Jump to content
THIS IS THE TEST SITE OF EUROBRICKS! ×
THIS IS THE TEST SITE OF EUROBRICKS!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Yes, I know :blush: To be honest, the more I wrote about Quincy, the more guilty he seemed to me. I still don’t think Anthony is in the clear, mind you, but for now I feel Quincy is the better vote. And if I have to change votes again for us all to get a lynch, so be it. There’s no limit on how many times you can vote/unvote, so I don’t feel there’s anything wrong with me changing my opinion. Do you not find Quincy suspicious as well?

Quincy's a null read of mine. He hasn't really scumtold or towntold at all. To be honest, I feel slightly uneasy at your apparent indifference as to who our lynch will be. Almost as if you're happy to get a lynch on any townie at all, whoever it is.

A lot of people have been pinging me on and off, but my opinion changes frequently the more I read/think about these things. And as it’s day one, there’s not a lot of substantial evidence for any one person. Doesn’t mean we should vote mindlessly, but it’s hard to get a good read on a lot of people. I personally feel like Quincy is a strong lynch candidate at the moment, but not many others seem to think so.

If you feel so strongly, why not make a case against him? Compile his posts and point out the scummy stuff. Just saying you think he's scum isn't a good enough reason for anyone to vote him. I'm sure Humphrey would back me up if he were here (wherefore art thou, Humphrey? :cry_sad: )

Hey I'm here. Sorry I got sidetracked by RL. An early observation is that the vote is crazy spread out; not a typical day one voting-wise. I think we need to organize our thoughts a bit better to reach a lynch today.

Surely most Day Ones begin with the vote being spread out, and then later concentrated onto one or two candidates? To be honest, this post is just fluff.

Ray and Mike also strike me as odd. Ray's reasons and justifications for voting Mike seem a little weak, and a lot of what else he's saying strike me as trying to appear helpful. I suppose it's typical day 1 conversation starter that could be genuine. Mike was quite eager to get people talking about Perce's soft claim but is otherwise pretty much ignoring it. His behavior seems more inclined to push others.

If that's what you think, then so be it. I have a legitimate reason for voting Mike, he hasn't given me any reason to unvote, and so my vote stands. And I agree about Mike's behaviour.

Well, I really thought I had a convincing argument on Elijah, namely that he'd change his title if lynched. But apparently that's not good enough for the rest of you! :wacko: So I'm going to set that aside...for now...

So it was a joke vote......

Instead of responding with his reasoning for his vote he threatened me instead and then instantly soft claimed vanilla, as many others have noted.

That's a good point, Perce is definitely on my scumdar and I'd be prepared to vote him to get a lynch if needs be.

  • Replies 164
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

I don't feel like this is legitimate reasoning - how many people have actually contributed? Elijah's vote was wrong, I think, but I'm pretty sure he had some reasoning. I don't think you're on this trail of your own accord and I stand by my vote for now.

You know what? I agree with you. Anthony isn't really scummy looking, and I think Molly would know well enough that he's just being a goof. I still think Ewan is rather stinky too, but not a single person wants to weigh in on the topic either way. Let's see if we can get people on Molly for poor vote justification.

Unvote: Ewan

Vote: Molly (Lady K)

Posted

Current Votes:

1 Vote for Anthony Dixon: (Lady K)

3 Votes for Delwyn Couch: (mediumsnowman, Tariq J, CallMePie)

2 Votes for Molly Tolbert: (Tamomono, def)

1 Vote for Doctor Wynn: (Tachyon)

1 Vote for Ray Christiansen: (Bob)

3 Votes for Perce Triggs: (TinyPiesRUs, KingoftheZempk, jluck)

2 Votes for Mike Johnson: (Dragonfire, fhomess)

1 Vote for Quincy Easton: (Ranger of the Forest)

WIth 17 players, it'll take a majority of 9 votes to complete a lynch.

You have a little less than 12 hours to reach a consensus.

Posted

You know what? I agree with you. Anthony isn't really scummy looking, and I think Molly would know well enough that he's just being a goof. I still think Ewan is rather stinky too, but not a single person wants to weigh in on the topic either way. Let's see if we can get people on Molly for poor vote justification.

