Dragonator Posted January 10, 2009 Posted January 10, 2009 Well if you ladies want to have your fun, then I guess that's fine. Just don't let it interfere with the real purpose of our meeting here, to eliminate the presence of the FBI rats. Which we don't seem to be getting anywhere with...
MagPiesRUs Posted January 10, 2009 Posted January 10, 2009 I think it defeats the purpose of it being secretive, don't it? If you've given in your vote then relax, Iris will tell us what the deal is when the time comes, old buddy. *Pats on back* 'Sides, pretty sure that that would cause more bandwagon jumping, which seems to have been a problem in the past. I pick the second option. Understood. I just hope that no one is keeping any valuable information to themselves is all. It'd be great to check things over before we go off killing members of the family.
Lego12 Posted January 10, 2009 Posted January 10, 2009 Ok, lets do this PB. I'm done with this DESPrite club crap! I'm better than this! I quit! Lets find these rats and blow them up!
Admiral Blockbeard Posted January 10, 2009 Posted January 10, 2009 Now remember, we're just talking about nail polish and how we should dress tomorrow. Iris supports it and she's the Mafia leader! Don't ruin our fun, now. I hope your not commenting on what we are wearing and hair styles Last person who did that
Zepher Posted January 10, 2009 Posted January 10, 2009 No where my dear man! I may of just found a clue! Or something useless! Either or, I have broken from the meeting of DESPrite to tell you! Inertiatieri, in the second to last picture and the last one is handcuffed to Iris. This may mean nothing, or it may be a subtle clue! Who knows!
Lego12 Posted January 10, 2009 Posted January 10, 2009 Oh wait, you said it was ok? Hehe...sorry about that girls.....count me in.....again.... Oh and Adalaide wanted me to tell you that we aren't going to have a captain. She's not handcuffed to my husband....its Darlene's hand.....
Admiral Blockbeard Posted January 10, 2009 Posted January 10, 2009 I believe that is actually a severed hand! Once belonging to Darlene.
Zepher Posted January 10, 2009 Posted January 10, 2009 You are both correct. My aploigies! This is just impossible! We have no idea who anyone's voting for! We can not see allainces! No one is trying to get someone killed! This first day could end right here, we have no clues. Oh well! Back to womenly talk!
Dragonator Posted January 10, 2009 Posted January 10, 2009 Oh well! Back to womenly talk! No no no, let's stay here and discuss what is going on. We have been told that we are allowed to discuss who we vote for, so if anyone has already voted, I want to know who for and why. If you have seen something the rest of us have missed then share it, for we will only find the truth through discussion. Myself I have not yet voted, as I feel it is too early to safely classify anyone as a true rat. However if one of you has seen something I have missed, I would like to know, as it could effect my decision. We'll get nowhere if we don't discuss what we are going to do.
Lego12 Posted January 10, 2009 Posted January 10, 2009 I voted for Boyd because he has aroused suspicion on my part....
Zepher Posted January 10, 2009 Posted January 10, 2009 Doesn't discussing it ruin the point? I agree with Draggy. There are zero clues so far. I am a proud women who would never stain her hands with blood... unless they inculted my hair... or if they were a rat. But this is family. Other then the Fronts, if I killed an innocent it would be awful!
Dragonator Posted January 10, 2009 Posted January 10, 2009 Zabrina, discussion allows us to see all sides of the case so that we can make an informed decision when it comes to voting. That way we might have the chance of reaching a majority and coming to some decision. I voted for Boyd because he has aroused suspicion on my part.... Excellent, a starting point. Thanks for sharing. Now, may I enquire as to why he has aroused your suspicions? Is it the way he has been acting, or do you know something else? Please, feel free to share. If you don't want to then that's OK to, but if we know your reasons then we'll be able to decide whether we agree or disagree with you.
Zepher Posted January 10, 2009 Posted January 10, 2009 That's what I'm afraid of. For whatever reason Iris didn't want us to know eachother's votes. i think it will make it nasty hard to reach a majority. I for one think that there must be at least one traitor from each group. Whose the smallest group at the moment. Maybe we'll start with them.
