Ok.. fine. Unvote:Mike Vote:Damien. There. Everyone happy? This logical now Hinckley????!

Ok.. fine. Unvote:Mike Vote:Damien. There. Everyone happy? This logical now Hinckley????!

No need to scream...

No need to scream...

People one and people all, the doctor approaches! Perhaps now he can answer your questions.

(sdpirate has now confirmed, give him as much of a hard time as you like )

Doesn't that defeat the purpose? Isn't the point to figure things out, not just get rid of the annoying users? Do I suddenly sound defensive?

Seriously though, it is the character, not the player who we should be voting out here, or I've missed the whole point of the game.

(OOC: Mr. Shadows, the idea is that if you vote for a character but don't know his username, then how are you going to convict him? Voting is to be done against the player, not the character. This way you do not need to know the player's character to vote for him, however if you want to vote for a character then you have to find out who he/she is played by. You may vote for a player based on evidence against their character, but not on a character without knowing the player.

I bet I've confused you even more now. )

Current voting:

stash2sixx (Mike): 2

sdpirate (Damien): 5

Audience: 1

Hinckley's face: 1

I unvote: sdpirate and unboo him too.

Let's give him a chance to explain himself before we kill him...

Once again, Unvote: sdpirate. Be warned Damien, people are going to watching you the most. And I have the eyes of a fisherman.

~ Calvin the Fisherman ~

(OOC: Mr. Shadows, the idea is that if you vote for a character but don't know his username, then how are you going to convict him? Voting is to be done against the player, not the character. This way you do not need to know the player's character to vote for him, however if you want to vote for a character then you have to find out who he/she is played by. You may vote for a player based on evidence against their character, but not on a character without knowing the player.

I bet I've confused you even more now. )

Yep, you did.

EXACTLY! The bold part is why we should vote based on character and not player. I thought we were told to stay in character, even if we don't reveal them. Our characters are unaware that they are the pawns of users, manipulating their bits and byes for our own amusement, so they should be voting based on their fellow fictional characters.

If it wasn't an issue, wouldn't you just announce who everyone is right from the start? Whatever the case, this is my first one of these, so I don't know what the hell I'm doing.

I unvote: sdpirate and unboo him too.

Let's give him a chance to explain himself before we kill him...

That sounds like a good plan. We wouldn't want to kill him until after we've given him a hard time.

Unvote: Damien/sdpirate/whatever.

Bring on the doctor!

And I have the eyes of a fisherman.

~ Calvin the Fisherman ~

*points at Calvin's fish eyes!*

They aren't doing a very good job at this, are they?

No, not really.

Maybe we could help?

I don't think that's allowed.

But I already know who did it!

You couldn't possibly.

Sure I could!

Bluervo whispers into Shadow's ear.

Well I'll be damned.

Yep, you did.

EXACTLY! The bold part is why we should vote based on character and not player. I thought we were told to stay in character, even if we don't reveal them. Our characters are unaware that they are the pawns of users, manipulating their bits and byes for our own amusement, so they should be voting based on their fellow fictional characters.

If it wasn't an issue, wouldn't you just announce who everyone is right from the start? Whatever the case, this is my first one of these, so I don't know what the hell I'm doing.

(OOC: Now I'm confused.

Think of it this way. The characters are not pawns of users, you are the character, just with a different name. Therefore as nobody can remember who anyone else is until they are found out, you must vote for a player, either because they are acting suspicious or because you know they're character and think them guilty due to evidence or something. The idea is that you can easily blame the deed on a character, but to condemn that character you must know who the player is.

This discussion is becoming confusing, if you wish to argue it further, please do so by PM. )

Majiko decided to have a look for some food since Mike hadn't got him any yet.

Cook! Where's the cook? I saw him around earlier. I want some breakfast! What with this whole commotion I didn't get anything! And I'm hungry!!

Why would you make fun of me... So, umm.. yeah. And I said the eyes of a fisherman. Jerk.