Unvote: Ewan

Vote: Molly (Lady K)

Just have a little bit of context here, apparently (according to Anthony himself) Molly tends to go after/suspect Anthony in every game they play together. So Humphrey and I would say that Molly has an issue with Anthony's playstyle. Nevertheless, her vote was indeed poorly justified and it looked like she was trying to jump on the nearest bandwagon.

So we have under 12 hours to reach a consensus. Delwyn, Perce, Mike and Molly are the leading wagons right now; we should collectively decide on one or two people to focus on today.

Edit: *By "one or two people" I don't necessarily mean the four leading wagons

Posted

That's a good point, Perce is definitely on my scumdar and I'd be prepared to vote him to get a lynch if needs be.

Whilst he isn't in the clear just yet, it could have just been a neewbie mistake rather than a scummy post.

Posted

Whilst he isn't in the clear just yet, it could have just been a neewbie mistake rather than a scummy post.

So are you saying you have a town lean on perce? I want to get your stance nailed down for future reference, either good or bad.

Posted

Just have a little bit of context here, apparently (according to Anthony himself) Molly tends to go after/suspect Anthony in every game they play together.

Your defense of Molly is noted :wink:

Posted

Good Morning All, well it seems while I have been off practicing singing, some good conversation has taken place.

The main reason I wouldn't vote for him is that scum have a hard time jumping out front day one. As inane as his vote is, it is the kind of behaviour that draws attention an possible investigation, leading me to think he isn't scum.

I would agree with you here except that the only other time I remember him being so out front he was actually scum. However, as I had stated my vote for him was to draw out conversation, which it has done. I still consider him suspect, but I am willing to change my vote.

Well, I really thought I had a convincing argument on Elijah, namely that he'd change his title if lynched. But apparently that's not good enough for the rest of you! :wacko: So I'm going to set that aside...for now...

Here's what I've been watching.

I immediately called him on his post with the next post when I said:

Instead of responding with his reasoning for his vote he threatened me instead and then instantly soft claimed vanilla, as many others have noted.

I've not seem him return since this point so maybe he has more to add...? I'd be willing to listen, but I'm also willing to vote:

unvote:Elijah (def)

vote: perce triggs (Tachyon)

Megablocks, I just realized I was the third person on the perce triggs wagon! I'm done for! :distressed:

Thank you for finally giving some good thought behind your vote. While I still find your initial vote and lack of reason behind it suspicious, I am will to change my vote.

Unvote: Anthony Dixon (jluck)

I'm not really liking the Perce wagon. I feel like he's just nooby. I don't think Mike's behavior in relation to Perce is a scumtell either, necessarily.

I agree. Delywn's behavior is pretty weird. I'd take her as a second vote.

I don't feel like this is legitimate reasoning - how many people have actually contributed? Elijah's vote was wrong, I think, but I'm pretty sure he had some reasoning. I don't think you're on this trail of your own accord and I stand by my vote for now.

I actually did do this on my own and I do still feel he did not have good reasoning behind his vote for Elijah, so I placed my vote and stated it was to start conversation which it did.

You know what? I agree with you. Anthony isn't really scummy looking, and I think Molly would know well enough that he's just being a goof. I still think Ewan is rather stinky too, but not a single person wants to weigh in on the topic either way. Let's see if we can get people on Molly for poor vote justification.

Unvote: Ewan

Vote: Molly (Lady K)

Actually I did/still do think it is possible he is scum and not just goofing. And with your vote on me with the reason of seeing if you can get people on me for poor vote justification (when his vote was on you) leads me to think I may just be on to something there.

Just have a little bit of context here, apparently (according to Anthony himself) Molly tends to go after/suspect Anthony in every game they play together. So Humphrey and I would say that Molly has an issue with Anthony's playstyle. Nevertheless, her vote was indeed poorly justified and it looked like she was trying to jump on the nearest bandwagon.

So we have under 12 hours to reach a consensus. Delwyn, Perce, Mike and Molly are the leading wagons right now; we should collectively decide on one or two people to focus on today.

