Hinckley Posted July 7, 2015 Posted July 7, 2015 I don't feel particularly confident in the lynch of either Mist or Brand... I do think the Brand scenario is our best lead... and his lynch does seem to be the most realistic, so I am willing to place a vote there. What? You're not confident in our best lead and the lynch seems realistic? I'm not familiar with this concept: what makes a lynch realistic, exactly? I figured if Hervi is weighing in defending you, he's got more experience than me and the balance is toward your being ok. Since you were probably ok, I wanted to open a channel for future days as the town coaleses. Thanks to Ragnvald for pointing this out. First, I didn't defend him, I picked apart your bonkers accusation. Second, Ragnvald is right, how would my defense of him convince you he is OK, exactly? Experience doesn't equal Loyal. To know I'm Loyal, you'd have to be Corrupted yourself. Going by your logic... 1. Cranbienn pokes Jarl. Could he be scum poking town to distract. 1. Brand defendy/suspicions me. Therefore he and I must be scum. 2. Brand defendishes you. He's scum (see 2, which happened before 1, but never mind) and therefore so is Agnar. 3. Hervi defends Jarl. Jarl is town if Cranbienn is scum, but then Hervi is scum is Jarl is town. But Hervi poked Cranberry. Is that distraction or is Hervi town too? Maybe Cranebean is too. But if Crabnean is, does that mean Agnar isn't since he poked Crabnizle? Or maybe sometimes scum do randomly defendy/suspicion townies just to screw up neat chains of logic... Even knowing now that you meant me when you said Hervi, I have no idea what your point was here. What were you trying to say? Leave the watching to Heimdall. I'm watching you, and only you, Pudding-head. The amount of suspicious-ness you throw on others directly reflects the amount of guilt you have inside. I think you are compensating for something... I super am not comfortable with this. Brand is watching only me yet he throws me a potato all "You are town–reading to me! Bler bler bler..." So many people's behavior I don't like today...
MagPiesRUs Posted July 7, 2015 Author Posted July 7, 2015 Vote Count Brand (Brickelodeon): 13 votes (Penalty x5, Palathadric, Chromeknight, Jackjonespaw, KingoftheZempk, Hinckley, Lord Duvors, TrumpetKing, Darkdragon) Mist (Mencot): 2 votes (Dragonfire, Lady K) Munud the Strange (mostlytechnic): 2 votes (CallMePie, Tamamono) Tarben the Wise (Tamamono): 1 vote (Brickelodeon) 12 votes are required to lynch. Just under 31 hours remain in the day. NOTE: In the event that more than one player has a "majority" of 12 votes at the end of the Day, the player with the most votes will be lynched.
Chromeknight Posted July 7, 2015 Posted July 7, 2015 Even knowing now that you meant me when you said Hervi, I have no idea what your point was here. What were you trying to say? I was responding to the assertion that town don't defend town and scum don't defend town. The incoherence is a demonstration that that assertion does not hold up. As for knowing if you're loyal or not, I don't know that. I do know that you don't have a problem with Jarl, you have brought no reason to suspect him and have rubbished the slight reason I brought up. That's why I think he might possibly be town. But possibly doesn't equal trust, in either him or you.
jluck Posted July 7, 2015 Posted July 7, 2015 Vote Count Brand (Brickelodeon): 13 votes (Penalty x5, Palathadric, Chromeknight, Jackjonespaw, KingoftheZempk, Hinckley, Lord Duvors, TrumpetKing, Darkdragon) Mist (Mencot): 2 votes (Dragonfire, Lady K) Munud the Strange (mostlytechnic): 2 votes (CallMePie, Tamamono) Tarben the Wise (Tamamono): 1 vote (Brickelodeon) 12 votes are required to lynch. Just under 31 hours remain in the day. NOTE: In the event that more than one player has a "majority" of 12 votes at the end of the Day, the player with the most votes will be lynched. You missed one in post 224. Add mine to it. vote: Cranebeinn the Redder (chromeknight) For the suspicions I gave in post 205...and because he doesn't have his name in his signature On a day when I think our lynch is more convenient than convincing, Cranebeinn's actions are more akin to what I'd expect scum to be doing day one.
Chromeknight Posted July 7, 2015 Posted July 7, 2015 You missed one in post 224. Add mine to it. vote: Cranebeinn the Redder (chromeknight) ... because he doesn't have his name in his signature Bwhahahahahaaaaaaaa! Oh. Man. Bestest reason ever! Fixed.