Vote: Imperialshadows.

Unvote: Imperialshadows.

That'll learn ya.

Oh, and by the way...

~ Calvin the Fisherman ~

Right, a quick update to the rules everyone, mainly because some people are getting a little confused (yes that's you shadows, not me, not at all!)

Please use the following formula when voting:

Vote: <username> (<character>)

There is no need to update your previous votes, but from now it should be done like that. This means that to vote for someone you must now both their username and character. Please not that this only applies to daytime voting; night actions only require a username.

Now, get back to the game!

Why would you make fun of me... So, umm.. yeah. And I said the eyes of a fisherman. Jerk.

imperialshadows: When you need a good jerk.™

That can't be right.

Right, a quick update to the rules everyone, mainly because some people are getting a little confused (yes that's you shadows, not me, not at all!)

I was never confused at all.

So, for example, that would be:

Vote: Atoll Dweller (fisheyes the fishy fishcatcherman)

or

Unvote: Atoll Dweller (fisheyes the fishy fishcatcherman)

Ok, I think we're all a lot clearer on this now. Why did you have to go and distract the whole thing with this silly conversation? Geez, some people.

Back on topic! We really do suck at this. :laugh:

While the above squabble settled down

We are awaiting for a "very important" person. Daimen aka sdpirate. It's time for you to do some explaination. We have enough suspects at our hands. It's time for you to prove you innocence! We do not want to prosecute an innocent victim. Tell us what you know! Only the truth, Doctor. Otherwise, face the wraith.

While the above squabble settled down

We are awaiting for a "very important" person. Daimen aka sdpirate. It's time for you to do some explaination. We have enough suspects at our hands. It's time for you to prove you innocence! We do not want to prosecute an innocent victim. Tell us what you know! Only the truth, Doctor. Otherwise, face the wraith.

((OOC Earlier on, Dragonator stated that sdpirate isnt playing at all, so no point in questioning him, we will all just vote him out this week and then get on with the game again))

Why does my head still feel fuzzy, hmmm i could sure go for a bite to eat....might clear my head a little. No fish for me thankyou

((OOC Earlier on, Dragonator stated that sdpirate isnt playing at all, so no point in questioning him, we will all just vote him out this week and then get on with the game again))

OOC: He just submit his pledge to Lord Dragonator a few hours ago, blah blah. Therefore, some of them are awaiting for his explaination before we vote. Give him a chance.

OOC: He just submit his pledge to Lord Dragonator a few hours ago, blah blah. Therefore, some of them are awaiting for his explaination before we vote. Give him a chance.

Right! Then we kill him!

we shouldnt waste are time on the doctor

we should focuse in who we have evidence for

Mike the servet we should definaltey vote and tommorow we should try to find out who the maid is.

focus on what the wizard says, he metioned the cook now!

the way i see it is

maid makes poision using herbs

cook uses her poision in his food for king

Mike (stash) delivers the food to the king

i even saw Mike the last night, he says that he was delivering food. he's admitted it!

we shouldnt waste are time on the doctor

we should focuse in who we have evidence for

Mike the servet we should definaltey vote and tommorow we should try to find out who the maid is.

focus on what the wizard says, he metioned the cook now!

the way i see it is

maid makes poision using herbs

cook uses her poision in his food for king

Mike (stash) delivers the food to the king

i even saw Mike the last night, he says that he was delivering food. he's admitted it!

So you were loitering then! Anyhow, how did you see Mike without acting suspiciously? Plus, if the maid and the cook did poison the food, then how do we know that Mike was part of the plot? He could have just been doing his job without knowing that he was actually delivering poison. The way I see it, you're just very desperate to pin the blame on someone else.

never there is no crime gonig to the loo i am a proud loyilast 

we shouldnt waste are time on the doctor

we should focuse in who we have evidence for

Mike the servet we should definaltey vote and tommorow we should try to find out who the maid is.

focus on what the wizard says, he metioned the cook now!