Edit: *By "one or two people" I don't necessarily mean the four leading wagons

It is noted that you are supporting Elijah here without reading my posts clearly. I did justify my vote for Anthony and stated I wanted to start conversation. I was the first and only one to vote to him so how is that me trying to jump on the nearest bandwagon?

Posted

Actually I did/still do think it is possible he is scum and not just goofing. And with your vote on me with the reason of seeing if you can get people on me for poor vote justification (when his vote was on you) leads me to think I may just be on to something there.

Then why did you unvote him? Your comment here is close to nonsensical. It's really flaily. Yo uunvoted him, but still think he could be scum, and my vote on you makes you think he may be scum. Huh?

It is noted that you are supporting Elijah here without reading my posts clearly. I did justify my vote for Anthony and stated I wanted to start conversation. I was the first and only one to vote to him so how is that me trying to jump on the nearest bandwagon?

How is he supporting me?

You are doubly suss at this point.

Posted

You know what? I agree with you. Anthony isn't really scummy looking, and I think Molly would know well enough that he's just being a goof. I still think Ewan is rather stinky too, but not a single person wants to weigh in on the topic either way. Let's see if we can get people on Molly for poor vote justification.

Unvote: Ewan

Vote: Molly (Lady K)

:thumbup:

Just have a little bit of context here, apparently (according to Anthony himself) Molly tends to go after/suspect Anthony in every game they play together. So Humphrey and I would say that Molly has an issue with Anthony's playstyle. Nevertheless, her vote was indeed poorly justified and it looked like she was trying to jump on the nearest bandwagon.

This smells bad.

So we have under 12 hours to reach a consensus. Delwyn, Perce, Mike and Molly are the leading wagons right now; we should collectively decide on one or two people to focus on today.

Edit: *By "one or two people" I don't necessarily mean the four leading wagons

Dragonfire is probably scum this game too, just fyi

I would agree with you here except that the only other time I remember him being so out front he was actually scum. However, as I had stated my vote for him was to draw out conversation, which it has done. I still consider him suspect, but I am willing to change my vote.

Thank you for finally giving some good thought behind your vote. While I still find your initial vote and lack of reason behind it suspicious, I am will to change my vote.

Unvote: Anthony Dixon (jluck)

I actually did do this on my own and I do still feel he did not have good reasoning behind his vote for Elijah, so I placed my vote and stated it was to start conversation which it did.

Actually I did/still do think it is possible he is scum and not just goofing. And with your vote on me with the reason of seeing if you can get people on me for poor vote justification (when his vote was on you) leads me to think I may just be on to something there.

This is pretty bad too. Backtracking and trying to erase the fact that you did have a so-called "justification" when you voted for him before, and then saying you still think he's scum? But unvoting him?

Posted

Then why did you unvote him? Your comment here is close to nonsensical. It's really flaily. Yo uunvoted him, but still think he could be scum, and my vote on you makes you think he may be scum. Huh?

How is he supporting me?

You are doubly suss at this point.

Well, lets see here.....I am the only one that had a vote for Anthony, obviously there is no change he will be lynched today. Then he (Anthony) finally came back with a real vote and he justified his reason to my vote on him to start conversation worked. There was no need to keep my vote on him today. As I stated I still find his initial behavior suspicious but we do need a lynch today and time is running out.

As to Ray supporting you, he agreed with you that my vote was poorly justified (in fact I fully justified it and stated it was to start conversation which it did) proves he didn't even bother to go back and read my post. Maybe supporting you was a bad choice of words, as he could be scum just trying to hide behind you.

Hey I have my opinions too. And I am leaning town on both you and Foorth even with your votes on me. So why you are going after me when there are better choices I have no idea.

Posted

Well, lets see here.....I am the only one that had a vote for Anthony, obviously there is no change he will be lynched today. Then he (Anthony) finally came back with a real vote and he justified his reason to my vote on him to start conversation worked. There was no need to keep my vote on him today. As I stated I still find his initial behavior suspicious but we do need a lynch today and time is running out.

As to Ray supporting you, he agreed with you that my vote was poorly justified (in fact I fully justified it and stated it was to start conversation which it did) proves he didn't even bother to go back and read my post. Maybe supporting you was a bad choice of words, as he could be scum just trying to hide behind you.

