CloneCommanderDelta7 Posted September 29, 2009 Posted September 29, 2009 Here is the link for the line of vehicles called 'Juggernauts' from the A4 to the massive HAV A6. This is the one from Kashyyyk anthis may be its prototype. These models are slightly different, probably their power output and size, possibly also their weapons and mountings. One of these may be the one that will be in the Clone Wars but the HAV/wheeled A6 Juggernaut is the most famed of them all. It doesn't matter which one anyway because they were all manufactured and released into service before the end of the Clone Wars. The Clone Wars are a stand-alone series menaing they are not linked to each other (save the 'to be continued' episodes) so they can be from different eras. If not stated when the following episode is situated in, then it may be very confusing to all but the most Star Wars oriented (I am not one of them) and can see the time even if doesn't say. Problems face the Clone Wars, I fear. Quote
KimT Posted September 29, 2009 Author Posted September 29, 2009 The Clone Turbo Tank will be the Clone Wars Animated Series version. (At least to my knowledge ) Quote
CloneCommanderDelta7 Posted September 29, 2009 Posted September 29, 2009 How do you know? Or did you guess (a pretty legitimate one at that anyway) Quote
helicaon Posted September 29, 2009 Posted September 29, 2009 Yes, even though that has absolutely nothing to do with my post... aye, sorry, I was going to make the comment DURING the helmet thread, but couldn't remember my login password, so I just hopped on the most recent post that mentioned it...apologies... Quote
starwarsfanatic Posted September 29, 2009 Posted September 29, 2009 (edited) The Clone Turbo Tank will be the Clone Wars Animated Series version.(At least to my knowledge ) I hope not, for the reason that I collect non-CW minifigs more. I hope that Palp's shuttle is RotS. I don't really watch CW, so I don't know if Palpatine has a shuttle in the series, but a Rots one would be good. With a RotS Palpatine and some Shocktroopers! Perfect for building my clone army. Edited September 29, 2009 by starwarsfanatic Quote
Skipper 24 Posted September 29, 2009 Posted September 29, 2009 Say it ain't so! Say it ain't sooooo!! I hope that Palp's shuttle is RotS. I don't really watch CW, so I don't know if Palpatine has a shuttle in the series, but a Rots one would be good. With a RotS Palpatine and some Shocktroopers! Perfect for building my clone army. What's your problem. Even if it's CW the actual vehicle is going to turn out roughly the same as a non CW version would. Wouldn't it? Quote
starwarsfanatic Posted September 29, 2009 Posted September 29, 2009 What's your problem. Even if it's CW the actual vehicle is going to turn out roughly the same as a non CW version would. Wouldn't it? I mean the minifigs. The reason I'm looking forward to the CTT is because there's a chance of a Kashyyk Biker Scout, which I really would like. Also, I collect Phase II clones, so a CW one wouldn't be quite as good for me. Quote
Drock Posted September 29, 2009 Posted September 29, 2009 I hope that Palp's shuttle is RotS. I don't really watch CW, so I don't know if Palpatine has a shuttle in the series, but a Rots one would be good. With a RotS Palpatine and some Shocktroopers! Perfect for building my clone army. I'm not sure if he's left his office in the TV show. It still could be a CW set though. Quote
Commander Flash Posted September 29, 2009 Posted September 29, 2009 I am pretty sure it will be CW, but it isn't too bad a thing, especially if it's containing a new Mini Fig Quote
Klaus-Dieter Posted September 29, 2009 Posted September 29, 2009 (edited) Since we got the hint of an AT-AT set for next year already now, since there's this year's exclusive City set firstly out in October (which means that imo another exclusive City set already in January is not very likely), since the Castle Exlusive was firstly released in January (which means that imo another exclusive Castle set next year is not very likely (the period between 10184 and 10199 is nearly two years!), since the Pirates theme will be discontinued next year (which means that imo an exclusive Pirates set is excluded) and since the two Hoth BPs will be released in January: May the AT-AT be an Exclusive already released in the beginning of 2010? Klaus-Dieter Edited September 29, 2009 by Klaus-Dieter Quote
KimT Posted September 29, 2009 Author Posted September 29, 2009 Perhaps... But we've (Star Wars) have already gotten Republic Dropship and Tantive IV this year, so I kinda doubt we'll see an early superset like the AT-AT would be. My guess is late 2010. Quote
CloneCommanderDelta7 Posted September 30, 2009 Posted September 30, 2009 (edited) Well KimT, they say Lego Star Wars (if it really is ending) is going to go out with a bang!!! KA-BOOM! (If that happened, I would smell the burning plastics of Lego Bricks. That Said, a supersized or regular sized AT-AT is not out of the Equation: AT + AT = AT-AT Edited September 30, 2009 by CloneCommanderDelta7 Quote
KimT Posted September 30, 2009 Author Posted September 30, 2009 The current license runs until 2011, so let's not get into that discussion right now or here. "Stay on Target!" Quote
Ras 74 Posted September 30, 2009 Posted September 30, 2009 Hope that BrickCon will bring clearity to us all with great and detailed pictures. But we will probably only see the January sets by now :( Quote
