Rick Posted October 3, 2010 Posted October 3, 2010 It means the first mystery person met someone in Stash residence. At that point, it could be Stash or someone else who happens to find him, based on the quote below. In this way, I am very much certain the second mystery guy could have approached our likely investigator in this case? This is how I linked everything up for Stash story. This is my interpretation of what happened as well... but we could be wrong of course. Why are we certain that the person holding the briefcase was either Stash or a Policeman? Since when do scum care about rules like breaking and entering? This is some of the flimsiest evidence I've heard of. Right. Who introduced this story (it's either Stash or a policeman)? Because it could be an attempt to lead the suspicions in a certain direction. But then again... seems like we have no other leads whatsoever.
The Legonater Posted October 3, 2010 Posted October 3, 2010 Hmm... it appears any evidence againt Stash had been proven... not firm. Of course, I uh... knew that. I figured that might be the case. So... Unvote: Stash the Stylist
Eskallon Posted October 3, 2010 Posted October 3, 2010 Hmm... it appears any evidence againt Stash had been proven... not firm. Of course, I uh... knew that. I figured that might be the case. So... Unvote: Stash the Stylist Hmm, why bother drawing back your vote at this late time. Anyway the day is nearly over so I suggest we retire back to my pub for the evening.
HouseofH Posted October 3, 2010 Posted October 3, 2010 God, it seems every day we're wasting time. Sure it's too late to vote now, but tomorrow we need to step up our game and take things seriously. Suspecting Stash was a strange thing to do, as there was little evidence and we didn't get his defense.
The Legonater Posted October 3, 2010 Posted October 3, 2010 Hmm, why bother drawing back your vote at this late time. Anyway the day is nearly over so I suggest we retire back to my pub for the evening. *Checks watch* Oh, it is late! I wouldn't go to the bar, not only is it unhealthy, but I think the cops are busy enough as it is....
JimBee Posted October 3, 2010 Posted October 3, 2010 Well, even though it seems that we won't be getting a conviction today, I just wanted to say that, if anything, Stash's reckless move proves he is innocent. Think about it, no Mafia member is going to throw himself into the center of attention like that. I will not be voting today either, though I do hope we are all fortunate enough to stay alive during this night.
Bendybadger Posted October 3, 2010 Posted October 3, 2010 Wow my nerves are really shot now. I really need a drink but before I do I think it is time to take action I vote: Erik King/KingoftheZempk I still think the Police have something to hide apart from Carrie Price of course
Sirius Black Posted October 3, 2010 Posted October 3, 2010 In personal life, my close relative died. I am serious about this, I do not joke about such things. - Redwater I apologize for that, and am sorry for your loss. Would you mind telling us why you are so outspoken against a list? I would highly doubt that preposterous is an accurate word to describe the theory that those who do not speak up could be mafia. It has happened in the past, and in a crowd of this size, it is easy to hide. If someone could post a list, that could help. Susan.
Peanuts Posted October 3, 2010 Posted October 3, 2010 Unvote:Stash But I feel there is even less evidence against Officer King, perhaps you can re-iterate the evidence arrayed against him? Well, in fact there is no solid evidence against either of them. But the evidence against Stash was, that the burglar in Stashs house justified itself against the one who discovered him, while the evidence against Erik was, that he brought up fuzzy assupmtions about mafias working together and more illogical stuff and didn´t stop today. Also many assume that there is a scummy guy in the police, which would give us a 20% chance to get him, maybe every family has an informant in police, therefore we would have 2 out of 5, which is the very best odd we´ll get in this game, unless someone´s investigated (which hasn´t happened so far and may never happen, as maybe 2 investigaters may be converted )or claims to be scum (which seems highly impropable to me ). Also, if you believe Ivans Stalker to be an investigater and Stashs burglar to be one as well, and therefore two investigators are turned around, and you also suggest that at least one policeman has investigating powers, than it is much more likely that one of the turned is a policeman, which increases the possible proportion of scums in police once again. All good reason, ain´t they?
CMP Posted October 3, 2010 Posted October 3, 2010 Well, in fact there is no solid evidence against either of them. But the evidence against Stash was, that the burglar in Stashs house justified itself against the one who discovered him, while the evidence against Erik was, that he brought up fuzzy assupmtions about mafias working together and more illogical stuff and didn´t stop today. Also many assume that there is a scummy guy in the police, which would give us a 20% chance to get him, maybe every family has an informant in police, therefore we would have 2 out of 5, which is the very best odd we´ll get in this game, unless someone´s investigated (which hasn´t happened so far and may never happen, as maybe 2 investigaters may be converted )or claims to be scum (which seems highly impropable to me ). Also, if you believe Ivans Stalker to be an investigater and Stashs burglar to be one as well, and therefore two investigators are turned around, and you also suggest that at least one policeman has investigating powers, than it is much more likely that one of the turned is a policeman, which increases the possible proportion of scums in police once again. All good reason, ain´t they? Why the hell does everyone keep assuming there is a scum in the police? It's just as likely one of the resturant people, normal citizens or bikers has a scum in them.