Hey I have my opinions too. And I am leaning town on both you and Foorth even with your votes on me. So why you are going after me when there are better choices I have no idea.

What better choices? Anthony? Or no, since you unvoted him?

Posted

:thumbup:

This smells bad.

Dragonfire is probably scum this game too, just fyi

This is pretty bad too. Backtracking and trying to erase the fact that you did have a so-called "justification" when you voted for him before, and then saying you still think he's scum? But unvoting him?

No I did not backtrack at all. I can still think he is scum and not vote for him to make sure we have a lynch for today since no one else shares the same opinion.

What better choices? Anthony? Or no, since you unvoted him?

Ray's behavior is on the scummy side as is Dewlyn's. Ewan is practically non existant, could be he is busy elsewhere. And only 12 out of 17 have even bothered to cast a preliminary vote at all.

Quite frankly I think most the scum are quietly hiding watching the town argue amongst ourselves.

Posted

While I still find Anthony's behavior suspect, I feel Dake Bowman would be a better choice for today. He has made six post of which the first three fluff are understandable for day 1 prior to voting opening. His last three however feel very much as he is trying to hide under the radar without committing.

Geez. Four pages and we are barely in the first day. Let's see which one of you looks suspicious enough (I'll vote in a while, but first I have to catch up on everything)

Understand you need to read to catch up, but four pages is nothing compared to some games I have seen.

So, as far as I can see, the first few votes were based on nothing so I won't be looking into them that much. The fact that Perce Triggs just voted Doctor Wynn out of the blue seems to seem like a typical newbie mistake, nothing special. But the way that Ray Christianen responded to Perce's random vote makes me curious:

You aren't adding anything to discussion. It just seems like fluff to make it seem like you are actually part of the discussion.

And Delwyn already said what I was going to say about Quincy and if it comes to it, I will vote for her so that we can have a majority as I do find her scummy, but not as scummy as I find Ray here.

Vote: Ray Chistiansen (Dragonfire)

You felt Ray was scummy enough to vote for. Even though you have not really added to the discussion either.

Sorry. I was still writing my post when you posted that last message and it didn't feel like fluff to me this time.

Unvote: Ray Christiansen

I would vote for Quincy now but I don't want to jump to conclusions since my only reasoning is fluff and I thought that Ray was scummy for posting fluff in the beginning (I was clearly wrong).

And here you quickly unvote Ray claiming a cross post, but won't commit to a vote for Quincy who you previously stated you agreed with Delwyn and would vote to have a majority. Two votes is hardly a majority.

I would really like to hear what you have to say. I will change my vote if necessary.

Vote: Dake Bowman (cutcobra)

Vote: Duke Bowman (cutcobra) I really hate autocorrect. Sorry. :blush:

Posted

Understand you need to read to catch up, but four pages is nothing compared to some games I have seen.

I haven't played too many games so I don't know what the default "too much" is considered.

You felt Ray was scummy enough to vote for. Even though you have not really added to the discussion either.

I did, actually. Just like you are thinking that I am scum for "posting fluff" I also thought that Ray was scum for posting fluff until I was proven wrong (He seems like he is contributing. To me, at least)

And here you quickly unvote Ray claiming a cross post, but won't commit to a vote for Quincy who you previously stated you agreed with Delwyn and would vote to have a majority. Two votes is hardly a majority.

I didn't want to vote for Quincy since I don't want to jump right in to something from a mere suggestion of scumminess. I realize I need little more than just fluff as a reason to vote for someone. Up until now, though, he hasn't contributed to anything. Only voted for Perce, who seemed like he (Perce) was getting a bandwagon of votes behind him. So:

Vote: Quincy Easton (KingoftheZempk)

I also have you on my radar, since your sudden focus on me seems like a desperate measure to get the attention away from you, and the already added up evidence against you. But you don't really strike me as scum since you are contributing a lot to the discussion.

Posted

While I still find Anthony's behavior suspect, I feel Dake Bowman would be a better choice for today. He has made six post of which the first three fluff are understandable for day 1 prior to voting opening. His last three however feel very much as he is trying to hide under the radar without committing.