Mencot Posted July 7, 2015 Posted July 7, 2015 For a day one this has been busy and messed up stuff, lets see what we will figure out on day two about this all. But: You’ve said this kind of thing before. If you have to keep restating that you have nothing to hide, then you might just be hiding something after all. There’s been a lot of strange goings-on here, but I find Cranebeinn’s behavior to be some of the weirdest. So for now I’m going to Vote: Cranebeinn (Chromeknight) There’s still 35 hours left in the day, so I’d be happy to reconsider my vote if more information comes forward and/or if we have a better lynch candidate. Can you say a bit more about What is it in his behavior that is so strange!? You missed one in post 224. Add mine to it. vote: Cranebeinn the Redder (chromeknight) For the suspicions I gave in post 205...and because he doesn't have his name in his signature On a day when I think our lynch is more convenient than convincing, Cranebeinn's actions are more akin to what I'd expect scum to be doing day one. You ain´t voting for him just because of that he hasn´t got his rolename in his sig, that voting reason his even lamer than what is on me.
Piratedave84 Posted July 7, 2015 Posted July 7, 2015 I'm going to Vote: Brand (Brickelodeon) for a few reasons: 1) As someone metionned earlier, I fear his behaviour will continue to get worst, or at least remain as flippy-floppy, and will undoubtedly become a burden on the group. 2) All the changes in his defence/explanations/PMs is making me uncomfortable 3) What's wrong with your quotes dude; just quote the post. For a day one this has been busy and messed up stuff, lets see what we will figure out on day two about this all. But: Can you say a bit more about What is it in his behavior that is so strange!? You ain´t voting for him just because of that he hasn´t got his rolename in his sig, that voting reason his even lamer than what is on me. Wow .... you really, really like Cranebeinn don't you!!! Why was it necessary for you to defend him twice in one post?
Hinckley Posted July 7, 2015 Posted July 7, 2015 For a day one this has been busy and messed up stuff, lets see what we will figure out on day two about this all. But: Can you say a bit more about What is it in his behavior that is so strange!? You ain´t voting for him just because of that he hasn´t got his rolename in his sig, that voting reason his even lamer than what is on me. I agree with the half-troll, this is a major ping.
jluck Posted July 7, 2015 Posted July 7, 2015 For a day one this has been busy and messed up stuff, lets see what we will figure out on day two about this all. But: Can you say a bit more about What is it in his behavior that is so strange!? You ain´t voting for him just because of that he hasn´t got his rolename in his sig, that voting reason his even lamer than what is on me. I agree with the half-troll, this is a major ping. Don't be fooled. Cranebeinn the Redder changed my quote in a very manipulative way. Look what I said: You missed one in post 224. Add mine to it. vote: Cranebeinn the Redder (chromeknight) For the suspicions I gave in post 205...and because he doesn't have his name in his signature On a day when I think our lynch is more convenient than convincing, Cranebeinn's actions are more akin to what I'd expect scum to be doing day one. I'd already made my argument against him in post 205, which I will gladly quote if anyone is too lazy to go back and read. The signature is clearly not the reason I voted him, it was just a reminder for him. But look what he quoted: vote: Cranebeinn the Redder (chromeknight) ...because he doesn't have his name in his signature Bwhahahahahaaaaaaaa! Oh. Man. Bestest reason ever! Fixed. Don't you see what he did?! He completely changed my quote making it look like I voted for completely different reasons than I did!! He even took out the word "and" to make it look like this was the only reason I gave! You can't honestly be ok with this.
Hinckley Posted July 7, 2015 Posted July 7, 2015 Don't be fooled. Cranebeinn the Redder changed my quote in a very manipulative way. Look what I said: I'm not fooled, at least I don't think. I'm referring to the posts of Mist. Don't you see what he did?! He completely changed my quote making it look like I voted for completely different reasons than I did!! He even took out the word "and" to make it look like this was the only reason I gave! You can't honestly be ok with this. I agree that he reflected your real reason, but it is Mist defending Cranebeinn that is so disturbing. Are you saying that Mist and Cranberry Bread are both using the same defense...for him? Because it's true. And it would seem like subliminal seepage of Scum discussions... Maybe Mist is the better vote today. Why is everyone acting so Scummy?
Chromeknight Posted July 7, 2015 Posted July 7, 2015 The signature is clearly not the reason I voted him, it was just a reminder for him. But look what he quoted:He even took out the word "and" to make it look like this was the only reason I gave! Um. Logic fail there? Either my lack of sig name is one of the reasons you voted for me or it isn't. If it is a reason, it's reasonable I highlight it and call it what it is, a stupid reason to vote for someone. If it isn't a reason, why include it in a sentence about voting reasons and use a conjunction? (and you even complain I unfairly removed it!)
Mencot Posted July 7, 2015 Posted July 7, 2015 Öööh did I say I liked him or that he was less scum than the others. No, I didn't I just asked the two persons to write out what was scummy about him when voting, not just say "I find him suspicious" or similar.
