Kintobor Posted June 24, 2019 Posted June 24, 2019 -Day Three- As the second day wound to a close, Hinckley, cosplaying as Tauriel, was chosen to be lynched. "So, with you being given a majority vote, do you have any last words?" Karie asked. "Eat my megablocks." Hinckley replied. "Neat. Get out of my party." Karie said, pointing to the road. A hush descended over the crowd. "That's it? No death, no blood? Nothing of that sort?" Hinckley asked. "Nope. Just get out, you party pooper." Karie replied. Hinckley shrugged an walked through the crowd. The crowd watched as Hinckley walked towards the sunset and away from the house party... ...only to be promptly run over by a sudden and unexpected police vehicle! The crowd of party goers quickly descended into shock. "I didn't plan that!" Karie cried out, equally shocked. "I didn't plan for that to happen! Oh no!" The cops stepped out and approached Karie as the group went to bed. --- The group returned the following day, with the police gone and Karie still present. Despite yesterday's shocking end, the eight party goers still left then returned. "Seems as if though we got a noise complaint and the cops showed up. Whoops! Other than that, though, the game is still on. Hinckley was revealed to be town after I called the hospital he's staying at. Definitely out for the rest of our party, but probably not going to die. Probably. There's eight of you left and no scum caught. This party's still in full swing, so get some food, some drinks, and try not to die!" The Party Goers Karie, as Herself (NPC) jimmynick, as Black Canary Bob, as Egon Spengler Khscarymovie4, as Korra Sandy, as Kylo Ren Sir Stig, as Raphael Trekkie99, as Tyrion Lannister KotZ, as Newt Scamander Tariq j, as Tracer The "Deceased" Chromeknight, as Daphne Blake: Had a splitting stomachache- Town Hinckley, as Tauriel: Didn't look both ways when crossing the street- Town --- Rules: (Thanks Def. I'm stealing your rules.) 1. Each player will be given a character to play, who will be aligned with either the Town or the Scum. To win the game, the Town must kill off all the Scum, while the Scum needs to outnumber the Town. Third-party (neutral) characters have their own win conditions as outlined in their roles. 2. Each day you will be able to vote to lynch a player. Voting is mandatory. Voting should be done in the following format; Vote: Character (Player). Similarly, unvoting is to be done in the format; Unvote: Character (Player). No other format will be accepted. A majority vote is required to lynch a player. Failure to vote will incur a vote penalty the following game day. 3. A game day will last a maximum of 72 hours. You may not vote in the first 24 hours. The day will end when a majority vote has been reached after 72 hours. After the day has been concluded, a night stage will commence, which will last 48 hours. Night actions must be sent to the host in the first 20 hours of the night stage. 3.5. Players may not target the same player two nights in a row, and may not target themselves. 4. The alignment of lynched players, as well as those that died during the night, will be revealed at the beginning of the next day. 5. You may not quote or pretend to quote anything sent to or from you in PM with the game host, or in PM with any other players. This includes all the details of your character and role, as well as any night action results. Role claims and reporting of night action results are acceptable, but in your own words only. Do not attempt to use the structure of your role PM to your advantage. 6. Do not play the game outside the thread. Similarly, do not post out of character inside the thread. Game tactics and roles may only be discussed in the game thread or via PM with other players. Private discussion is done at your own risk and should be treated as part of the game. 7. If you are dead, you may not post in thread or discuss the game with any of the players. Any information you had becomes void, and may not be passed on. 8. You may not edit your posts. 9. You must post in every day thread. 10. If you encounter a problem or have a question, please contact the host via PM 11. Violation of any of the above rules will result in a 5 vote penalty for the first offence, and death on your second offence.
KotZ Posted June 24, 2019 Posted June 24, 2019 12 minutes ago, Trekkie99 said: Huh. No keel. That's nice. No keel, but the haul was a lynched townie. So in a sea of scummy, sheepish, people, I've been the most sheepish, I'll admit that. Scummy is definitely Sir Stig, Sandy, or blackcanary, in my opinion. I honestly cannot read Bob.
Trekkie99 Posted June 24, 2019 Posted June 24, 2019 5 minutes ago, KotZ said: Scummy is definitely Sir Stig, Sandy, or blackcanary, in my opinion. I honestly cannot read Bob. Bruh, I feel you man.
