Hinckley Posted January 10, 2011 Posted January 10, 2011 Has anyone questioned about Martin's briefcase? This is a great question. However, there's no way to find it unless we have a investigative or peeping-tom-type night action. Hopefully his final investigation will turn up at some point. Many were stuck with a photo of a declared Jesus. Is it real help to investigations or is just blabbering? And the blue arm on the Marting photo? Few are wearing that kind of clothes, but still there where doubting about it being black... And who gave Jesus the siringe? Is there a resident with a black arm? It looks very blue anyway. As for the syringe, I've always had it and I still have it. Petey Pirowski has a black arm... it could have a bluish tint due to the lighting...
CorneliusMurdock Posted January 10, 2011 Posted January 10, 2011 I think we can only use the pictures to confirm suspicions right now and not to base new ones from. They are too open to interpretation and vague on some points. At least they're not blurry like the ones I took on the moon. I really should have made sure that the lens was clean. However is taking these ones are at least maintaining their equipment properly.
Peanuts Posted January 10, 2011 Posted January 10, 2011 I think talking about the Jesus photo has no use anymore, as the King won't live tomorrow anymore and Jesus already admitted he was there and owns the syringe. There isn't any other thing to read out of this photo. I have no reason not to trust his words, I mean, we have a photo showing him at the King's bed, he said he was at the King's bed, what else do you want, God saying: "Yes, my son was there and used a syringe on the King of Delaware?" Petey Pirowski has a black arm... it could have a bluish tint due to the lighting... Yes, I wear black, and maybe the lightning might even change the look to blue, and I must say, I can't alibi that I didn't kill Martin, unless someone wants to ask my bed about one? Oh, if it should answer...then this is the right place for you
yumiyoshi Posted January 10, 2011 Posted January 10, 2011 This is a great question. However, there's no way to find it unless we have a investigative or peeping-tom-type night action. Hopefully his final investigation will turn up at some point. Is there a resident with a black arm? It looks very blue anyway. As for the syringe, I've always had it and I still have it. Petey Pirowski has a black arm... it could have a bluish tint due to the lighting... Good. I like when people speak directly and clearly. m-m-m The photographer catched a closed briefcase. The blue armed arm knows what was inside the handbag. I said blue: the machete was black, and the arm shadow looks different. Mr.Nowhere and the King have blue arm, twins' arms looks lighter, Petey's black. Must be one of these names the assassin. Mr.Nowhere hands, are pale as his face? How come youhave a siringe,and why you keep it? you know that youcan use it only once or infections may spread around? did you ever pin Shadows?
Hinckley Posted January 10, 2011 Posted January 10, 2011 How come youhave a siringe,and why you keep it? you know that youcan use it only once or infections may spread around? did you ever pin Shadows? How many times do I have to repeat this giggle-brain? If I inject two non-protected insane people with my syringe, their personalities and abilities are switched for the night. I tried to inject Shadows on the first night but it didn't work because he is insane. I believe I was blocked last night. I can use it every night. Infections? What? There are no antibiotics inside. I don't know what is inside. I'm not a doctor, I'm Jesus.
Rufus Posted January 10, 2011 Posted January 10, 2011 I tried to inject Shadows on the first night but it didn't work because he is insane. Jesus, do you know for sure that it didn't work on Shadows because he was not insane, or could it have been because King of Delaware is indeed sinister? Did it just not work, or did you learn why it didn't work? This could be further prrrroof against the King. For now, vote: King of Delaware/KingoftheZempk
Hinckley Posted January 10, 2011 Posted January 10, 2011 Jesus, do you know for sure that it didn't work on Shadows because he was not insane, or could it have been because King of Delaware is indeed sinister? Did it just not work, or did you learn why it didn't work? This could be further prrrroof against the King. For now, vote: King of Delaware/KingoftheZempk After clarification...with my brain (??)...I believe that it didn't work because Shadows was neutral/independent. I believe my action will work on Sinister and Insane alike. It's seemed crazy at first, but I understand the potential benefits more and more now...
