Posted February 5, 20187 yr The Arlinsport Advisor missed out (quite rightly) the MRCA results, so I decided to put together some data showing just what happened in terms of profits. Here is the overview, you can see that Oleon made the most profits, almost double Corrington and Eslandola! Factions As a chart Chart And again as a table: Table This table also shows how few Sea Rats took part in the MRCA. They still caused a big fuss though. 16 out of 223 ships sank, got captured or where diverted, about 7%. That's all from me, it was quite easy to do but didn't show much in the end. Hope it was useful, if you think it was I'll do it again next time. Sorry if there is a large space at the bottom of this post.
February 5, 20187 yr Great job putting these data together! I especially like how Eslandola is in purple.
February 5, 20187 yr Author On 2/5/2018 at 7:13 PM, Kai NRG said: Great job putting these data together! I especially like how Eslandola is in purple. Yes, the colours were just whatever Excel put in, not perfect but almost effortless.
February 5, 20187 yr Interesting - particularly the number of ships employed. Would be interesting to see statistics on the total number of ship levels employed, to clean the data from any bias due to some factions using larger or smaller vessels.
February 6, 20187 yr Very nice analysis @SpaceJoey86! I should have done one, but I've had some trouble calculating the upkeep of vessels. Very interesting data!
February 6, 20187 yr Author On 2/5/2018 at 8:10 PM, Bregir said: Interesting - particularly the number of ships employed. Would be interesting to see statistics on the total number of ship levels employed, to clean the data from any bias due to some factions using larger or smaller vessels. Not sure how to do that but it would be interesting. I'll see if I can find that somewhere. On 2/6/2018 at 1:03 AM, Mesabi said: Very nice analysis @SpaceJoey86! I should have done one, but I've had some trouble calculating the upkeep of vessels. Very interesting data! Thanks, I found it interesting too.
February 6, 20187 yr If you enjoy this kinda thing i say go for it every month ... I actually like seeing this breakdown as far as helpful for me ... Not so much but its definately interesting to see the way it works out.
February 6, 20187 yr Author This one took longer, here are the ship levels by faction. Maybe I'll look at what these show tomorrow. Ship levels On 2/6/2018 at 7:54 AM, Roadmonkeytj said: If you enjoy this kinda thing i say go for it every month ... I actually like seeing this breakdown as far as helpful for me ... Not so much but its definately interesting to see the way it works out. Glad it helped, I am planning to do it again next month.
February 7, 20187 yr On 2/6/2018 at 8:11 PM, SpaceJoey86 said: This one took longer, here are the ship levels by faction. Maybe I'll look at what these show tomorrow. Ship levels Glad it helped, I am planning to do it again next month. It would be interesting to see a break down of actual ship levels used during the mrca compared to profit avereaged per level used per faction ... If that made sence
February 7, 20187 yr Nice job Spacejoey. It's reconforting to see Oleon is making the most profit, we surely need a lot of dbs to support our large fleet.
February 7, 20187 yr Author On 2/7/2018 at 12:43 AM, Roadmonkeytj said: It would be interesting to see a break down of actual ship levels used during the mrca compared to profit avereaged per level used per faction ... If that made sence Do you mean this? Average_DBs On 2/7/2018 at 12:46 AM, Bodi said: Nice job Spacejoey. It's reconforting to see Oleon is making the most profit, we surely need a lot of dbs to support our large fleet. Yes, this is very comforting. So is this new data! Also I forgot to mention there may be slight inaccuracies due to some ships changing owner and so on. Not too bad though.
February 8, 20187 yr Author Oops, that's per ship level actually. On 2/7/2018 at 5:20 PM, Kai NRG said: Carno seems to have averaged a wildly high profit per ship ratio this MRCA!
February 8, 20187 yr On 2/8/2018 at 7:36 AM, SpaceJoey86 said: Oops, that's per ship level actually. Oh, okay. Missed that. Still high! But I suppose it probably only represents a couple fortunate ships instead of a whole fleet of seven that all did really well.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.