aeh5040 Posted December 17, 2023 Posted December 17, 2023 (edited) 15 hours ago, M_longer said: Hopefully this will quiet down all the moaning! 😉 It looks quite useful. Even just for rigidly connecting two parallel liftarms it is quite handy, while the additional hole brings plenty of further possibilities. Edited December 17, 2023 by aeh5040 Quote
Maaboo the Witch Posted December 17, 2023 Posted December 17, 2023 34 minutes ago, aeh5040 said: Hopefully this will quiet down all the moaning! 😉 Not gonna lie, it has sweetened the deal. Quote
howitzer Posted December 17, 2023 Posted December 17, 2023 Wow, this new part is really cool. Obviously it hasn't been created for this set, I wonder how it'll be used in the upcoming sets... Quote
gyenesvi Posted December 17, 2023 Posted December 17, 2023 (edited) 18 hours ago, Zerobricks said: Seems like a twist on the 3 studded flip flip beam. I thought the same, hope it is not because they don't ever want to make a 3L flip-flop, that would be very useful too. 4 hours ago, aeh5040 said: Even just for rigidly connecting two parallel liftarms it is quite handy, while the additional hole brings plenty of further possibilities. That was my second thought indeed :) Wonder if this is the same 'small beam' mentioned to be in the space sets in the interview video. Other than that, I don't yet know how useful this part would be, never found myself needing something like exactly this. Edited December 17, 2023 by gyenesvi Quote
msk6003 Posted December 17, 2023 Posted December 17, 2023 That will be very useful for make GBC rail. Quote
PlopiNinetySix Posted December 17, 2023 Posted December 17, 2023 (edited) Someone from above prolly listened! For me, this is a Hanukkah miracle You could also get a ton of these, stack them on the longer axles and possibly build a custom linear actuator. Edited December 17, 2023 by PlopiNinetySix Quote
2GodBDGlory Posted December 17, 2023 Posted December 17, 2023 Looks like a handy part! I can see it being used as a hub for unsteered independent suspensions for small models that don't/can't use 3-pin hubs, but then probably anything that small/skinny can't really use CV joint-style suspensions anyways. Also, in some cases it could work like the lower left part in this image from @gyenesvi's Technic Parts We Would Find Useful thread, though of course in many cases it wouldn't. Quote
Maaboo the Witch Posted December 17, 2023 Posted December 17, 2023 Looking forward to Sariel's review! Quote
gyenesvi Posted December 17, 2023 Posted December 17, 2023 58 minutes ago, 2GodBDGlory said: Also, in some cases it could work like the lower left part in this image from @gyenesvi's Technic Parts We Would Find Useful thread, though of course in many cases it wouldn't. Yeah, maybe sometimes, but I often find that part needed in very tight places where this new one would be too big. Still have to see where it would be useful for me. Quote
msk6003 Posted December 18, 2023 Posted December 18, 2023 5 hours ago, 2GodBDGlory said: used as a hub for unsteered independent suspensions for small models that don't/can't use 3-pin hubs I never thought about that! Cause 3pin hub is longer than this part, I think it is still useful for car which use 56908 wheel and maybe if we use half stud thick beam like 5L or 7L, it also can work as suspended steering with driving hub.(Mustang's 5 spook 30x20 wheel will not fit) Quote
2GodBDGlory Posted December 18, 2023 Posted December 18, 2023 1 hour ago, msk6003 said: I never thought about that! Cause 3pin hub is longer than this part, I think it is still useful for car which use 56908 wheel and maybe if we use half stud thick beam like 5L or 7L, it also can work as suspended steering with driving hub.(Mustang's 5 spook 30x20 wheel will not fit) Huh, good point! I'd be a bit worried to use it on a bigger wheel, though, just because having only one stud of axle engagement with a standard CV joint wouldn't give much grip. How are you thinking of doing the suspended/steered hub with that? Quote
msk6003 Posted December 18, 2023 Posted December 18, 2023 (edited) 4 hours ago, 2GodBDGlory said: Huh, good point! I'd be a bit worried to use it on a bigger wheel, though, just because having only one stud of axle engagement with a standard CV joint wouldn't give much grip. How are you thinking of doing the suspended/steered hub with that? Like this(new part highlighted in lime) but unlike my first thought wheel position is same with 3pin hub and in those setup suspension movement is very small cause 1x3 half thick beam will rub suspension arm. Maybe it only useful for non-suspended axle or live axle setup. Edited December 18, 2023 by msk6003 Quote