Bob Posted June 24, 2019 Posted June 24, 2019 42 minutes ago, KotZ said: in my opinion. I honestly cannot read Bob. I am an open book. Just turn the pages and see what you find! I plan on voting for Tyrion again today. Nothing that's happened has changed my mind on him. In a game this small, there's several reasons there wasn't a kill: 1) A block 2) The scum can only kill every other night 3) The scum killer decided to stay home 4) A protect I'm worried that if there's actually a town blocker or protector, which in a game of ten people there very well may not be, they might be convinced that their action had an effect when it may have not.
Khscarymovie4 Posted June 25, 2019 Posted June 25, 2019 I guess RIP to Tauriel. But an elf should know better then to go onward without checking for dangers. Also I am very glad too see that we are all here. No creepy shadow people doing creepy things is a plus. Vote: Egon (Bob) Reason? Wait what reason? This is mafia we don't need reasons for anything. OK his hair is odd. HE MUST BE SCUM! Unvote: Egon (Bo) Don't want that to accidentally count. But it seems like this attitude was used a lot yesterday. So many votes and people being scummy of others for what? Quote OK, lemme break this down for you. If someone says "OMFG Daphne died, I super super hope she wasn't the cop" that's congratulating the scum on their choice of kill. That's what Kylo Ren did, and I didn't like it. The "defeatist attitude" is the tone of how Sandy said it: more or less "well shit we've lost our (possible )cop, what are we going to do now." I still don't really understand what your saying. If i say I hope Tauriel was not a power role am I congratulating the scum? I don't think it would be. I'm very interested too see what you say today. Quote Why did you have to point out it was a joke vote on me yesterday? After Jimmynick pointed out stupid reason. I don't find much contribution in your posts, other than keeping score of who is not active, and stating obvious mafia strategies. I am still waiting for an example of how I did either of these. Also good to know you were on the lynch for Tauriel. What was the reasoning again? Quote Combined with your earlier comments about my inexperience (That's right, that one hit me right in the feels), I will change my vote again. Let's see who hammers, and who doesn't. If he turns up town, I, Sandy and the hammerer will be under scrutiny. This is a risk I am willing to take. I would vote for Korry/Khscarymovie4 if she was close, and am willing to change if enough people are on board with that gut feeling. Since most does not understand my gibberish, I just have to cross my fingers and hope for the best (getting a scum early on).Unvote: Tyrion Lannister (Trekkie99) Vote: Tauriel (Hinkley) She hurt your feelings. I guess your right about being under scrutiny though. I find your behavior incredibly scummy and not just for the vote. Part of me believes you can't be scum based off of how outlandish you seem, but then if you are scum you could easily win that way. "Oh scum wouldn't do that, lets move on to other people and forget about Ralph's post where almost every sentence is fishy". Could that be the angle scum are playing this game? 1 hour ago, KotZ said: No keel, but the haul was a lynched townie. So in a sea of scummy, sheepish, people, I've been the most sheepish, I'll admit that. Scummy is definitely Sir Stig, Sandy, or blackcanary, in my opinion. I honestly cannot read Bob. Yes your hammer on a now fallen townie was very sheepish. You admitting that only makes you look worse in my eyes. If you know you are being a sheep then why bah? I need some old schooling in the air temples in the mountains. Where I can focus on the water, fire, earth, and air without a giant turtle accusing me of??? I don't know.
jimmynick Posted June 25, 2019 Posted June 25, 2019 Although it's disappointing to have lost Tauriel, it's good to know that what he said was in good faith since I shared some of his thoughts in the past couple of days. 22 minutes ago, Khscarymovie4 said: So many votes and people being scummy of others for what Did you accidentally a word? 22 minutes ago, Khscarymovie4 said: If i say I hope Tauriel was not a power role am I congratulating the scum? I mean yeah, there's no point speculating about who has what role since that distracts from the task at hand. Going over yesterday's posts, I find it interesting that when Trekkie99 says something you disagree with, you say: Quote While I can't really agree with the outcome I thank you for giving us all your reasoning but when I write something that you disagree with, you get up my backside and obviously cannot give it a rest. Are you going soft on Tyrion because he's your scum buddy, and going hard on me to get me out of the way? It wouldn't be the first time someone's spewed a load of crap at me. 1 hour ago, Bob said: 2) The scum can only kill every other night I remember a pirate ship where this happened and everyone went wild over it.
