the_green_avenger Posted February 27, 2010 Author Posted February 27, 2010 It's definitely bigger and I will indeed be involved. I'll be designing the aircraft. Cool! (and I thought 21 feet was long... but now comes an even bigger one! ) This is a practical idea if you build stand-alone MOCs, but if you start combining different things it's trickier. One of the few examples that I know is a wonderful Russian diorama built by GambortCheers, Ralph That seems like a good idea to keep the smaller things in a bigger scale. But if you have pieces to burn, you could still have everything in the larger scale. Again, personal prefference (or piece count) is involved Quote
Star wars lego guy Posted August 28, 2020 Posted August 28, 2020 On 2/19/2010 at 12:10 AM, blueandwhite said: I've never heard that it was commonly accepted that minifigs are 6 ft. tall before. I suppose it depends on whether you view minifigs as being exceedingly short or morbidly obese. I think there has been a lot of discussion on what height is appropriate for a minifig, but I don't think there is a definite answer. This is similar to the 6 vs. 8-wide train debate. The proportions of minifigs simply don't allow for an ideal scale. I prefer to treat minifigs as being on the short side, but that's simply a personal preference. Just go seven studs, thats easy enough. And it’ll fix the arguement too... Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.