Epic Technic Posted November 18, 2015 Posted November 18, 2015 Are there any pneumatic engines that run at a reasonable rpm without modified parts? Not amazing RPM but it's possible. I would highly recommend opening your cylinders and replacing the grease with some better type of lubricant, even plain old vegetable oil works well for me. Quote
MSc Shobaki Posted November 18, 2015 Posted November 18, 2015 Are there any pneumatic engines that run at a reasonable rpm without modified parts? Roughly between 170-220 rpm unmodded. 250-280 lubricated with silicon spray Quote
nerdsforprez Posted November 18, 2015 Posted November 18, 2015 I finally got around to reading this thread. I love pneumatics and have used them successfully in several build s. Personally I would love to see some truck trials with only pneumatic engines. That would allow some muddin and boggin competitions not really possible with current truck trials because of electronics. Also.... Surprised not to see the work of Alex Zorko (lpepower) mentioned here. I think he had some of the best lpes available. Quote
Karle Posted November 18, 2015 Posted November 18, 2015 I'm interested in building the 8275 bulldozer. Has anyone built one with pneumatics? Quote
A Gallifreyan Cat Posted November 19, 2015 Posted November 19, 2015 A quick google search reveals that someone has: Quote
Epic Technic Posted November 30, 2015 Posted November 30, 2015 Does anyone has a compact method of attaching two of the new (the ones without the brick base) medium sized cylinders without the expensive cylinder bracket? I sort of need this for TC9 so anything is dearly appreciated Quote
Saberwing40k Posted November 30, 2015 Posted November 30, 2015 Does anyone has a compact method of attaching two of the new (the ones without the brick base) medium sized cylinders without the expensive cylinder bracket? I sort of need this for TC9 so anything is dearly appreciated I do, as a matter of fact. Pneumatic cylinder bracket by Saberwing007, on Flickr step2 by Saberwing007, on Flickr the track link can be replaced with a 3L thin liftarm if so desired, but I prefer the track link as it is thinner than a liftarm, so allowing a better connection. However, there is a caveat. when incorporating this assembly into a structure, one should orient the two cylinder so that the force applied is more likely to push the cylinders into the bracket, as the inlets could snap if enough pressure were applied to them. Quote
Alasdair Ryan Posted March 1, 2016 Posted March 1, 2016 Has anyone created a moc with servo controlled pneumatic steering like the image below,If so how well did it work? I am thinking of having a servo control the "direction" of both cylinders to control the steering of the axle. I would also like the ability to change the direction of each side (crab steer,all wheel steer) using another servo or gearbox. Quote
syclone Posted March 1, 2016 Posted March 1, 2016 (edited) I suppose there will be problems of coordination between the two pistons. Also a problem is that the pneumatics don't have proportional control Edited March 1, 2016 by LXF Quote
Alasdair Ryan Posted March 1, 2016 Posted March 1, 2016 I suppose there will be problems of coordination between the two pistons. Yes there is going to be some difference,that is a shame. Also a problem is that the pneumatics don't have proportional control Does that not depend on the construction of the servo powering the valve? Quote
AkiyamaWataru Posted March 1, 2016 Posted March 1, 2016 As LXF said you dont get proportional steering. With a servo and a valve its only posdible to control the speed with which the piston extends or retracts. It is not possible to control the position. (Except the extreme positions) Quote
lcvisser Posted March 1, 2016 Posted March 1, 2016 Can't you use only one cylinder and use a beam to connect left and right? That would solve the coordination problem. I don't see why you would have to control left and right on a single axis individually. Quote
Corvette3 Posted March 1, 2016 Posted March 1, 2016 (edited) Yes there is going to be some difference,that is a shame. How about a 13l beam on the lower pins? Oops ninja'd Edited March 1, 2016 by Corvette3 Quote
Alasdair Ryan Posted March 1, 2016 Posted March 1, 2016 Yes I could do that,how well does it work in terms of controlling the steering? Quote