Rufus Posted January 10, 2011 Posted January 10, 2011 After clarification...with my brain (??)...I believe that it didn't work because Shadows was neutral/independent. I believe my action will work on Sinister and Insane alike. It's seemed crazy at first, but I understand the potential benefits more and more now... Ok. That pees on the fire a little, but I'll stand by my vote for now.
badboytje88 Posted January 10, 2011 Posted January 10, 2011 Vote:Cookie Custer (Roncanator) I do not trust him one bit.
Quarryman Posted January 10, 2011 Posted January 10, 2011 This is all very interesting, (quite a bit of it tiresome too, but that's the trouble with so many people having so much to say, a lot of noise will always be generated). So, before I forget: vote: King of Delaware/KingoftheZempk (it does seem like the best decision for today, and I think it will give us something to work on tomorrow).
Hinckley Posted January 10, 2011 Posted January 10, 2011 Vote:Cookie Custer (Roncanator) I do not trust him one bit. That's quite a move after everything else that has happened today.
Quarryman Posted January 10, 2011 Posted January 10, 2011 Vote:Cookie Custer (Roncanator) I do not trust him one bit. Any particular reasons why you don't trust him? (not saying he can be trusted, just interested in hearing what you have to say about it)
badboytje88 Posted January 10, 2011 Posted January 10, 2011 That's quite a move after everything else that has happened today. I know the king is sinister. I've stated this before. He already has enough votes to get voted off. So I won't waste my vote on him. By voting on cookie I just wanted to let him no that I haven't trusted him since day one. And I am watching his every move, as far as this is possible for me. If it turns out that the King is sinister, it might be a good idea to investigate the Chief since they are childhood friends.
Lord Arjay Posted January 10, 2011 Posted January 10, 2011 The investigation shows up as insane or not insane. Let's use another example. If say the insane were called townies. The investigation could turn up townie or not a townie. Apparently the night investigator has found that Washing Bear and the King of Delaware are Sinister. Hmm. Jesus, were you told that Washing Bear and the King were sinister or not insane? It seems a little odd that two investigators would get different results.
badboytje88 Posted January 10, 2011 Posted January 10, 2011 Any particular reasons why you don't trust him? (not saying he can be trusted, just interested in hearing what you have to say about it) He voted for Big Cam during night one to save his own megablocks. He could have removed his vote without endangering his own life. This might have lead people to unvote and it would have been a tie between him and Big Cam. None of them would have been evicted and Big Cam would have lived to see another day. By the way did I mention that the Chief persuaded some of us to vote for Big Cam. If the King turns out to be Sinister, the Chief will be at my top sinister list along with mister Cookie.
Hinckley Posted January 10, 2011 Posted January 10, 2011 I know the king is sinister. I've stated this before. He already has enough votes to get voted off. So I won't waste my vote on him. By voting on cookie I just wanted to let him no that I haven't trusted him since day one. And I am watching his every move, as far as this is possible for me. If it turns out that the King is sinister, it might be a good idea to investigate the Chief since they are childhood friends. We've been told that investigations came back on both of them as Sinister. Please pay attention. Hmm. Jesus, were you told that Washing Bear and the King were sinister or not insane? It seems a little odd that two investigators would get different results. Sinister. And there haven't been two different investigations with different results. What are you talking about?
Lord Arjay Posted January 10, 2011 Posted January 10, 2011 Sinister. And there haven't been two different investigations with different results. What are you talking about? Perhaps I worded that badly. From what I gathered, when Martin investigated he either got back a result of insane or not insane - with not-insane meaning independents and sinisters. However, this other investigator apparently got back a result of sinister. I just found it slightly wierd that if the were both to investigate a sinister Martin would get back a result of not-insane but the other investigator would get back sinister.