Maaboo the Witch Posted December 18, 2023 Posted December 18, 2023 Sariel's cons, slightly paraphrased: Wrong tyres Looks like a generic harvester, not the 9700 Green stickers don't match parts The gears on the harvesting unit shouldn't all rotate in the same direction Sooo, pretty much what a lot of us have been saying. Quote
PlopiNinetySix Posted December 18, 2023 Posted December 18, 2023 (edited) The Blue Pins of Doom strike again. Save yourselves. Sariel's humor is amazing >D This set urgently needs some wheel mod too. Edited December 18, 2023 by PlopiNinetySix Fixed spelling error Quote
rener Posted December 18, 2023 Posted December 18, 2023 1 hour ago, Maaboo the Witch said: Sariel's cons, slightly paraphrased: Wrong tyres Looks like a generic harvester, not the 9700 Green stickers don't match parts The gears on the harvesting unit shouldn't all rotate in the same direction Sooo, pretty much what a lot of us have been saying. And still, a pretty decent set;) Quote
1gor Posted December 18, 2023 Posted December 18, 2023 1 hour ago, Maaboo the Witch said: Sariel's cons, slightly paraphrased: Wrong tyres Looks like a generic harvester, not the 9700 Green stickers don't match parts The gears on the harvesting unit shouldn't all rotate in the same direction Sooo, pretty much what a lot of us have been saying. And implement is not driven by Selfpropelled harvester, but with small wheels on it... Quote
R0Sch Posted December 18, 2023 Posted December 18, 2023 On 12/17/2023 at 9:36 AM, Jockos said: I wonder if it will have any role in the upcoming 1:8 car's gearbox Most likely if the element was designed in 2022. Only the flagship models take so long to develop. And if the 28T gear was recolored maybe a yellow supercar is not that unrealistic. Quote
Oh_Hi_Mao Posted December 18, 2023 Posted December 18, 2023 (edited) 1 hour ago, R0Sch said: Most likely if the element was designed in 2022. Only the flagship models take so long to develop. And if the 28T gear was recolored maybe a yellow supercar is not that unrealistic. Yellow supercar would be amazing because all the new yellow panels and parts could be used for yellow heavy duty construction vehicles :D Edited December 18, 2023 by Oh_Hi_Mao Quote
1gor Posted December 18, 2023 Posted December 18, 2023 14 minutes ago, Oh_Hi_Mao said: Yellow supercar would be amazing because all the new yellow panels and parts could be used for yellow heavy duty construction vehicles :D I don't want to spoil the fun and to go oftopic to much; but most known yellow supercars are Lamborghini cars (and we have one in 2020), but I would more then welcome narow yellow curved panel like the black ones on this years McLaren... Quote
R0Sch Posted December 18, 2023 Posted December 18, 2023 Here's the correct and updated Studio model, even including the new liftarm element: 42168.io Quote
Lego Tom Posted December 19, 2023 Posted December 19, 2023 (edited) It's a bit puzzling - he rates the set at 5 stars for looks, but points out it barely matches the 1:1 model upon which it is based, the stickers don't color match, the tires are wrong, the use of blue pins, the black distractions on the roof and the one side of the harvester gears turning in the wrong direction (the latter being a functional issue, but also a visual when in operation). With all these detractors, it's puzzling that he didn't rate it 3 or 4 stars instead of 5. Otherwise a fair review and as @Maaboo the Witch points out, supports what many have already stated. Edited December 19, 2023 by Lego Tom Quote
Maaboo the Witch Posted December 19, 2023 Posted December 19, 2023 1 hour ago, Lego Tom said: It's a bit puzzling - he rates the set at 5 stars for looks, but points out it barely matches the 1:1 model upon which it is based, the stickers don't color match, the tires are wrong, the use of blue pins, the black distractions on the roof and the one side of the harvester gears turning in the wrong direction (the latter being a functional issue, but also a visual when in operation). With all these detractors, it's puzzling that he didn't rate it 3 or 4 stars instead of 5. Otherwise a fair review and as @Maaboo the Witch points out, supports what many have already stated. To be fair, he did give it a 2/5 for Authenticity (which I think was a bit generous). I mean, it looks alright - aside from the blue pins it's reasonably attractive even if it doesn't really resemble the real thing. Quote
M_longer Posted December 19, 2023 Posted December 19, 2023 22 hours ago, R0Sch said: Here's the correct and updated Studio model, Thank you! Quote
Maaboo the Witch Posted December 19, 2023 Posted December 19, 2023 8 minutes ago, M_longer said: I'd like to retract my "reasonably attractive" comment. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.