The Crazy One Posted October 2, 2010 Posted October 2, 2010 I agree, but before we vote anyone off, we need solid evidence. So what do we know about last night? -Someone tried to kill/convert the Chief, but they either got cold feet or he has some ability we dont know of. -Someone tried the same thing with Ivan, but they were intercepted by someone with a briefcase. -Someone investigates Stash and apparently found something, before they too were intercepted. Am I missing anything? An interesting night to say the least. I think we are looking at mob recruters being blocked here. I wonder if the briefcase means anything. Anyone got a briefcase?
Professor Flitwick Posted October 2, 2010 Posted October 2, 2010 I don't think so. Well then what do the thoughts in your head tell you? Pah, coswollop if there are any!
CMP Posted October 2, 2010 Posted October 2, 2010 An interesting night to say the least. I think we are looking at mob recruters being blocked here. I wonder if the briefcase means anything. Anyone got a briefcase? No offence, but it seems a bit obvious that the breifcasers are the mob. I mean, the threatening gray tone of it... Well then what do the thoughts in your head tell you? Pah, coswollop if there are any! *Charges up tazer* What were you saying?
Professor Flitwick Posted October 2, 2010 Posted October 2, 2010 *Charges up tazer* What were you saying? You dare threaten me you little Oik! I asked what your opinion was on what the waiter had said, being as all you said was 'I don't think so'.
KotZ Posted October 2, 2010 Posted October 2, 2010 Well, in t-this lack of evidence, and b-believe me, I hate to do th-i-this, but I think we n-need to vote. I vote: Stash the Stylist/ Stash I'm s-sorry to do this to you, St-Stash, but I th-think we need to lynch you, and if you are s-scum, I am glad. If not, I will be v-very angry, and I w-will take the blame for in-initiating the vote-off of an in-innocent.
CMP Posted October 2, 2010 Posted October 2, 2010 You dare threaten me you little Oik! I asked what your opinion was on what the waiter had said, being as all you said was 'I don't think so'. I didn't have anything to add, the things listed were pretty much everything we know right now. Why are you voting Stash? He's been investigated, clearly, and somebody probably would have come forward if he was scum.
KotZ Posted October 2, 2010 Posted October 2, 2010 I didn't have anything to add, the things listed were pretty much everything we know right now. Why are you voting Stash? He's been investigated, clearly, and somebody probably would have come forward if he was scum. But wh-when I look at w-what we saw, one of the figures said "I wasn't stealing". That means it w-wasn't Stash who was h-holding the briefcase. That m-means the m-man with the briefcase is either a cop (or m-mafioso investigating the "t-thief", or going to convert the p-person) or it was S-Stash doing the same.
Peanuts Posted October 2, 2010 Posted October 2, 2010 But wh-when I look at w-what we saw, one of the figures said "I wasn't stealing". That means it w-wasn't Stash who was h-holding the briefcase. That m-means the m-man with the briefcase is either a cop (or m-mafioso investigating the "t-thief", or going to convert the p-person) or it was S-Stash doing the same. Wait a minute, I don´t get what you mean. You say, because one of the guys told the other, it wouldn´t have been stealig, Stash didn´t hold the briefcase? Why should the briefcase man be a cop or a mafioso? And why could Stash be the person, while you said before, It couldn´t be Stash? This doesn´t make any sence to me. Well, in t-this lack of evidence, and b-believe me, I hate to do th-i-this, but I think we n-need to vote. I vote: Stash the Stylist/ Stash I'm s-sorry to do this to you, St-Stash, but I th-think we need to lynch you, and if you are s-scum, I am glad. If not, I will be v-very angry, and I w-will take the blame for in-initiating the vote-off of an in-innocent. Okay, this was very early. I think we shall vote, but we should wait at least till lunch, ´cause we really can´t kill someone for being victim of a theft who didn´t steal anything at all. What I believe, what hapened, is following: Someone (propably a vigilante) believed the Chief to be scum and therefore tried to kill him. The Chief was so obviously town (I guess he can´t be killed) that the killer decided not to finish the assasination. I think, both the Chief and the killer are town. Afterward, Ian was investigated by someone else, who had some contact with a scum man, who propably tried to bribe him. This is the only thing the briefcase could mean to me. Then, Stashs house was burgled, the burglar could have investigated or actually stolen something from Stash. While only a theft would claim not to be a theft without even being charged to be a theft, I believe him to be a theft. Someone -maybe the same person as the on who tried to use a night action on Ians stalker- tried to use the same night action on the theft -or not theft- which was used on the stalker of Ian. My interpretation: Someone (or two different people) tried to convert Ians stalker and Stashs theft as well. I just want to remind, like I said before, that Mr. Bricks was the only one who claimed to be suspect of Ian. He also hasn´t said a word today, and he was talking very much yesterday. Maybe he was converted by the scum. I won´t take responsibility for his guilt, but he is a good starting point. And, Stash, you´re right, these are no facts. I just assumed that everyone agreed with this at this time. I had no idea how many forms of interpretation are possible.