Sandy Posted June 25, 2019 Posted June 25, 2019 Crap, that wasn't the result I hoped for Tauriel, but of course we are lucky not to lose anyone else during the night. Gives us time to think... Like Bob said, there could be any number of reasons why there wasn't a kill last night. I just hope there has been a Town Block formed privately that might know something more. I am vanilla Town so I don't have anything to contribute to said Block, but I promise to consider my vote more carefully today. Yesterday's vote was more of a gut feeling, and I was honestly surprised by the end that the vote didn't swing my way instead. Of course that leaves my co-voters Raphael and Newt under my scrutiny, since they joined what is considered an "easy vote" for the scum.
Tariq j Posted June 25, 2019 Posted June 25, 2019 Out of the votes yesterday two stood out as being scummy as said above: “Combined with your earlier comments about my inexperience (That's right, that one hit me right in the feels), I will change my vote again. Let's see who hammers, and who doesn't. If he turns up town, I, Sandy and the hammerer will be under scrutiny. This is a risk I am willing to take. I would vote for Korry/Khscarymovie4 if she was close, and am willing to change if enough people are on board with that gut feeling. Since most does not understand my gibberish, I just have to cross my fingers and hope for the best (getting a scum early on). Unvote: Tyrion Lannister (Trekkie99) Vote: Tauriel (Hinkley)” By Sir Stig And then this vote by Newt: “Y'all, we need a lynch, otherwise we're basically resetting. Today's been ugly. Hopefully we can analyze a bit better tomorrow. Unvote: Kylo Ren (Sandy) Vote: Tauriel (Hinckley) Both are really scummy today, and there's way too many of us acting sheepish.” Both myself and Black Canary pointed out Newt’s sheepish initial vote for Sandy but got no response from him. He then voted for Hinckley despite admitting he found Black Canary scummy. I pointed it out, but again no response. Sit Stig was flip flopping all over the place. Being undecided or trying to stir up confusion? Note as well that Hinckley had two penalty votes on him yesterday. Something I think the scum took advantage of. Either way my vote is definitely going too either one of these too unless a night action with some concrete evidence is brought up.
Sir Stig Posted June 25, 2019 Posted June 25, 2019 11 hours ago, Bob said: I am an open book. Just turn the pages and see what you find! I plan on voting for Tyrion again today. Nothing that's happened has changed my mind on him. In a game this small, there's several reasons there wasn't a kill: 1) A block 2) The scum can only kill every other night 3) The scum killer decided to stay home 4) A protect I'm worried that if there's actually a town blocker or protector, which in a game of ten people there very well may not be, they might be convinced that their action had an effect when it may have not. Did you get a blocked kill result, and want to make the blocker/protector doubt their result? Everyone: If there is a town blocker or protector, today is the day to get that message across some way. 6 hours ago, Sandy said: Crap, that wasn't the result I hoped for Tauriel, but of course we are lucky not to lose anyone else during the night. Gives us time to think... Like Bob said, there could be any number of reasons why there wasn't a kill last night. I just hope there has been a Town Block formed privately that might know something more. I am vanilla Town so I don't have anything to contribute to said Block, but I promise to consider my vote more carefully today. Yesterday's vote was more of a gut feeling, and I was honestly surprised by the end that the vote didn't swing my way instead. Of course that leaves my co-voters Raphael and Newt under my scrutiny, since they joined what is considered an "easy vote" for the scum. Very early to claim Vanilla Town. If that is correct you are only helping the scum narrow it down and find possible power roles. And then you attempt to throw the suspicion on me and Newt. Interesting... 1 hour ago, Tariq j said: Out of the votes yesterday two stood out as being scummy as said above: “Combined with your earlier comments about my inexperience (That's right, that one hit me right in the feels), I will change my vote again. Let's see who hammers, and who doesn't. If he turns up town, I, Sandy and the hammerer will be under scrutiny. This is a risk I am willing to take. I would vote for Korry/Khscarymovie4 if she was close, and am willing to change if enough people are on board with that gut feeling. Since most does not understand my gibberish, I just have to cross my fingers and hope for the best (getting a scum early on). Unvote: Tyrion Lannister (Trekkie99) Vote: Tauriel (Hinkley)” By Sir Stig And then this vote by Newt: “Y'all, we need a lynch, otherwise we're basically resetting. Today's been ugly. Hopefully we can analyze a bit better tomorrow. Unvote: Kylo Ren (Sandy) Vote: Tauriel (Hinckley) Both