Capn Frank Posted January 10, 2017 Author Posted January 10, 2017 3 hours ago, Legostone said: While I'm not Garmadon, I guess I can argue anyways. In this case it may be fair to let it go through - the 3F didn't go through a single MRCA before the 2F was licensed, so there was no benefit of licensing it first. I just checked the MRCA responses. You are correct. @Garmadon could have easily waited to until his 2F was done before licensing his 3F. His 2F is now free, and he is now 100 DB richer. Quote
Garmadon Posted January 10, 2017 Posted January 10, 2017 39 minutes ago, Phred said: I just checked the MRCA responses. You are correct. @Garmadon could have easily waited to until his 2F was done before licensing his 3F. His 2F is now free, and he is now 100 DB richer. Well, thanks! And I'll make sure to be more careful about the order in which I do my paperwork in the future! Quote
Legostone Posted January 17, 2017 Posted January 17, 2017 (edited) Thanks for finally simplifying the form! So much more convenient to use! Also, can you please check if 295 DB have been transferred from MAESTRO to TitusV (and I haven't typed Titus V as usual)? Edited January 17, 2017 by Legostone Quote
Capn Frank Posted January 17, 2017 Author Posted January 17, 2017 5 hours ago, Legostone said: can you please check if 295 DB have been transferred from MAESTRO to TitusV Good to go. Quote
Tomsche Posted January 17, 2017 Posted January 17, 2017 Hellooooo Phred Here is you ol` seadog again that just doesn`t get his sailoring head around the computerising thing stuff machine Ca I ask to change the name in the sheet from MAESTRO Corrington to MAESTRO COR as that seems to be a common typing mistake here? Same happened with the MRCA results, I guess as I tried to transfer 264 DB from MCor to regular Maestro (and failed), and it seems the MCRA isn`t on the account of Mcor either, probably due to the same error? I promise I`ll do my best to NOT bother you with my boo-boo's the next month... Quote
kaiju Posted January 20, 2017 Posted January 20, 2017 And of course... Just licensed two ships that were purchased from another player, and the full (for a Sea Rat) license costs were taken out of my account. Quote
Capn Frank Posted January 20, 2017 Author Posted January 20, 2017 On 1/17/2017 at 9:56 AM, Tomsche said: Ca I ask to change the name in the sheet from MAESTRO Corrington to MAESTRO COR as that seems to be a common typing mistake here? That was a huge pain. MAESTRO Corrington has been changed to MAESTRO COR. No take-backsies. 1 hour ago, kaiju said: And of course... Just licensed two ships that were purchased from another player, and the full (for a Sea Rat) license costs were taken out of my account. How does it look now? Quote
kaiju Posted January 21, 2017 Posted January 21, 2017 7 hours ago, Phred said: How does it look now? Much better (until the next time), Thanks Quote
Elostirion Posted January 24, 2017 Posted January 24, 2017 In the January sheet the settlement "Terreli" has had a monthly town bank income of 5 DBs for four months now. However being part of the old world, like Belson and Granoleon, it shouldn't have. I assume someone typed "Terreli" instaed of "Nova Terreli" in the freebuild or even the property license form. Is there a way to find out which MOC this is? Quote
Kai NRG Posted January 24, 2017 Posted January 24, 2017 1 hour ago, Elostirion said: I assume someone typed "Terreli" instaed of "Nova Terreli" in the freebuild or even the property license form. Is there a way to find out which MOC this is? I may have typed Terreli for one of my builds, but if so, it was actually located in Terreli... Quote
Capt Wolf Posted January 24, 2017 Posted January 24, 2017 I may be the culprit, as I did place a build in terreli: the MCTC HQ. I would have registered the build, but wouldn't have licensed it. Quote
Capn Frank Posted January 24, 2017 Author Posted January 24, 2017 There are a few builds in Terreli from the Build Submittals and no licensed properties. Quote
Elostirion Posted January 24, 2017 Posted January 24, 2017 So where does the 5 DB income come from? And the main question: Does it belong to Terreli (and should be zeroed) or does it actually belong to Nova Terreli and should be added there? Quote
Capn Frank Posted January 24, 2017 Author Posted January 24, 2017 1 minute ago, Elostirion said: So where does the 5 DB income come from? And the main question: Does it belong to Terreli (and should be zeroed) or does it actually belong to Nova Terreli and should be added there? Not according to Capt Wolf's response. In the form response, he said yes, the build is licensable. So it counted towards the settlement size and town bank. Quote
Capt Wolf Posted January 24, 2017 Posted January 24, 2017 4 minutes ago, Phred said: Not according to Capt Wolf's response. In the form response, he said yes, the build is licensable. So it counted towards the settlement size and town bank. If I said it was licensable, then that was a mistake on my part when filling out the form, since we can't license anything in the old world. Quote