CMP Posted October 2, 2010 Posted October 2, 2010 I just want to remind, like I said before, that Mr. Bricks was the only one who claimed to be suspect of Ian. He also hasn´t said a word today, and he was talking very much yesterday. Maybe he was converted by the scum. I won´t take responsibility for his guilt, but he is a good starting point. Mr. Bricks has been indisposed. I find it unlikely he did anything last night. Of course, it is possible. Also, I'm sure someone thinks someone in the government is in the mob. Someone tried to kill the Chief and (I'm assuming) investigated Ian.
KotZ Posted October 2, 2010 Posted October 2, 2010 Oh, wh-whoops! I meant St-Stash was holding the briefc-case, confronting the person who s-said they weren't s-stealing. I accidentaly said "didn't".
Inconspicuous Posted October 2, 2010 Posted October 2, 2010 To me, it looks like someone was investigating Stash and was interrupted by one of the mob bosses. The presumed investigator seemed to act like they were upsetting the boss in some way, implying that it was Stash or a police officer. A police officer would be the only other person concerned with someone else stealing. And by the way, my name is Ivan. For some reason, everyone is calling me Ian.
CMP Posted October 2, 2010 Posted October 2, 2010 To me, it looks like someone was investigating Stash and was interrupted by one of the mob bosses. The presumed investigator seemed to act like they were upsetting the boss in some way, implying that it was Stash or a police officer. A police officer would be the only other person concerned with someone else stealing. I think it may have just been the circumstances under which the investigator was found. Nobody would like to see somboedy else snooping around in these dark times.
Admiral Ron Posted October 3, 2010 Posted October 3, 2010 I think it may have just been the circumstances under which the investigator was found. Nobody would like to see somboedy else snooping around in these dark times. That is true I suppose, but IF it was a police officer, what would they be doing there anyway? To convert Stash? or just to convert the thief/investigator? and, if Officer King is correct, this may imply Stash is indeed scum.
Capt.JohnPaul Posted October 3, 2010 Posted October 3, 2010 That is true I suppose, but IF it was a police officer, what would they be doing there anyway? To convert Stash? or just to convert the thief/investigator? and, if Officer King is correct, this may imply Stash is indeed scum. *Insert Southern Accent*If an officer was there that late at night, they would need a warrant. And if for some reason they had to search Stash's place, wouldn't it be a good reason? So... I vote:Stash The Stylist/Stash
The Legonater Posted October 3, 2010 Posted October 3, 2010 I believe we're finally getting somewhere. But are we sure that Stash was the one approached? I've seen little proof, I mean- anyone could have been holsing a suitcase. Before voting our stylist I suggest we do some further investigating.
Admiral Ron Posted October 3, 2010 Posted October 3, 2010 I believe we're finally getting somewhere. But are we sure that Stash was the one approached? I've seen little proof, I mean- anyone could have been holsing a suitcase. Before voting our stylist I suggest we do some further investigating. I think it is undeniable he was investigated, who else has hair like that? I am not saying he is scum, but that is a very important piece of evidence, and by the sound of it, whoever investigated him found something, whether or not it is if he is scum, I have no idea. I dont really know if he was the one holding the briefcase, but there could really be only 3 options, which may sound kinda vague. -Stash -Police Officer -Somebody followed the investigator/thief inside In all 3 of these options, the perpetrator would be nervous when they noticed the briefcase holder, even more so if it was Stash or an Officer.
The Legonater Posted October 3, 2010 Posted October 3, 2010 I think it is undeniable he was investigated, who else has hair like that? I am not saying he is scum, but that is a very important piece of evidence, and by the sound of it, whoever investigated him found something, whether or not it is if he is scum, I have no idea. I dont really know if he was the one holding the briefcase, but there could really be only 3 options, which may sound kinda vague. -Stash -Police Officer -Somebody followed the investigator/thief inside In all 3 of these options, the perpetrator would be nervous when they noticed the briefcase holder, even more so if it was Stash or an Officer. But that isn't his hair, merely hair on a head mold. Then again, a ehad mold would only be in a store... or a stylist's shop. I hate to do this, but if we don't do anything today, we'll be right where we were to start... but with more men and women to the mafia cause. Vote: Stash the Stylist
Zepher Posted October 3, 2010 Author Posted October 3, 2010 3 Votes for Stash (Erik King/KingoftheZempk, Janice Boy/Capt.JohnPaul, Horace Leg/TheLegonater) Due to the populace of 40 (Thomas Bricks is banned and so can't vote, and the Florist character was never created), 14 votes are needed to lynch today.
