Account Summary

[Ayrlego]

Troop locations and numbers have now (finally) been fixed in the Mar-Apr summary which now should be finalised. I will start working on the May-Jun summary and post the WIP link here when it is semi-presentable!

[evancelt]

Thanks @Ayrlego!

[Capt Wolf]

14 hours ago, Ayrlego said:

Troop locations and numbers have now (finally) been fixed in the Mar-Apr summary which now should be finalised. I will start working on the May-Jun summary and post the WIP link here when it is semi-presentable!

I'm only seeing the main account summary page, which shows troop ownership, but not any tabs to navigate to the settlement page, where troop locations would be recorded.

[evancelt]

26 minutes ago, Capt Wolf said:

I'm only seeing the main account summary page, which shows troop ownership, but not any tabs to navigate to the settlement page, where troop locations would be recorded.

The 'Settlement Status' tab is showing for me, though it takes ~20 seconds to show up (the page has to finish loading completely)

[Ayrlego]

@Capt Wolf Everything appears find on my end - is it working now?

Meanwhile, here is the May-Jun summary.

[NOD]

@Ayrlego Thank you for the great work. According to my calculations, Poppy Port fulfils the requirements to be Settlement Level City. Is there anything still missing?

[Capt Wolf]

13 hours ago, Ayrlego said:

Everything appears find on my end - is it working now?

I think it's a browser issue on my end. I'll have to check from a different computer later. Thanks.

EDIT: Confirmed, browser issue on my end. I can get to the other tabs now. Sorry for the trouble.

[NOD]

On 8/18/2021 at 9:24 AM, NOD said:

@Ayrlego Thank you for the great work. According to my calculations, Poppy Port fulfils the requirements to be Settlement Level City. Is there anything still missing?

 

Why hasn't Poppy Port risen to the city yet?

https://www.eurobricks.com/forum/index.php?/forums/topic/118540-by-land-maps-properties-and-settlements-in-the-egs/

 

About Settlements:

Settlement Size City: 61 - 100 Number of Properties; 8 Each Artisan, Residence, Commerce, Factory Properties; 3 Educational Properties Cultural Properties; 2 Cultural Properties; 1 Royal Properties

 

All requirements were provided.

@Bart discovered the island, researched, built a settlement and built into a town. I have built what is necessary. I expanded it into a large town and a city.

Edited September 2, 2021 by NOD

[Ayrlego]

1 hour ago, NOD said:

Why hasn't Poppy Port risen to the city yet?

Because I haven't had a chance to do it yet. I'll get there, but I can't access Google Sheets atm. 

[Ayrlego]

Jul-Aug 21 Summary

As usual, let me know any issues and I'll try to get to them as soon as possible

 

[Ayrlego]

Sep-Oct Summary

I will have another week to make any changes before I go away without internet for a while - so let me know any issues quickly!

[NOD]

Thank you for the great and extensive work. I wish you a nice and relaxing vacation without internet.

[Capt Wolf]

12 hours ago, Ayrlego said:

Sep-Oct Summary

I will have another week to make any changes before I go away without internet for a while - so let me know any issues quickly!

Thank you for all the work keeping this updated!

No account issues that I see, just a note that I think Punto Sur now meets the requirements for the Large Town settlement level.

[Ayrlego]

3 hours ago, Capt Wolf said:

Punto Sur now meets the requirements for the Large Town settlement level.

So it does! fixed

[Capt Wolf]

1 hour ago, Ayrlego said:

So it does! fixed

Woo-hoo! The Oktoberfest party continues!

[Ayrlego]

Nov-Dec Account Summary

Please note, I haven't had a time to add upkeep expenses for the last tMRCA yet. I'll hopefully get to that soon, but it is very time consuming so rather than wait I decided to release what I have now. Any issues, let me know.

 

[evancelt]

50 minutes ago, Ayrlego said:

I decided to release what I have

Thanks @Ayrlego!

[Spud The Viking]

Amazing, thanks @Ayrlego!

A very minor point, but I've noticed that Spudkirk is one short on Commerce properties.

[Ross Fisher]

Thanks @Ayrlego!

GMs, can I query where my 70 troops are? I think they were moved to Terraversa as part of that campaign, but I hadn't planned on them being anywhere else. Can I move them to Nola Mar, or do I need to arrange transport for that?

[LM71Blackbird]

Much appreciated @Ayrlego!

[Jeff of Clubs]

"The new phonebook is here! I'm somebody now!" Thanks for your time and effort @Ayrlego! You rock!

Edited February 3, 2022 by Jeff of Clubs
Reading r hard

[NOD]

@Ayrlego Thanks for the hard work!

[Ross Fisher]

On 2/2/2022 at 9:53 PM, Ross Fisher said:

GMs, can I query where my 70 troops are? I think they were moved to Terraversa as part of that campaign, but I hadn't planned on them being anywhere else. Can I move them to Nola Mar, or do I need to arrange transport for that?

Just wanted to bump this because I haven't had a response yet. Is anyone able to help me out?

[Ayrlego]

20 hours ago, Ross Fisher said:

Just wanted to bump this because I haven't had a response yet. Is anyone able to help me out?

Sorry, I forgot about this question.

So, tricky question. Technically we should track who owns the troops in each location... but we don't...

Basically troops are complicated, and to make my job easier, the account sheet only tracks who owns the for the purposes of upkeep, while troops in a location are only tracked by number, not owner. I could query the paperwork and see (if it was submitted) where yours are, but if Oleon has 70 troops on Terraversa that they are happy to say are yours, then you can move them as you wish. (does that make sense?). In Corrington we solved ownership issues by saying private accounts can't own troops, only the faction and chartered trade companies. We discussed doing the same for Oleon with your leadership at the time - I even think it was agreed on, but has never been actioned.

To move between locations that are conected by land, you can do that without transport, just submit a troop movement form.

[Jeff of Clubs]

@Ayrlego

I'm down for that but I do feel we lose some flavor and flexibility in play. I totally understand that the GMs have plenty else to deal with but perhaps the players can assume more responsibility for tracking all forces they themselves pay upkeep on. 

Think, a 'Chief of Staff" topic, linked in the index(not pinned). Within this topic, players create a reply that will be updated(edited) by the player upon first purchasing a private force with a link to all the applicable mocs at all times going forward. The player is responsible for updating information such as quantity, quality/unit type, total upkeep cost and critically, disposition.

At the top, in the main topic itself, a faction chief-of-staff tallies separate totals for both faction upkeep troops and private upkeep troops to the same specifications listed above in separate bulletins. Providing the grand totals and locations of all ground forces loyal to the faction, for rapid, at-will GM reading.

Be a little busy and hectic topic to begin with though. I mean, if we can rutinely update the settlements pages with our properties as we post them, surely this is a cake-walk in the park? 

Just a thought though and thanks for all you do! 

I'm a wargamer by habit for over 20yrs now. I have encountered nearly a hundred various rule systems dictating combat for scales that run from a skirmish between foraging parties to whole army groups clobbering each other. I have waaay too much time on my hands these days and could post a concept topic to show the aforementioned concept and how truely accessible the information can be. 

Edited February 10, 2022 by Jeff of Clubs