Zerobricks Posted February 16, 2022 Posted February 16, 2022 (edited) 14 minutes ago, Ngoc Nguyen said: Mathematically, the connection points on the blade's direction are two axle holes, so the whole build is a right trapezoid: DC = 1, AD = 2, and AB = 1.5. AB is the cam piece. The diagonal BC is larger than 2 but is forced into a length of 2, which are 3 holes apart, in the bottom liftarm. Would be an easy fix if the cam is not forced to be perpendicular. So using (O) and (O +) beam isntead of (+ O +) half beams? Edited February 16, 2022 by Zerobricks Quote
Ngoc Nguyen Posted February 16, 2022 Author Posted February 16, 2022 1 minute ago, Zerobricks said: using (O) and (O +) beam Using that will not fix the blade to the beams. The fix should be using thin liftarms 1x4 (+OO+) Quote
Stephan Posted February 17, 2022 Posted February 17, 2022 (edited) 19 hours ago, Zerobricks said: Cn you post these and others in the LDD new parts too: I check this forum too . I will prepare these parts and add them when IDs are known. If @R0Sch is okay with that? In the LDD files it will be stated that you are the creator of the 3D models. Edited February 17, 2022 by Stephan Quote
phmzt Posted February 17, 2022 Posted February 17, 2022 13 hours ago, Ngoc Nguyen said: Apparently there's an illegal building technique at the back, according to the speed build video. … The bottom axle hole of the cam piece theoretically can't fit into the pinhole, but the builder is instructed to put an axle hole through it. I've tried this kind of assembly now. Considering the tolerances, the illegal technique is less wobbly. The parts don't get twisted but only pushed to the limit. It's probably because it has to hold the long blade, is it? Quote
ace_klimax Posted February 17, 2022 Posted February 17, 2022 12 hours ago, Ngoc Nguyen said: Finished. Nice job, will you share the file? Thanks Quote
R0Sch Posted February 17, 2022 Posted February 17, 2022 6 hours ago, Stephan said: I check this foruk too . I will prepare these parts and add them when IDs are known. If @R0Sch is okay with that? In the LDD files it will be stated that you are the creator of the 3D models. My files are only mock-ups. I wouldn't publish them if I were you. The only accurate part might be the 2x1x1 curved panel, but I cannot be certain. Quote
Ngoc Nguyen Posted February 17, 2022 Author Posted February 17, 2022 Corporate needs you to find the difference between the left design and the right design. Quote
phmzt Posted February 17, 2022 Posted February 17, 2022 26 minutes ago, Ngoc Nguyen said: Corporate needs you to find the difference between the left design and the right design. V8, raised, attached further back (and connected through a gear reduction?) Plus other modifications I don't think I can figure out. Quote
Zerobricks Posted February 17, 2022 Posted February 17, 2022 One is from 42141 and the other from 42000? Do I win a cookie? Quote
kbalage Posted February 17, 2022 Posted February 17, 2022 If it ain't broke, don't fix it... 42077-42096 reloaded ;) Quote
R0Sch Posted February 17, 2022 Posted February 17, 2022 43 minutes ago, kbalage said: If it ain't broke, don't fix it... 42077-42096 reloaded ;) Yeah, but if it ain't broke don't make it worse either. 42141 is a clear downgrade from a technical point of view. Just some new fancy panels to cover up the empty framework. Quote
johnnytifosi Posted February 17, 2022 Posted February 17, 2022 On 2/16/2022 at 7:05 PM, Ngoc Nguyen said: There is none. The body is hollow, like that of the Ferrari 42125. This is pathetic Quote
Ngoc Nguyen Posted February 18, 2022 Author Posted February 18, 2022 On 2/17/2022 at 5:27 PM, Ngoc Nguyen said: Corporate needs you to find the difference between the left design and the right design. They are the same design https://nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/memecreator-cdn/media/__processed__/28a/template-find-the-difference-0c6db91aec9c.jpg Quote
Ngoc Nguyen Posted February 18, 2022 Author Posted February 18, 2022 (edited) Compare the innards: It was only when I started building the 42000 did I realize that it even has manifolds. Edited February 18, 2022 by Ngoc Nguyen Quote
