Jump to content
THIS IS THE TEST SITE OF EUROBRICKS! ×
THIS IS THE TEST SITE OF EUROBRICKS!

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 4.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Palnetttt (who is VERY reliable) has posted to his story about this situation. I'll quote him here.

'In short, everything that was "fake" has actually been taken from other leakers'

'The only truly fake one was the F1 leak that he stole from me and changed the info for'

'Everything else is either real, or is real and has some details that might change'

'The dude was just trying to throw everyone off by taking real leaks and calling them fake'

 

Posted
17 hours ago, wesker said:

The team only has four members. Is there really much point in spreading them out?

$$$

6 hours ago, CF Mitch said:

:grin: 
I could see it happening, though. Like... 40-60% chance :innocent:

YESSS!!!

Regards,
Mitch

I'll give you... 12% of the credit  chance.

It would be nice to have a more unique one, but I just don't know if they're that confident in the X-men, like I said.

Posted
6 hours ago, brickbride said:

The bit about the Avengers bursting out of the Marvel logo is apparently true, though. The usual place has a breakdown of which rumous of his have been confirmed by other sources so far. The one about Galactus is unconfirmed.

The breakdown by Clay Bricks on Galactus is interesting.

"There will be one set based on a Marvel movie, but not sure if this is the number or description."

Regardless whether the Galactus rumor turns out to be true or false, it doesn't sound like there's going to be much product planned for next year's movie slate.

Posted
4 hours ago, wesker said:

The breakdown by Clay Bricks on Galactus is interesting.

"There will be one set based on a Marvel movie, but not sure if this is the number or description."

Regardless whether the Galactus rumor turns out to be true or false, it doesn't sound like there's going to be much product planned for next year's movie slate.

Yeah, that quote about there being one set based on a Marvel movie pretty much implies that we're only getting one set based on an MCU movie next year and it's obvious it will be F4. 

I think it's an easy set to imagine. It'll probably be around $90-$100 and include the Fantasticar and a Galactus built like the construction figures and include 4-5 minifigures. 

But anyways, RIP Thunderbolts* sets.

Posted (edited)
32 minutes ago, hikouki said:

Is that Marvel logo going to have minifigs? Or are the avengers just depicted as bursting out of the logo in the design itself?

There's minifigs. The line-up has been leaked earlier. One's Scarlet Witch, I don't remember the others right now. If you go back in this thread far enough, you should find the full line-up.

Edited by brickbride
Posted
52 minutes ago, hikouki said:

Is that Marvel logo going to have minifigs? Or are the avengers just depicted as bursting out of the logo in the design itself?

Iron Man, Captain America (WWII suit), Thor, Scarlet Witch and Bruce Banner OR Nick Fury (don't ask me how someone could confuse those two—I've not the slightest idea).

Posted
1 hour ago, brickbride said:

There's minifigs. The line-up has been leaked earlier. One's Scarlet Witch, I don't remember the others right now. If you go back in this thread far enough, you should find the full line-up.

I wonder if there's any chance she'll get a new headmold with better printing. I'm sure it's as likely as Magneto getting dual molded legs in the X-Mansion. 

Posted
2 hours ago, JeanGreyForever said:

I wonder if there's any chance she'll get a new headmold with better printing. I'm sure it's as likely as Magneto getting dual molded legs in the X-Mansion. 

That's like asking for cloth on a Star Wars figure, you're asking for too much

Posted
4 hours ago, hikouki said:

Is that Marvel logo going to have minifigs? Or are the avengers just depicted as bursting out of the logo in the design itself?

There are definitely Minifigures included. Even the name of the set makes a deal about it. Also this logo is made for a younger audience than the Star Wars one. (76313 is a 12+ set).