are really scummy today, and there's way too many of us acting sheepish.” Both myself and Black Canary pointed out Newt’s sheepish initial vote for Sandy but got no response from him. He then voted for Hinckley despite admitting he found Black Canary scummy. I pointed it out, but again no response. Sit Stig was flip flopping all over the place. Being undecided or trying to stir up confusion? Note as well that Hinckley had two penalty votes on him yesterday. Something I think the scum took advantage of. Either way my vote is definitely going too either one of these too unless a night action with some concrete evidence is brought up. True. I am flip flopping all over the place. Hmm, how does one act not sheepish in mafia? I could say I am town, but this is a game of deception, so that would seem very sheepish. Too bad that Hinckley turned up town. It is a sad bi-effect of being a very good player. I really hope the cop car was not a hint that we just lost our cop. I am always wary when the lynch mob start being too unified. I thought the push towards Sandy yesterday was somewhat lacking in good arguments, and I got a feeling that she was sincere in her replies. It may very well be that I was wrong for not jumping on that bandwagon (don't forget to keep that one in mind for analyzing later on) and that it is my fault for yesterdays erroneous voting. One theory is that Sandy put the early vote on Hinckley to take away focus from Newt/Kotz (who also had penalty votes), and the chance to take out Hinckley got too big of a temptation to let go, while also saving themselves from penalty votes. Since Newt/Kotz did not answer Tariq J and Blackcanary, his vote on Sandy may have been a way to mess up the voting analysis and try to distance themselves from eachother. @Sandy, @KotZ: 3 questions for you: 1. Is the above theory close to home? 2. What are your thoughts on each other? 3. What are your thoughts on me? Bonus question: Someone else that tickles your fancy? If I spread confusion, I am sorry. It is only my own confusion leaking out.
Bob Posted June 25, 2019 Posted June 25, 2019 1 hour ago, Sir Stig said: Did you get a blocked kill result, and want to make the blocker/protector doubt their result? Everyone: If there is a town blocker or protector, today is the day to get that message across some way. If you are the town blocker or protector please do not reveal in thread that you are the town blocker or protector for the love of god. What kind of a play is this? 1 hour ago, Sir Stig said: I really hope the cop car was not a hint that we just lost our cop. There's no clues in the pictures. We spent half of the day yesterday wondering whether or not Daphne was the detective because she said off-handedly that we needed to become detectives to root out the scum. I can't tell what exactly your angle is here. I'm really not sure what you're out to accomplish. If you're scum you're making it really obvious. If you're town, you're looking extremely scummy. I just don't know what to make of you.
Khscarymovie4 Posted June 25, 2019 Posted June 25, 2019 14 hours ago, jimmynick said: I mean yeah, there's no point speculating about who has what role since that distracts from the task at hand. Going over yesterday's posts, I find it interesting that when Trekkie99 says something you disagree with, you say: but when I write something that you disagree with, you get up my backside and obviously cannot give it a rest. Are you going soft on Tyrion because he's your scum buddy, and going hard on me to get me out of the way? It wouldn't be the first time someone's spewed a load of crap at me. That's because while I did not agree with Tyrion it was a perspective I could see someone having. Your reasoning's yesterday I could not see a perspective thus I continue to ask. Do you want a thank you? Thank you for giving very odd reasons as to why you vote I guess. Also nice to note that Ralph has continued to ignore my questions for the claims he made against me. @Sir Stig need I remind you what they were?
Tariq j Posted June 25, 2019 Posted June 25, 2019 4 hours ago, Sir Stig said: True. I am flip flopping all over the place. Hmm, how does one act not sheepish in mafia? I could say I am town, but this is a game of deception, so that would seem very sheepish. What? If you were town why would you want to deceive the town? It wouldn’t be sheepish. 4 hours ago, Sir Stig said: One theory is that Sandy put the early vote on Hinckley to take away focus from Newt/Kotz (who also had penalty votes), and the chance to take out Hinckley got too big of a temptation to let go, while also saving themselves from penalty votes. Since Newt/Kotz did not answer Tariq J and Blackcanary, his vote on Sandy may have been a way to mess up the voting analysis and try to distance themselves from eachother. @Sandy, @KotZ: 3 questions for you: That’s a fair point. Voting for Hinckley may have taken the attention off him. And it would explain Newt’s sudden vote swap. I don’t what to think anymore.
