Dragonator Posted December 27, 2009 Posted December 27, 2009 Looking at what we know and from what I have heard from several of you today, I would be happy to vote Leanne as my most likely suspect. Her theories are just confusing and distracting, and very likely have some sort of alternative motive. Without further ado, I shall: Vote: Leanne (Forresto)
Darth_Legois Posted December 27, 2009 Posted December 27, 2009 (edited) I wonder how much time do we have left. About 16 Hours I believe. Vote count: Forresto/Leanne: 8 (Hewkii9, Sandy, JimButcher, dannylonglegs, Inconspicuous, YG-49, Shadows, Dragonator) Millacol88/Mike Johnson: 1 (Simonjedi) , Non-Voters: 11 (Quarryman, Zapper Brick, The Crazy One, Big Cam, Eskallon, Whitefang, Ricecracker, TinyPiesRUs, Millacol88, JCC1004, Forresto) 11 Votes are required to lynch. Edited December 27, 2009 by Darth_Legois
Eskallon Posted December 27, 2009 Posted December 27, 2009 Leanne / Forresto You wrongly point fingers with very little evidence and then when people start to vot against you, you apologise and by that you try to shift votes away from you. Yes a member of the police may be scum but unless you have some solid evidence, I will vote for you. I think you might be investigating people at night though. If so feel free to contact me privatly and we can have a chat about your findings.
MagPiesRUs Posted December 27, 2009 Posted December 27, 2009 He voted for you after you accused the police. I doubt there's more than one mafia in the police, and if there is scum in the police, the other police would likely be innocent. We've been through this many times today, don't count on the "one person in each group is scum". The allegiances of each character were most likely randomly assigned, so everyone is equally as likely to be scum. Leanne / ForrestoYou wrongly point fingers with very little evidence and then when people start to vot against you, you apologise and by that you try to shift votes away from you. Yes a member of the police may be scum but unless you have some solid evidence, I will vote for you. I think you might be investigating people at night though. If so feel free to contact me privatly and we can have a chat about your findings. So you're voting for someone you think is the town investigator? Well, it seems Leanne will be voted off today, but I'm reserving my vote for now. Leanne, if you have a night action that is useful to the town, now would be the time to tell us. We wouldn't want to lose an important role so early in the game. ... of life.
Sandy Posted December 27, 2009 Posted December 27, 2009 Am I the only one who thinks people who hold back on voting seem highly suspicious? It is so easy for the scum to not vote when townies turn against each other. So yeah, I'm having second doubts for voting Leanne, since she seems too "independent" to be a mobster. I'm sure the Mafia wouldn't let their members (especially inexperienced ones) just spout out any theories, but to keep their heads low. My suspicion shifts back to Sarah Wolf/TinyPies and also Robbie Willis/WhiteFang, who both seem to use the same "lines" they spoke yesterday. "Oh, I won't vote, since I don't want to have innocent blood on my hands", "Hmm, she might be or she might not be, so I won't vote". Again, it's easy not to vote when you know the truth, huh?
YG-49 Posted December 27, 2009 Posted December 27, 2009 We've been through this many times today, don't count on the "one person in each group is scum". The allegiances of each character were most likely randomly assigned, so everyone is equally as likely to be scum. That'd be like thinking that someone in the Jackson family was scum! So you're voting for someone you think is the town investigator? Or scum...
Bob Posted December 27, 2009 Author Posted December 27, 2009 Vote count: Forresto/Leanne: 9 (Hewkii9, Sandy, JimButcher, dannylonglegs, Inconspicuous, YG-49, Shadows, Dragonator, Eskallon) Millacol88/Mike Johnson: 1 (Simonjedi) , Non-Voters: 11 (Quarryman, Zapper Brick, The Crazy One, Big Cam, Whitefang, Ricecracker, TinyPiesRUs, Millacol88, JCC1004, Forresto) 11 Votes are required to lynch. There are now twenty-four hours left in this day. Legois was wrong.