Chromeknight Posted July 7, 2015 Posted July 7, 2015 I'd responded to your accusations in post 205 elsewhere, plus in the post before you'd just agreed with me that one player defending another doesn't mean the defended player is scum. So I felt no need to comment on the other parts of your 'reasons' and focussed on the ludicrous.
Hinckley Posted July 7, 2015 Posted July 7, 2015 Öööh did I say I liked him or that he was less scum than the others. No, I didn't I just asked the two persons to write out what was scummy about him when voting, not just say "I find him suspicious" or similar. But Jarl is pointing out that he did spell it out. For some reason you've chosen to only look at the joke he made.
Brickelodeon Posted July 7, 2015 Posted July 7, 2015 It seems that there isn't much I can do for myself today, the bandwagon is already fairly solid. I know things can still swing in another way still though. I would just like you guys to remember Tarben's strange behavior tomorrow. Don't let him forget! If he is the traitor (and I think he is), the scum are sure to have recruited him by now, and he's in their circle, making him even more dangerous. Don't forget about this!!
MagPiesRUs Posted July 7, 2015 Author Posted July 7, 2015 Vote Count Brand (Brickelodeon): 14 votes (Penalty x5, Palathadric, Chromeknight, Jackjonespaw, KingoftheZempk, Hinckley, Lord Duvors, TrumpetKing, Darkdragon, Piratedave84) Mist (Mencot): 2 votes (Dragonfire, Lady K) Munud the Strange (mostlytechnic): 2 votes (CallMePie, Tamamono) Cranebeinn the Redder (Chromeknight): 2 votes (Ranger of the Forest, jluck) Tarben the Wise (Tamamono): 1 vote (Brickelodeon) No Vote: 7 (Pandora, Dannylonglegs, Mencot, The Lazy Chicken, Tariq j, mostlytechnic, Adam) 12 votes are required to lynch. 24 hours remain in the day.
Mencot Posted July 7, 2015 Posted July 7, 2015 But Jarl is pointing out that he did spell it out. For some reason you've chosen to only look at the joke he made. Okay (not ok-ey) didn´t see that post. Piggy head, Are you again trying to get ride of me on day 1 again. Because "you don´t wanna need suposedly "explain" stuff to me"... or what was the metagame excuse you used when you killed me in the last game we played.
Hinckley Posted July 7, 2015 Posted July 7, 2015 Piggy head, Are you again trying to get ride of me on day 1 again. Because "you don´t wanna need suposedly "explain" stuff to me"... or what was the metagame excuse you used when you killed me in the last game we played. No. I killed you in Unrest in the Forest because you have a tendency to flip out and suspect me when I am at my strongest Town game. You know, sending people YouTube clips of Emperor Palpatine and stuff like that? Then I have to take all this time to re-assure you that I'm not Scum and follow the plan and don't freak out and blab the Town block info to others. I think this was in IMHOTEP, specifically but it's definitely happened more than once. You and the half-troll both like to do it. But, yes, that's why I killed you there. In this game, which is a different game, you have: a. referred to yourself as corrupted b. defended Cranberry Face who is being very Scummy So, that's why I'm suspicious of you. I'm not even voting for you. Not sure why you think I'm trying to get rid of you. Perhaps it's the magnification you get through Scum PerspectiveTM. Wait, why is you line so long? It didn't wrap, did you copy and paste it in from a text editor?
Mencot Posted July 7, 2015 Posted July 7, 2015 It seems that there isn't much I can do for myself today, the bandwagon is already fairly solid. I know things can still swing in another way still though. I would just like you guys to remember Tarben's strange behavior tomorrow. Don't let him forget! If he is the traitor (and I think he is), the scum are sure to have recruited him by now, and he's in their circle, making him even more dangerous. Don't forget about this!! Yea things look pretty bad but it is much about the penalty votes you messed up with. And the fact your strange rumbling, you should had known when to stop. If Tarben is a traitor, this things will not be forgotten and he will be under watch. But I still find it strange why you two did have this little "game" before the real game started. Sounds so stupied and suspicious. No. I killed you in Unrest in the Forest because you have a tendency to flip out and suspect me when I am at my strongest Town game. You know, sending people YouTube clips of Emperor Palpatine and stuff like that? Then I have to take all this time to re-assure you that I'm not Scum and follow the plan and don't freak out and blab the Town block info to others. I think this was in IMHOTEP, specifically but it's definitely happened more than once. You and the half-troll both like to do it. But, yes, that's why I killed you there. In this game, which is a different game, you have: a. referred to yourself as corrupted b. defended Cranberry Face who is being very Scummy So, that's why I'm suspicious of you. I'm not even voting for you. Not sure why you think I'm trying to get rid of you. Perhaps it's the magnification you get through Scum PerspectiveTM. Wait, why is you line so long? It didn't wrap, did you copy and paste it in from a text editor? What are you talking about, you and me had only played one game together before "unrest" and that was ragnarök 2, where I was killed on night 1 by the serial killer. And A. I have never referred myself as corrupted, never. I have mixedessed up the roleplay names but i haven´t said i am Corrupted, because I ain´t. And B. I didn´t defend him, I just wanted to know what these two found scummy about him, that I can see it through and compare it with what he has said.
