Corvus Posted July 23, 2009 Posted July 23, 2009 But as long as they don't make "Disney Channel" minifigures, normality can be contained. Or else we'd have to bring out the trash compactor! Oh. I think you just gave me nightmares. Quote
Emperor Claudius Rome Posted July 23, 2009 Posted July 23, 2009 But as long as they don't make "Disney Channel" minifigures, normality can be contained. Or else we'd have to bring out the trash compactor! I'm not to sure about that. A Jonas Brother minifig could come in handy for brckfilms Quote
Cavannus Posted July 23, 2009 Posted July 23, 2009 I can't understand how Lego could make this piece: Is it supposed to be a flat rectangle object? Otherwise, why not designing minifigs, horses, threes, buildings, etc. like that, i.e. using a tile with a printed pattern?? Quote
The Who Posted July 23, 2009 Posted July 23, 2009 New worst part! Those complete and utter disgusting horrendous...hideous excuses for Lego in the Disney Toy story heads!Well I thought they were interesting.Sort of like a modern day Fabuland, or the closest we will ever get to returning to Fabuland. Quote
Derek Posted July 24, 2009 Posted July 24, 2009 Even three-year-olds will say "I want my Lego heads!" These things are downright stupid! The Prince Of Persia minifigs could really come in handy, so good job on that TLG, but that mess of Toy story is disgusting. But as long as they don't make "Disney Channel" minifigures, normality can be contained. Or else we'd have to bring out the trash compactor! I hope no 3 year olds play with normal Lego. And you have to admit, some good figure pieces would come out of a Disney Channel line... Quote
Emperor Claudius Rome Posted July 24, 2009 Posted July 24, 2009 I hope no 3 year olds play with normal Lego. And you have to admit, some good figure pieces would come out of a Disney Channel line... Yes, you would even get the ability to make some parody vigs! But seriously, the worst part in my opinion is those trans blue saws from Alpha-team Quote
Captain Zuloo Posted July 24, 2009 Posted July 24, 2009 Hmmm...I think this part is pretty useless. I would relly admire someone who could include it in a MOC as anything other than an oversized train nose. Quote
Commander Flash Posted July 24, 2009 Posted July 24, 2009 A large Viewing Cryogenic freezer Or even a big Bacta/Kolto tank Quote
Rick Posted July 24, 2009 Posted July 24, 2009 I hope no 3 year olds play with normal Lego. I'm almost sure I did (I have to check b-day pics some day that include lego gifts) Quote
Darth Legolas Posted July 24, 2009 Posted July 24, 2009 A large Viewing Cryogenic freezer Oh my! It fits right in with the Disney line! But we need to find the right head... Quote
hewkii9 Posted July 24, 2009 Posted July 24, 2009 This part is pretty useless. What is that? A shoehorn? I can't understand how Lego could make this piece: It's more convenient and more useful in some cases than designing a whole dynamite piece when it could only have been used in one line back then - the actual dynamite piece pops up in two, three lines? Hmmm...I think this part is pretty useless. I would relly admire someone who could include it in a MOC as anything other than an oversized train nose. SHIP cockpit. Quote
Dennimator Posted July 24, 2009 Posted July 24, 2009 (edited) What is that? A shoehorn? Kinda looks like a giant manta ray... Any panel, just hate them Panels ftw! Edited July 24, 2009 by Dennimator Quote
jonwil Posted July 25, 2009 Posted July 25, 2009 I would rate the Mars Mission alien as one of the worst parts of all time. Or certainly one of the ugliest parts of all time. Quote
hewkii9 Posted July 25, 2009 Posted July 25, 2009 I would rate the Mars Mission alien as one of the worst parts of all time. Or certainly one of the ugliest parts of all time. It could be used as a jelly baby if one was to build a Bionicle-scale Fourth Doctor... As for what I actually think is a terrible part - the Fabuland baskets without the + hole. Sure, they were good buckets, but that's all they could do, and if you stuck a tile in the base it was borderline impossible to get out. Quote
user Posted July 25, 2009 Posted July 25, 2009 What is that? A shoehorn? It was a display stand for a stingray set. Quote
Whittleberry Posted July 25, 2009 Posted July 25, 2009 One piece I find to be pretty useless outside the set it was designed to fit, was the large frame for the sails like in this set Do you even have that set? If, like me, you did, I'm sure you would know that its made up of two bar pieces. Quote
HumanPackMule Posted July 25, 2009 Posted July 25, 2009 Do you even have that set? If, like me, you did, I'm sure you would know that its made up of two bar pieces. Yes, I do have the set. One of the separate pieces was the one I was saying is useless(not the lance) Quote
YellowCorvette Posted August 25, 2015 Posted August 25, 2015 (edited) Nice use with the Technic Wiliams F1 Race Car. Edited August 25, 2015 by ArmstrongYong Quote
engineermax Posted August 25, 2015 Posted August 25, 2015 In my opinion one of the worst pieces ever made is Quote
HawkLord Posted August 25, 2015 Posted August 25, 2015 Flick fire missiles and their related parts. Quote
CaptainToad Posted August 25, 2015 Posted August 25, 2015 there is just too many parts that are mostly useless or one trick ponies Quote
Modulex Guy Posted August 25, 2015 Posted August 25, 2015 Flick fire missiles and their related parts. I've used flick fires for axles and stuff that needs a technic and rod connection, they are actually kinda useful. Quote
Lordofdragonss Posted August 26, 2015 Posted August 26, 2015 Hmmm...I think this part is pretty useless. I would relly admire someone who could include it in a MOC as anything other than an oversized train nose. I tgink it would look nice as spacebase roof. Quote
legoguy1984 Posted August 26, 2015 Posted August 26, 2015 One persons worst part is anothers treasure. One thing I've learnt is that it's not the piece so much as the person using it. I find alot of pieces useless but someone else will find those same pieces useful. The only pieces everyone seems to agree on is the <insert that tiresome argument> chassis but even that in it's context in a juniors set is a good piece. The only limits seem to be the imagination of the person holding the piece and what style they mostly build in. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.