Quarryman Posted December 27, 2009 Posted December 27, 2009 Yaaawn. Oh, vote going on. Oh well, I guess I'll have to vote after all, to look less suspicious to that fine gentleman the District Attorney. Vote: Leanne / Forresto (I do hope we learn something from this though)
WhiteFang Posted December 27, 2009 Posted December 27, 2009 Robbie Willis/WhiteFang, who both seem to use the same "lines" they spoke yesterday. "Oh, I won't vote, since I don't want to have innocent blood on my hands", "Hmm, she might be or she might not be, so I won't vote". First of all, I speak with an independent mind of my own, and in the same case, I am sharing the very same situation as what, we Townies are facing. More importantly, it doesn't make any sense when I didn't want to vote yesterday, because I clearly feel that Susan was a reckless Young Dancer due to her lack of experience in life, and in most game of life, all of our first day conviction always ends up with a loyal citizen. I am not someone like "yourself" whom is willing to expand the lives of innocent citizens. Please look back at my statement carefully, with regards to Day 1. There is a lot of progress so far, but I feel this situation reminds me of a movie classic which used to show in another town, called Guilder City in Noir State, I believed, named after "Reckless Young Cop" and now I feel I like seeing it a "Reckless Young Dancer".Although Susan is trying very hard to participate and helps the citizens to think of certain possibilities and angles in this cruel situation, but some part of her stories maybe be contradicting with one another, pointed by others. I believed she is trying to help but not sure how. Given the current exposure that she was involved in the games of life, this is her very first grand opening. I find it hard that we are doing this to convict a possible confused townie, based on mere confusion. Mind you everyone, today is only the first day. How can we convict someone with concrete evidence. There is enough grief for one day, but do we need to add. I am not trying to shield her or defend her, but based on my humble position. I believe she is just a little confused. I will reserve my vote for the time being. Even we were to move on with results gained, we should do it with the right discussion and possible logical directions, instead of just arguing among ourselves. Yes, you are right, those scumbags are probably whining their way through and I want to learn some truth in each conviction. But now, are you telling me those whom are voting along with you are all townie and those whom are not voting for Forresto are all possible scums? I reserve my vote because I want to evaluate the situation clearly... I thought as an experience DA like yourself will see better truth in it. Those scums know their stuff inside out. They are probably more eager to kill off any loyal townies at day.
Zapper Brick Posted December 27, 2009 Posted December 27, 2009 Oh my, how confusing. So, we are voting someone off, because they are new to this game....of life, and probably dosen't understand everything about this mob buisness, I will not vote for her. I will, however.... Vote: Jackson/YG-49 You have been wildly accusing anyone who gets voted by the majority, a suspicous trait mainly used by those in the mob or those duped by the mob.
YG-49 Posted December 27, 2009 Posted December 27, 2009 Oh my, how confusing. So, we are voting someone off, because they are new to this game....of life, and probably dosen't understand everything about this mob buisness, I will not vote for her. I will, however....Vote: Jackson/YG-49 You have been wildly accusing anyone who gets voted by the majority, a suspicous trait mainly used by those in the mob or those duped by the mob. I'm thoroughly confused... I haven't accused anyone of anything. When exactly have I done that?
Sandy Posted December 27, 2009 Posted December 27, 2009 But now, are you telling me those whom are voting along with you are all townie and those whom are not voting for Forresto are all possible scums? I reserve my vote because I want to evaluate the situation clearly... I am saying no such thing, and if you think you can twist my words to your liking, you're badly mistaken. I happen to know how an effective Mafia works, and I want to share my knowledge to everyone, so they wouldn't be so easily duped by the bad guys. At this point, everyone is still a possible scum to me, barring myself of course. I just want to point out those of us who seem to be "flying under the radar", so to speak, because that's often the Mafia's strategy. A clever Mafia wouldn't risk themselves by being overly vocal or accusatory at this point of the game, but they would do their best not to arouse any suspicions. There's always a chance that we have an inexperienced, reckless Mafia pestering us, but somehow I doubt that. There's just too many veteran players of this game of life that are remaining dubiously silent at this point, and I have my eyes on them. That includes you, Mr. Willis.
WhiteFang Posted December 27, 2009 Posted December 27, 2009 I am saying no such thing, and if you think you can twist my words to your liking, you're badly mistaken. I happen to know how an effective Mafia works, and I want to share my knowledge to everyone, so they wouldn't be so easily duped by the bad guys. Sharing past experience is defintely useful to our cause, and all of us are anxious to get rid of scums, but being hasty isn't going to benefit us, loyal citizens. And, no, I am merely a cinema worker and I don't think I have such capability to twist words of DA like yourself. Being an experienced DA, I am sure you have prosecute many vile criminals, and you should be trying your best to help us. And, no if you are thinking I am attempting to fly under the radar, then you are terribly wrong. Saying awful much or less does not necessary means the person is scum or not. I could be busy attending to my job, and ensure that we are still doing our part during this crisis. There are always leaders and followers, and all of us have a choice to choose.