Understand you need to read to catch up, but four pages is nothing compared to some games I have seen.

You felt Ray was scummy enough to vote for. Even though you have not really added to the discussion either.

And here you quickly unvote Ray claiming a cross post, but won't commit to a vote for Quincy who you previously stated you agreed with Delwyn and would vote to have a majority. Two votes is hardly a majority.

I would really like to hear what you have to say. I will change my vote if necessary.

Vote: Dake Bowman (cutcobra)

Vote: Duke Bowman (cutcobra) I really hate autocorrect. Sorry. :blush:

You don't seem to have a clear viewpoint on things. I mean it's okay to change your mind but it seems every time someone challenges your thoughts you change your mind.

Posted

Changing your vote is fine, but changing your opinion for the sake of a lynch feels...off to me.

:look:

I think you misunderstand me here. I’m not changing my opinion in regards to who I find scummy, I’m changing my opinion in who would make a good lynch candidate.

Quincy's a null read of mine. He hasn't really scumtold or towntold at all. To be honest, I feel slightly uneasy at your apparent indifference as to who our lynch will be. Almost as if you're happy to get a lynch on any townie at all, whoever it is.

If you feel so strongly, why not make a case against him? Compile his posts and point out the scummy stuff. Just saying you think he's scum isn't a good enough reason for anyone to vote him.

I am by no means indifferent to who we lynch. My point is I’d like us to get a lynch today, as often that gives the town more to go on in the days ahead than a no lynch, and I’m willing to change my vote in order to have one. Of course if I don’t think there’s a good chance that the person is actually scum, I will withhold my vote.

That’s...actually not a bad thought. Might as well at this point. But I think it’s only fair to ask other people besides me, who haven’t already done so, to do the same, no?

Ray's behavior is on the scummy side as is Dewlyn's.

Do you have any reasons for believing that I'm scummy? Besides the fact that other people have said so? :hmpf:

Posted

Sleeper agents? Ah this will make my sweating even worse. And this cold just makes the sweat cold. Anyone want to hug me to keep me warm?

I guess we should warm up those vocal muscles.

Pretty standard start of the day material, some roleplaying, wondering at the situation, etc. Nothing blatantly objectionable.

Please don't let this hurt. That will just make me sweat more. Or maybe that's a good thing.

What?

I think I see your point. My only worry is that if his personality is like this, who's to say it's not a way to ignore him or for the scum (if he's not one) to place blame on him? I won't vote for him just because it does seem personality based but it might be worth it to keep an eye on him.

That seems like a pretty weird way to claim. Could be neutral. Maybe you're vanilla, but claiming that early seems a weird move. It doesn't register right with me.

Vote: Perce Triggs (Tachyon)

I actually agree that personality shouldn’t be an excuse for behaving oddly. And yet...you contradict yourself by making a big deal about not wanting to let personality influence your vote, and then you...decide not to vote for him because of his personality :wacko: Maybe I’m misinterpreting your intent here, but you switch your approach in two sentences.

I also find Perce’s behavior odd

I agree. Seems like a good reason just to take note of him and see what happens tomorrow and what he says. There's a difference between a loud personality and being scummy. Difficult but it is possible.

It's been a relatively quiet first day. It would be nice to hear from some people.

Difficult? There have been plenty of loud personalities who aren’t scum. In fact, it makes less sense for scum to draw attention to themselves by being either too quiet or too loud. You’d think they’d make more of an effort to stay somewhere in the middle “safe zone,” if you will. Are you trying to not look scummy by not being a “loud personality,” if that’s what you think scum typically act like? Those two sentences just don’t sit right with me.

And here we have the calling out of people who aren’t posting. At the very least you’ve refrained from automatically assuming low posters are scum, but your passive request for people to talk seems strange in light of your own absence for the past several hours. Do you not have anything to contribute? What’s your opinion on current events? If it’s RL events that are keeping you from posting, that’s understandable, but for goodness’ sake don’t say you want to hear people’s thoughts if you aren’t able to give any of your own.