Inconspicuous Posted October 3, 2010 Posted October 3, 2010 Right. Who introduced this story (it's either Stash or a policeman)? Because it could be an attempt to lead the suspicions in a certain direction. Why the hell does everyone keep assuming there is a scum in the police? It's just as likely one of the resturant people, normal citizens or bikers has a scum in them. I guess I did. “AHHH! Wha… I was just lost… I… I wasn’t stealing…” I thought that the only people the investigator would say that to would be a cop or Stash. It's flimsy evidence, but everyone apparently decided to accept it for fact. I was in no way trying to mislead any of you, I was trying to point something out and seeing if it could help us at all.
def Posted October 3, 2010 Posted October 3, 2010 Nothing's happening today. Unvote: Stash I need a beer.
Captain Genaro Posted October 4, 2010 Posted October 4, 2010 Wow, what a day. Lots of voting and unvoting going on. It's just a hunch but I get the feeling that either Stash is a scum or someone who voted for him early on is. Why do I say that you ask? What better chance for the scum to start killing off townies than to start accusing townies people find suspicious. Next, there is little evidence to defend or accuse someone so this would be a good opportunity before anyone can jump in and say " I investigated him and he's innocent". If they want to start killing off townies, better now than later. Now, off to find me a beer...
Sisco Posted October 4, 2010 Posted October 4, 2010 Whoo, forget the beer, get the Jack! I'm off to check all the fire hydrants for a few hours, only to find 7 pages the video records of a bunch of bickering! We need to get something done, people.
Admiral Ron Posted October 4, 2010 Posted October 4, 2010 Whoo, forget the beer, get the Jack! I'm off to check all the fire hydrants for a few hours, only to find 7 pages the video records of a bunch of bickering! We need to get something done, people. I agree, as much as it pains me to say, I dont think there is anything we can do today, me might have to wait til tomorrow again.
hewkii9 Posted October 4, 2010 Posted October 4, 2010 This certainly has been a strange, and worrying day.
Dragonator Posted October 4, 2010 Posted October 4, 2010 Well I'm glad most of you have left off this god damned business with our stylist, for as you have now finally realised, there isn't any evidence against him, just circumstantial misinterpreted nonsense, and I for one am will to vouch for him not being a mobster at the present time. Why are we certain that the person holding the briefcase was either Stash or a Policeman? Since when do scum care about rules like breaking and entering? This is some of the flimsiest evidence I've heard of. This here man should get a blazing medal! We're dealing with bloody mobsters, ladies, not a bunch of pansies who try to scheme and plot while sticking to the word of the law. Leave that to the politicians, yourself excepted of course, governor. Until you lot all realise this, we're not going to get flaming anywhere! Deputy! Whiskey! NOW!! Do I even have a bloody deputy?
Sisco Posted October 4, 2010 Posted October 4, 2010 Well I'm glad most of you have left off this god damned business with our stylist, for as you have now finally realised, there isn't any evidence against him, just circumstantial misinterpreted nonsense, and I for one am will to vouch for him not being a mobster at the present time. This here man should get a blazing medal! We're dealing with bloody mobsters, ladies, not a bunch of pansies who try to scheme and plot while sticking to the word of the law. Leave that to the politicians, yourself excepted of course, governor. Until you lot all realise this, we're not going to get flaming anywhere! Deputy! Whiskey! NOW!! Do I even have a bloody deputy? I agree with our esteemed Police Chief. Stop arguing, please. It's not getting us anywhere at all. Also chief, you don't have a deputy. But you can have some of my Jack Daniels, if you like.
brickme Posted October 4, 2010 Posted October 4, 2010 Geez I spend the entire day treating my sick gerbil and I find out that stash has been voted and unvoted. I will have to agree that while stash is flimsy we should not vote him off. I think that another night another piece to the puzzle will be added. Oh and Craig can you spare any of that jack daniels? We'll have a nice round of captain morgan's if we live through this.
Sisco Posted October 4, 2010 Posted October 4, 2010 Sure, someone get the Shot Glasses. Honestly at this point, I don't know who to trust. I have some suspects, but I want to keep the identities to myself until I have more evidence.
Dragonator Posted October 4, 2010 Posted October 4, 2010 But you can have some of my Jack Daniels, if you like. Damn fine of you Craig, just what I need to steady the old legs for a night on patrol.
Sisco Posted October 4, 2010 Posted October 4, 2010 Would you like a shot glass or just a swig on the bottle? I think that Mr. Quest just went for some glasses, so you'll have to wait if you prefer a glass.
JCC1004 Posted October 4, 2010 Posted October 4, 2010 Glad to see that everyone is still here but we have no solid leads on possible mafia members! Lets try not to take any shots in the dark. The last thing I want to see is our town being destroyed by itself.
Admiral Ron Posted October 4, 2010 Posted October 4, 2010 Glad to see that everyone is still here but we have no solid leads on possible mafia members! Lets try not to take any shots in the dark. The last thing I want to see is our town being destroyed by itself. Indeed, and let me just say that I acted rashly, my apologies Mr. Stash. Mind if I join you gentlemen?
Recommended Posts