Jump to content
THIS IS THE TEST SITE OF EUROBRICKS! ×
THIS IS THE TEST SITE OF EUROBRICKS!

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 209
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Maybe I missed, but what about the lifting height? And would my MOD to increase lifting heigh by making a longer (double) rope solution actually work?

(Or should I just sit back and wait for the reviews to be published on August 1st? Thats also fine with me)

 

Posted

To be honest; I forgot to measure the lifting height and now I have the B-model assembled :tongue:

Posted
37 minutes ago, Jim said:

Thank you sir!

I have put a 16L link under and it fit perfectly ;)
I am going to build the B model in the evening too.

Posted
Just now, Ngoc Nguyen said:

@Jim Would you review the B model as well?

That would make sense :laugh:

I will have some pictures of it, yes. 

Posted

I have almost done mine thank you to M_Longer. First of all great look with a few pieces and second I would change some pieces but I don't know yet if it uses them for the B model so a very nice and playable set, must have if you can do it or if you need 4x2 L liftarns :laugh: .

Posted
On 7/21/2018 at 2:36 PM, M_longer said:

Look at instruction page 13 and see the magic going there:

What am I missing? I haven't built the B-model myself, so I have missed this mistake (?)

I am looking at my picture of the chassis and I am probably overlooking the mistake.

Posted
26 minutes ago, Jim said:

What am I missing? I haven't built the B-model myself, so I have missed this mistake (?)

I am looking at my picture of the chassis and I am probably overlooking the mistake.

The mistake is that in the instruction two axle holes are connected at an acute angle, which is impossible :tongue: Axle holes are connected only at angles whose measures are multiple of 90 degree.

Posted
3 minutes ago, Ngoc Nguyen said:

The mistake is that in the instruction two axle holes are connected at an acute angle, which is impossible :tongue: Axle holes are connected only at angles whose measures are multiple of 90 degree.

Ahhh yes. I see what you mean. That's weird.

Posted (edited)
On 7/21/2018 at 1:27 AM, Rudivdk said:

Maybe I missed, but what about the lifting height?

The lifting height, looking at it now is not too unrealistic:

43637838141_8b53708d8b_z.jpg42921916454_3d2d75f799_b.jpg

Edited by Magical Duck
Posted
23 minutes ago, Magical Duck said:

The lifting height, looking at it now is not too unrealistic:

But the lack of double wheels on front is? ;)

Posted
Just now, M_longer said:

But the lack of double wheels on front is? ;)

:laugh:

But if you look at the schematic drawing, the front wheels stick out about a stud more than the rear ones:

28751461407_948b73cd50_b.jpg

Posted
Just now, Maaboo35 said:

Same probable reason the 42071 didn't have double wheels: the price of the set.

Yeah, I have 42071 and the wheels just look rickety without doubles.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Announcements

  • THIS IS THE TEST SITE OF EUROBRICKS!

×
×
  • Create New...