I would have suspected her was because of the information that Al uncovered. Most interactions that I have are more based on foolishness or on arguments. I had little to disagree with with Irene, unfortunately. But as far as wanting to keep distance is concerned, I'm sure that if we were both scum I would not pursue the same targets as she did so vigorously when there was no support. :shrug:
MagPiesRUs Posted May 20, 2015 Posted May 20, 2015 I'm not going to announce any investigation results unless it actually benefits us. At the moment, I don't feel it does. If you are the town blocker and you haven't contacted me, please do so now as it could help us catch a liar. If you still don't trust me with your role information, remember this: - I helped to deliver up a Milano yesterday. - I announced in public at a time when no one was dead yet that I was the tracker. There were and have been no counter claims. I feel like the presence of a watcher helps to support my claim, as these two roles often seem to accompany one another in games. Also, the watcher has confirmed that I targeted who I said I targeted one Night One. - I am in contact with the several PRs, none of which have been counter claimed, and none of whom have expressed any concern about me. - Brian clearly wanted me lynched on Day One. The same goes for the vigilante, though contact between us is not quite as urgent. I'm not sure what Al Cooper is playing at here. I'd like to think he's just throwing weight on Shelly's vote to see who will bite, but if not, it seems just too effortless an action. Though I have to think that if he were scum, surely he would have thought of that? Meh! It's probably the most suspicious thing of the day, so I will Vote: Al Cooper (TinyPiesRUs). The question is, who to vote for? Brian has been somewhat suspicious I guess. I do not like the fact that he's clinging to his vote in the face of Al's claim, but I understand as well that it could certainly be seen as a rather convenient claim.Brian has also been relatively talkative, which is a good thing, sort of. In any case, at this point I'd rather vote for Brian than Al. I will however, be able to get back online (barring a really weird occurrence) to change my vote later in the day, and until then, I'd like to present a different option: Sarah Harris. Her only useful post was this: Now I understand if one person (Eugene) missed out on the discussion and didn't realize Wanda's situation. I find Wanda somewhat suspicious despite everything, but this vote seems really poor and like no thought was put into it. Sarah echoes a lot of what has been said, offers nothing more and has slipped under the radar, contributing nothing so far. I unvote Al Cooper (TinyPiesRUs) and Vote Sarah Harris (JackJonesPaw) I still have a hard time believing Irene is scum, but at this point it's the only logical way to vote. :shrug: Vote: Irene Allen (mostlytechnic) [irene] seemed active and like she was pushing against scumbos, but I guess we just have quite a number of townies are acting like scumbos. I really thought I was onto something as far as Sarah is concerned, but it seems like that will need to be re-"thunk" as well. I'm still not convinced that she's a townie though. At the very least she doesn't seem to be paying much attention at all. All of these posts feel very non-committal to me. It seems like you're second-guessing your accusations even before you make them.
Palathadric Posted May 20, 2015 Posted May 20, 2015 My theory is that since there are so many different role claims, there might be a second Mafia family besides the dreadful Milano. On Day One, he listed the options for the killers, but did not mention that possibility, which struck me as odd. We're a game of eighteen people. I seriously doubt there can be two scum teams. My personal theory on the kills is that, considering we had two less kills from Night 1 to Night 2 and we haven't had a dead Serial Killer or a lynched Townie thus far: 1. either two people were blocked/protected tonight. 2. there is some sort of one-shot killer, which sounds weird for scum and, if for town, a weird choice to use it on Night 1. 3. the vig has died (I don't know how much of a possibility the vig having died is because I think in every game I've played where the vig has been killed at night, it has shown him killing someone first, presuming he or she attempted to do so). 4. the scum killer died and that, somehow, prevents them from killing for one night or something (I don't think I've ever seen the scum having to wait a night when someone of theirs died though, but I remember it being mentioned somewhere). The first one sounds the most obvious choice, but it's fun to speculate, eh? Did I miss anything?
MagPiesRUs Posted May 20, 2015 Posted May 20, 2015 But I did vote for Irene! You are again demanding that I should've been clairvoyant and know to vote for Irene before any concrete evidence showed up, just like the case was with Brian. I don't have a ring of night action users around me, so why am I supposed to be the one holding all the knowledge? But you did suspect Irene before I revealed the information about her. From what you said, it seemed like you suspected her just as much, if not more than Gregory. You never actually provided a reason for voting for Gregory other than because the lynch was apparently between you and him (despite it being very early in the day at the time) I'm not sure anyone sees you as the Big Bad. You're one of many suspects.