Zapper Brick Posted December 27, 2009 Posted December 27, 2009 I'm thoroughly confused... I haven't accused anyone of anything. When exactly have I done that? God, I hate bandwagons. But... The evidence is quite strong against her... Vote: Leanne/Forresto I truly hope you aren't a townie, because that'd be three women murdered in two days. Gah, sorry, I meant three town women. There, remember, cause you forget an aweful lot.
Zapper Brick Posted December 27, 2009 Posted December 27, 2009 Sorry, I meant to put the part I quoted in a qoute, but I forgot.
Dannylonglegs Posted December 27, 2009 Posted December 27, 2009 wow*snip* That's really confusing, I'm not sure what your getting at here, perhaps you're covering for Leanne My vote stays.
Zapper Brick Posted December 27, 2009 Posted December 27, 2009 It isn't? Looks like it to me, you voted, didn't you? Huh? Confusing? What do you mean. Explain.
YG-49 Posted December 27, 2009 Posted December 27, 2009 Yeah, I voted. But so did eight other people. It means you're attacking me, singling me out.
Zapper Brick Posted December 27, 2009 Posted December 27, 2009 Yeah, I voted. But so did eight other people. It means you're attacking me, singling me out. Yes, I singled you out because I see a pattern with you. You just follow the Bandwagon, but I'm also suspicous of the local hobo, as he's just voting because the DA did.
Dannylonglegs Posted December 27, 2009 Posted December 27, 2009 but I'm also suspicous of the local hobo, as he's just voting because the DA did. Perhaps he trusts the judgement of the DA as he has been proved innoccent, I think
Bob Posted December 27, 2009 Author Posted December 27, 2009 God, I hate bandwagons.Vote: Leanne/Forresto Pssst, Zapper, you need to bold this and unvote YG-49 for this vote to count! Vote count: Forresto/Leanne: 10 (Hewkii9, Sandy, JimButcher, dannylonglegs, Inconspicuous, YG-49, Shadows, Dragonator, Eskallon, Quarryman) Millacol88/Mike Johnson: 1 (Simonjedi) YG-49 / Martin Jackson: 1 (Zapper Brick) Non-Voters: 9 (Zapper Brick, The Crazy One, Big Cam, Whitefang, Ricecracker, TinyPiesRUs, Millacol88, JCC1004, Forresto) 11 Votes are required to lynch.
Zapper Brick Posted December 27, 2009 Posted December 27, 2009 Pssst, Zapper, you need to bold this and unvote YG-49 for this vote to count!Vote count: Forresto/Leanne: 10 (Hewkii9, Sandy, JimButcher, dannylonglegs, Inconspicuous, YG-49, Shadows, Dragonator, Eskallon, Quarryman) Millacol88/Mike Johnson: 1 (Simonjedi) YG-49 / Martin Jackson: 1 (Zapper Brick) Non-Voters: 9 (Zapper Brick, The Crazy One, Big Cam, Whitefang, Ricecracker, TinyPiesRUs, Millacol88, JCC1004, Forresto) 11 Votes are required to lynch. Accualty, I was quoting YG-49, and meant to put quotes there, but I forgot.
YG-49 Posted December 27, 2009 Posted December 27, 2009 Yes, I singled you out because I see a pattern with you. You just follow the Bandwagon, but I'm also suspicous of the local hobo, as he's just voting because the DA did. You seemed to be pretty quick at joining the bandwagon on voting off my wife yesterday! It seems you were waiting for someone to vote for her so then you could join the bandawgon and not get blamed!
Zapper Brick Posted December 27, 2009 Posted December 27, 2009 You seemed to be pretty quick at joining the bandwagon on voting off my wife yesterday! It seems you were waiting for someone to vote for her so then you could join the bandawgon and not get blamed! Huh? I voted for your wife first, and some people followed me. How is that a bandwagon?
Recommended Posts