Legostone Posted January 26, 2017 Posted January 26, 2017 (edited) Is it possible something broke with land licenses? Seems like the license cost has been removed all of a sudden - would also explain the values in the factions being much lower all of a sudden. Yep, seems like since May only manually entered license costs have been added, I guess those with Monopolies. Edited January 26, 2017 by Legostone Quote
Ayrlego Posted January 26, 2017 Posted January 26, 2017 On 1/25/2017 at 7:23 AM, Phred said: Not according to Capt Wolf's response. In the form response, he said yes, the build is licensable. So it counted towards the settlement size and town bank. So just to clarify regarding this part of the build form. If we intend on licensing the build, do we still check the 'build is licensable' box? Or if we check this box, then licence the build in the property form, does that (incorrectly) count +2 for settlement size? Does that make sense? Quote
Elostirion Posted January 26, 2017 Posted January 26, 2017 (edited) 8 hours ago, Legostone said: Is it possible something broke with land licenses? Seems like the license cost has been removed all of a sudden - would also explain the values in the factions being much lower all of a sudden. Yep, seems like since May only manually entered license costs have been added, I guess those with Monopolies. Licensing fees have always been subtracted for me, I don't know if the 50% were added to Eslandola, though. EDIT: Nevermind, I just checked. It IS broken. For September my expenses should be 125 DBs but are 0. For October it subtracted some of my expenses but not all, cannot explain how the numbers came along. Definitely not about a monopoly, though! Currently I am sitting at 9.000 DBs but should be sitting at ~5.300 or 5.700 if I remember correctly (especially the licensing costs of 2.4k for the Grand Road of Nellisa). Well, definitely broken. But it was not some days ago! EDIT2: The yields, however, seem to work out perfectly fine. Edited January 26, 2017 by Elostirion Quote
Elostirion Posted January 26, 2017 Posted January 26, 2017 On 20.1.2017 at 11:49 PM, Phred said: That was a huge pain. MAESTRO Corrington has been changed to MAESTRO COR. No take-backsies. How does it look now? Well.... Maybe that killed it? :-D Quote
Legostone Posted January 26, 2017 Posted January 26, 2017 5 minutes ago, Elostirion said: Well.... Maybe that killed it? :-D I think it was still fine after that change. No sense investigating without knowing how the doc runs though. Quote
Capn Frank Posted January 26, 2017 Author Posted January 26, 2017 8 hours ago, Elostirion said: EDIT: Nevermind, I just checked. It IS broken. For September my expenses should be 125 DBs but are 0. For October it subtracted some of my expenses but not all, cannot explain how the numbers came along. Definitely not about a monopoly, though! Currently I am sitting at 9.000 DBs but should be sitting at ~5.300 or 5.700 if I remember correctly (especially the licensing costs of 2.4k for the Grand Road of Nellisa). Well, definitely broken. But it was not some days ago! How about now? 7 hours ago, Elostirion said: Well.... Maybe that killed it? :-D Nope. Those are completely unrelated. Not sure when it happened. Quote
Legostone Posted January 26, 2017 Posted January 26, 2017 5 minutes ago, Phred said: How about now? Nope. Those are completely unrelated. Not sure when it happened. Doesn't seem like the factions get anything from properties getting licensed as far as I can tell... I remember that being different. Quote
kaiju Posted January 26, 2017 Posted January 26, 2017 So I just re-licensed the 3A Mirthless Jest, which was given to me by Kwatchi so I believe I only have to pay the extra cost for it being 4+ vessel. (Amusingly, Kwatchi obtained the ship from another player, who captured it from me a couple of MRCAs ago). Quote
Maxim I Posted January 27, 2017 Posted January 27, 2017 13 hours ago, Legostone said: Doesn't seem like the factions get anything from properties getting licensed as far as I can tell... I remember that being different. @Phred Indeed, looks like the taxes are not going to the faction coffers anymore... Is there a change in rule we are not aware of? Quote
Legostone Posted January 30, 2017 Posted January 30, 2017 (edited) @Phred The right to use the following captured licenses has changed: 5T Goldilocks Maxim I 5T Merry Merfish Legostone 5T Tango Kid Elostirion 3T2 Tuna King Maxim I 3T2 Ol's Best Umbra Manis 1T Light Carrier Nova Terrelli ESL only 3A Wolf Capt Wolf What forms would I have to fill out to take care of that usually? I'm guessing the transaction form isn't as advanced yet? Also, if anyone is wondering - Maxim bought Goldilocks straight from me ;) Edited January 30, 2017 by Legostone Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.