brettbarbaro Posted April 25, 2023 Posted April 25, 2023 Hi! I am enjoying Sariel's book tremendously! I'm having trouble figuring out Figure 3-35, with the studs of studded beams inserted into the holes on opposite sides of a studless beam. The caption says, "This connection, with studs inserted into the beam's pin holes, is sturdy but considered incorrect. This is because - unlike in the previous examples - the spacing between the bricks' pin holes is not equal to a full number of studs. In terms of LEGO units, the bricks are misaligned." But when I try it, it seems to me that the spacing IS equal to a full number of studs. In contrast, the setup in Figure 3-34 DOES appear to be misaligned by this definition. I must be misunderstanding something. Can someone help me? Thanks, B Quote
Jurss Posted April 26, 2023 Posted April 26, 2023 For 3-35 spacing really could be correct between both bricks, but not for 3-34 Don't know if @Sariel is here Quote
Lipko Posted April 26, 2023 Posted April 26, 2023 I think he refers to the holes ín the studded brick. Those don't align properly of you want to connect them perpendicularly. I guess ... Quote
pleegwat Posted April 26, 2023 Posted April 26, 2023 16 hours ago, brettbarbaro said: Hi! I am enjoying Sariel's book tremendously! I'm having trouble figuring out Figure 3-35, with the studs of studded beams inserted into the holes on opposite sides of a studless beam. The caption says, "This connection, with studs inserted into the beam's pin holes, is sturdy but considered incorrect. This is because - unlike in the previous examples - the spacing between the bricks' pin holes is not equal to a full number of studs. In terms of LEGO units, the bricks are misaligned." But when I try it, it seems to me that the spacing IS equal to a full number of studs. In contrast, the setup in Figure 3-34 DOES appear to be misaligned by this definition. I must be misunderstanding something. Can someone help me? Thanks, B 3-34 appears misaligned here. However actually, the hollow studs on a half-pin can fit the bottom of a technic beam in two ways: The normal way any stud fits, or at a half-offset with the hollow stud fitting over the bump on the bottom of the pinhole on the beam. Quote
gyenesvi Posted April 26, 2023 Posted April 26, 2023 That's weird, because as @Lipko says, I thought the problem would be perpendicular alignment of the two yellow bricks, but I just tried to connect them with a 3L beam (after bringing them closer longitudinally), and it seems to be a perfect fit.. On the other hand, 3-34 cannot be connected perpendicularly, so maybe @Jurss is right that it's the other way round. I guess longitudinally neither are misaligned, right? Quote
Nazgarot Posted April 26, 2023 Posted April 26, 2023 Because the holes are offset on the studded beams the beams in figure 3-34 has exactly 3 Lego unit between them vertically across the gray beam. In figure 3-35 there is less than 3 Lego units between the holes, and no beam can be connected vertically across the beams using opposing holes. I believe this is what Sariel was refering to. Quote
Saruzeufel Posted April 27, 2023 Posted April 27, 2023 (edited) The spacing for the holes from techicbrick to liftarm to technicbrick is only like 2.8 units, not the full 3 you would expect. You cannot connect the two technicbricks from hole to hole as there is a slight offset. Tried taking pictures, but my camera is bad DSC_2224 DSC_2223 Edited April 27, 2023 by Saruzeufel fixed pictures Quote
gyenesvi Posted April 27, 2023 Posted April 27, 2023 1 hour ago, Saruzeufel said: The spacing for the holes from techicbrick to liftarm to technicbrick is only like 2.8 units, not the full 3 you would expect. You cannot connect the two technicbricks from hole to hole as there is a slight offset. Ah, you are right, upon better examination, it is indeed a bit shorter. 8 hours ago, Nazgarot said: Because the holes are offset on the studded beams the beams in figure 3-34 has exactly 3 Lego unit between them vertically across the gray beam. I think that's just not true, it is in fact about 3.5 units distance, because the holes in a studded beam are further away from the bottom than from the top. You can also verify it by how studded beam layers are usually connected on top of each other: you put 2 plates between them when the studs of both are on top, and the height of 2 plates is less than 1 unit. Quote
brettbarbaro Posted May 3, 2023 Author Posted May 3, 2023 (edited) On 4/27/2023 at 1:07 AM, gyenesvi said: Ah, you are right, upon better examination, it is indeed a bit shorter. I think that's just not true, it is in fact about 3.5 units distance, because the holes in a studded beam are further away from the bottom than from the top. You can also verify it by how studded beam layers are usually connected on top of each other: you put 2 plates between them when the studs of both are on top, and the height of 2 plates is less than 1 unit. OK – I see it now. There is a small gap when I connect the studded bricks on either side of the liftarm. Indeed, when the studs are pointed away from the liftarm, there seems to be 3.5 units distance between the holes. Interestingly, a Tyco plate works perfectly to fill the gap! Tyco plates are .5 units, not 1/3 units like Lego. Edited May 8, 2023 by brettbarbaro clarification Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.