Palathadric Posted May 20, 2015 Posted May 20, 2015 All of these posts feel very non-committal to me. It seems like you're second-guessing your accusations even before you make them. I always tend to that. I'm not as aggressive a player as I should be and I do tend to worry a lot that I've got things wrong. I voted for you because you had probably done the most scummy thing up until that point. I was uncertain of Sarah, but she seemed the best vote at the time. Later on I got more confident. And I think I've already explained my feelings on Irene. However, I don't feel as if I'm ready to vote for you yet, and since I want to hear from him more, I'm going to Vote: Eric (Palathdric) until he speaks about his seeming involvement and defence of known scum Irene. I don't recall defending her. I just didn't think she was scum. And...we had nothing between us. ...I swear, Ann.
jimmynick Posted May 20, 2015 Posted May 20, 2015 On the subject of Eric, I asked him why he thought Wanda was scummy in the face of things like facts, and he said: I meant that despite my finding Sarah's vote on Wanda very poorly grounded so much so that Sarah is the person I think is the most likely to be scum, I also find Wanda suspicious. Does that make it clearer? I dropped the issue, but Eric strikes me as a scummo trying to appear consistent in his or her behavior. And there was the issue of him and Irene voting for Sarah one after the other. And now he's come out with this: We're a game of eighteen people. I seriously doubt there can be two scum teams. My personal theory on the kills is that, considering we had two less kills from Night 1 to Night 2 and we haven't had a dead Serial Killer or a lynched Townie thus far: 1. either two people were blocked/protected tonight. 2. there is some sort of one-shot killer, which sounds weird for scum and, if for town, a weird choice to use it on Night 1. 3. the vig has died (I don't know how much of a possibility the vig having died is because I think in every game I've played where the vig has been killed at night, it has shown him killing someone first, presuming he or she attempted to do so). 4. the scum killer died and that, somehow, prevents them from killing for one night or something (I don't think I've ever seen the scum having to wait a night when someone of theirs died though, but I remember it being mentioned somewhere). The first one sounds the most obvious choice, but it's fun to speculate, eh? Did I miss anything? Options 2-4 are pretty bogus. It's just dumb to think the scum can't kill because their killer died. I'm not happy with Eric. Vote: Eric (Palathadric)
Palathadric Posted May 20, 2015 Posted May 20, 2015 You know what, this is more tangible than my initial gut feeling so Unvote: Gregory McHenry (Lady K) and Vote: Sarah Harris (Jackjonespaw) Although, I have to say that I'm somewhat confused by what you're talking about, because it wasn't yesterday. And I was on between the time that the information was revealed and the vote was given. Maybe I should look back. I think I'd put Greg at the top of my list of possible scum. I still have suspicions about Sarah and Russel, but not as intensely as I did. A lot of people seem to only be showing up for the sake of it though and have not really been doing much but jumping on whatever way the pressure swings.
jimmynick Posted May 20, 2015 Posted May 20, 2015 A lot of people seem to only be showing up for the sake of it though and have not really been doing much but jumping on whatever way the pressure swings. You mean me? I do what I do because I know what's going on, unlike scummos who get their stories in a twist.
Piratedave84 Posted May 20, 2015 Posted May 20, 2015 I got my people confused ... unvote: Sarah (Jackjonespaw) Vote: Eric (Palathadric) Now this is good; the post was not about you (well it was but I mixed up the names) but you felt compelled to answer it .. admission of guilt Although, I have to say that I'm somewhat confused by what you're talking about, because it wasn't yesterday. And I was on between the time that the information was revealed and the vote was given. Maybe I should look back.
Dragonfire Posted May 20, 2015 Posted May 20, 2015 Just generally, I'm sorry for my inactivity; this is a rather busy time for me and I'm less able to post than I otherwise would be. I found this in the day two thread. This is some time after Irene's ploy as the vig is unravelled. I'm not sure he would want to stand out like that. Think about it: with one experienced scum dead and another going down, the remaining scum are going to do whatever they can to avoid unnecessary attention. Seems like odd behaviour for a scum - but then again, I've never played with Eric before and don't know how he plays as scum or town... Onto my main suspect of today: I just don't understand how you can still be saying I was in cahoots with Irene, after the way she attacked me yesterday. It really brought the attention to me, didn't it? It would totally suck to be a scum if one's mates were like that... WIFOM. This was your whole plan, wasn't it? The distancing... Doesn't anyone have any results from last night? I feel like we should wait for them before we start to throw around votes. But nothing wrong with throwing blame around. And this is just fishing. Al or the investigator can reveal any results at their own discretion... I still think Ace is trying to fly under the radar, and with the penalty votes he should have from not voting yesterday, he would be an easy lynch. Typical scum behaviour - picking someone who is suspicious and is an easy lynch, and pushing on them... My theory is that since there are so many different role claims, there might be a second Mafia family besides the dreadful Milano. On Day One, he listed the options for the killers, but did not mention that possibility, which struck me as odd. Of course, Ace is not the only inactive person in this game of life, which makes it sad that the active and contributing people are only pointing at each other and getting killed. I've seen this too many times before. Suggesting the existence of a second scum team is a classic scum tactic to confuse and overly worry the town; it makes the townies increasingly paranoid and spreads confusion. I've been suspicious of you since Day One and I feel that you deserve my vote today. Vote: Russel Price (Sandy)
Sandy Posted May 20, 2015 Posted May 20, 2015 Okay, I'll just shut up now since literally everything I say sounds scummy to someone. If I talked about the weather it would probably sound scummy to you! Vote: Eric (Palathadric) I got my people confused ... That Wanda sure sounds like a true expert of this game of life to me, Eric...