Lego12 Posted January 10, 2009 Posted January 10, 2009 He's been acting very strange IMHO and I don't like the way he acts...... I'm going home.....come on Inertia....*yawns*
Dragonator Posted January 10, 2009 Posted January 10, 2009 That's what I'm afraid of. For whatever reason Iris didn't want us to know eachother's votes. i think it will make it nasty hard to reach a majority. Not quite true, note the following quote: You can discuss who you would like to vote, but can vote whoever you like by PM.A player must have a majority of votes to be convicted. So as you can see, we are expected to discuss who to vote for, but in the end, the actual decision comes down to who you really think. However by discussing we are much more likely to reach a majority, and thus are much more likely to actually get rid of the rats instead of going around in circles.
Sir Dillon Posted January 10, 2009 Posted January 10, 2009 I've been thinking about Pedro. ... do you think he might be more to his death than just being annoying? Perhaps he ran into a 'land mine', as was mentioned, by voting for someone he shouldn't have.
Dragonator Posted January 10, 2009 Posted January 10, 2009 I for one think that there must be at least one traitor from each group. Whose the smallest group at the moment. Maybe we'll start with them. An interesting idea, although I'm not sure if it is true or not. In answer to your question, the smallest group at the moment is the Fronts, consisting of only Ian, Stanton and Boyd. That is an interesting idea Dickie, although I think the hair insult was probably the most likely cause. You know how the woman can be.
Zepher Posted January 10, 2009 Posted January 10, 2009 An interesting idea, although I'm not sure if it is true or not. In answer to your question, the smallest group at the moment is the Fronts, consisting of only Ian, Stanton and Boyd.That is an interesting idea Dickie, although I think the hair insult was probably the most likely cause. You know how the woman can be. Yes, I indeed know how we can be. Thank ,I shall look into them a tad more closely. As for the landmine, I doubt it was avote. Or else we'd be having more deaths. I do feel there was more to his death though. He wasn't exactly trying to not get killed, the oppsite in fact... it's all rather strange.
Admiral Blockbeard Posted January 10, 2009 Posted January 10, 2009 I've been thinking about Pedro. ... do you think he might be more to his death than just being annoying? Perhaps he ran into a 'land mine', as was mentioned, by voting for someone he shouldn't have. He is a curious one. tracking his past he has all ways been like this... he was land mined because of the bold'd part of Iris'sss post. Yes, I indeed know how we can be.Thank ,I shall look into them a tad more closely. As for the landmine, I doubt it was avote. Or else we'd be having more deaths. I do feel there was more to his death though. He wasn't exactly trying to not get killed, the oppsite in fact... it's all rather strange. As I said, he does this a lot, a joker in the family. He likes to stir things... just like witches... He was not impressed by somethings we said to him... our hearts are black? blah blah... he should be safe now? all gibberish to me.
MagPiesRUs Posted January 10, 2009 Posted January 10, 2009 It is possible that Adalaide is a day killer, though considering the clues and that she was shown killing Pedro, it's quite unlikely. Perhaps when we find a rat, instead of voting for them, we could make them insult Adalaide's hair...
Dragonator Posted January 10, 2009 Posted January 10, 2009 Perhaps when we find a rat, instead of voting for them, we could make them insult Adalaide's hair... You know... you might just be on to something. That would be far more amusing to watch than having them taken out by the hit man. We always have liked our sport in this family. I do not think she is a day killer however, I just think she is very touchy about how people talk about her. Which is fair enough, really, who isn't?
