allanp Posted June 29, 2016 Posted June 29, 2016 (edited) I guess It's somebody wrinkly when standing still! Edited June 29, 2016 by allanp Quote
dr_spock Posted June 29, 2016 Posted June 29, 2016 I'm guessing somebody who has gone through the Reviewer's Academy process. Quote
andrewganschow Posted June 29, 2016 Posted June 29, 2016 Gonna take a guess and say that the review might end up containing animations of different functions, high quality renders and photography, hmmm I wonder who that could be. Quote
Jim Posted June 29, 2016 Author Posted June 29, 2016 Gonna take a guess and say that the review might end up containing animations of different functions, high quality renders and photography, hmmm I wonder who that could be. Pfff I sure hope not. That means I will need to do that too for future reviews Quote
Andy D Posted June 29, 2016 Posted June 29, 2016 I guess it someone from the states.... I have a feeling it is someone from the states that we have seen before. He did great reviews, received high praise from Jim, great photos and detailed descriptions. He is mostly a great reviewer! Well that's my guess. Andy D Quote
Jim Posted June 29, 2016 Author Posted June 29, 2016 I have a feeling it is someone from the states that we have seen before. He did great reviews, received high praise from Jim, great photos and detailed descriptions. I think you made it to the country, but drifted along the shore lines Quote
Blakbird Posted June 29, 2016 Posted June 29, 2016 You missed the part about the surprise reviewer. So it will not be Jim. There's no way to know who it is for sure, but if Jim vouches for him it must be someone super awesome. Quote
Andy D Posted June 29, 2016 Posted June 29, 2016 (edited) I think you made it to the country, but drifted along the shore lines Hmmm... Maybe it will be a surprise reviewer we have not seen yet? Let's see, East Coast, West Coast? Middle of the country, where oh, where? More thought and research required. There's no way to know who it is for sure, but if Jim vouches for him it must be someone super awesome. I think this could be a humble clue... Who is going yo be the first to actually name names? Andy D Edited June 29, 2016 by Andy D Quote
Kaanere Posted June 29, 2016 Posted June 29, 2016 There's no way to know who it is for sure, but if Jim vouches for him it must be someone super awesome. ...with a super awesome website... Quote
andrewganschow Posted June 29, 2016 Posted June 29, 2016 It will be Blackbird... :D Max I believe you hit the nail right on the head my friend. Quote
Andy D Posted June 29, 2016 Posted June 29, 2016 It will be Blackbird... :D Max I agree, with the clues presented and Blakbird's comment (humble brag) this is a logical conclusion. Now how long will it take for jim to confirm or deny. Andy D Quote
thomol Posted June 29, 2016 Posted June 29, 2016 It will be Blackbird... :D Max Now we must stone you to death for speaking His name out loud. Quote
Blakbird Posted June 30, 2016 Posted June 30, 2016 It will be Blackbird... :D Now we must stone you to death for speaking His name out loud. And for spelling my name wrong. Quote
Andy D Posted June 30, 2016 Posted June 30, 2016 Now we must stone you to death for speaking His name out loud. I didn't hear anything! Andy D Quote
MaxSupercars Posted June 30, 2016 Posted June 30, 2016 And for spelling my name wrong. Ahh sorry... Normally I take attention. Now I made mistake. But thank you for confirmation! :D :D :D Max Quote
Erik Leppen Posted June 30, 2016 Posted June 30, 2016 If I read a topic about 42055, I expect discussion about the set. Not about its reviewer. Can we please stop speculating on that, and just talk about the set instead? Quote
Jim Posted June 30, 2016 Author Posted June 30, 2016 If I read a topic about 42055, I expect discussion about the set. Not about its reviewer. Can we please stop speculating on that, and just talk about the set instead? Hi Erik. If you don't like something, please use the report button instead of mini moderating. Furthermore, this is about the review of the set, so I think there's room for a little playful discussion. Quote
Alonzo Brickovsky Posted June 30, 2016 Posted June 30, 2016 Can we guesstimate when these early reviews appear? Can't wait. :) Quote
ctx1769 Posted June 30, 2016 Posted June 30, 2016 I say 14th July for the first review from a reviewer with sore fingers Quote
Alonzo Brickovsky Posted June 30, 2016 Posted June 30, 2016 I say 14th July for the first review from a reviewer with sore fingers That wouldn't be bad. I don't mind sore fingers as long as they aren't mine. Quote
BrickWild Posted July 1, 2016 Posted July 1, 2016 when would the review come out? In just a few weeks I'd say. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.