KotZ Posted June 25, 2019 Posted June 25, 2019 16 hours ago, Bob said: I'm worried that if there's actually a town blocker or protector, which in a game of ten people there very well may not be, they might be convinced that their action had an effect when it may have not. Same. 16 hours ago, Khscarymovie4 said: Yes your hammer on a now fallen townie was very sheepish. You admitting that only makes you look worse in my eyes. If you know you are being a sheep then why bah? Because I felt like we needed a lynch, and I feel it was better to be honest today. 5 hours ago, Sir Stig said: One theory is that Sandy put the early vote on Hinckley to take away focus from Newt/Kotz (who also had penalty votes), and the chance to take out Hinckley got too big of a temptation to let go, while also saving themselves from penalty votes. Since Newt/Kotz did not answer Tariq J and Blackcanary, his vote on Sandy may have been a way to mess up the voting analysis and try to distance themselves from eachother. @Sandy, @KotZ: 3 questions for you: 1. Is the above theory close to home? 2. What are your thoughts on each other? 3. What are your thoughts on me? Bonus question: Someone else that tickles your fancy? 1. No 2. I don't trust Sandy at all, especially after seeing Tauriel turned up Town and them two going back and forth yesterday. 3. I don't trust you, because while you are asking for good questions, your earlier call for a blocker or protector to announce seemingly in thread worries the magic out of me. Bonus Answer: Blackcanary, as I mentioned earlier. but if I'm honest, that one's still kinda not as much. Black Canary seems more aggressive rather than scummy, looking back over the posts.
Sandy Posted June 25, 2019 Posted June 25, 2019 9 hours ago, Sir Stig said: Very early to claim Vanilla Town. If that is correct you are only helping the scum narrow it down and find possible power roles. And then you attempt to throw the suspicion on me and Newt. Interesting... I am always wary when the lynch mob start being too unified. I thought the push towards Sandy yesterday was somewhat lacking in good arguments, and I got a feeling that she was sincere in her replies. It may very well be that I was wrong for not jumping on that bandwagon (don't forget to keep that one in mind for analyzing later on) and that it is my fault for yesterdays erroneous voting. One theory is that Sandy put the early vote on Hinckley to take away focus from Newt/Kotz (who also had penalty votes), and the chance to take out Hinckley got too big of a temptation to let go, while also saving themselves from penalty votes. Since Newt/Kotz did not answer Tariq J and Blackcanary, his vote on Sandy may have been a way to mess up the voting analysis and try to distance themselves from eachother. @Sandy, @KotZ: 3 questions for you: 1. Is the above theory close to home? 2. What are your thoughts on each other? 3. What are your thoughts on me? Bonus question: Someone else that tickles your fancy? If I spread confusion, I am sorry. It is only my own confusion leaking out. First of all, I already claimed to be vanilla town yesterday when I was one vote from being lynched myself. So I'm not saying anything the scum hasn't already heard. Yesterday was a fumble, but in this game we often need to fumble a bit to get anywhere. Of course on the retrospect, having someone highly experienced like Tauriel still around would be great, but on the other hand she would've been deadly had she been scum. As far as your questions go: 1. I give your theory no credit. Why would have Newt voted for me in the first place if we were in cahoots and trying to slip under the radar? 2. If Newt was scum, he was really lucky to get the heat off of him yesterday, being the other one with penalty votes. I don't trust him for hammering down the Tauriel lynch, but also that's not something a "lucky scum" would do, since now the heat is on him. 3. I'm not finding you really helpful or trustworthy, but your behavior isn't exactly like that of a smart scum. Of course, there have been many erratic scum before... Bonus question: Tracer has been quite non-commital in her comments, solely nodding or shrugging her shoulders to other people's theories. A scum would dream to remain as low-key as she is... Unless something drastic comes up, I think my vote will go to Raphael or Newt tonight, anyway.