DrJB Posted March 1, 2016 Posted March 1, 2016 In real-life applications, dozers suffer from what's called 'straight tracking', where both left/right tracks are not always running at the same speed (at least for hydro-static drives). As a result, most dozers would tend to steer randomly left/right, depending on soil conditions. In such case, what is done is to define one track (left or right) as a master, and the other as a slave. The user input (throttle) always controls the master track, and the electronics ensure the slave track is always keeping-up with the master. Neat implementation of sensors, hydraulics and computer code. Quote
Jim Posted March 1, 2016 Posted March 1, 2016 In real-life applications, dozers suffer from what's called 'straight tracking', where both left/right tracks are not always running at the same speed (at least for hydro-static drives). As a result, most dozers would tend to steer randomly left/right, depending on soil conditions. In such case, what is done is to define one track (left or right) as a master, and the other as a slave. The user input (throttle) always controls the master track, and the electronics ensure the slave track is always keeping-up with the master. Neat implementation of sensors, hydraulics and computer code. Interesting! Quote
LucyCol Posted March 1, 2016 Posted March 1, 2016 (edited) In real-life applications, dozers suffer from what's called 'straight tracking', where both left/right tracks are not always running at the same speed (at least for hydro-static drives). As a result, most dozers would tend to steer randomly left/right, depending on soil conditions. In such case, what is done is to define one track (left or right) as a master, and the other as a slave. The user input (throttle) always controls the master track, and the electronics ensure the slave track is always keeping-up with the master. Neat implementation of sensors, hydraulics and computer code. Wished they'd had this in my day used to spend all day pulling on one track to keep a straight line, main problem was the pins that held the track links together wore unevenly, only computer we had was the one on top of my neck Edited March 1, 2016 by LucyCol Quote
Epic Technic Posted June 5, 2017 Posted June 5, 2017 Does anyone know of some good pneumatic steering systems and possibly ones with return to center steering? Quote
Limga Posted June 5, 2017 Posted June 5, 2017 44 minutes ago, Epic Technic said: Does anyone know of some good pneumatic steering systems and possibly ones with return to center steering? I tried some, but didn't made any pictures. It is possible to have a return to center steering. Still, no proportional control. I will try to rebuild it soon. Quote
Milan Posted June 5, 2017 Posted June 5, 2017 1 hour ago, Epic Technic said: Does anyone know of some good pneumatic steering systems and possibly ones with return to center steering? Did you check axle collection thread? Maybe you'll have some luck there... Quote
mocbuild101 Posted June 5, 2017 Posted June 5, 2017 1 hour ago, Epic Technic said: Does anyone know of some good pneumatic steering systems and possibly ones with return to center steering? I know of some with linear actuators, but I don't think they could be adapted for pneumatics . I might try to make one myself... Quote
degenerate Posted September 25, 2017 Posted September 25, 2017 Hey, Last time I played with pneumatics was some 18 years ago with the 8462 tow truck, don't have any experience with the V2 parts. I remember hoses flying off their connections due to high pressure, is this fixed with the V2 ones? I plan on building an excavator where I'll have 3 small pumps run by a PF motor, is there some part that dumps air when the pressure reaches a certain level or does the pumps have a similar feature built in nowadays? Cheers Quote
Leonardo da Bricki Posted September 26, 2017 Posted September 26, 2017 @degenerate There are no functions included like that, so you either have to monitor the pressure yourself, or it is possible to make a pressure shut-off valve using a small cylinder, a red or blue rubber band, and a PF switch. Sariel's handy-dandy Unofficial Lego Technic Builder's Guide 2nd Edition will give you all you need to know. My pneumatic parts are currently in use, otherwise I could show you how the set-up works. Sorry. Quote
aminnich Posted September 26, 2017 Posted September 26, 2017 Probably a terrible idea, but has anyone ever ran water through their pneumatics? I would think water does my compress as easily as air, so the cylinders could withstand more pressure. I don't know, what do you think? Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.