Yup, I should have corrected that when I replied. Sorry for that.

And radio dead air from here on out...

I’d like to hear some sort of defense or explanation from you, because I don’t want to vote for someone as a result of me not understanding their approach. I’m keeping my vote where it is from now, but if you really are town, a solid defense from you could make a difference. You’re not currently in danger of being lynched or anything, but hearing from you would be helpful.

I’m beginning to find Molly a good lynch option, considering how defensive she’s being at the moment. You have what, one, two, votes on you? Why are you acting like you’re about to be lynched all of a sudden? Flailing does not somehow alleviate suspicion of you, however slight it may be.

:facepalm:

Of course I forgot to address something. Following after the “I also find Perce’s behavior odd” bit...I think the fact that you jump to neutral as a possibility a little odd. Correct me if I’m wrong, but there’s no indication that there is one at all this game in the rules. Maybe it’s usually like that, but I still find it strange that you’re bringing it up. Not impossible, but his claim was definitely more vanilla townie focus. And if there is a neutral, who happens to be Perce, I think him outing himself like that in thread would be very foolish, even if he is new. What are everyone else’s thoughts on there being a third party? Likely? Not likely?

Although, at the moment I think the question of who we’re lynching is a more pressing matter. I still feel like Quincy is a good option, but until I hear from him I’m not changing my vote.

:facepalm::wall::ugh:

*So until I hear from him...

I’m struggling with words today you guys.

If any of you other people currently active (Molly, Anthony, Mike) have anything to say, please chime in at your leisure. I’ve got some other matters to attend to, but I’ll be back if any of you have questions directed at me :sweet: And of course, any other valuable thoughts you have are greatly appreciated by all of us townies, to be sure. :wink::tongue::laugh:

Posted

Delwyn this is why I find you somewhat scummy. If you read my initial vote, which was for Anthony, I stated he isn't usually this talkative and I wanted to draw out conversation.

There isn't enough evidence to lynch anyone right now is correct, but to cast a vote helps get said evidence. Anthony usually isn't this talkative on day one of our choir performances (well except one show I remember and he was very scummy then) so to draw out conversations here is my vote:

Vote: Anthony Dixon (jluck)

Your vote for Anthony was immediately after mine.

Apologies for my absence, I was so busy making sure that we had enough supplies for the journey that I forgot about all of you...

Who is this "Jluck" person you keep speaking of, Anthony?

But whoever he is, there's no way he's been acting fishy as you have so far today. Your posts genuinely baffle me, and I find you more suspicious than anyone else thus far. But considering it's day one, that's not saying much.

So for now I'll Vote: Anthony Dixon (Jluck)

This is almost certainly subject to change, especially if we need to get a lynch, but I might as well go with my gut for the present.

You find him more suspicious than anyone else so you vote right away instead of maybe waiting a little while to see what kind of conversation might be generated from my vote on him, as well as maybe a response from him. It was the quickness of the vote that really bothered me and thus felt scummy in my opinion.

I am not being defensive, I don't need to be with only two votes on me. I am merely replying to questions others are asking. It is you who currently have the most votes at three.

Posted

Wow, it's quiet in here with just a few more hours of voting left and no strong candidates. We need to organize, scum want us split like this. Anyone?

Posted

Wow, it's quiet in here with just a few more hours of voting left and no strong candidates. We need to organize, scum want us split like this. Anyone?

Yes, what is there, about 4 hours left? The top vote-getter has 3 out of the required 9. Gale and Ewan haven't even voted at all. :wacko: A no-lynch is not good for the town. I still want to lynch Delwyn, but Gale or Ewan wouldn't be bad either. Whoever gets lynched, we need to get our act together, and fast.

Posted

Whilst he isn't in the clear just yet, it could have just been a neewbie mistake rather than a scummy post.

Yes, it could, of course :wacko: Nice bit of subtle defense here.

Your defense of Molly is noted :wink:

You can call it that if you want, but just ask Anthony, he'll say the same.

This smells bad.

Dragonfire is probably scum this game too, just fyi

All you're doing is just going "I don't like this" "he's scum" etc etc, without analysing, asking questions, whatever. I can't respond to "he's probably scum". If you want to find scum, start questioning people! Or say why you think it "smells bad"....