CommanderFox Posted September 30, 2009 Posted September 30, 2009 (edited) The Clone Turbo Tank will be the Clone Wars Animated Series version.(At least to my knowledge ) what are ye keeping from us ehh KimT?? How do you know? Or did you guess (a pretty legitimate one at that anyway) The MODs know ALOT of things we don't know thats why there the MODs Im not really fussing if the ARC will be CW or ROTS, im fine with anything as i collect both ROTS and CW. starwarsfanatic I hope Jag has a double sided face aswell, though its been awhile since Lego did double sided faces, I think the last time was Zam Wessel in 2002 or 2003 don't quite remember though. sorry if this was abit off-topic. CommanderFox Edited September 30, 2009 by CommanderFox Quote
ben506 Posted September 30, 2009 Posted September 30, 2009 what are ye keeping from us ehh KimT?? The MODs know ALOT of things we don't know thats why there the MODs Im not really fussing if the ARC will be CW or ROTS, im fine with anything as i collect both ROTS and CW. starwarsfanatic I hope Jag has a double sided face aswell, though its been awhile since Lego did double sided faces, I think the last time was Zam Wessel in 2002 or 2003 don't quite remember though. sorry if this was abit off-topic. CommanderFox They've done double sided faces more recently than that. The jester in the castle sets and Captain Antilles from the Tantive IV this year spring to mind, so there's every chance he is. It would seem strange for them to do two heads for clones in a set, so I imagine they're both the same, just one is on backwards. Quote
Big Cam Posted September 30, 2009 Posted September 30, 2009 They've done double sided faces more recently than that. The jester in the castle sets and Captain Antilles from the Tantive IV this year spring to mind, so there's every chance he is. It would seem strange for them to do two heads for clones in a set, so I imagine they're both the same, just one is on backwards. Isn't Captain Antilles the only Star Wars set to have a reversable face besides Zam Wessel? It doesn't seem to be a common theme in the Star Wars line, but it's definetaly possible. Quote
yellost Posted September 30, 2009 Posted September 30, 2009 (edited) Isn't Captain Antilles the only Star Wars set to have a reversable face besides Zam Wessel?It doesn't seem to be a common theme in the Star Wars line, but it's definetaly possible. you forgot Jango Fett, too But I don't see why they wouldn't do it just because it SW. OK, it hasn't been common to this line but lately, almost every other lines have some reversible heads, even Indiana Jones. Edited September 30, 2009 by yellost Quote
ADHO15 Posted September 30, 2009 Posted September 30, 2009 you forgot Jango Fett, too But I don't see why they wouldn't do it just because it SW. OK, it hasn't been common to this line but lately, almost every other lines have some reversible heads, even Indiana Jones. Jango Fett just has a yellow face on a black head, not a reversible head. Quote
Big Cam Posted September 30, 2009 Posted September 30, 2009 you forgot Jango Fett, too But I don't see why they wouldn't do it just because it SW. OK, it hasn't been common to this line but lately, almost every other lines have some reversible heads, even Indiana Jones. Oh, I know, that's why i ssaid it's definetaly possible. Jango Fett just has a yellow face on a black head, not a reversible head. I was about to day that. Quote
yellost Posted September 30, 2009 Posted September 30, 2009 (edited) Jango Fett just has a yellow face on a black head, not a reversible head. But you had to put it backward when he's wearing his helmet --> reversible! I know, that was stretching it. That's why the Edited September 30, 2009 by yellost Quote
starwarsfanatic Posted September 30, 2009 Posted September 30, 2009 I guess that we aren't likely to know until January. At least that gives us something to look forward to (other than the sets of course ) Quote
marker photography Posted September 30, 2009 Posted September 30, 2009 I HOPE to see an encore of the "mos eisley cantina" soon Quote
CommanderFox Posted September 30, 2009 Posted September 30, 2009 They've done double sided faces more recently than that. The jester in the castle sets and Captain Antilles from the Tantive IV this year spring to mind, so there's every chance he is. It would seem strange for them to do two heads for clones in a set, so I imagine they're both the same, just one is on backwards. Sorry, I didn't know Antilles had a double sided face Well since there have been more recent sets with double sided faces then hopefully Jag will have a double sided face. Are these new sets coming out in late December or January, because Ive seen some sites saying January and others saying late December?? Thanks CommanderFox Quote
The Who Posted September 30, 2009 Posted September 30, 2009 That Said, a supersized or regular sized AT-AT is not out of the Equation: AT + AT = AT-ATBut that equation is mathematically incorrect. I hope Jag has a double sided face aswell, though its been awhile since Lego did double sided faces...They do them all the time, just not often for Star Wars sets.I HOPE to see an encore of the "mos eisley cantina" soonDo you mean a remake of the old set? I'm not sure I understand your post there... Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.