Kintobor Posted June 25, 2019 Author Posted June 25, 2019 "Voting is now open!" With eight players remaining, a majority of five is needed to secure a lynch. 48 hours remain. As an aside, I noticed some of you are having issues related to quoting posts from previous days. If you guys want I can unlock the posts to allow you to do so. Is that something you guys want?
Tariq j Posted June 25, 2019 Posted June 25, 2019 1 hour ago, Sandy said: Bonus question: Tracer has been quite non-commital in her comments, solely nodding or shrugging her shoulders to other people's theories. A scum would dream to remain as low-key as she is... Really? I was the one who pointed out that Newt was being sheepish on Day 2. If anything others have been nodding their heads or just ignoring my theories. Today I explained my problems with Newt and Rapheal's vote. That said, I agree with the choice to lynch either Raphael or Newt. I'm more inclined to vote for Newt since I still don't understand what Raphael is playing at. He's not being very Townie but then he's drawing a ridiculous amount of attention to himself by being scummy. And I can't fathom as to why a scum would do that. He's not helping whatever side he's on.
KotZ Posted June 25, 2019 Posted June 25, 2019 10 minutes ago, Tariq j said: That said, I agree with the choice to lynch either Raphael or Newt. I'm more inclined to vote for Newt since I still don't understand what Raphael is playing at. He's not being very Townie but then he's drawing a ridiculous amount of attention to himself by being scummy. And I can't fathom as to why a scum would do that. He's not helping whatever side he's on. Could he be a third-party?
Trekkie99 Posted June 26, 2019 Posted June 26, 2019 3 hours ago, Sandy said: Of course on the retrospect, having someone highly experienced like Tauriel still around would be great, but on the other hand she would've been deadly had she been scum. More of a opinion scum would have than town IMO.
Trekkie99 Posted June 26, 2019 Posted June 26, 2019 1 hour ago, Kintobor said: As an aside, I noticed some of you are having issues related to quoting posts from previous days. If you guys want I can unlock the posts to allow you to do so. Is that something you guys want? We can always just copy & paste, but if it's not a inconvenience then that would be great.
Bob Posted June 26, 2019 Posted June 26, 2019 1 hour ago, KotZ said: Could he be a third-party? I would scream it from the hill tops, if we weren't on a flat baseplate with plates on it. In a game with 10 players, I don't think there are any third party players. Especially not a jester. Vote: Raphael / Sir Stig
Khscarymovie4 Posted June 26, 2019 Posted June 26, 2019 6 minutes ago, Bob said: I would scream it from the hill tops, if we weren't on a flat baseplate with plates on it. In a game with 10 players, I don't think there are any third party players. Especially not a jester. Vote: Raphael / Sir Stig Need some hills? I can arrange that! -tries- Oh yeah, I'm just a cosplayer, nothing more..... I definitely think Raphael and Newt look the scummiest and bah the most. I'm fine with lynching either one. I will vote for Raphael though as he has done a lot more scummy and wacky things, including failing to give any examples of the scummy things he said I did. After multiple times of me asking. Vote: Raphael (Sir Stig)
Trekkie99 Posted June 26, 2019 Posted June 26, 2019 On 6/24/2019 at 6:58 PM, Bob said: I'm worried that if there's actually a town blocker or protector, which in a game of ten people there very well may not be, they might be convinced that their action had an effect when it may have not. Worried you say? I mean yes the concern is justified, but why can't you be scum who is worried cause they were blocked? Of course WIFOM comes into play because I don't think scum would say what you did, but maybe they know that so maybe they would say it and etc. etc. etc. Either way I just wanted to point that out. And no I'm not a town blocker so don't go lynching Bob if I'm killed since that would probably be scum trying to frame Bob which would be rather obvious IMO. Or maybe Bob is scum and I just gave him a great idea. For fucks sake.
Khscarymovie4 Posted June 26, 2019 Posted June 26, 2019 6 minutes ago, Trekkie99 said: For f#cks sake. This is a party! A hand of the king should know better! Scum thy must be!
Trekkie99 Posted June 26, 2019 Posted June 26, 2019 Vote: Raphael (Sir Stig) If scum are gonna play some funny business to coast to a win because "scum don't do that", then we's gonna shut it down early. Just now, Khscarymovie4 said: This is a party! A hand of the king should know better! Scum thy must be!
Recommended Posts