Admiral Ron Posted October 3, 2010 Posted October 3, 2010 I am going to go with my guts on this one, I vote for Stash the Stylist
Dragonator Posted October 3, 2010 Posted October 3, 2010 Damn that was a good drink, I needed that for sure! Now, what is going on here, huh? The way I see it, there isn't anything to be suspicious of Stash for, I mean he bloody well told us his house was broken into, didn't he? I sure as hell won't be voting for him, not with the flimsy garbage that has been thrown about so far today, and particularly because I don't think he's guilty. I'm s-sorry to do this to you, St-Stash, but I th-think we need to lynch you, and if you are s-scum, I am glad. If not, I will be v-very angry, and I w-will take the blame for in-initiating the vote-off of an in-innocent. Officer, I would have hoped you might have a little more sense than that, aye? I don't want to see one of my officers go down for no reason, but if this vote goes through I will be most displeased with you come tomorrow morning, understand? To me, it looks like someone was investigating Stash and was interrupted by one of the mob bosses. The presumed investigator seemed to act like they were upsetting the boss in some way, implying that it was Stash or a police officer. A police officer would be the only other person concerned with someone else stealing. You lad are making a little more sense, it is indeed obvious the thief who broke into Stash's house was caught in the act by a mob boss, and so has likely been converted. However I don't think this means we can draw any conclusions about who that person is, as anybody could have followed the thief to Stash's house and confronted him there. Although your inference that it could be a police officer could very well be true, and makes me very worried about my force. I think we should bear this in mind when looking at future evidence, it could prove useful.
Rick Posted October 3, 2010 Posted October 3, 2010 I also am hesitant to go with the vote for Stash. Seems kind of far fetched to assume all kinds of things about a person based on the fact that their house was broken into. There is nothing to suggest that it was the stylist who confronted the intruder. But if anyone knows something about what happened at his house, it would be Stash himself. So, I'd like to hear from him. Regarding the police chief, I believe one of two scenarios is possible. One, favorable for him, is that he was about to be converted (although there is no suitcase present, ...) and could not be converted because of his 'love' for the town. Second, is that he was investigated and the investigation failed/showed him to be allied to the town, which COULD imply he's a mob boss (as they typically show up pro-town when investigated), but could also mean he just truly loves this town. I don't think anyone was blocked, as there would be a second all-black figure in the scene and there wouldn't be the 'I love this town' result of the night action. Chief, do you know anything of what happened to you the past night?
Dragonator Posted October 3, 2010 Posted October 3, 2010 Chief, do you know anything of what happened to you the past night? Not a god damn clue my friend, appears those spineless bastards didn't have the guts to go through with anything, don't have a blasted idea as to why though. *Drake polishes his "I love my town" badge patriotically*
Shadows Posted October 3, 2010 Posted October 3, 2010 To me, it looks like someone was investigating Stash and was interrupted by one of the mob bosses. The presumed investigator seemed to act like they were upsetting the boss in some way, implying that it was Stash or a police officer. A police officer would be the only other person concerned with someone else stealing. An interesting point, and troubling to think a cop could be one of the bosses. And by the way, my name is Ivan. For some reason, everyone is calling me Ian. Have you ever worked as a chef? I also am hesitant to go with the vote for Stash. Seems kind of far fetched to assume all kinds of things about a person based on the fact that their house was broken into. There is nothing to suggest that it was the stylist who confronted the intruder. But if anyone knows something about what happened at his house, it would be Stash himself. So, I'd like to hear from him. All good points. Mr. Hairstylist, what do you have to say about last night?
RoryoCox Posted October 3, 2010 Posted October 3, 2010 I also am hesitant to vote. I see no solid evidence again the stylist and until we get some we are going no where. I want to here from Stash first before I jump to any conclusions.
Bendybadger Posted October 3, 2010 Posted October 3, 2010 I feel that we moust vote today as we need action now and cannot let the recruitment of more mafia members go on. My gut feeling all along has been that the Police are mixed up in this. I think the big clue is the briefcase, and what do the Police work on? Cases! Thats right. It all boils down to a conspiracy I feel and the Chief is in on it. I am not voting Stash just yet as the evidence is very flimsy against him. Let's wait to hear from the Chief or Stash and see what they have to say for themselves. Back to the bar for me as I am sure there are plenty of Ladies needing looking after and I need something to steady my nerves.
Recommended Posts