Hinckley Posted July 7, 2015 Posted July 7, 2015 What are you talking about, you and me had only played one game together before "unrest" and that was ragnarök 2, where I was killed on night 1 by the serial killer. Whatever. Games mix together for me after a while. This isn't about that game, either way. You annoyed me in Ragnarok 2, so I killed you. Can we move on? You're Scummy in this game and it's hard to decide who to vote for between you, Cranebeinn and Brand.
Mencot Posted July 7, 2015 Posted July 7, 2015 Yes we can move on but you killed me in forest, It was Wary the Black that killed me the last time... But I don´t know why I remember that, has to be the mead that is talking. Yes lets concentrate on this game.
Pandora Posted July 7, 2015 Posted July 7, 2015 Well... I had all sorts of things marked to comment as I caught up, but in the end, none of them were worth saying. Just this one was worth keeping. I think this is dead on - my gut says that Brand and Tarben and Pudding are three townies fighting with each other. So no, I'm not going to vote Brand. Odds are high he gets voted off as an easy target between the penalties and the fight, but I'm not voting for someone I think more likely to be town than scum. My gut is rumbling from all the test batches of turning milk into mead, but it's also saying the scum are probably sitting back and enjoying an easy day 1. Plenty of fighting for them to make comments here and there without looking suspicious later, and no real threats to them getting lynched. I think Munud now ties with Brand for the honour of ‘scummiest post of the day’ and I am sorely tempted to vote for him, but I keep coming back to Brand. He’s made the whole day a big confusing mess over who said what to whom and whether or not he thinks Tarben is scum. I don’t recall him having any input or opinion about anyone else other than those directly related to his argument(s) aside from what initially sounded like defending Cranebeinn, but apparently was 'throwing suspicion on him', just in a not-actually-throwing-suspicion-on-him kind of way. Despite his merry-go-round of crazy all day, at least quite a few of us have managed to bring other thoughts to the table, but he’s had nothing to say about any of them, instead perpetuating this unfathomable argument, and that just makes his scummy post, asking people to add to the discussion, look even scummier. I’ve said before that I don’t understand why he felt Pudding so trustworthy to start a conversation with. I mean, I get the whole ‘everybody wants to potato Pudding’ but he actually said he wouldn’t be potatoing him if he didn’t think he was loyal and I don't get why he'd think that so early on day one. He still hasn’t responded to any of this, and I'm now wondering if he's been told to just I'm a moron and not incriminate anyone. None of this makes any sense to me unless he is scum so I will Vote: Brand (Brickelodeon).
Ranger of the Forest Posted July 7, 2015 Posted July 7, 2015 Can you say a bit more about What is it in his behavior that is so strange!? Pretty sure I already gave a variety of reasons in my first post but okay. Wow .... you really, really like Cranebeinn don't you!!! Why was it necessary for you to defend him twice in one post? I agree with Petr, this is rather strange. You have no reason to defend him, at all Unless you’re both on the same, scummy side, of course Öööh did I say I liked him or that he was less scum than the others. No, I didn't I just asked the two persons to write out what was scummy about him when voting, not just say "I find him suspicious" or similar. I think everyone who accused Cranebeinn, including myself, gave more reasons than “I find him suspicious.” I said my piece against him in post 224, but I’ll gladly repeat myself here. Not only were his reasons for voting "petty and vindictive," he also based his opinion that Jarl was Loyal on the basis that a more experienced player thought he was. I mean, whaaaaat? He's stated multiple times that he has nothing to hide, yet acts very defensive when people call him out on his behavior. His behavior in general just struck me as really bizarre. Probably not as legitimate a reason, but I have a gut feeling about him as well. And as I’ve said before, I’m happy to change my vote if something else comes along. But it looks like Brand is going to get lynched today anyway, unless major unvoting happens in the next 24 hours. Consider yourself under suspicion now as well, Mist
Mencot Posted July 7, 2015 Posted July 7, 2015 Fair enough. But gut feelings on day one probably go wrong. You just keep watching me, it is amusing. My gut feeling says maybe Brand or any of the other (don't remember any names, I never do on day 1)
TheLazyChicken Posted July 7, 2015 Posted July 7, 2015 Tarr, where are you? You haven't posted at all... You could be a corrupted watching from the sidelines as well, because from looking at your profile, it says you were active today... Vote: Tarr Egg-Chaser (Tariq J)
Recommended Posts