Think logically. Someone supplied the poison. Someone put the poison in the food or wine. Someone delivered the poison.

This is all true. BUT! Only 2 of those positions need to know what they're doing, unless two are the same person.

I actually think Mike could be innocent, I'd like to hear what he has to say for himself.

I still think the doctor is the most likely to have supplied the poison.

This takes brains. The cook or cellar keeper could have put the poison in something with simple direction, but it takes brains to plan out such a thing. The maid and Mike are dumb as rocks, that's why they're servants.

Who are the most likely to be intelligent AND have a motive? Well, who gains the most from this death. The family. No one else in the castle can be promoted to king except for a male member of the family, it's tradition!

If we're going to continue to ignore the doctor, even though it's obvious that he was involved, then we need to look at the family. Follow the power.

never there is no crime gonig to the loo i am a proud loyilast

I hope you washed your hands.

never there is no crime gonig to the loo i am a proud loyilast

OK then, sorry to have bothered you.

Who are the most likely to be intelligent AND have a motive? Well, who gains the most from this death. The family. No one else in the castle can be promoted to king except for a male member of the family, it's tradition!

If we're going to continue to ignore the doctor, even though it's obvious that he was involved, then we need to look at the family. Follow the power.

That, I agree on. The nobles should be examined, they're often the ones involved in these kind of plots.

EDIT: Reason for editing - the quote needed to be fixed; I am not someone who leaves them broken.

Edited June 10, 200816 yr by commanderbly42

the reason i think the miad made the poison becaue the wizard said "women and there bloddy herbs" maybe it was

lady suzanne or mary

we mut decide now

noble or servent

the reason i think the miad made the poison becaue the wizard said "women and there bloddy herbs" maybe it was

lady suzanne or mary

we mut decide now

noble or servent

I noticed that too, but I sort of thought he was trying to mislead us. I mean, he thinks it was in the food or drink, but then he wants something to eat? Would you order food with a killer around?

I've noticed that he seems to give one serious bit of information, like revealing an identity, then some confusing puzzle that could be a trick.

Plus, if we're supposed to believe that he knows who did it and how, why didn't he save the king? That would make him a traitor in my book, but I think he's just a little... sometimes. We have to take what he says very carefully.

I mean, seriously, he also said to go ahead and kill the doctor, as if it didn't matter to him. Should we take that to mean that he knows the doctor is guilty, or that he just doesn't care who lives or dies? Like I said ...

i thought he was trying to get across that killing the doctor was meaningless becaue he isnt a tratior or involed

(sorry for double post again)

with the food i think h was trying to say the cook was involed

To Hinckley:

I have just been informed (by the powers that be) that I delivered the food and the wine. I was only informed that I delivered the food, but I guess the goofy Wizard remembered that I brought the wine too now.

To everyone:

In fact, if I remember, earlier today, the Wizard had asked me for food. Now the Wizard is crazy, but he ain't stupid. If I killed the king, would the wizard still be asking me for food to be brought to him?

To Pencoin:

My vote would be for you. You are extremely quick to pin this on me, you have named me more than once in your ramblings, yet the majority of us don't know who you are. You say you were using the facilities that evening, then what is there to be ashamed; show us who you are. Unless, of course, you have something to hide?

My vote: PENCOIN / Mystery person

Edited June 10, 200816 yr by stash2sixx

I mean, seriously, he also said to go ahead and kill the doctor, as if it didn't matter to him. Should we take that to mean that he knows the doctor is guilty, or that he just doesn't care who lives or dies? Like I said ...

This is an intriguing thought! Till now, the doctor have no submission. Is it remaining slience means constent? How about the maid and cellar. I agreed that this sinister plot could not be accomplished by one. There must be 2 suspects in order to make this show works. Mike had started talking. How about the rest of the suspects? I am sure the maid have something to do with it.