Is your member number a set number?

[Fallenangel]

Some DUPLO set:

[Brickdoctor]

Some DUPLO set:

[snip]

Well it's almost an X-wing. Sorta. Edited May 5, 2011 by Brickdoctor

[Artanis I]

I previously looked up my number to find that it is not a set. I noticed that a few people are doing the "remove the first/last digit and you get xxx" so I thought I'd try that too. Unfortunately there is still no 10965, nor is there a 965 but 1096 comes up as:

So that's something I suppose. Cheap, simple, undesirable, maybe we were made for each other.

From 1997, which was when my dark age began. The same set as 6400 & 6406.

[EverettYA]

I decided to look up my member number and to my dismay I am the dreaded Flex Track .

EverettYA

Edited May 8, 2011 by EverettYA

[minifig_gal]

Removing the first digit, I'm a "Midi-scale Millenium Falcon". Which is cool, and all, but if I remove the last digit instead, I am the cutest little plane ever!

[Big Cam]

Removing the first digit, I'm a "Midi-scale Millenium Falcon". Which is cool, and all, but if I remove the last digit instead, I am the cutest little plane ever!

I suppose with the higher member numbers, your member number might actually NOT be a set number.

Good work on finding a cool replacement!

[brenden perkins]

Apparently my number matches up with a jeep from 1976, that's kinda cool. Set 365-1 Jeep With Steering

[Lego Otaku]

13293 gets nothing

1329 gets nothing

3293 is a duplo set

Can I trade numbers? ;)

OTOH I can wait until Lego runs out of 10xxx numbering and start doing 11xxx, then 12xxx, finally 13xxx but at about 220 numbered sets every decade, it'd be about 140 years before number 13293 gets used for a set. :(

[ttoole73]

My number is the as yet unrleased Star Wars Advent Calender. Works for me.

[Lego Love]

I predict that at this rate my number will be a set in approximately 25 years.

I hope Eurobricks lasts that long. :)

[-GZ-]

http://www.brickset.com/detail/?Set=8976-1

Eh... I have this one in my collection!)

Edited May 18, 2011 by -GZ-

[LandShark]

Hmm... I'm 19253.

Nothing for the whole number, but if I take away the first number I get:

Nothing if I take away the last number, or for the three middle numbers.

But still, I got a nice, simple set. I'm not going to ask for anything more.

[Scorpiox]

None for me!

If I remove the last digit I get:

1637-1: Basic Building Set, 3+. It's so old there are no pictures!

If I remove the first digit I get:

6378-1: Shell Service Station

Which is actually pretty cool.

[JPS97]

-19172=Nothing

-9172 (First number removed)=Nothing

-1917=This beast of a catapult!

Now I must go grab this little guy. To ebay!

-JPS97

[K-Nut]

I looked up 19691 on Brickset and got nothing, so then I decided to take off the last digit, but found 1969-1, Which is this:

Image from Brickset. I really like this one and will now go on a never ending search to find it.

[Skipper]

My real number is a whole lotta nothing, so I took off the first digit and got this :

(from Peeron)

[Lyichir]

At first I was worried, because there was no set matching my full number, or the first four digits. But the last four match the newest Hagrid's Hut! Awesome!

[Brickman125]

Take off the one: http://www.bricklink.com/catalogItem.asp?S=3642-1

Not bad I suppose, better then Minnie's Birthday Party

[Cpt. Tristan]

Awesome thread. Unfortunately I have 19882,which is way too long for a set . But when put backward there is 2889-1 (as Brickset has it listed, they put -1 after everything), which I am very happy with :

Edit: added link to picture

Edited August 31, 2011 by Cpt. Tristan

[HighFlyer]

17118 is too long for a set number

Perhaps in 20 years there might be a LEGO 17118?

Hopefully an Art Deco style Modular Building.

However when reversed, set 8117-1 is this:

I'm not sure what to make of this...

Edited September 3, 2011 by HighFlyer

[LandShark]

Ah, I haven't tried mine backwards yet.

Oh.

[martyboy70]

Mine is 19993 so obviously no set for that but if I remove the last digit I get a threesome(I wish)

A cool little Classic Space collection.

[lincolnwho]

http://brickset.com/detail/?set=6209-1

couldn't get better than this, couldnt beleive it when it popped up on Brickset

I should win a prize any offers (i would even accept Jack Stone )

[masterX244]

Got 3267

A Duplo Set :-(

[LEGOman273]

Mine:

Full number (227977) does not exist

Without the first digit (2977) is Duplo set Eeyore and the Little Raincloud

Without the middle digit (2277) does not exist

Without the last digit (2297) is Duplo set Cute Building Animals

Backwards without the first digit (7922) is Happy Meal toy Snowboarder, Orange Vest

Backwards without the middle digit (7722) is set Steam Cargo Train Set

Backwards without the last digit (7792) is Duplo set Deluxe Starter Set

Without the first digit and inside out (9277) does not exist

Without the middle digit and inside out (2277) does not exist

Without the last digit and inside out (2279) does not exist

Backwards without the first digit and inside out (9722) does not exist

Backwards without the middle digit and inside out (7722) is set Steam Cargo Train Set

Backwards without the last digit and inside out (7729) does not exist

Edited December 27, 2011 by Legoman273