DarthSion Posted April 21, 2009 Posted April 21, 2009 Well it looks like we have an air date for the second season, its the 2nd of October 2009, and will be a double episode. Thought i would start a new thread as the other was getting long in the tooth, and seemed more about opinion of it. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Star_...on_2:_2009-2010 Seems there will be another dvd before the full season, the name seems to imply it will be about the commanders, like rookies, and perhaps the two with Lok Durd. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clone_Wars_(3D_CGI_TV_series) Quote
The Rancor Posted April 21, 2009 Posted April 21, 2009 I don't think the Clone Wars on Cartoon Network have finished yet for season 1. Probably won't get season 2 until February 2010 in the UK! However, I'm glad that the series continues Quote
DarthSion Posted April 22, 2009 Author Posted April 22, 2009 Ah well yes that is USA air times. Quote
Corvus Posted April 23, 2009 Posted April 23, 2009 Interesting... I can't wait for October 2nd. Maybe the season will be released in the meantime. But Bane captures Force-sensitive children for Sidious? It seems that that would expose him to the Jedi, who he seems to be hiding from until Ep. III. Plus, the Jedi don't even know he actually exists until then, so this doesn't sound right. Then again, it's Wikipedia, so... Quote
Oky Posted April 24, 2009 Posted April 24, 2009 Thanks for this information, Sion. October 2nd, eh? That's gonna be a long wait. Oh well, at least we'll have the DVDs, the "Decoded" episodes, and the summer Lego sets to keep us occupied. Btw, I don't think the Lok Durd episodes will be on the Commandos DVD. They will probably stick to the episode chronology, so it will be episodes 5-8 and maybe even 9. But Bane captures Force-sensitive children for Sidious? It seems that that would expose him to the Jedi, who he seems to be hiding from until Ep. III. Plus, the Jedi don't even know he actually exists until then, so this doesn't sound right. I don't think that Sidious himself will be in the episodes much. In the first one, he'll probably only appear to Bane in an hologram to give him the assignment, and in the second one, he will likely only be an hologram too, but there is a chance that he might be there in person, in which case he will probably be long gone when the Jedi arrive. Then again, it's Wikipedia, so... Well, yeah, but this rumor has popped up several times now, so I think it's true. Quote
DarthSion Posted April 24, 2009 Author Posted April 24, 2009 Yeah tis along wait, thank god for archiving. Well this is what will be on the clone commandos dvd. http://www.eucantina.net/archives/2210 It is Sidious, i mean its like everyone calls him Dukoo, but its really Darth Tryanus. Quote
Dutch Posted April 27, 2009 Posted April 27, 2009 Well I think Force-sensitive children means young jedi that can be turned to the dark side or the light side of the force. Quote
General Magma Posted April 27, 2009 Posted April 27, 2009 Cool! Can't wait for it. And in my country it started in february, if it doesn't stop for months to wait for season 2, we (for everyone who lives in the Netherlands, = we) will for example, be around episode 40 while America (the country where they started playing it each week, right?) will be at 35..just an example. Quote
DarthSion Posted May 7, 2009 Author Posted May 7, 2009 New info up on the first 5 episodes. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Star_...on_2:_2009-2010 Quote
Holy Diver Posted May 7, 2009 Posted May 7, 2009 Sounds interesting. I'll just have to wait for October. Quote
Oky Posted May 7, 2009 Posted May 7, 2009 An episode with Ahsoka and with the word "dead" in the title? Sounds promising! Quote
DarthSion Posted May 7, 2009 Author Posted May 7, 2009 Huh, it says dead on Teth, sounds interesting but odd, why there, unless its a tie into the movie. Quote
Jedi Joe Posted May 9, 2009 Posted May 9, 2009 Must... Prevent... Upchucking... Ugh, they are ruining Star Wars! The first season was good, but WHY would Sidious need a FREAKIN' BOUNTY HUNTER to capture Jedi for him? Why would he even need Jedi? Stupid... Very stupid. Quote
Captain REX Posted May 9, 2009 Posted May 9, 2009 Must... Prevent... Upchucking...Ugh, they are ruining Star Wars! The first season was good, but WHY would Sidious need a FREAKIN' BOUNTY HUNTER to capture Jedi for him? Why would he even need Jedi? Stupid... Very stupid. It says they are force sensitive, not jedi. Besides its obviously so he can convert them to the dark side and use them as acolytes. Quote
DarthSion Posted May 9, 2009 Author Posted May 9, 2009 (edited) Vader had half a dozen bounty hunters go after Han in the OT. Edited May 9, 2009 by DarthSion Quote
Jedi Joe Posted May 9, 2009 Posted May 9, 2009 It just seems way too far-fetched to me. The old CW series was much better, because Gendy actually took the movie canon seriously. Quote
DarthSion Posted May 9, 2009 Author Posted May 9, 2009 (edited) It just seems way too far-fetched to me. The old CW series was much better, because Gendy actually took the movie canon seriously. So its not far fetched Vader who probably was ordered by the emperor to use bounty hunters to get Han which was written in by Lucas, but too far fetched for Palpatin to use bounty hunters, to which EVERYTHING would have to get Lucas approval, not to mention he is an executive producer on the series, not to mention Lucas co-wrote 14 episodes of the first season and no doubt as many for the 2nd. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0458290/fullcredits#cast Edited May 9, 2009 by DarthSion Quote
Captain REX Posted May 9, 2009 Posted May 9, 2009 It just seems way too far-fetched to me. The old CW series was much better, because Gendy actually took the movie canon seriously. How is the new series not canonical? It fits in with episodes 2 and 3. Quote
Jedi Joe Posted May 9, 2009 Posted May 9, 2009 (edited) Double post, sorry... Edited May 9, 2009 by Jedi Joe Quote