Trexxen Posted January 10, 2009 Posted January 10, 2009 I'd say that Adalaide probably can kill in the day - there are several people in our group (meaning the mafia - don't try to twist this around, you cheeky rats) who are proficient at killing, of course On top of that, I'm willing to wager that at least one person can kill at night - whether it is one of us, or one of the rats, remains to be seen, but I certainly hope it's one of us. Also from past experience, from what I read about the previous blunders of our family, there is likely at least one neutral person that can harm both sides. Finally, there are probably bodyguards and investigators - it would seem unlikely for a FBI agent to be an investigator because I'm sure they know who eachother are (it usually works out that way), or a bodyguard for that matter. My point, though, is that tons of people have proficiencies, and it would be beneficial to let them out as soon as possible - WITHOUT giving any evidence that could get you a top spot on the hit list. If your night action is investing, blocking, guarding, or killing, don't say ANYTHING...capeesh? ~Trexxisanti
Dragonator Posted January 10, 2009 Posted January 10, 2009 I'd say that Adalaide probably can kill in the day - there are several people in our group (meaning the mafia - don't try to twist this around, you cheeky rats) who are proficient at killing, of course On top of that, I'm willing to wager that at least one person can kill at night - whether it is one of us, or one of the rats, remains to be seen, but I certainly hope it's one of us. Also from past experience, from what I read about the previous blunders of our family, there is likely at least one neutral person that can harm both sides. Finally, there are probably bodyguards and investigators - it would seem unlikely for a FBI agent to be an investigator because I'm sure they know who eachother are (it usually works out that way), or a bodyguard for that matter. My point, though, is that tons of people have proficiencies, and it would be beneficial to let them out as soon as possible - WITHOUT giving any evidence that could get you a top spot on the hit list. If your night action is investing, blocking, guarding, or killing, don't say ANYTHING...capeesh? ~Trexxisanti You make some excellent points. There is also the the Hit Man, as well as a possible "peeking Tom" and something like the paranoid gun owner. So, plenty of roles around, I'd say. I agree that it is probably best for those people who do have roles not to say so at the moment, as although it would be good for us of the family to know, the rats are always listening, and we don't want them to gain even a scrap more advantage than they already have. We are good at keeping secrets, so I'd say this idea of yours will work fine. What the rats don't know, the rats can't act on.
Trexxen Posted January 10, 2009 Posted January 10, 2009 You make some excellent points. There is also the the Hit Man, as well as a possible "peeking Tom" and something like the paranoid gun owner. So, plenty of roles around, I'd say. I agree that it is probably best for those people who do have roles not to say so at the moment, as although it would be good for us of the family to know, the rats are always listening, and we don't want them to gain even a scrap more advantage than they already have. We are good at keeping secrets, so I'd say this idea of yours will work fine. What the rats don't know, the rats can't act on. Bingo - what the FBI doesn't know, will probably hurt them badly...and that's something I can get behind! So...I have to ask, mainly because I still haven't been able to form a complete opinion of anyone. Who, right now, do YOU think is most likely to be a rat at this point? I'd say at least one of each group is a reasonable idea. Personally I have to say that any of the remaining fronts have a significant amount against them. None of them are true members of the family; they are all just businessmen who would rather pay us and give us their services; and yet at the same time I feel that thinking like this could be one of the worst things I could do. Still, though, there are only three of them - any one of them is a one in three shot, if we accept that each group has one. They are to us what Carter once was... Then again, it would be just like...well, mafians in general - not just us - for one whole group to betray the others over a power struggle... ~Trexxisanti
Inertia Posted January 10, 2009 Posted January 10, 2009 Bingo - what the FBI doesn't know, will probably hurt them badly...and that's something I can get behind! So...I have to ask, mainly because I still haven't been able to form a complete opinion of anyone. Who, right now, do YOU think is most likely to be a rat at this point? I'd say at least one of each group is a reasonable idea. Personally I have to say that any of the remaining fronts have a significant amount against them. None of them are true members of the family; they are all just businessmen who would rather pay us and give us their services; and yet at the same time I feel that thinking like this could be one of the worst things I could do. Still, though, there are only three of them - any one of them is a one in three shot, if we accept that each group has one. They are to us what Carter once was... Then again, it would be just like...well, mafians in general - not just us - for one whole group to betray the others over a power struggle... ~Trexxisanti You make some excellent points there Trexxisanti! The Fronts may be the best group to start our investigations, they can be bribed easily if the FBI offer them more money than they are getting off us. We know Pedro was Loyal, and that leaves the remaining three, so the most likely suspects are ones who have weaker, money driven motives. The last thing we should all do is start throwing suspicion around the room, that's the worst thing we could do! We should base our vote on someone who we have strong evidence against. I'm just voicing my thoughts here, but if Adalaide was a Rat, she would know Pedro was loyal and he gave her the perfect opportunity to kill him. Although, that's just a though, I'm not going to condemn someone over an idea.
Recommended Posts