amorti Posted February 18, 2022 Posted February 18, 2022 20 hours ago, phmzt said: connected through a gear reduction Shame to remove that and have the fake motor spin at a reduced speed. They could easily have used the new diff to get the speed back up, too. Quote
Peter1999 Posted February 18, 2022 Posted February 18, 2022 Looking at the photos of W13 from track today, tumbler tires as wets does not seem to be a bad choice. Wets are still Cinturato, so stickers on lego are incorrect. Wheel covers need improvements, they are too big. All teams chosed style of second FIA iteration (smaller, more bulky) instead of first drafts (big flat cover). Quote
phmzt Posted February 18, 2022 Posted February 18, 2022 6 hours ago, amorti said: Shame to remove that and have the fake motor spin at a reduced speed. They could easily have used the new diff to get the speed back up, too. Yes. However, I'm planning to put in a mini-engine with spinning turbo, and too much rotational speed might rend it to pieces. Besides, what is lost in speed is gained in noise and moving parts, so I think that's ok. (And I would really like to implement a pullback motor as an representation of KERS, as suggested by @Void_S on page 12 here) Quote
williamyzfr1 Posted February 18, 2022 Posted February 18, 2022 6 hours ago, Peter1999 said: Looking at the photos of W13 from track today, tumbler tires as wets does not seem to be a bad choice. Wets are still Cinturato, so stickers on lego are incorrect. Wheel covers need improvements, they are too big. All teams chosed style of second FIA iteration (smaller, more bulky) instead of first drafts (big flat cover Wrong name, incorrect sticker, wrong wheel cover. Lego need to improve. Quote
Toitoine Posted February 19, 2022 Posted February 19, 2022 (edited) On 2/16/2022 at 11:18 AM, R0Sch said: ... I updated the CAD file according to the real part connection points:https://brickshelf.com/gallery/R0Sch/42141/3x19-Frame/technic_frame_3x19.colhttps://brickshelf.com/gallery/R0Sch/42141/3x19-Frame/technic_frame_3x19.connhttps://brickshelf.com/gallery/R0Sch/42141/3x19-Frame/technic_frame_3x19.dat ... Hi ROSch, Thanks for the part ! Can you tell me if it works on studio Mac. I have imported the 3 files in: /Applications/Studio 2.0/ldraw/collider /Applications/Studio 2.0/ldraw/connectivity /Applications/Studio 2.0/ldraw/parts but don't find it in the library when I open studio. Did I make a mistake ? Edited February 19, 2022 by Toitoine Quote
Ngoc Nguyen Posted February 20, 2022 Author Posted February 20, 2022 On 2/17/2022 at 7:18 PM, ace_klimax said: Nice job, will you share the file? Thanks You can get the file here. https://bricksafe.com/files/nguyengiangoc/original-models/42141.io Quote
kbalage Posted February 20, 2022 Posted February 20, 2022 On 2/16/2022 at 9:38 PM, Ngoc Nguyen said: Apparently there's an illegal building technique at the back, according to the speed build video. The bottom axle hole of the cam piece theoretically can't fit into the pinhole, but the builder is instructed to put an axle hole through it. @kbalage I think you may wanna cover this in your review! Quoted the screenshot by purpose to make sense - the axle can be pushed in the hole without the smallest effort. Might not be a mathematically perfect fit but thanks to the flexibility of the parts there's no issue or even visible stress. I've seen multiple builds in official sets with more stress on the parts than this. Quote
Ngoc Nguyen Posted February 20, 2022 Author Posted February 20, 2022 On 2/18/2022 at 12:42 AM, kbalage said: If it ain't broke, don't fix it... 42077-42096 reloaded ;) Would you like the Studio file that contains 42414 and 42000 to show the comparison in your video? Quote
kbalage Posted February 20, 2022 Posted February 20, 2022 6 minutes ago, Ngoc Nguyen said: Would you like the Studio file that contains 42414 and 42000 to show the comparison in your video? Thank you for the offer, PM sent. Quote
whitepen Posted February 23, 2022 Posted February 23, 2022 (edited) Honestly, I really like this set! It has: F1 Suspension parts Cv joints! (I dont have any!) LOTS of orange panels 4 tumbler tires Cool suspension system Its a must buy for me! Edited February 23, 2022 by whitepen Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.