Peanuts Posted January 10, 2011 Posted January 10, 2011 By the way did I mention that the Chief persuaded some of us to vote for Big Cam. No, you didn't. That's a really confusing thing you bring up there. Did he persuade you publicly or privately in the bathroom? And did he directly tell you to vote for him or indirectly by his actions? It seems a bit odd that he really wants you people to vote for his strongest rival, especially because he never voted for Cam himself? Perhaps I worded that badly. From what I gathered, when Martin investigated he either got back a result of insane or not insane - with not-insane meaning independents and sinisters. However, this other investigator apparently got back a result of sinister. I just found it slightly wierd that if the were both to investigate a sinister Martin would get back a result of not-insane but the other investigator would get back sinister. Yeah, that's a bit weird, but makes sence somehow, as if both investigators would e.g. investigate Shadows (if he still lived) one would get "not insane" and one "not sinister", so they could figure out his true identity. Maybe just to add some variety or such. Either that or it's a mistake.
Hinckley Posted January 10, 2011 Posted January 10, 2011 Perhaps I worded that badly. From what I gathered, when Martin investigated he either got back a result of insane or not insane - with not-insane meaning independents and sinisters. However, this other investigator apparently got back a result of sinister. I just found it slightly wierd that if the were both to investigate a sinister Martin would get back a result of not-insane but the other investigator would get back sinister. Martin got that result because he investigated someone who was not insane. He never investigated a Sinister. There are three groups: Insane, Sinister Insanse, Not Insane. If Martin never investigated a Sinister Insanse, he'd never get that result. Since the person he investigated was Not Insane, that's the result he got. He also investigated Dragonator/Salvatore who is Insane, so that's the result he got. Make sense? We've been over it a few times, so please try to pay attention. Thanks and God bless you, my child.
Peanuts Posted January 10, 2011 Posted January 10, 2011 Martin got that result because he investigated someone who was not insane. He never investigated a Sinister. There are three groups: Insane, Sinister Insanse, Not Insane. If Martin never investigated a Sinister Insanse, he'd never get that result. Since the person he investigated was Not Insane , that's the result he got. He also investigated Dragonator/Salvatore who is []Insane[/b], so that's the result he got. Make sense? We've been over it a few times, so please try to pay attention. Thanks and God bless you, my child. Well, this makes even more sense than my idea of explanation.
Lord Arjay Posted January 10, 2011 Posted January 10, 2011 Make sense? Yes, somehow I was under the impression that not insane meant sinister aswell. I must have missed that earlier. Oops.
Sandy Posted January 10, 2011 Posted January 10, 2011 Martin got that result because he investigated someone who was not insane. He never investigated a Sinister. There are three groups: Insane, Sinister Insanse, Not Insane. If Martin never investigated a Sinister Insanse, he'd never get that result. Since the person he investigated was Not Insane , that's the result he got. He also investigated Dragonator/Salvatore who is Insane, so that's the result he got. Make sense? But what about Shadows and Sparky, who turned out to be "insane but independent". Wouldn't that make them belong to a fourth group, then?
Admiral Ron Posted January 10, 2011 Posted January 10, 2011 But what about Shadows and Sparky, who turned out to be "insane but independent". Wouldn't that make them belong to a fourth group, then? I just assumed they were under the "Not Insane" category.
badboytje88 Posted January 10, 2011 Posted January 10, 2011 No, you didn't. That's a really confusing thing you bring up there. Did he persuade you publicly or privately in the bathroom? And did he directly tell you to vote for him or indirectly by his actions? It seems a bit odd that he really wants you people to vote for his strongest rival, especially because he never voted for Cam himself? Gosh, I might have overreacted in my previous statement. He didn't persuade anyone. I must have been listening to the wrong voices in my head. Shut up Lucy! Shut up.
Scouty Posted January 10, 2011 Posted January 10, 2011 Mr.Nowhere and the King have blue arm, twins' arms looks lighter, Petey's black. Must be one of these names the assassin. Mr.Nowhere hands, are pale as his face? Yes, they are. I'm all pale white
Recommended Posts