z3_2drive Posted December 23, 2015 Posted December 23, 2015 Hello, after a long pause I decided to begin a new project, another high speed chassis, but this time I wanted to build a chassis with proper driven independent suspension and lighter than my previous build. After many attempts in the past, I concluded that this wouldn't be possible without printed pieces, as lego u-joints just can't survive the shock load of 4 buggy motors. My previous MOCs either had solid driven axles or suspension using only one u-joint, which didn't have ideal handling. Now, after testing efferman's 3D printed CV joints (coupled with Lego spherical gears, similar to 8880) on a small MOC, I used them on this large scale project. Results - it works! They easily handle the power and CV joints are more smooth in general. There is still room for changes and even after these pictures were taken I reinforced the rear suspension. Features/details: RWD - 4 Buggy motors, with 2 powering each wheel, they aren't coupled through the center. Independent suspension on all wheels, front uses efferman's printed wishbones. Servo steering Anti-roll bars 3rd party electronics and custom battery pack link for the curious Total non-Lego/modified parts: Wheel hubs made by nicjasno link Modified 9L links Printed wishbone pieces link Printed lower suspension arm pieces link Printed spherical gear holder (CV joint) link Modified pneumatic cylinders Photos: ^Pneumatic tubes work well to tie down the battery. Excuse the sand, took it offroad for a bit Oh man, I should never sell my parts after using them like this Enjoy! Quote
JJ2 Posted December 24, 2015 Posted December 24, 2015 Like I said in effes topic this thing looks awesome. I like the 4 wheel indepenednt suspension but I think it might perform better with smaller top wishbones. Have you thought of making the font and back of +caster? I really like the Znap pieces to make the cabin at least I think they are Quote
z3_2drive Posted December 24, 2015 Author Posted December 24, 2015 Have you thought of making the font and back of +caster? I want to keep it as simple as possible. I guess I could add positive caster, but I would have to completely disassemble the front, and may increase the part count to accommodate for the offset. I could make the top rear wishbones smaller but I don't think it needs the negative camber, will try it out though. I saw the cabin pieces on bricklink, but them because they looked cool and strong, not sure where they're from Thanks for the feedback. Quote
Saberwing40k Posted December 24, 2015 Posted December 24, 2015 Those parts on the cab are actually not Znap, but from the Cybermaster set. Those Cybermaster sets have a lot of unique and rare parts. Quote
JJ2 Posted December 24, 2015 Posted December 24, 2015 Those parts on the cab are actually not Znap, but from the Cybermaster set. Those Cybermaster sets have a lot of unique and rare parts. Ya your right! what in the world is up with this set? 4 RC antennas? Quote
clarkdef Posted December 24, 2015 Posted December 24, 2015 Curious to see how she handles! The body looks quite solid and high speed stable, I do think you can get that batt into the body I was thinking we should come up with a testing system to put high end models such as this in, which could consist of visual appeal test, 8 meter accel test, top speed test, ramp accent (like a skate bowl), bump test (driving over a hose at full power) and top speed turn test... What ya think? Quote
AndyCW Posted December 24, 2015 Posted December 24, 2015 That looks fearsome. Hoping for a video soon or at least a report. Make sure you test it to failure so we know where the weak points are. v/r Andy Quote
tibivi Posted December 24, 2015 Posted December 24, 2015 I love moc's like these, with detailed chassis like your anti roll bars and such. The negative camber is indeed not really necessary as you have a buggy, but a positive caster angle should help with performance and steering like in your other cars, so it would be nice to see that here too i see you took the slower output of the RC motors, i think this is for better accelerating? or was there another reason? Great MOC and i too look forward to a video if thats possible Quote
z3_2drive Posted December 24, 2015 Author Posted December 24, 2015 Clarkdef, I will be sure to make a video soon, and as far as testing those are interesting ideas. Without positive caster and with stiff suspension I don't this model would fair well on the bump test :D Andy, the only weakpoint I see is the front axle, since without 3 point hubs it is very vulnerable to damage, bit I try to drive smart ;) Any other points of failure would be a large fall, as the suspension is quite stiff in the rear. I don't see the CV joint s failing unless I threw the vehicle backwards while on full throttle, but that's just cruel/unnecessary. Tibivi, thanks, and if you look closely the actual driveshafts come out of the faster output, I simply join the pairs of motors through the slower output. Quote
Lakop Posted December 25, 2015 Posted December 25, 2015 That looks great. Love the rear wheels. I would make a shorter wheelbase if possible. Good image and the yellow of the pneumatics is great. H Quote
2LegoOrNot2Lego... Posted December 28, 2015 Posted December 28, 2015 Excellent chassis!!! No one should buy your parts after using them like this... :laugh: :laugh: Quote
z3_2drive Posted December 28, 2015 Author Posted December 28, 2015 (edited) Thanks everyone I gave Horace's suggestion a try and shortened the wheelbase by 4 studs, and took a small video. It is still a work in progress and I want to make a realistic looking roll cage which is proving to be difficult Edited December 28, 2015 by z3_2drive Quote
JJ2 Posted December 29, 2015 Posted December 29, 2015 Very fast the new rollcage is looking good. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.