Jedi Joe Posted May 9, 2009 Posted May 9, 2009 So its not far fetched Vader who probably was ordered by the emperor to use bounty hunters to get Han which was written in by Lucas, but too far fetched for Palpatin to use bounty hunters, to which EVERYTHING would have to get Lucas approval, not to mention he is an executive producer on the series, not to mention Lucas co-wrote 14 episodes of the first season and no doubt as many for the 2nd.http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0458290/fullcredits#cast Why would Siddy need Force sensitive children? Besides, the bounty hunters looking for Han were in the movies, not some cartoon which tries every trick in the book to stretch the canon. How is the new series not canonical? It fits in with episodes 2 and 3. Ahsoka, Grievous being a weakass troll who can't even kill a padawan, Anakin fighting Dooku when in Episode III, they clearly act like the last time they fought was in Episode II, just to name a few. Quote
Jedi Joe Posted May 9, 2009 Posted May 9, 2009 (edited) Triple post, what the heck? Edited May 10, 2009 by Jedi Joe Quote
Oky Posted May 10, 2009 Posted May 10, 2009 Why would Siddy need Force sensitive children? Either to convert them to the darkside or simply kill them. Duh! Seriously, why don't you wait until you see the episodes before you talk 'em to trash? Before "Hidden Enemy" aired, everybody was like "WTF? A clone who betrays his brothers? That makes no sense!", but now many agree that it is one of the best episodes of Season 1. So patience, young padawan. Besides, the bounty hunters looking for Han were in the movies, not some cartoon which tries every trick in the book to stretch the canon. I see what you mean, but TV series will always have trouble fitting in with the movies they are based on. Star Wars is no exception. And I must agree with DarthSion: Both the movies and the cartoon are being produced by Lucas, so they automatically have the same amount of canon. Ahsoka There is no canon that proves that Anakin couldn't have had a padawan during the Clone Wars. Grievous being a weakass troll who can't even kill a padawan Although I totally agree that Grievous should be way more badass than he currently is, you must realize that he was kind of a wuss in the movie too (he didn't kill anyone ), so what you are saying here contradicts with your argument that this show doesn't follow the movie canon. Anakin fighting Dooku when in Episode III, they clearly act like the last time they fought was in Episode II They never said that. They simply only referred to that one fight because it was their first fight and because it was the one where Anakin lost his hand to Dooku. There is nothing that says that they couldn't have met in the meantime. Besides, Episode III was made before there was much known about the events of the CW, so the makers of the movie had to assume that this was their second fight, no matter what happened in the CW. Therefore, this argument is kinda unfair. In conclusion, none of your arguments prove that this show is ignoring the canon. It may not be far as good as Tartakovsky's cartoon, but this series isn't as bad as you make yourself believe it is. Give it a chance. They are simply trying to create enjoyable entertainment for us. Quote
Jedi Joe Posted May 10, 2009 Posted May 10, 2009 Either to convert them to the darkside or simply kill them. Duh! Why would he turn them to the Dark Side? He still had faith in Dooku. Killing them? Good point, Bane needs to be tested! :P There is no canon that proves that Anakin couldn't have had a padawan during the Clone Wars. I think the council would have made Anakin a master, or at least be less negative on the subject if they knew he had trained a padawan. Although I totally agree that Grievous should be way more badass than he currently is, you must realize that he was kind of a wuss in the movie too (he didn't kill anyone ), so what you are saying here contradicts with your argument that this show doesn't follow the movie canon. Grievous was a very formidable villian in Episode III. Obi-Wan was a master of Soresu, which requires patience and the ability to look for weaknesses. They never said that. They simply only referred to that one fight because it was their first fight and because it was the one where Anakin lost his hand to Dooku. There is nothing that says that they couldn't have met in the meantime. Besides, Episode III was made before there was much known about the events of the CW, so the makers of the movie had to assume that this was their second fight, no matter what happened in the CW. Therefore, this argument is kinda unfair. Yes, but you would think that the creators would actually watch the movies more often. Don't get me wrong, The CW is a creat series. I just refuse to put most of it on par with the movies. Quote
DarthSion Posted May 10, 2009 Author Posted May 10, 2009 (edited) Oky im leaving this one to you, i have better things to do. Edited May 10, 2009 by DarthSion Quote
Captain REX Posted May 10, 2009 Posted May 10, 2009 Why would he turn them to the Dark Side? He still had faith in Dooku. Killing them? Good point, Bane needs to be tested! :PI think the council would have made Anakin a master, or at least be less negative on the subject if they knew he had trained a padawan. Grievous was a very formidable villian in Episode III. Obi-Wan was a master of Soresu, which requires patience and the ability to look for weaknesses. Yes, but you would think that the creators would actually watch the movies more often. Don't get me wrong, The CW is a creat series. I just refuse to put most of it on par with the movies. To become a master you have to train a padawan. Grevious has actually killed a padawan, he did it in lair of grevious. Besides just because he didnt kill ahsoka (which he nearly did if it hadnt been for an explosion), doesnt mean hes crap. Just because ahsoka is a padawan, doesn't make her really bad at fighting, shes probably really skilled. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.