As to Ray supporting you, he agreed with you that my vote was poorly justified (in fact I fully justified it and stated it was to start conversation which it did) proves he didn't even bother to go back and read my post. Maybe supporting you was a bad choice of words, as he could be scum just trying to hide behind you.

I think your vote was poorly justified because you outright said it was to draw out conversation. Supposing he is scum, if he knows the vote is merely to draw out conversation then he won't react. If he thinks you actually want to lynch him, you might get a reaction. Therefore the vote was weak and poorly justified.

Hey I have my opinions too. And I am leaning town on both you and Foorth even with your votes on me. So why you are going after me when there are better choices I have no idea.

"I'm gonna call the people voting me town so they will be flattered and unvote me". Even Humphrey sees through this desperate attempt to shake off suspicion.

I didn't want to vote for Quincy since I don't want to jump right in to something from a mere suggestion of scumminess. I realize I need little more than just fluff as a reason to vote for someone. Up until now, though, he hasn't contributed to anything. Only voted for Perce, who seemed like he (Perce) was getting a bandwagon of votes behind him. So:

Vote: Quincy Easton (KingoftheZempk)

Instantly after being called out, you jump on Quincy :wacko: What has he said between this post and your last to drive you to vote for him?

I also have you on my radar, since your sudden focus on me seems like a desperate measure to get the attention away from you, and the already added up evidence against you. But you don't really strike me as scum since you are contributing a lot to the discussion.

So she's on your radar.... but you don't think she's scum. Wishy-washy much?

I’d like to hear some sort of defense or explanation from you, because I don’t want to vote for someone as a result of me not understanding their approach. I’m keeping my vote where it is from now, but if you really are town, a solid defense from you could make a difference. You’re not currently in danger of being lynched or anything, but hearing from you would be helpful.

Nice justification - but I still don't find Quincy particularly scummy. However, I find you more towny than before.

You find him more suspicious than anyone else so you vote right away instead of maybe waiting a little while to see what kind of conversation might be generated from my vote on him, as well as maybe a response from him. It was the quickness of the vote that really bothered me and thus felt scummy in my opinion.

Have you not considered that two votes might generate more conversation from him than one? Sometimes applying pressure works to make people talk.

Ray's behavior is on the scummy side as is Dewlyn's. Ewan is practically non existant, could be he is busy elsewhere. And only 12 out of 17 have even bothered to cast a preliminary vote at all.

Guess who Molly suspects? The person with the most votes, and the people whom her accusers also suspect... the originality is strong with this one.

Yes, what is there, about 4 hours left? The top vote-getter has 3 out of the required 9. Gale and Ewan haven't even voted at all. :wacko: A no-lynch is not good for the town. I still want to lynch Delwyn, but Gale or Ewan wouldn't be bad either. Whoever gets lynched, we need to get our act together, and fast.

Agreed. I'd be up for voting Molly or Perce if that's where town wants to go. I personally don't think Delwyn is scum, but I'm prepared to vote her if it's between that and a no-lynch. As for Gale, he really hasn't been here, and I wouldn't feel comfortable lynching someone who's basically said nothing - no reads can be gotten from them.

Posted

Agreed. I'd be up for voting Molly or Perce if that's where town wants to go. I personally don't think Delwyn is scum, but I'm prepared to vote her if it's between that and a no-lynch. As for Gale, he really hasn't been here, and I wouldn't feel comfortable lynching someone who's basically said nothing - no reads can be gotten from them.

I'd be game to lynch Molly. It's not ideal but it's better than a no-lynch.

Posted

Really our top two choices right now are Dewlyn and Perce. At least Dewlyn has been active and participating so I think we should switch to Perce. He never really addressed my concern of his anti-townie post to Anthony either and he has been practically non-existant.

And Duke did address my concerns on him so for now:

Unvote: Duke Bowman(cutcobra)

Vote: Perce Triggs (Tachyon)

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Announcements

  • THIS IS THE TEST SITE OF EUROBRICKS!

×
×
  • Create New...