mostlytechnic Posted September 26, 2015 Posted September 26, 2015 The scum watcher might not have been the wisest in conjunction with the investigator. Regardless, though, it's about damn time someone popped EB's "Scum Watcher" cherry. Come on! It's always thrown out there on day 1, and it's not abnormal or broken in any way! I had no idea I was the first. It just seemed so normal to me. See, I told you it made TOTAL sense for the scum watcher to be a thing! And yet you tried to lynch me over it... @#%$@# Federation people....
Hinckley Posted September 27, 2015 Posted September 27, 2015 See, I told you it made TOTAL sense for the scum watcher to be a thing! And yet you tried to lynch me over it... @#%$@# Federation people.... We never said it didn't make sense. We said it was odd that you hypothesized a Scum watcher which we hadn't seen on EB before and Dave was clearly the Scum Watcher. And then you kept defending the Scum Watcher. That's why you were a lynch candidate. In retrospect, this PM was a big clue to lots of things: Yeah, as a whole I'm pretty on-board with your theoretical scum team. I'm thinking we lynch one of the other ones first (maybe MT, everyone seems to be pretty suspicious of him anyhow) and investigate Dave. If he's somehow the town watcher, then we're not killing one of our PRs, which is great. If he's not, well, I can think of worse scum roles to deal with then watcher. Thoughts?
Dannylonglegs Posted September 27, 2015 Author Posted September 27, 2015 We never said it didn't make sense. We said it was odd that you hypothesized a Scum watcher which we hadn't seen on EB before and Dave was clearly the Scum Watcher. And then you kept defending the Scum Watcher. That's why you were a lynch candidate. In retrospect, this PM was a big clue to lots of things: I thought it was a hilarious coincidence that you pegged Dave correctly, but then went back and saw that MT had played perfectly into "knowing too much" if events had transpired differently, I wonder if after Dave was killed or lynched, if MT wouldn't have been the next lynch. In regards to player analysis, tomorrow :tm: should work for me. ~Insectoid Aristocrat
fhomess Posted September 29, 2015 Posted September 29, 2015 I was dead by this point, but IMO, if you have 3 night kills and an uncontested vig claim, you ought to keep looking elsewhere regardless of how scummy they're acting. And yes, I realize that the vig could've been killed the night they last killed.
Hinckley Posted September 29, 2015 Posted September 29, 2015 I was dead by this point, but IMO, if you have 3 night kills and an uncontested vig claim, you ought to keep looking elsewhere regardless of how scummy they're acting. And yes, I realize that the vig could've been killed the night they last killed. That's what we were trying to see on the last night. We were not aware that a test would end the game for all. But thanks for pointing out that 3 equals 3.
mediumsnowman Posted September 29, 2015 Posted September 29, 2015 (edited) I understand if you don't have time Danny, but I'd like to know if the player analysis is coming at all... or not. Edited December 2, 2015 by mediumsnowman
Recommended Posts