Posted

So, for the rest of the year, we have sets 76300, 76304763127631576316, 763177631976320763217632276323, 7632476325, 7632676327, and 76329. We know two of those sets are Endgame Final battle and Hall of Armor and then one other is for a movie. So that’s 3/16 accounted for. In the past few years we’ve gotten 6-8 legacy sets per year and we already have 3 accounted for. So let’s say another 5 of those are legacy. We typically get 3 buildable figures, 3 buildable objects (we already have the logo, so let’s say another 2). and 3 D2C sets (split between Marvel and DC). That’s 13. So, barring additional sets, I’m guessing that’s gonna be the rough  breakdown for the rest of the year with maybe a couple of those legacy sets going to Superman.

Posted

According to the latest rumors, the logo features: Cap, Iron Man, Thor, Black Widow and Bruce Banner. Cap WW2 has been mentioned in the past but there is no confirmation. There has also been a rumor that Iron Man mark 6 will be undamaged, but again, it is best to keep expectations low :-/

Posted
3 hours ago, Legocentrico said:

According to the latest rumors, the logo features: Cap, Iron Man, Thor, Black Widow and Bruce Banner. Cap WW2 has been mentioned in the past but there is no confirmation. There has also been a rumor that Iron Man mark 6 will be undamaged, but again, it is best to keep expectations low :-/

It makes sense that they would pick the MCU's founding Avengers after all (they'd have been my pick, too), and I guess someone who's not into Marvel might mistake red-headed Nat for Wanda. But where is Clint and why wouldn't it be the Hulk instead of Bruce? 

Posted
12 hours ago, THELEGOBATMAN said:

Bruce Banner OR Nick Fury (don't ask me how someone could confuse those two—I've not the slightest idea).

That leaker doesn't see color. Or hair. Or number of eyes.

(Or they saw a black coat torso piece in the instruction/part list and just completely guessed)

1 hour ago, brickbride said:

But where is Clint and why wouldn't it be the Hulk instead of Bruce? 

Also if they're bursting out of the logo, is Bruce just some guy going flying through a wall?

Posted
1 hour ago, Mandalorianknight said:

Also if they're bursting out of the logo, is Bruce just some guy going flying through a wall?

They could use the 'hulking out' face we got from the hulkbuster last year, but still would look weird.

In other news, the Galactus set seems to actually be real, likely comic based, and 'much bigger' than the sentinel from the x-mansion. This has been my dream marvel set ever since the Fox/Disney deal was announced. The hype is real!

Posted
11 minutes ago, The_Fiery_Rooster said:

In other news, the Galactus set seems to actually be real, likely comic based, and 'much bigger' than the sentinel from the x-mansion….

Wait, what? Hopefully this is true. Comic based versions would be fantastic.

Posted

So a couple of days ago 76316 was Galactus vs Fantastic Four then that guy turned out to be a troll. Now 76316 is still Galactus vs Fantastic Four and is comic based. So was the troll so good at trolling he predicted the future?

Posted
34 minutes ago, upliftingbricks said:

So a couple of days ago 76316 was Galactus vs Fantastic Four then that guy turned out to be a troll. Now 76316 is still Galactus vs Fantastic Four and is comic based. So was the troll so good at trolling he predicted the future?

I didn’t think we would ever get a leak as crazy as that survey leak last year. I have been proven wrong. I look forward to see what craziness Lego leakers have in store for us next year.

Posted
45 minutes ago, upliftingbricks said:

So a couple of days ago 76316 was Galactus vs Fantastic Four then that guy turned out to be a troll. Now 76316 is still Galactus vs Fantastic Four and is comic based. So was the troll so good at trolling he predicted the future?

On 9/27/2024 at 6:59 PM, poisonbricks said:

Palnetttt (who is VERY reliable) has posted to his story about this situation. I'll quote him here.

'In short, everything that was "fake" has actually been taken from other leakers'

'The only truly fake one was the F1 leak that he stole from me and changed the info for'

'Everything else is either real, or is real and has some details that might change'

'The dude was just trying to throw everyone off by taking real leaks and calling them fake'

 

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Announcements

  • THIS IS THE TEST SITE OF EUROBRICKS!

×
×
  • Create New...