Palathadric Posted May 20, 2015 Posted May 20, 2015 Vote: Eric (Palathadric) Now this is good; the post was not about you (well it was but I mixed up the names) but you felt compelled to answer it .. admission of guilt Admission of guilt? You've got to be kidding me! The post was obviously about me, since you were quoting where Al was talking about me. What in your post would make me feel guilty? You mean me? I do what I do because I know what's going on, unlike scummos who get their stories in a twist. You see, Wanda? This is someone how feels guilty. I mentioned no names, but just generally called out those who were not contributing worthwhile stuff, and Louis immediately peeps up assuming I'm talking about him. That Wanda sure sounds like a true expert of this game of life to me, Eric... Yeah, well, everyone has their lapses.
Dragonfire Posted May 20, 2015 Posted May 20, 2015 Can someone please remind me of the case against Eric? As far as I see it, quite a few people are voting for him with little explanation. I know he was on the Sarah bandwagon, but is there any other significantly scummy things that he has done?
Kintobor Posted May 20, 2015 Posted May 20, 2015 And...we had nothing between us. ...I swear, Ann. Pfft, do you think you're going to get Ace Brickman to channel his inner female elven knight at this point in time.... well... okay, maybe in a bit. I need to go get changed in that case, and that takes precious time we don't have! Can someone please remind me of the case against Eric? As far as I see it, quite a few people are voting for him with little explanation. I know he was on the Sarah bandwagon, but is there any other significantly scummy things that he has done? There was some weird coincidences going on Day 1 between Eric and Irene. The only reason I voted Eric was to get his attention and to hear what he had to say on the matter of him and Irene posting similarly. I'm going to let him go for now, since there's not a lot of evidence on his part, but I am still suspicious of him. Now, onto my main suspect. Unvote: Eric (Pala) Vote: Russell (Sandy) Out of all the inactive townies, you point me out, mainly because of my vote penalty. I'd be an easy bandwagon for scum to jump on, and yet you still seem bent on me getting lynched. You also claimed to vote for Irene, which really means nothing, since you only voted for Irene when she'd been declared scum, as in Day Two you originally voted for Greg. Assuming your scum, it'd make you look pro town if you voted for a known scum, and I would imagine most of the scum did in fact vote for Irene, seeing how it'd make them look town as well. That and your claims of a second scum team have been largely ignored and have also been misleading. You can claim to not talking, but your going to have to in the next 24 hours.
JackJonespaw Posted May 20, 2015 Posted May 20, 2015 So it's between Greg, Russel, and Eric.. Aren't many of us left, we'll have to decide who to vote off today, there have to be...7 of us for a majority? I rolled my eyes, because I knew that everyone would look at the closeness of the votes and say that we were probably scum working together to switch the bandwagon from Brian to Sarah. If I were scum and trying to distance myself from Irene, I would probably not have jumped onto her wagon so soon. Now I understand if one person (Eugene) missed out on the discussion and didn't realize Wanda's situation. I find Wanda somewhat suspicious despite everything, but this vote seems really poor and like no thought was put into it. Sarah echoes a lot of what has been said, offers nothing more and has slipped under the radar, contributing nothing so far. I unvote Al Cooper (TinyPiesRUs) and Vote Sarah Harris (JackJonesPaw) Oh, and somebody jumped onto it before me. Ah, well. In any case, this gives me a little more confidence that maybe we can secure a vote for Sarah. Pa-da-ping! I love pointing out contradictions! Distance? Oh, no, no, my friend. I thought it 'twas merely a coincidence that you both posted the same vote for me near the same time!
Recommended Posts